Search (2012 results, page 2 of 101)

0.105118476 = product of:
  0.21023695 = sum of:
    0.0363315 = weight(_text_:und in 4058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0363315 = score(doc=4058,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14826427 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        0.24504554 = fieldWeight in 4058, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4058)
    0.17390545 = weight(_text_:headings in 4058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17390545 = score(doc=4058,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32437804 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        0.53611964 = fieldWeight in 4058, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4058)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Eine Einführung in der Probleme der Formal- und Inhaltserschließung

Content

Revised to take account of the 1988 revision of AACR2, the publication of new ISBD texts, the changed format of LC subject headings and progress in computer applications

0.101263374 = product of:
  0.20252675 = sum of:
    0.021798898 = weight(_text_:und in 2261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021798898 = score(doc=2261,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14826427 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 2261, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2261)
    0.18072785 = weight(_text_:headings in 2261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18072785 = score(doc=2261,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.32437804 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        0.5571519 = fieldWeight in 2261, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2261)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The biomedical book collection in the Genetech Library and Information Services was first inventoried and cataloged in 1983 when it totaled about 2000 titles. Cataloging records were retrieved from the OCLC system and used as a basis for cataloging. A year of cataloging produced a list of 1900 subject terms. More than one term describing the same concept often appears on the list, and no hierarchical structure related the terms to one another. As the collection grew, the subject catalog became increasingly inconsistent. To bring consistency to subject cataloging, a thesaurus of biomedical terms was constructed using the list of subject headings as a basis. This thesaurus follows the broad categories of the National Library of Medicine's Medical Subject Headings and, with some exceptions, the Guidelines for the Establishment and Development of Monolingual Thesauri. It has enabled the cataloger in providing greater in-depth subject analysis of materials added to the collection and in consistently assigning subject headings to cataloging record.

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.098794825 = product of:
  0.19758965 = sum of:
    0.025432048 = weight(_text_:und in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025432048 = score(doc=785,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14826427 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        0.17153187 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
    0.1721576 = weight(_text_:headings in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1721576 = score(doc=785,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32437804 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        0.5307314 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This paper discusses goals, methods and benefits of the conceptual mapping approach developed by the CrissCross project, in the framework of which the topical headings of the German subject headings authority file Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) have been mapped to notations of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC). Projectspecific retrieval concepts for improving thematic access in heterogeneous information spaces are outlined and explained on the basis of significant examples.

Series

Bibliotheca Academica - Reihe Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaften; Bd. 1

0.098375775 = product of:
  0.3935031 = sum of:
    0.3935031 = weight(_text_:headings in 2792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3935031 = score(doc=2792,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32437804 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        1.2131003 = fieldWeight in 2792, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2792)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Object

Sears List of Subject Headings

0.098375775 = product of:
  0.3935031 = sum of:
    0.3935031 = weight(_text_:headings in 2842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3935031 = score(doc=2842,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32437804 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        1.2131003 = fieldWeight in 2842, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2842)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.098375775 = product of:
  0.3935031 = sum of:
    0.3935031 = weight(_text_:headings in 1706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3935031 = score(doc=1706,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32437804 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        1.2131003 = fieldWeight in 1706, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1706)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Object

Sears List of Subject Headings

0.09721611 = product of:
  0.38886443 = sum of:
    0.38886443 = weight(_text_:headings in 4516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.38886443 = score(doc=4516,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.32437804 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        1.1988001 = fieldWeight in 4516, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4516)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

16 Beiträge zu: (*) Machine validation of subdivided headings, especially headings with free-floating subdivisions; (*) order and display of subdivides headings; (*) simplification of rules for assigning subdivisions; (*) creation of a national subject authority file

0.09623903 = product of:
  0.38495612 = sum of:
    0.38495612 = weight(_text_:headings in 1176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.38495612 = score(doc=1176,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.32437804 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        1.1867515 = fieldWeight in 1176, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1176)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

LCSH

Form headings
Subject headings / Literary form
Subject headings / Literature
Subject headings / Motion pictures
Subject headings / Television programs

Subject

Form headings
Subject headings / Literary form
Subject headings / Literature
Subject headings / Motion pictures
Subject headings / Television programs

0.09336275 = product of:
  0.373451 = sum of:
    0.373451 = weight(_text_:judged in 684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.373451 = score(doc=684,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.51079464 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.6410246 = idf(docFreq=57, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        0.73111767 = fieldWeight in 684, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          7.6410246 = idf(docFreq=57, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=684)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In a novel approach to information finding in networked environments, each user's specific purpose or "quest" can be represented in numerous ways. The most familiar is a list of keywords, or a natural language sentence or paragraph. More effective is an extended text that has been judged as to relevance. This forms the basis of relevance feedback, as it is used in information retrieval. In the "Ant World" project (Ant World, 1999; Kantor et al., 1999b; Kantor et al., 1999a), the items to be retrieved are not documents, but rather quests, represented by entire collections of judged documents. In order to save space and time we have developed methods for representing these complex entities in a short string of about 1,000 bytes, which we call a "Digital Information Pheromone" (DIP). The principles for determining the DIP for a given quest, and for matching DIPs to each other are presented. The effectiveness of this scheme is explored with some applications to the large judged collections of TREC documents

0.09336275 = product of:
  0.373451 = sum of:
    0.373451 = weight(_text_:judged in 2167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.373451 = score(doc=2167,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.51079464 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.6410246 = idf(docFreq=57, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        0.73111767 = fieldWeight in 2167, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          7.6410246 = idf(docFreq=57, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2167)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This study systematically compares retrievals on 11 topics across five well-known data bases, with MEDLINE's subject indexing as a focus. Each topic was posed by a researcher in the medical behavioral sciences. Each was searches in MEDLINE, EXCERPTA MEDICA, and PSYCHINFO, which permit descriptor searches, and in SCISEARCH and SOCIAL SCISEARCH, which express topics through cited references. Searches on each topic were made with (1) descriptors, (2) cited references, and (3) natural language (a capabiblity common to all five data bases). The researchers who posed the topics judged the results. In every case, the set of records judged relevant was used to to calculate recall, precision, and novelty ratios. Overall, MEDLINE had the highest recall percentage (37%), followed by SSCI (31%). All searches resulted in high precision ratios; novelty ratios of data bases and searches varied widely. Differences in record format among data bases affected the success of the natural language retrievals. Some 445 documents judged relevant were not retrieved from MEDLINE using its descriptors; they were found in MEDLINE through natural language or in an alternative data base. An analysis was performed to examine possible faults in MEDLINE subject indexing as the reason for their nonretrieval. However, no patterns of indexing failure could be seen in those documents subsequently found in MEDLINE through known-item searches. Documents not found in MEDLINE primarily represent failures of coverage - articles were from nonindexed or selectively indexed journals

0.091476426 = product of:
  0.3659057 = sum of:
    0.3659057 = weight(_text_:judged in 3109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3659057 = score(doc=3109,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.51079464 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.6410246 = idf(docFreq=57, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        0.716346 = fieldWeight in 3109, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.6410246 = idf(docFreq=57, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3109)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Many Web sites have begun allowing users to submit items to a collection and tag them with keywords. The folksonomies built from these tags are an interesting topic that has seen little empirical research. This study compared the search information retrieval (IR) performance of folksonomies from social bookmarking Web sites against search engines and subject directories. Thirty-four participants created 103 queries for various information needs. Results from each IR system were collected and participants judged relevance. Folksonomy search results overlapped with those from the other systems, and documents found by both search engines and folksonomies were significantly more likely to be judged relevant than those returned by any single IR system type. The search engines in the study had the highest precision and recall, but the folksonomies fared surprisingly well. Del.icio.us was statistically indistinguishable from the directories in many cases. Overall the directories were more precise than the folksonomies but they had similar recall scores. Better query handling may enhance folksonomy IR performance further. The folksonomies studied were promising, and may be able to improve Web search performance.

0.08919598 = product of:
  0.17839196 = sum of:
    0.030828299 = weight(_text_:und in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030828299 = score(doc=2659,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14826427 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        0.20792803 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
    0.14756367 = weight(_text_:headings in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14756367 = score(doc=2659,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.32437804 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        0.4549126 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Classification

AN 75400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Schlagwortregeln, Schlagwortverzeichnis

LCSH

Subject headings

RVK

AN 75400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Schlagwortregeln, Schlagwortverzeichnis

Subject

Subject headings

0.08695272 = product of:
  0.3478109 = sum of:
    0.3478109 = weight(_text_:headings in 1723) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3478109 = score(doc=1723,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32437804 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        1.0722393 = fieldWeight in 1723, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1723)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.08695272 = product of:
  0.3478109 = sum of:
    0.3478109 = weight(_text_:headings in 1725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3478109 = score(doc=1725,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32437804 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        1.0722393 = fieldWeight in 1725, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1725)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.08695272 = product of:
  0.3478109 = sum of:
    0.3478109 = weight(_text_:headings in 2172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3478109 = score(doc=2172,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32437804 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        1.0722393 = fieldWeight in 2172, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=2172)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.08695272 = product of:
  0.3478109 = sum of:
    0.3478109 = weight(_text_:headings in 1004) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3478109 = score(doc=1004,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.32437804 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        1.0722393 = fieldWeight in 1004, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1004)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

LCSH

Subject headings / Information technology
Subject headings / Electronic data processing

Subject

Subject headings / Information technology
Subject headings / Electronic data processing

0.08695272 = product of:
  0.3478109 = sum of:
    0.3478109 = weight(_text_:headings in 1497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3478109 = score(doc=1497,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.32437804 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        1.0722393 = fieldWeight in 1497, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1497)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Spansih subject headings can be used when searching ILLINET Online. Although Spanish language Bilindex subject headings have been available for more than a decade, the library literature has virtually ignored their existence. Provides a brief introduction to these headings, identifies several Illinois libraries which currently assign them, and presents some examples. Surveys various prospects and problems associated with their use

0.086516865 = product of:
  0.34606746 = sum of:
    0.34606746 = weight(_text_:headings in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.34606746 = score(doc=844,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.32437804 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        1.0668646 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Sears List of Subject Headings (Miller and McCarthy 2010), first published in 1923, is now in its 20th edition. Like most subject headings lists, apart from being a list of preferred (and non-preferred) headings, it also provides patterns, clear instructions, and examples for coining new subject headings not explicitly listed. Key headings form a vital part of the system of coining new headings. It is proposed that more key headings should be designated. Some candidate headings are described. One far-reaching provision seems to be the use of a subdivision of a preferred heading with all of its NTs. Thus, every preferred heading is a potential key heading for all of its NTs. This proposal works on the principle that what is true of a class is true of its narrower classes of all types. Applying this principle will enormously enhance the capacity of the List without adding even an iota to its text and size.

Object

Sears List of Subject Headings

0.08624481 = product of:
  0.34497923 = sum of:
    0.34497923 = weight(_text_:judged in 7019) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.34497923 = score(doc=7019,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.51079464 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.6410246 = idf(docFreq=57, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        0.67537755 = fieldWeight in 7019, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.6410246 = idf(docFreq=57, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7019)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Describes proposed USA legislation and administrative initiatives which aim to build a National Information Infrastructure and thus radically restructure the supporting mechanism for libraries. Details legislative initiatives, the proposed National Technology Initiative, components of the proposed roles for agencies and their involvement in the National Information Infrastructure. Warns that libraries are not longer seen as important cultural institutions but that their role and funding will be judged according to contribution to the national economic welfare

0.085195914 = product of:
  0.34078366 = sum of:
    0.34078366 = weight(_text_:headings in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.34078366 = score(doc=400,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.32437804 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06684897 = queryNorm
        1.0505756 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Scope notes from Library of Congress Subject Headings are examined for 1) adherence to principles enunciated in the introduction to the list; 2) peculiarities of subject headings associated with such notes; 3) the structure of the notes; and 4) typical patterns associated with certain categories of subject headings. Scope notes are shown to enable catalogers to apply subject headings consistently and readers to distinguish related headings knowledgeably.