-
Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993)
0.08
0.08113426 = product of:
0.32453704 = sum of:
0.32453704 = weight(_text_:heading in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.32453704 = score(doc=5611,freq=6.0), product of:
0.40051475 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.06621197 = queryNorm
0.8102998 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis
-
McGarry, D.: Magda Heiner-Freiling and her work in the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing : ein Erfahrungsbericht (2008)
0.07
0.06624585 = product of:
0.2649834 = sum of:
0.2649834 = weight(_text_:heading in 3201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2649834 = score(doc=3201,freq=4.0), product of:
0.40051475 = queryWeight, product of:
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.06621197 = queryNorm
0.661607 = fieldWeight in 3201, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3201)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Magda Heiner-Freiling was an exceptional person, and her participation with the Section on Classification and Indexing helped to produce valuable publications as well as contributing to a very pleasant working environment. She participated in and contributed to a satellite meeting on subject indexing, in a Working Group on Principles Underlying Subject Heading Languages, and in surveying national libraries and national bibliographies on subject heading languages and classification systems used. She brought many excellent qualities to her work.
-
McGarry, D.: Section on classification and indexing (1994)
0.01
0.010795589 = product of:
0.043182354 = sum of:
0.043182354 = weight(_text_:und in 8164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043182354 = score(doc=8164,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14685147 = queryWeight, product of:
2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
0.06621197 = queryNorm
0.29405463 = fieldWeight in 8164, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8164)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Bericht über das satellite meeting 'Subject indexing: principles and practices in the '90s' in Lissabon 1993 und die IFLA-Tagung 1993 in Barcelona