Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Beghtol, C."
  1. Beghtol, C.: Exploring new approaches to the organization of knowledge : the subject classification of James Duff Brown (2004) 0.08
    0.08435373 = product of:
      0.33741492 = sum of:
        0.33741492 = weight(_text_:james in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33741492 = score(doc=994,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.4933813 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.2947483 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44421)
              0.067635134 = queryNorm
            0.68388265 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              7.2947483 = idf(docFreq=81, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    James Duff Brown was an influential and energetic librarian in Great Britain in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. His Subject Classification has characteristics that were unusual and idiosyncratic during his own time, but his work deserves recognition as one of the precursors of modern bibliographic classification systems. This article discusses a number of theories and classification practices that Brown developed. In particular, it investigates his views on the order of main classes, on the phenomenon of "concrete" subjects, and on the need for synthesized notations. It traces these ideas briefly into the future through the work of S. R. Ranganathan, the Classification Research Group, and the second edition of the Bliss Bibliographic Classification system. It concludes that Brown's work warrants further study for the light it may shed on current classification theory and practice.
  2. Beghtol, C.: ¬The Iter Bibliography : International standard subject access to medieval and renaissance materials (400-1700) (2003) 0.02
    0.01759506 = product of:
      0.07038024 = sum of:
        0.07038024 = weight(_text_:headings in 4965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07038024 = score(doc=4965,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3281928 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
              0.067635134 = queryNorm
            0.21444786 = fieldWeight in 4965, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4965)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Iter ("journey" or "path" in Latin) is a non-profit project for providing electronic access to materials pertaining to the Middle Ages and Renaissance (400-1700). Iter's background is described, and its centrepiece, the Iter Bibliography, is explicated. Emphasis is an the subject cataloguing process and an subject access to records for journal articles (using Library of Congress Subject Headings and the Dewey Decimal Classification). Basic subject analysis of the materials is provided by graduate students specializing in the Middle Ages and Renaissance periods, and, subsequently, subject access points systems are provided by information professionals. This close cooperation between subject and information experts would not be efficient without electronic capabilities.
  3. Beghtol, C.: Response to Hjoerland and Nicolaisen (2004) 0.00
    0.0032163921 = product of:
      0.0128655685 = sum of:
        0.0128655685 = weight(_text_:und in 4536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0128655685 = score(doc=4536,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1500079 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.067635134 = queryNorm
            0.085765935 = fieldWeight in 4536, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4536)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Hjoerland, B., J. Nicolaisen: Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naïve": a comment to Beghtol (2003). In: Knowledge organization. 31(2004) no.1, S.55-61. - Vgl. die Erwiderung von Nicolaisen und Hjoerland in KO 31(2004) no.3, S.199-201.