Search (1372 results, page 2 of 69)

0.11204009 = product of:
  0.22408018 = sum of:
    0.033671092 = weight(_text_:und in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033671092 = score(doc=329,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13880253 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.24258271 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
    0.19040908 = weight(_text_:handling in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19040908 = score(doc=329,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3925275 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.48508468 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This authoritative user's guide and reference manual for the LATEX computer typesetting system has been revised to document features now available in the new standard software release - LATEX2e. The new edition features additional styles and functions, improved font handling, and enhanced graphics capabilities.

Classification

ST 281 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Einzelne Benutzerschnittstellen (alphabet.)

RVK

ST 281 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Einzelne Benutzerschnittstellen (alphabet.)

0.10880519 = product of:
  0.43522075 = sum of:
    0.43522075 = weight(_text_:handling in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.43522075 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3925275 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        1.108765 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.10880519 = product of:
  0.43522075 = sum of:
    0.43522075 = weight(_text_:handling in 7706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.43522075 = score(doc=7706,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3925275 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        1.108765 = fieldWeight in 7706, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7706)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.10880519 = product of:
  0.43522075 = sum of:
    0.43522075 = weight(_text_:handling in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.43522075 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3925275 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        1.108765 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.10710907 = product of:
  0.21421814 = sum of:
    0.023809057 = weight(_text_:und in 3623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023809057 = score(doc=3623,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13880253 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.17153187 = fieldWeight in 3623, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3623)
    0.19040908 = weight(_text_:handling in 3623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19040908 = score(doc=3623,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3925275 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.48508468 = fieldWeight in 3623, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3623)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The patterns of overlap between terms which are closely related in a thesaurus are considered. The relationships considered are parent/child, in which one term is a broader term of the other, and sibling in which to 2 terms share the same broader term. The patterns of overlap observed in the MeSH thesaurus with respect to selected MEDLINE postings are examined. The implications of the overlap patterns are discussed, in particular, the impact of the overlap patterns on the potential effectiveness of a proposed algorithm for handling negation is considered.

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.102527365 = product of:
  0.41010946 = sum of:
    0.41010946 = weight(_text_:judaica in 4014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.41010946 = score(doc=4014,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.53886527 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.76106125 = fieldWeight in 4014, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4014)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Judaica librarianship. 6(1991/92) nos.1/2, S.24-32,37

0.0961711 = product of:
  0.3846844 = sum of:
    0.3846844 = weight(_text_:handling in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3846844 = score(doc=601,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3925275 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.98001903 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Information handling technology is an explosive growth area. Librarians need not run faster just to keep up with the information explosion any more, but must now run faster to keep up with the information controllability explosion. If they don't, their place in the information-handling world will be usurped by others who do realise what a growth area it is

0.09422806 = product of:
  0.37691224 = sum of:
    0.37691224 = weight(_text_:handling in 5247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37691224 = score(doc=5247,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3925275 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.96021867 = fieldWeight in 5247, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5247)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Whereas up to now document analysis was mainly concerned with the handling of formal properties of documents (scanning, editing), AI (artificial intelligence) techniques in the field of Natural Language Processing have shown the possibility of "Content based text handling", i.e., a content analysis for textual documents. Research and development in this field at The Siemens Corporate Research Laboratories are described in this article.

0.09422806 = product of:
  0.37691224 = sum of:
    0.37691224 = weight(_text_:handling in 5875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37691224 = score(doc=5875,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3925275 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.96021867 = fieldWeight in 5875, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5875)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Describes the EDUCATE (End User Courses in Information Access through Communication Technology) project for end user education in information access, retrieval and handling, a 3 year CEC Libraries Programme Project started in Feb 94. Examines the need for education and training in information retrieval and handling, presents the course design, and gives the goals for the project. Discusses the use of networks in connection with EDUCATE, and the tools and interfaces used. Describes the ways in which the program can be used for a variety of users

0.082449555 = product of:
  0.32979822 = sum of:
    0.32979822 = weight(_text_:handling in 5416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32979822 = score(doc=5416,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3925275 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.84019136 = fieldWeight in 5416, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5416)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In the information age marked by the global highways and instant information handling sharing worldwide, all citizens must become knowledgeable about, and efficient in, handling information. People need training in how to organize, evaluate, and analyze the enormous array of information now available in both print and electronic formats. Information skills need to be taught and developed on all levels from elementary schools thorugh universities. Librarians worldwide are uniquely qualified through education, training, and experience to provide people with necessary information-handling skills on all levels. Using available data regarding information literacy programs on the international level, Rader proposes a course of action for the next decade

0.082449555 = product of:
  0.32979822 = sum of:
    0.32979822 = weight(_text_:handling in 4939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32979822 = score(doc=4939,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.3925275 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.84019136 = fieldWeight in 4939, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4939)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The Semantic Web has attracted much attention, both from academia and industry. An important role in research towards the Semantic Web is played by formalisms and technologies for handling uncertainty and/or vagueness. In this paper, I first provide some motivating examples for handling uncertainty and/or vagueness in the Semantic Web. I then give an overview of some own formalisms for handling uncertainty and/or vagueness in the Semantic Web.

0.081603885 = product of:
  0.32641554 = sum of:
    0.32641554 = weight(_text_:handling in 1039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32641554 = score(doc=1039,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3925275 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.8315737 = fieldWeight in 1039, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1039)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.081603885 = product of:
  0.32641554 = sum of:
    0.32641554 = weight(_text_:handling in 1040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32641554 = score(doc=1040,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3925275 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.8315737 = fieldWeight in 1040, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1040)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.081603885 = product of:
  0.32641554 = sum of:
    0.32641554 = weight(_text_:handling in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32641554 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3925275 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.8315737 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.081603885 = product of:
  0.32641554 = sum of:
    0.32641554 = weight(_text_:handling in 1846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32641554 = score(doc=1846,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.3925275 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.8315737 = fieldWeight in 1846, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1846)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Novel ideas often experience resistance from incumbent forces. While evidence of the bias against novelty has been widely identified in science, there is still a lack of large-scale quantitative work to study this problem occurring in the prepublication process of manuscripts. This paper examines the association between manuscript novelty and handling time of publication based on 778,345 articles in 1,159 journals indexed by PubMed. Measuring the novelty as the extent to which manuscripts disrupt existing knowledge, we found systematic evidence that higher novelty is associated with longer handling time. Matching and fixed-effect models were adopted to confirm the statistical significance of this pattern. Moreover, submissions from prestigious authors and institutions have the advantage of shorter handling time, but this advantage is diminishing as manuscript novelty increases. In addition, we found longer handling time is negatively related to the impact of manuscripts, while the relationships between novelty and 3- and 5-year citations are U-shape. This study expands the existing knowledge of the novelty bias by examining its existence in the prepublication process of manuscripts.

0.076936886 = product of:
  0.30774754 = sum of:
    0.30774754 = weight(_text_:handling in 3743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30774754 = score(doc=3743,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3925275 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.78401524 = fieldWeight in 3743, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3743)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports on the 2 year trail period of the document delivery system ADONIS, made for the pharmaceutical industry. A market survey reports the needs of the pharmaceutical industry for such a product. Its success as a CD-ROM product depends on rapid conversion from paper in less than 3 weeks and special compression techniques to limit the number of CD-ROMs produced. Discusses handling of source material, the production software, errata handling and the hardware. Considers current developments, the benefits of using ADONIS generally and those for the publishers

0.076936886 = product of:
  0.30774754 = sum of:
    0.30774754 = weight(_text_:handling in 1494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30774754 = score(doc=1494,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3925275 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.78401524 = fieldWeight in 1494, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1494)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Business process re-engineering (or redesign) has achieved mixed results in business and industry but it offers an approach to thinking about the future of academic libraries in the digital age that is worth considering. This paper outlines the forces that are currently affecting academic libraries in the UK and proposes a strategy whereby the transformation from the handling of artefacts to the handling of electronic sources may be effected with maximum benefit to the information user.

0.076936886 = product of:
  0.30774754 = sum of:
    0.30774754 = weight(_text_:handling in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30774754 = score(doc=3254,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3925275 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.78401524 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

State of the art review of computerized chemical structure handling and the way in which the need for representation of chemical structures and structure diagrams, by computer software, has created a sub domain of information retrieval that integrates the requirements of research chemists for graph-theoretic algorithms with the database designs of computer science. Identifies and discusses the current research topics and selected portions of the literature, particularly during the period of its most rapid expansion between 1989 and 1996

0.07689553 = product of:
  0.3075821 = sum of:
    0.3075821 = weight(_text_:judaica in 6161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3075821 = score(doc=6161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.53886527 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.57079595 = fieldWeight in 6161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6161)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.07650648 = product of:
  0.15301296 = sum of:
    0.01700647 = weight(_text_:und in 3583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01700647 = score(doc=3583,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13880253 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.12252277 = fieldWeight in 3583, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3583)
    0.13600649 = weight(_text_:handling in 3583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13600649 = score(doc=3583,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3925275 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06258289 = queryNorm
        0.34648907 = fieldWeight in 3583, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3583)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Purpose - Seeks to share with digital library practitioners the development process of an online image collection that integrates the syndetic structure of a controlled vocabulary to improve end-user search and browse functionality. Design/methodology/approach - Surveys controlled vocabulary structures and their utility for catalogers and end-users. Reviews research literature and usability findings that informed the specifications for integration of the controlled vocabulary structure into search and browse functionality. Discusses database functions facilitating query expansion using a controlled vocabulary structure, and web application handling of user queries and results display. Concludes with a discussion of open-source alternatives and reuse of database and application components in other environments. Findings - Affirms that structured forms of browse and search can be successfully integrated into digital collections to significantly improve the user's discovery experience. Establishes ways in which the technologies used in implementing enhanced search and browse functionality can be abstracted to work in other digital collection environments. Originality/value - Significant amounts of research on integrating thesauri structures into search and browse functionalities exist, but examples of online resources that have implemented this approach are few in comparison. The online image collection surveyed in this paper can serve as a model to other designers of digital library resources for integrating controlled vocabularies and metadata structures into more dynamic search and browse functionality for end-users.

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus