Search (1415 results, page 3 of 71)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Landry, P.: Multilingual subject access : the linking approach of MACS (2004) 0.09 
    0.08657198 = product of:
  0.17314395 = sum of:
    0.020518534 = weight(_text_:und in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020518534 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13955593 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
    0.15262543 = weight(_text_:heading in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15262543 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.40099442 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The MACS (Multilingual access to subjects) project is one of the many projects that are currently exploring solutions to multilingual subject access to online catalogs. Its strategy is to develop a Web based link and search interface through which equivalents between three Subject Heading Languages: SWD/RSWK (Schlagwortnormdatei/Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog) for German, RAMEAU (Repertoire d'Autorite-Matière Encyclopedique et Alphabetique Unifie) for French and LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings) for English can be created and maintained, and by which users can access online databases in the language of their choice. Factors that have lead to this approach will be examined and the MACS linking strategy will be explained. The trend to using mapping or linking strategies between different controlled vocabularies to create multilingual access challenges the traditional view of the multilingual thesaurus.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: In pursuit of interoperability : can we standardize mapping types? (2011) 0.09 
    0.08657198 = product of:
  0.17314395 = sum of:
    0.020518534 = weight(_text_:und in 788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020518534 = score(doc=788,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13955593 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 788, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=788)
    0.15262543 = weight(_text_:heading in 788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15262543 = score(doc=788,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.40099442 = fieldWeight in 788, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=788)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In the last few years projects such as DESIRE, MACS, CrissCross and KoMoHe have demonstrated the benefits as well as the challenges of mapping between controlled vocabularies. Each project has taken a slightly different approach to the definition and implementation of appropriate types of mapping. The mapping types supported by SKOS are slightly different again. In an ideal world, all major databases would be interconnected; all widely used thesauri, classification schemes and subject heading schemes would map to each other; and all of us would use the same basic types of mapping to enable universal interoperability. Or would we? This paper will discuss the feasibility and desirability of agreeing and implementing standardized mapping types.
    Series
    Bibliotheca Academica - Reihe Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaften; Bd. 1
  3. Weinberg, B.H.: ¬The hidden classification in Library of Congress Subject Headings for Judaica (1993) 0.08 
    0.07731291 = product of:
  0.30925164 = sum of:
    0.30925164 = weight(_text_:judaica in 6161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30925164 = score(doc=6161,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5417902 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.57079595 = fieldWeight in 6161, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6161)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  4. Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993) 0.08 
    0.07710353 = product of:
  0.30841413 = sum of:
    0.30841413 = weight(_text_:heading in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30841413 = score(doc=5611,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.8102998 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis
  5. Chan, L.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Errors and obsolete elements in assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for subject cataloging and subject authority control (1997) 0.08 
    0.07710353 = product of:
  0.30841413 = sum of:
    0.30841413 = weight(_text_:heading in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30841413 = score(doc=1492,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.8102998 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    An analysis of a sample of 9.442 headings assigned by the LoC to bibliographic records disclosed 2 types of invalid headings: those that were erroneous and those that were obsolete. Each type revealed recurring patterns. Errors and obsolete elements occuring in assigned heading involve MARC coding, terminology in main headings and subdivisions, application of subdivisions, and in mechanical elements such as punctuation and capitalization. Different headings (e.g. personal name, corporate name, topical, etc.) display different patterns as well as predominance of errors and obsoleteness. Although the overall error rate is low, an awareness and understanding of patterns of errors and obsolescnce in subject heading strings should contribute to improvement in subject heading assignment and subject authority control
  6. Drabenstott, K.M.: Facilitating geographic subdivision assignment in subject headings (1992) 0.08 
    0.07710353 = product of:
  0.30841413 = sum of:
    0.30841413 = weight(_text_:heading in 3708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30841413 = score(doc=3708,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.8102998 = fieldWeight in 3708, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3708)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Recognises the limitations of the existing files of Library of Congress name and subject authority records for indirect geographic subdivision. Makes recommendations for enhancements to existing authority records, which would enable online systems to assist in subject heading formulation and verify, with limited assistance by human intermediaries, whether geographic subdivision is authorized for use with a particular main heading and whether the correct form of indirect geographic subdivision is authorized for use with a particular main heading and whether the correct form of indirect geographic subdivision is given. A study of subdivided subject headings in a large bibliographic data base forms the basis of the recommendations
  7. Lazinger, S.S.: LC Classification of a library and information science library for maximum shelf retrieval (1984) 0.08 
    0.07710353 = product of:
  0.30841413 = sum of:
    0.30841413 = weight(_text_:heading in 464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30841413 = score(doc=464,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.8102998 = fieldWeight in 464, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=464)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In reclassifying a Library and Information Science library from DDC to LC, an attempt was made to concentrate books with related subject headings on the shelf for maximum shelf retrieval even in cases where the Subject Authorities or C.I.P. assign them varying numbers. Most of the shelf concentration was achieved either by selecting a single number for a given heading and then classifying all books with the heading in that number or by replacing the standard LC number for a heading with one which placed it together with related books on the shelf.
  8. Studwell, W.E.: Two lessons of history : how the development of the descriptive cataloging code and the recent cultural trend towards 'least effort' affect the formulation of a subject heading code (1992) 0.08 
    0.07631271 = product of:
  0.30525085 = sum of:
    0.30525085 = weight(_text_:heading in 5417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30525085 = score(doc=5417,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.80198884 = fieldWeight in 5417, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5417)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  9. Barden, B.R.; Denison, B.: Guide to the SLA loan collection of classification schemes and subject heading lists on deposit at Western Reserve Univ. as of March 20, 1961 (1961) 0.08 
    0.07631271 = product of:
  0.30525085 = sum of:
    0.30525085 = weight(_text_:heading in 6225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30525085 = score(doc=6225,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.80198884 = fieldWeight in 6225, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6225)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  10. Studwell, W.E.; Aggarwal, N.K.: Library of Congress Subject Heading period subdivisions for West Asia and the Near East in general : some proposed additions (1983) 0.08 
    0.07631271 = product of:
  0.30525085 = sum of:
    0.30525085 = weight(_text_:heading in 336) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30525085 = score(doc=336,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.80198884 = fieldWeight in 336, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=336)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  11. Studwell, W.E.; Hamilton, D.A.: Library of Congress Subject Heading period subdivisions for Eastern Europe, excluding the Soviet Union : some proposed additions (1985) 0.08 
    0.07631271 = product of:
  0.30525085 = sum of:
    0.30525085 = weight(_text_:heading in 4916) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30525085 = score(doc=4916,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.80198884 = fieldWeight in 4916, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4916)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  12. Studwell, W.E.; Aggarwal, N.K.: Library of Congress Subject Heading period subdivisions for East Asia, South Asia, and Asia in general : some proposed additions (1983) 0.08 
    0.07631271 = product of:
  0.30525085 = sum of:
    0.30525085 = weight(_text_:heading in 433) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30525085 = score(doc=433,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.80198884 = fieldWeight in 433, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=433)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  13. Dutta, B.: Ranganathan's elucidation of subject in the light of 'Infinity (8)' (2015) 0.07 
    0.072143316 = product of:
  0.14428663 = sum of:
    0.017098779 = weight(_text_:und in 3794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017098779 = score(doc=3794,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13955593 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.12252277 = fieldWeight in 3794, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3794)
    0.12718785 = weight(_text_:heading in 3794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12718785 = score(doc=3794,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.334162 = fieldWeight in 3794, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3794)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This paper reviews Ranganathan's description of subject from mathematical angle. Ranganathan was highly influenced by Nineteenth Century mathematician George Cantor and he used the concept of infinity in developing an axiomatic interpretation of subject. Majority of library scientists interpreted the concept of subject merely as a term or descriptor or heading to include the same in cataloguing and subject indexing. Some library scientists interpreted subject on the basis of document, i.e. from the angle of the concept of aboutness or epistemological potential of the document etc. Some people explained subject from the viewpoint of social, cultural or socio-cultural process. Attempts were made to describe subject from epistemological viewpoint. But S R Ranganathan was the first to develop an axiomatic concept of subject on its own. He built up an independent idea of subject that is ubiquitously pervasive with human cognition process. To develop the basic foundation of subject, he used the mathematical concepts of infinity and infinitesimal and construed the set of subjects or universe of subjects as continuous infinite universe. The subject may also exist in extremely micro-form, which was termed as spot subject and analogized with point, which is dimensionless having only an existence. The influence of Twentieth Century physicist George Gamow on Ranganathan's thought has also been discussed.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft zu Leben und Werk von S.R. Ranganathan.
  14. Das, A.K.; Mishra, S.: S R Ranganathan in Google Scholar and other citation databases (2015) 0.07 
    0.072143316 = product of:
  0.14428663 = sum of:
    0.017098779 = weight(_text_:und in 3797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017098779 = score(doc=3797,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13955593 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.12252277 = fieldWeight in 3797, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3797)
    0.12718785 = weight(_text_:heading in 3797) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12718785 = score(doc=3797,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.334162 = fieldWeight in 3797, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3797)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This paper analyses the scholarly contribution of S R Ranganathan as reflected in Google Scholar Citations, Web of Science, and Scopus. This paper also identifies popularity of his published works, particularly which are highly referred by the researchers and LIS curriculum designers. His top three highly cited books are namely Prolegomena to Library Classification, The Five Laws of Library Science, and Colon Classification. His top three highly referred journal articles are titled "Hidden Roots of Classification", "Subject Heading and Facet Analysis", and "Colon Classification Edition 7 (1971): A Preview". This paper identifies the articles that cited his works extensively and got considerable citations from the other researchers. Top citing journal articles are namely "The Need for a Faceted Classification as the Basis of All Methods of Information Retrieval", "Ranganathan and the Net: Using Facet Analysis to Search and Organise the World Wide Web" and "Grounded Classification: Grounded Theory and Faceted Classification". These citing articles also indicate that Ranganathan is very relevant to today's researchers in interdisciplinary areas, particularly which belong to the fields of computer applications and information systems.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft zu Leben und Werk von S.R. Ranganathan.
  15. Cochrane, P.A.: Subject access - free text and controlled : the case of Papua New Guinea (1985) 0.07 
    0.07194831 = product of:
  0.28779325 = sum of:
    0.28779325 = weight(_text_:heading in 1458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28779325 = score(doc=1458,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.7561223 = fieldWeight in 1458, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1458)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The online catalogue can provide the user with efficient and effective access through a variety of access points. New interests in subject heading is indicated. Keyword access and free text searching are considered alternatice methods. An investigation is suggested into the symbiotic relationship between classification and subject heading
  16. Drabenstott, K.M.: ¬The need for machine-readable authority records for topical subdivisions (1992) 0.07 
    0.07194831 = product of:
  0.28779325 = sum of:
    0.28779325 = weight(_text_:heading in 1502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28779325 = score(doc=1502,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.7561223 = fieldWeight in 1502, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1502)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This paper recognizes the limitations of the existing file of Library of Congress authority records for subject heading assignment and validation. It makes recommendations for a new machine-readable file of authority records for topical subdivisions and for enhancements to the existing subject authority file. The recommended changes qould enable online systems to assist in subject heading formulation and verify, with limited assistance by human intermediaries, the individual components of subdivided headings. A study of subdivided subject headings in a large bibliographic database forms the basis of the recommendations
  17. Nuckolls, K.A.: Subject access to diversity materials : the Library of Congress subject heading shortfall (1994) 0.07 
    0.07194831 = product of:
  0.28779325 = sum of:
    0.28779325 = weight(_text_:heading in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28779325 = score(doc=668,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.7561223 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In the past, there has seemed to be a stubbornness on the part of the Library of Congress to update ethnic and racial, as well as sexual and medical subject headings. Delaying change can frustrate users of today's online and card catalogues. Reviews changes that have occured over the last 20 years and shows how library catalogues can be updated, or at least rendered more useful. Shows how automation can enhance, as well as prevent, subject heading updating
  18. Duncan, D.: IFLA Core Programme for Universal Bibliographic Control and International MARC (UBCIM) and Division of Bibliographic Control reports on activities 1994-1995 : Section on Classification and Indexing (1996) 0.07 
    0.07194831 = product of:
  0.28779325 = sum of:
    0.28779325 = weight(_text_:heading in 4995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28779325 = score(doc=4995,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.7561223 = fieldWeight in 4995, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4995)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Discusses the work of the Section on Classification and Indexing, covering the working group on principles underlying subject heading languages; a state of the art survey of subject heading systems; requirements for a format for classification data; DDC edition 20; open programs at the Istanbul conference; the section newsletter; and cooperative projects
  19. O'Neill, E.T.: OCLC authority control (1994) 0.07 
    0.07194831 = product of:
  0.28779325 = sum of:
    0.28779325 = weight(_text_:heading in 6594) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28779325 = score(doc=6594,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.7561223 = fieldWeight in 6594, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6594)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    A system based authority control system was essential to support OCLC's large database and the number and diversity of its users. The authority control system had to be able to (1) identify nonidentical heading entries in bibliographic records of the same name, geographic place, or subject, and (2) maintain a link from the erroneous form of the heading to the valid form (i.e. cross reference). Over 3.6 million headings have been corrected as part of these efforts
  20. Studwell, W.E.; Hamilton, D.A.: Library of Congress Subject Heading period subdivisions for Eastern Europe excluding the Soviet Union : some proposed additions (1985) 0.07 
    0.07194831 = product of:
  0.28779325 = sum of:
    0.28779325 = weight(_text_:heading in 490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28779325 = score(doc=490,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.38061732 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06292258 = queryNorm
        0.7561223 = fieldWeight in 490, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=490)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Eastern Europe is a complex area for which there are not adequate Library of Congress subject heading period subdivisions. This article offers additional period subdivisions, with justifications, for all the countries and some regions of Eastern Europe, excluding the Soviet Union. Covered are: Europe, Eastern; Czechoslovakia (and three regions); Germany (East); Hungary; Poland; Galicia; Balkan Peninsula; Albania; Bulgaria; Romania; and Yugoslavia (and six regions).

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 32
  • m 3
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 956
  • m 313
  • el 111
  • s 102
  • i 21
  • n 19
  • r 12
  • x 12
  • b 9
  • ? 1
  • h 1
  • l 1
  • p 1
  • v 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications