Search (1607 results, page 2 of 81)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Mani, T.: Automatic summarization (2001) 0.10
    0.09690549 = product of:
      0.38762197 = sum of:
        0.38762197 = weight(_text_:jasist in 5076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38762197 = score(doc=5076,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41331357 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.9378399 = fieldWeight in 5076, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5076)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 53(2002) no.5, S.410-411 (S.J. Lincicium)
  2. He, S.; Spink, A.: ¬A comparison of foreign authorship distribution in JASIST and the Journal of Documentation (2002) 0.10
    0.09690549 = product of:
      0.38762197 = sum of:
        0.38762197 = weight(_text_:jasist in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.38762197 = score(doc=230,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.41331357 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.9378399 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    He and Spink count the first authors in JASIST and JDoc from 1950 to 1999 whose affiliation is outside the country of origin of each publication and record the time period and the author's geographic location. Foreign authorship in JASIST increased nearly four fold from 1995 to 1999 and the number of represented locations 3.6 times while in the same time period JDoc's foreign authorship doubled and foreign locations increased four fold. The largest foreign location for JDoc is the USA and the largest foreign location for JASIST is the UK. Canada is second on both lists.
  3. School library reference services in the 90s : where we are, where we're heading (1994) 0.10
    0.0964542 = product of:
      0.3858168 = sum of:
        0.3858168 = weight(_text_:heading in 2517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3858168 = score(doc=2517,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41235003 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 2517, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2517)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  4. Studwell, W.E.; Rolland-Thomas, P.: ¬The form and structure of a subject heading code (1988) 0.10
    0.0964542 = product of:
      0.3858168 = sum of:
        0.3858168 = weight(_text_:heading in 2784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3858168 = score(doc=2784,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41235003 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 2784, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2784)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  5. Dhawan, S.M.; Yerkey, A.N.: Trends in subject heading assignment in cataloging records during 1974-1978 (1983) 0.10
    0.0964542 = product of:
      0.3858168 = sum of:
        0.3858168 = weight(_text_:heading in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3858168 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41235003 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  6. Ho, J.: ¬An analysis of the structure of a subject heading list (1993) 0.10
    0.0964542 = product of:
      0.3858168 = sum of:
        0.3858168 = weight(_text_:heading in 6855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3858168 = score(doc=6855,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41235003 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 6855, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6855)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  7. Studwell, W.E.: Library of Congress Subject Heading period subdivisions for Australia, New Zealand and selected world islands : some proposed additions (1985) 0.10
    0.0964542 = product of:
      0.3858168 = sum of:
        0.3858168 = weight(_text_:heading in 896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3858168 = score(doc=896,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41235003 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 896, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=896)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  8. Studwell, W.E.; Rast, E.; Felmlee, C.: Library of Congress Subject Heading period subdivisions for Africa : some proposed additions (1984) 0.10
    0.0964542 = product of:
      0.3858168 = sum of:
        0.3858168 = weight(_text_:heading in 453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3858168 = score(doc=453,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41235003 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 453, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=453)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  9. Ranganathan, S.R.: Subject headings and facet analysis (1964) 0.10
    0.0954649 = product of:
      0.3818596 = sum of:
        0.3818596 = weight(_text_:heading in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3818596 = score(doc=1833,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.41235003 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.9260569 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    After establishing the terminology, shows how the choice of the name of the subject of a document and the rendering of the name in the heading of the specific subject entry can be got by facet analysis based on postulates and principles. After showing that subject headings constitute an artificial language, points out that using facet analysis for subject heading does not amount to using class number. Marks out the area for an objective statistical survey of sought heading for subject entry. Calls on Council for Library Resources Incorporated to provide for this project
  10. USMARC format for authority data : including guidelines for content designation (1993) 0.10
    0.0954649 = product of:
      0.3818596 = sum of:
        0.3818596 = weight(_text_:heading in 3713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3818596 = score(doc=3713,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.41235003 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.9260569 = fieldWeight in 3713, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3713)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Includes changes to all examples throughout the publication, as approved by MARBI in January 1993. Makes obsolete the second indicator position (non-filing characters) in all of the heading fields except the 130, which is uniform titles. Also new to this edition: definition of 18X heading fields for general, geographic and chronological subdivision headings, plus related 48X and 58X fields... 7XX fields for heading-linking entries... and the control field 003, named the 'control number identifier.' Also eliminates the national-level requirement codes at the field level
  11. Chan, L.M.: ¬The principle of uniform heading in descriptive cataloging : ideal and reality (1983) 0.10
    0.0954649 = product of:
      0.3818596 = sum of:
        0.3818596 = weight(_text_:heading in 434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.3818596 = score(doc=434,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.41235003 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.9260569 = fieldWeight in 434, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=434)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The principle of uniform heading underlies the rules for headings in descriptive cataloging in the American tradition. The rationale and the evolution of the principle are examined and its implications discussed in terms of the history of cataloging codes. The ideal embodied in the principle of uniform heading has been undergoing gradual modification in recent codes and considerably compromised in cataloging practice today.
  12. Shiri, A.: Powering search : the role of thesauri in new information environments (2012) 0.09
    0.09417645 = product of:
      0.1883529 = sum of:
        0.1661237 = weight(_text_:jasist in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1661237 = score(doc=2322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41331357 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.4019314 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
        0.0222292 = weight(_text_:und in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0222292 = score(doc=2322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15119095 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 65(2014) no.5, S.1085-1088 (B.H. Weinberg)
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  13. Stone, A.T.: ¬The LCSH century : a brief history of the Library of Congress Subject Headings, and introduction to the centennial essays (2000) 0.09
    0.09378963 = product of:
      0.18757926 = sum of:
        0.0222292 = weight(_text_:und in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0222292 = score(doc=6600,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15119095 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
        0.16535006 = weight(_text_:heading in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16535006 = score(doc=6600,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41235003 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.40099442 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The history of the Library of Congress Subject Headings is traced, from its beginnings with the implementation of a dictionary catalog at the Library of Congress in 1898 to the present day. The author describes the most significant changes which have occurred in LCSH policies and practices during the 100-year period. Events noted near the end of the century indicate an increased willingness on the part of' the Library of Congress to involve the larger library community in the creation or revision of subject headings and other decision-making regarding the LCSH system. Finally, the author provides a summary of the other contributions to this collection of essays, a collection which celebrates the "centennial" of the world's most popular library subject heading language
    Content
    Mit einer Publikationsgeschichte der LCSH (vgl. Tabellen) und dazu gehörenden Publikationen
  14. Landry, P.: Multilingual subject access : the linking approach of MACS (2004) 0.09
    0.09378963 = product of:
      0.18757926 = sum of:
        0.0222292 = weight(_text_:und in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0222292 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15119095 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
        0.16535006 = weight(_text_:heading in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16535006 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41235003 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.40099442 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The MACS (Multilingual access to subjects) project is one of the many projects that are currently exploring solutions to multilingual subject access to online catalogs. Its strategy is to develop a Web based link and search interface through which equivalents between three Subject Heading Languages: SWD/RSWK (Schlagwortnormdatei/Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog) for German, RAMEAU (Repertoire d'Autorite-Matière Encyclopedique et Alphabetique Unifie) for French and LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings) for English can be created and maintained, and by which users can access online databases in the language of their choice. Factors that have lead to this approach will be examined and the MACS linking strategy will be explained. The trend to using mapping or linking strategies between different controlled vocabularies to create multilingual access challenges the traditional view of the multilingual thesaurus.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  15. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: In pursuit of interoperability : can we standardize mapping types? (2011) 0.09
    0.09378963 = product of:
      0.18757926 = sum of:
        0.0222292 = weight(_text_:und in 788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0222292 = score(doc=788,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15119095 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 788, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=788)
        0.16535006 = weight(_text_:heading in 788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16535006 = score(doc=788,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41235003 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.40099442 = fieldWeight in 788, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=788)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In the last few years projects such as DESIRE, MACS, CrissCross and KoMoHe have demonstrated the benefits as well as the challenges of mapping between controlled vocabularies. Each project has taken a slightly different approach to the definition and implementation of appropriate types of mapping. The mapping types supported by SKOS are slightly different again. In an ideal world, all major databases would be interconnected; all widely used thesauri, classification schemes and subject heading schemes would map to each other; and all of us would use the same basic types of mapping to enable universal interoperability. Or would we? This paper will discuss the feasibility and desirability of agreeing and implementing standardized mapping types.
    Series
    Bibliotheca Academica - Reihe Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaften; Bd. 1
  16. Buckland, M.K.: Emanuel Goldberg and his knowledge machine : information, invention, and political forces (2006) 0.09
    0.09190579 = product of:
      0.18381158 = sum of:
        0.1384364 = weight(_text_:jasist in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1384364 = score(doc=2991,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41331357 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.33494282 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
        0.045375165 = weight(_text_:und in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045375165 = score(doc=2991,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.15119095 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.30011827 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    BK
    06.01 / Geschichte des Informations- und Dokumentationswesens
    02.01 / Geschichte der Wissenschaft und Kultur
    Classification
    06.01 / Geschichte des Informations- und Dokumentationswesens
    02.01 / Geschichte der Wissenschaft und Kultur
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 63(2012) no.2, S.427-428 (Thomas Haigh)
    RSWK
    Information und Dokumentation / Informationstechnik / Geschichte
    Subject
    Information und Dokumentation / Informationstechnik / Geschichte
  17. Gleick, J.: ¬The information : a history, a theory, a flood (2011) 0.09
    0.08774254 = product of:
      0.17548507 = sum of:
        0.1384364 = weight(_text_:jasist in 979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1384364 = score(doc=979,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41331357 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.33494282 = fieldWeight in 979, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=979)
        0.037048668 = weight(_text_:und in 979) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037048668 = score(doc=979,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.15119095 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.24504554 = fieldWeight in 979, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=979)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    BK
    05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft
    Classification
    05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 62(2011) no.12, S.2543-2545 (C.H. Davis)
    RSWK
    Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Geschichtee (BVB)
    Subject
    Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Geschichtee (BVB)
  18. Mainka, A.: Smart world cities in the 21st century (2018) 0.09
    0.08526075 = product of:
      0.1705215 = sum of:
        0.1384364 = weight(_text_:jasist in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1384364 = score(doc=516,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.41331357 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.33494282 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
        0.032085087 = weight(_text_:und in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032085087 = score(doc=516,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15119095 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.21221566 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    In dem Buch werden 31 Städte weltweit, darunter Berlin und München, miteinander verglichen und auf der Basis harter Daten sowie Experteninterviews Merkmale prototypischer Städte der Wissensgesellschaft abgeleitet sowie Beispiele für Best Practice gefunden. Das geschieht in der Weise, dass Hypothesen formuliert und vorläufig bestätigt oder reformuliert bzw. zurückgewiesen werden. The term smart city has become a buzzword. City planners develop ubiquitous connectivity through Wi-Fi hotspots, establish science parks, introduce bike and car sharing, and push entrepreneurship. All this is happening under the flagship of becoming a knowledge city. This book investigates the digital and cognitive infrastructure of 31 cities and how they meet the demands of the knowledge society in an increasingly digitized environment.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 71(2020) no.2, S.243-244 (Jacques Christiaan du Plessis).
  19. Nicolaisen, J.; Frandsen, T.F.: Bibliometric evolution : is the journal of the association for information science and technology transforming into a specialty Journal? (2015) 0.08
    0.08392262 = product of:
      0.33569047 = sum of:
        0.33569047 = weight(_text_:jasist in 2821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33569047 = score(doc=2821,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.41331357 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.8121932 = fieldWeight in 2821, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2821)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Applying a recently developed method for measuring the level of specialization over time for a selection of library and information science (LIS)-core journals seems to reveal that Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST) is slowly transforming into a specialty journal. The transformation seems to originate from a growing interest in bibliometric topics. This is evident from a longitudinal study (1990-2012) of the bibliometric coupling strength between Scientometrics and other LIS-core journals (including JASIST). The cause of this gradual transformation is discussed, and possible explanations are analyzed.
    Object
    JASIST
  20. Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993) 0.08
    0.08353179 = product of:
      0.33412716 = sum of:
        0.33412716 = weight(_text_:heading in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33412716 = score(doc=5611,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.41235003 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.06816854 = queryNorm
            0.8102998 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis

Authors

Languages

  • d 32
  • m 3
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 1006
  • m 454
  • s 146
  • el 110
  • i 21
  • n 19
  • r 12
  • x 12
  • b 9
  • ? 1
  • h 1
  • l 1
  • v 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications