Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Hjoerland, B."
  1. Hjoerland, B.; Bragato Barros, T.H.: Domain analysis versus facet analysis (2024) 0.03
    0.026005413 = product of:
      0.10402165 = sum of:
        0.10402165 = weight(_text_:headings in 2232) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10402165 = score(doc=2232,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.32337824 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06664293 = queryNorm
            0.32167178 = fieldWeight in 2232, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2232)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper delves into the complexities and theoretical underpinnings of knowledge organization systems (KOS), focusing on domain analysis and facet analysis as methodologies, such as improving the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH). The study repeats a former critique of the LCSH and argues for the incorporation of facet and domain analysis to enhance its utility and academic rigor. Facet analysis, although well-established, is critiqued for its rationalist philosophy and lack of empirical grounding. Domain analysis is presented as a complementary approach that addresses these gaps by considering empirical, historical, philosophical, and pragmatic issues. To any given system, the paper emphasizes that KO systems are not neutral; they reflect underlying theoretical paradigms that must be understood for effective classification. The study concludes by advocating for interdisciplinary research and broader cooperation among knowledge organization professionals, philosophers, and subject specialists to develop more robust and academically rigorous KOS.
  2. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.01
    0.012676831 = product of:
      0.050707325 = sum of:
        0.050707325 = weight(_text_:und in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050707325 = score(doc=4494,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1478073 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06664293 = queryNorm
            0.34306374 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  3. Hjoerland, B.: Theory of information science : Reply to Professor Gernot Wersig (1998) 0.01
    0.010865855 = product of:
      0.04346342 = sum of:
        0.04346342 = weight(_text_:und in 1403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04346342 = score(doc=1403,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1478073 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06664293 = queryNorm
            0.29405463 = fieldWeight in 1403, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1403)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 49(1998) H.2, S.122-126
  4. Hjoerland, B.: Information: objective or subjective/situational? (2007) 0.01
    0.0054329275 = product of:
      0.02173171 = sum of:
        0.02173171 = weight(_text_:und in 74) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02173171 = score(doc=74,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1478073 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06664293 = queryNorm
            0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 74, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=74)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Bezugnahme auf: Bates, M.J.: Fundamental forms of information. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2006), no.8, S.1033-1045 und Bates, M.J.: Information and knowledge: an evolutionary framework for information science. In: Information research, 10(2005) no.4.
  5. Hjoerland, B.; Scerri, E.; Dupré, J.: Forum: The Philosophy of Classification : The Periodic Table and the Philosophy of Classification - What is the Nature of the Periodic Table as a Classification System? - A Note on the Debate Between Hjørland and Scerri on the Significance of the Periodic Table (2011) 0.01
    0.0054329275 = product of:
      0.02173171 = sum of:
        0.02173171 = weight(_text_:und in 294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02173171 = score(doc=294,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1478073 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06664293 = queryNorm
            0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 294, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=294)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Thanks to Professor Eric Scerri for engaging in debate in this journal (Scerri 2011) by replying to my review (Hjørland 2008a) of his book (Scerri 2007). One of my points has been that we in our community (Knowledge Organization, KO / Library and Information Science, LIS) have been too isolated from broader academic fields related to classification and the organization of knowledge. The present debate is a step towards reversing this situation. Bezug zu: Scerri, E.R.: The periodic table: its story and its significance. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007. xxii, 346 S. und die Rezension dazu in: KO 35(2008) no.4, S.251-254 (B. Hjoerland).
  6. Hjoerland, B.: Concept theory (2009) 0.00
    0.00452744 = product of:
      0.01810976 = sum of:
        0.01810976 = weight(_text_:und in 448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01810976 = score(doc=448,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1478073 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06664293 = queryNorm
            0.12252277 = fieldWeight in 448, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=448)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: Szostak, R.: Comment on Hjørland's concept theory in: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.5, S. 1076-1077 und die Erwiderung darauf von B. Hjoerland (S.1078-1080)
  7. Hjoerland, B.: Are relations in thesauri "context-free, definitional, and true in all possible worlds"? (2015) 0.00
    0.00452744 = product of:
      0.01810976 = sum of:
        0.01810976 = weight(_text_:und in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01810976 = score(doc=3033,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1478073 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06664293 = queryNorm
            0.12252277 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  8. Hjoerland, B.: Does the traditional thesaurus have a place in modern information retrieval? (2016) 0.00
    0.00452744 = product of:
      0.01810976 = sum of:
        0.01810976 = weight(_text_:und in 3915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01810976 = score(doc=3915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1478073 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06664293 = queryNorm
            0.12252277 = fieldWeight in 3915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3915)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus