Search (1417 results, page 2 of 71)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Dhawan, S.M.; Yerkey, A.N.: Trends in subject heading assignment in cataloging records during 1974-1978 (1983) 0.09 
    0.09245881 = product of:
  0.36983523 = sum of:
    0.36983523 = weight(_text_:heading in 5270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.36983523 = score(doc=5270,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3952694 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 5270, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5270)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  2. Ho, J.: ¬An analysis of the structure of a subject heading list (1993) 0.09 
    0.09245881 = product of:
  0.36983523 = sum of:
    0.36983523 = weight(_text_:heading in 6855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.36983523 = score(doc=6855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3952694 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 6855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6855)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  3. Studwell, W.E.: Library of Congress Subject Heading period subdivisions for Australia, New Zealand and selected world islands : some proposed additions (1985) 0.09 
    0.09245881 = product of:
  0.36983523 = sum of:
    0.36983523 = weight(_text_:heading in 896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.36983523 = score(doc=896,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3952694 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 896, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=896)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  4. Studwell, W.E.; Rast, E.; Felmlee, C.: Library of Congress Subject Heading period subdivisions for Africa : some proposed additions (1984) 0.09 
    0.09245881 = product of:
  0.36983523 = sum of:
    0.36983523 = weight(_text_:heading in 453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.36983523 = score(doc=453,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3952694 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 453, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=453)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  5. Ranganathan, S.R.: Subject headings and facet analysis (1964) 0.09 
    0.09151049 = product of:
  0.36604196 = sum of:
    0.36604196 = weight(_text_:heading in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.36604196 = score(doc=1833,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3952694 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.9260569 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    After establishing the terminology, shows how the choice of the name of the subject of a document and the rendering of the name in the heading of the specific subject entry can be got by facet analysis based on postulates and principles. After showing that subject headings constitute an artificial language, points out that using facet analysis for subject heading does not amount to using class number. Marks out the area for an objective statistical survey of sought heading for subject entry. Calls on Council for Library Resources Incorporated to provide for this project
  6. USMARC format for authority data : including guidelines for content designation (1993) 0.09 
    0.09151049 = product of:
  0.36604196 = sum of:
    0.36604196 = weight(_text_:heading in 3713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.36604196 = score(doc=3713,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3952694 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.9260569 = fieldWeight in 3713, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3713)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Includes changes to all examples throughout the publication, as approved by MARBI in January 1993. Makes obsolete the second indicator position (non-filing characters) in all of the heading fields except the 130, which is uniform titles. Also new to this edition: definition of 18X heading fields for general, geographic and chronological subdivision headings, plus related 48X and 58X fields... 7XX fields for heading-linking entries... and the control field 003, named the 'control number identifier.' Also eliminates the national-level requirement codes at the field level
  7. Chan, L.M.: ¬The principle of uniform heading in descriptive cataloging : ideal and reality (1983) 0.09 
    0.09151049 = product of:
  0.36604196 = sum of:
    0.36604196 = weight(_text_:heading in 434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.36604196 = score(doc=434,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3952694 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.9260569 = fieldWeight in 434, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=434)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The principle of uniform heading underlies the rules for headings in descriptive cataloging in the American tradition. The rationale and the evolution of the principle are examined and its implications discussed in terms of the history of cataloging codes. The ideal embodied in the principle of uniform heading has been undergoing gradual modification in recent codes and considerably compromised in cataloging practice today.
  8. Stone, A.T.: ¬The LCSH century : a brief history of the Library of Congress Subject Headings, and introduction to the centennial essays (2000) 0.09 
    0.089904614 = product of:
  0.17980923 = sum of:
    0.021308407 = weight(_text_:und in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021308407 = score(doc=6600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14492822 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
    0.15850082 = weight(_text_:heading in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15850082 = score(doc=6600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3952694 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.40099442 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The history of the Library of Congress Subject Headings is traced, from its beginnings with the implementation of a dictionary catalog at the Library of Congress in 1898 to the present day. The author describes the most significant changes which have occurred in LCSH policies and practices during the 100-year period. Events noted near the end of the century indicate an increased willingness on the part of' the Library of Congress to involve the larger library community in the creation or revision of subject headings and other decision-making regarding the LCSH system. Finally, the author provides a summary of the other contributions to this collection of essays, a collection which celebrates the "centennial" of the world's most popular library subject heading language
    Content
    Mit einer Publikationsgeschichte der LCSH (vgl. Tabellen) und dazu gehörenden Publikationen
  9. Landry, P.: Multilingual subject access : the linking approach of MACS (2004) 0.09 
    0.089904614 = product of:
  0.17980923 = sum of:
    0.021308407 = weight(_text_:und in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021308407 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14492822 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
    0.15850082 = weight(_text_:heading in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15850082 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3952694 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.40099442 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The MACS (Multilingual access to subjects) project is one of the many projects that are currently exploring solutions to multilingual subject access to online catalogs. Its strategy is to develop a Web based link and search interface through which equivalents between three Subject Heading Languages: SWD/RSWK (Schlagwortnormdatei/Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog) for German, RAMEAU (Repertoire d'Autorite-Matière Encyclopedique et Alphabetique Unifie) for French and LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings) for English can be created and maintained, and by which users can access online databases in the language of their choice. Factors that have lead to this approach will be examined and the MACS linking strategy will be explained. The trend to using mapping or linking strategies between different controlled vocabularies to create multilingual access challenges the traditional view of the multilingual thesaurus.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  10. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: In pursuit of interoperability : can we standardize mapping types? (2011) 0.09 
    0.089904614 = product of:
  0.17980923 = sum of:
    0.021308407 = weight(_text_:und in 788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021308407 = score(doc=788,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14492822 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 788, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=788)
    0.15850082 = weight(_text_:heading in 788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15850082 = score(doc=788,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3952694 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.40099442 = fieldWeight in 788, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=788)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In the last few years projects such as DESIRE, MACS, CrissCross and KoMoHe have demonstrated the benefits as well as the challenges of mapping between controlled vocabularies. Each project has taken a slightly different approach to the definition and implementation of appropriate types of mapping. The mapping types supported by SKOS are slightly different again. In an ideal world, all major databases would be interconnected; all widely used thesauri, classification schemes and subject heading schemes would map to each other; and all of us would use the same basic types of mapping to enable universal interoperability. Or would we? This paper will discuss the feasibility and desirability of agreeing and implementing standardized mapping types.
    Series
    Bibliotheca Academica - Reihe Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaften; Bd. 1
  11. Stock, W.G.; Weber, S.: Facets of informetrics : Preface (2006) 0.09 
    0.08761848 = product of:
  0.17523696 = sum of:
    0.16103135 = weight(_text_:jean in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16103135 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48795334 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.467361 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.33001384 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.467361 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
    0.014205605 = weight(_text_:und in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014205605 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14492822 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.098018214 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    According to Jean M. Tague-Sutcliffe "informetrics" is "the study of the quantitative aspects of information in any form, not just records or bibliographies, and in any social group, not just scientists" (Tague-Sutcliffe, 1992, 1). Leo Egghe also defines "informetrics" in a very broad sense. "(W)e will use the term' informetrics' as the broad term comprising all-metrics studies related to information science, including bibliometrics (bibliographies, libraries,...), scientometrics (science policy, citation analysis, research evaluation,...), webometrics (metrics of the web, the Internet or other social networks such as citation or collaboration networks), ..." (Egghe, 2005b,1311). According to Concepcion S. Wilson "informetrics" is "the quantitative study of collections of moderatesized units of potentially informative text, directed to the scientific understanding of information processes at the social level" (Wilson, 1999, 211). We should add to Wilson's units of text also digital collections of images, videos, spoken documents and music. Dietmar Wolfram divides "informetrics" into two aspects, "system-based characteristics that arise from the documentary content of IR systems and how they are indexed, and usage-based characteristics that arise how users interact with system content and the system interfaces that provide access to the content" (Wolfram, 2003, 6). We would like to follow Tague-Sutcliffe, Egghe, Wilson and Wolfram (and others, for example Björneborn & Ingwersen, 2004) and call this broad research of empirical information science "informetrics". Informetrics includes therefore all quantitative studies in information science. If a scientist performs scientific investigations empirically, e.g. on information users' behavior, on scientific impact of academic journals, on the development of the patent application activity of a company, on links of Web pages, on the temporal distribution of blog postings discussing a given topic, on availability, recall and precision of retrieval systems, on usability of Web sites, and so on, he or she contributes to informetrics. We see three subject areas in information science in which such quantitative research takes place, - information users and information usage, - evaluation of information systems, - information itself, Following Wolfram's article, we divide his system-based characteristics into the "information itself "-category and the "information system"-category. Figure 1 is a simplistic graph of subjects and research areas of informetrics as an empirical information science.
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.8, S.385-389
  12. Sokal, A.: Transgressing the boundaries : toward a transformative hermeneutics of quantum gravity (1996) 0.08 
    0.08372258 = product of:
  0.16744515 = sum of:
    0.14233296 = weight(_text_:jean in 3136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14233296 = score(doc=3136,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.48795334 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.467361 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.29169378 = fieldWeight in 3136, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.467361 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44421)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3136)
    0.0251122 = weight(_text_:und in 3136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0251122 = score(doc=3136,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.14492822 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.17327337 = fieldWeight in 3136, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3136)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    1996 reichte der amerikanische Physiker Alan Sokal einen Aufsatz mit dem Titel Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity (deutsch: Die Grenzen überschreiten: Auf dem Weg zu einer transformativen Hermeneutik der Quantengravitation) bei der amerikanischen, für ihre postmoderne Ausrichtung bekannten Zeitschrift für Cultural studies Social Text zur Veröffentlichung ein. Diese druckte ihn unbeanstandet mit anderen in einer Sondernummer ab. Kurz nach der Veröffentlichung bekannte Sokal in einer anderen Zeitschrift, Lingua Franca, dass es sich bei dem Aufsatz um eine Parodie handle. Er habe die zusammengesuchten Zitate verschiedener postmoderner Denker mit dem typischen Jargon dieser Denkrichtung zu einem Text montiert, dessen unsinniger Inhalt bei Beachtung wissenschaftlicher Standards, so der Vorwurf an die Herausgeber von Social Text, als solcher hätte erkannt werden müssen. Dieser Vorfall löste im akademischen Milieu und der Presse (der Fall kam immerhin bis auf die Titelseite der New York Times) eine öffentliche Diskussion aus, wie dieser Vorfall im Besonderen und die Seriosität der postmodernen Philosophie im Allgemeinen zu bewerten sei. Sokal und Vertreter des kritisierten Personenkreises führten die Diskussion in weiteren Zeitschriftenartikeln fort und verteidigten ihre Standpunkte. 1997 veröffentlichte Sokal zusammen mit seinem belgischen Kollegen Jean Bricmont dazu ein Buch mit dem Titel Impostures Intellectuelles (übersetzt: Intellektuelle Hochstapeleien, deutscher Titel: Eleganter Unsinn), in dem er seine Thesen erklärt und an Beispielen von Texten bedeutender postmoderner französischer Philosophen erläutert (namentlich Jean Baudrillard, Gilles Deleuze/Félix Guattari, Luce Irigaray, Julia Kristeva, Jacques Lacan, Bruno Latour und Paul Virilio und - obwohl kein Postmoderner, als historisches Beispiel - Henri Bergson). In diesem Buch gaben Sokal/Bricmont - neben der Verteidigung gegen den vermuteten Missbrauch der Wissenschaft - auch ein politisches Motiv für ihren Vorstoß an. Sie bekannten sich zur politischen Linken und vertraten die Meinung, dass die zunehmende Verbreitung der postmodernen Denkrichtung in der Linken deren Fähigkeit zu wirkungsvoller Gesellschaftskritik schwäche. (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal-Aff%C3%A4re)
  13. Theriault, L.F.; Jean, J.: Confused? A kid's guide to the Internet's World Wide Web (1995) 0.08 
    0.080515675 = product of:
  0.3220627 = sum of:
    0.3220627 = weight(_text_:jean in 2208) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3220627 = score(doc=2208,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48795334 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.467361 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.6600277 = fieldWeight in 2208, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.467361 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2208)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  14. Tague-Sutcliffe, J.: Information retrieval experimentation (2009) 0.08 
    0.080515675 = product of:
  0.3220627 = sum of:
    0.3220627 = weight(_text_:jean in 788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3220627 = score(doc=788,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.48795334 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.467361 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.6600277 = fieldWeight in 788, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.467361 = idf(docFreq=68, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=788)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Jean Tague-Sutcliffe was an important figure in information retrieval experimentation. Here, she reviews the history of IR research, and provides a description of the fundamental paradigm of information retrieval experimentation that continues to dominate the field.
  15. Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993) 0.08 
    0.08007168 = product of:
  0.32028672 = sum of:
    0.32028672 = weight(_text_:heading in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32028672 = score(doc=5611,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3952694 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.8102998 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis
  16. Chan, L.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Errors and obsolete elements in assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for subject cataloging and subject authority control (1997) 0.08 
    0.08007168 = product of:
  0.32028672 = sum of:
    0.32028672 = weight(_text_:heading in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32028672 = score(doc=1492,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3952694 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.8102998 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    An analysis of a sample of 9.442 headings assigned by the LoC to bibliographic records disclosed 2 types of invalid headings: those that were erroneous and those that were obsolete. Each type revealed recurring patterns. Errors and obsolete elements occuring in assigned heading involve MARC coding, terminology in main headings and subdivisions, application of subdivisions, and in mechanical elements such as punctuation and capitalization. Different headings (e.g. personal name, corporate name, topical, etc.) display different patterns as well as predominance of errors and obsoleteness. Although the overall error rate is low, an awareness and understanding of patterns of errors and obsolescnce in subject heading strings should contribute to improvement in subject heading assignment and subject authority control
  17. Drabenstott, K.M.: Facilitating geographic subdivision assignment in subject headings (1992) 0.08 
    0.08007168 = product of:
  0.32028672 = sum of:
    0.32028672 = weight(_text_:heading in 3708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32028672 = score(doc=3708,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3952694 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.8102998 = fieldWeight in 3708, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3708)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Recognises the limitations of the existing files of Library of Congress name and subject authority records for indirect geographic subdivision. Makes recommendations for enhancements to existing authority records, which would enable online systems to assist in subject heading formulation and verify, with limited assistance by human intermediaries, whether geographic subdivision is authorized for use with a particular main heading and whether the correct form of indirect geographic subdivision is authorized for use with a particular main heading and whether the correct form of indirect geographic subdivision is given. A study of subdivided subject headings in a large bibliographic data base forms the basis of the recommendations
  18. Lazinger, S.S.: LC Classification of a library and information science library for maximum shelf retrieval (1984) 0.08 
    0.08007168 = product of:
  0.32028672 = sum of:
    0.32028672 = weight(_text_:heading in 464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32028672 = score(doc=464,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3952694 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.8102998 = fieldWeight in 464, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=464)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In reclassifying a Library and Information Science library from DDC to LC, an attempt was made to concentrate books with related subject headings on the shelf for maximum shelf retrieval even in cases where the Subject Authorities or C.I.P. assign them varying numbers. Most of the shelf concentration was achieved either by selecting a single number for a given heading and then classifying all books with the heading in that number or by replacing the standard LC number for a heading with one which placed it together with related books on the shelf.
  19. Studwell, W.E.: Two lessons of history : how the development of the descriptive cataloging code and the recent cultural trend towards 'least effort' affect the formulation of a subject heading code (1992) 0.08 
    0.07925041 = product of:
  0.31700164 = sum of:
    0.31700164 = weight(_text_:heading in 5417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31700164 = score(doc=5417,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3952694 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.80198884 = fieldWeight in 5417, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5417)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  20. Barden, B.R.; Denison, B.: Guide to the SLA loan collection of classification schemes and subject heading lists on deposit at Western Reserve Univ. as of March 20, 1961 (1961) 0.08 
    0.07925041 = product of:
  0.31700164 = sum of:
    0.31700164 = weight(_text_:heading in 6225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.31700164 = score(doc=6225,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3952694 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06534482 = queryNorm
        0.80198884 = fieldWeight in 6225, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6225)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 32
  • m 3
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 951
  • m 321
  • el 110
  • s 107
  • i 21
  • n 19
  • r 12
  • x 12
  • b 9
  • ? 1
  • h 1
  • l 1
  • v 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications