Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Svenonius, E."
  1. Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993) 0.07
    0.0707921 = product of:
      0.2831684 = sum of:
        0.2831684 = weight(_text_:heading in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2831684 = score(doc=5611,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.34946126 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.057771947 = queryNorm
            0.8102998 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis
  2. Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies (1990) 0.01
    0.01098939 = product of:
      0.04395756 = sum of:
        0.04395756 = weight(_text_:und in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04395756 = score(doc=1339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12813234 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.057771947 = queryNorm
            0.34306374 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  3. Svenonius, E.: Präkoordination - ja oder nein? (1994) 0.01
    0.009419478 = product of:
      0.03767791 = sum of:
        0.03767791 = weight(_text_:und in 1711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03767791 = score(doc=1711,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.12813234 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.057771947 = queryNorm
            0.29405463 = fieldWeight in 1711, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1711)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die Diskussion um Vor- und Nachteile von Präkoordination oder Postkoordination wird unter den in der verbalen Sacherschließung Engagierten in Deutschland seit Jahren geführt. Mit zunehmender Verbreitung der RSWK gewinnen die Überlegungen, die sich angesichts der Ausbreitung des OPAC für das 'Zerschlagen' der Schlagwortketten aussprechen, an Bedeutung. In diesem Zusammenhang trägt eine Berücksichtigung der internationalen Debatte um Prä- und Postkoordination zur Erweiterung des nationalen Horizontes bei. Der Beitrag ist eine leicht gekürzte Übersetzung eines Referates, das die Autorin beim IFLA Satellite Meeting zum Thema 'Subject indexing in the 90's - principles and practices' im August 1993 in Lissabon gehalten hat
    Footnote
    Original in: Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings ... Ed.: R.P. Holley et al. München: Saur 1995, S.231-255. - Übersetzt und mit einem Nachwort (S.294-296) versehen von M. Heiner-Freiling
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 41(1994) H.3, S.279-294
  4. Svenonius, E.: Facets as semantic categories (1979) 0.01
    0.0081575075 = product of:
      0.03263003 = sum of:
        0.03263003 = weight(_text_:und in 1426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03263003 = score(doc=1426,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12813234 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.057771947 = queryNorm
            0.25465882 = fieldWeight in 1426, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1426)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Klassifikation und Erkenntnis II. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 2 u. 3 "Wissensdarstellung und Wissensvermittlung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979