Search (1210 results, page 1 of 61)

0.24928449 = product of:
  0.49856898 = sum of:
    0.019612228 = weight(_text_:und in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019612228 = score(doc=1476,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13339174 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
    0.47895676 = weight(_text_:hacking in 1476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.47895676 = score(doc=1476,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.5543143 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.216561 = idf(docFreq=11, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        0.86405265 = fieldWeight in 1476, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          9.216561 = idf(docFreq=11, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1476)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The starting point of the following inquiry addresses John Searle's and Ian Hacking's most prominent critique of contemporary "constructionism" in the 1990s. It is stimulated by the astonishing fact that neither Hacking nor Searle take into account Peter Berger's and Thomas Luckmann's classical essay and sociological masterpiece The Social Construction of Reality in their contributions. Critically revisiting Searle's and Hacking's critique on the so-called constructivist approach, the article demonstrates that both authors have failed to put forth a sociologically valid understanding of the approach in question. The following analysis aims to deconstruct the conceptualizations offered by Searle and Hacking, and to reconstruct and defend the original sense of the term "social construction" as most prominently introduced by Berger and Luckmann to sociology, and social sciences in general.

Content

Vgl.: https://philpapers.org/rec/ENDOTV und https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10746-016-9395-3 (DOI: 10.1007/s10746-016-9395-3).

0.20824423 = product of:
  0.83297694 = sum of:
    0.83297694 = weight(_text_:java in 6858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.83297694 = score(doc=6858,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.42386025 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        1.965216 = fieldWeight in 6858, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6858)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Why use Java? Object oriented primer. Java applets. The Java language. Branching and looping. Graphics. Animation and multithreading. Handling exceptions. The Java.awt package. Handling events. Windows, dialogs and menus. Input and output streams. Modifiers and packages. Java and C++

LCSH

Java (Computer program language)

Object

Java

RSWK

Java <Programmiersprache>
World wide web / Seite / Gestaltung / Java <Programmiersprache> (2134) (4231)

Subject

Java (Computer program language)
Java <Programmiersprache>
World wide web / Seite / Gestaltung / Java <Programmiersprache> (2134) (4231)

0.16933677 = product of:
  0.67734706 = sum of:
    0.67734706 = weight(_text_:hacking in 379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.67734706 = score(doc=379,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5543143 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.216561 = idf(docFreq=11, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        1.2219548 = fieldWeight in 379, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.216561 = idf(docFreq=11, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=379)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Vgl. dazu: Hacking, I.: Streit um alternative Passungsverhältnisse

0.16168468 = product of:
  0.6467387 = sum of:
    0.6467387 = weight(_text_:java in 5740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.6467387 = score(doc=5740,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.42386025 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        1.52583 = fieldWeight in 5740, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5740)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The Ovid Java interface is compared with the Ovid Web Gateway and Ovid Windows Client, focusing on functionality from the user's perspective. The Java version draws upon both earlier Web and Windows versions, thus combining the worlds of the Web and application programs. It is concluded that Ovid Java offers enhanced functionality and requires high-end hardware and browser software to run well. Additional enhancements are forthcoming, some dependent upon the further development of Sun Microsystems' Java programming language

Object

Java

0.14659435 = product of:
  0.2931887 = sum of:
    0.05371031 = weight(_text_:und in 2813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05371031 = score(doc=2813,freq=60.0), product of:
        0.13339174 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        0.40265095 = fieldWeight in 2813, product of:
          7.745967 = tf(freq=60.0), with freq of:
            60.0 = termFreq=60.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2813)
    0.23947838 = weight(_text_:hacking in 2813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23947838 = score(doc=2813,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.5543143 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.216561 = idf(docFreq=11, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        0.43202633 = fieldWeight in 2813, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          9.216561 = idf(docFreq=11, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2813)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Suchmaschinen sind der wichtigste Zugangsweg zum Auffinden neuer Netzinhalte. Insgesamt verwendeten nach einer repräsentativen Studie im dritten Quartal 2005 fast 85 Prozent der deutschen Internetnutzer Suchmaschinen. Diese sind inzwischen auch ein Big Business: Gemessen am Börsenwert ist die Suchmaschine Google mit einem Gesamtwert von 80 Mrd. Dollar das wertvollste Medienunternehmen der Welt. Der Konzerngewinn stieg von 2004 auf 2005 um 367 Prozent auf 1,5 Mrd. Dollar. Als Gatekeeper im Internet stellen die Suchmaschinen eine zentrale Herausforderung für Wissenschaft und Forschung dar - letztlich geht es um die Frage der "digitalen Informationsmacht". Mit diesem Band liegt erstmals eine Publikation vor, die die Rolle von Suchmaschinen in der Informationsgesellschaft in den wichtigsten Dimensionen aus verschiedenen Perspektiven wissenschaftlich beleuchtet und dabei hilft, die künftige Suchmaschinenforschung zu systematisieren.

BK

05.20 Kommunikation und Gesellschaft

Classification

AP 18420 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Arten des Nachrichtenwesens, Medientechnik / Internet
05.20 Kommunikation und Gesellschaft

Content

Der Band geht auf die internationale Tagung Die wachsende Macht von Suchmaschinen im Internet: Auswirkungen auf User, Medienpolitik und Medienbusiness bestehend aus einem interdisziplinären wissenschaftlichen Workshop am 26. Juni 2006 und einer Publikumskonferenz am 27. Juni 2006 in Berlin zurück, die vom Lehrstuhl für Journalistik II der Universität Leitung und dem Lehrstuhl für Internationalen Journalismus der UniversitSt Dortmund in Kooperation mit der Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Bereich Medien und Politik, veranstaltet worden ist. In drei Kapiteln werden die zentralen Forschungsfelder aufgegriffen: Das erste Kapitel behandelt die wichtigsten Aspekte im Bereich der Suchmaschinenregulierung und -ökonomie. Es werden Herausforderungen transparent gemacht, die sich gegenwärtig in der Entwicklung befindlichen Regulierungsstrukturen analysiert und Lösungswege erarbeitet. Das zweite Kapitel beschäftigt sich, zum ersten Mal in Form einer Publikation, mit dem Verhältnis von Suchmaschinen und Journalismus. Dabei ist die Frage, inwieweit Suchmaschinen einerseits journalistische Funktionen übernehmen und andererseits Journalisten als Rechercheinstrument dienen und wie sich hierdurch das Gefüge des bisherigen Massenkommunikationssystems verändert, von entscheidender Bedeutung.
Im dritten Kapitel werden die Qualität von Suchmaschinen und das Nutzerverhalten näher beleuchtet. Erkenntnisse über die Güte von Suchmaschinen sind von großer Relevanz, um deren Rolle bei der Informationsvermittlung in einer Gesellschaft angemessen beurteilen zu können. Der Band liefert hier neue Ansätze und Vorschläge, da die Frage nach der Qualität von Suchmaschinen noch nicht ausreichend beantwortet worden ist. Zum anderen ist die Analyse des Nutzerverhaltens grundlegend, um Schlussfolgerungen für die Medienkompetenz als zentrale Schlüsselqualifikation im Informationszeitalter ziehen zu können. Unter den Autoren sind viele der international führende Experten auf dem Gebiet Suchmaschinen, darunter Wissenschaftler der Universitäten Harvard, Yale und Columbia sowie der London School of Economics und der Pariser Sorbonne. Darüber hinaus wurden auch Beiträge von Praktikern, allesamt leitende Redakteure oder Verantwortliche in Medienunternehmen aufgenommen, um deren Erkenntnisse für die Thematik fruchtbar zu machen. Der Band richtet sich neben der Wissenschaft auch an die Praxis, vor allem die Medienaufsicht und -ökonomie sowie an den Journalismus. Er bietet aber auch der allgemein interessierten Öffentlichkeit einen fundierten Einblick in die bisher wenig erforschte Welt der Suchmaschinen.
MARCEL MACHILL / MARKUS BEILER / MARTIN ZENKER: Suchmaschinenforschung. Überblick und Systematisierung eines interdisziplinären Forschungsfeldes TEIL 1: SUCHMASCHINENREGULIERUNG UND -ÖKONOMIE URS GASSER / JAMES THURMAN: Themen und Herausforderungen der Regulierung von Suchmaschinen NORBERT SCHNEIDER: Die Notwendigkeit der Suchmaschinenregulierung aus Sicht eines Regulierers WOLFGANG SCHULZ / THORSTEN HELD: Der Index auf dem Index? Selbstzensur und Zensur bei Suchmaschinen BORIS ROTENBERG: Towards Personalised Search: EU Data Protection Law and its Implications for Media Pluralism ELIZABETH VAN COUVERING: The Economy of Navigation: Search Engines, Search Optimisation and Search Results THEO RÖHLE: Machtkonzepte in der Suchmaschinenforschung TEIL 2: SUCHMASCHINEN UND JOURNALISMUS VINZENZ WYSS / GUIDO KEEL: Google als Trojanisches Pferd? Konsequenzen der Internet-Recherche von Journalisten für die journalistische Qualität NIC NEWMAN: Search Strategies and Activities of BBC News Interactive JÖRG SADROZINSKI: Suchmaschinen und öffentlich-rechtlicher Onlinejournalismus am Beispiel tagesschau.de HELMUT MARTIN-JUNG: Suchmaschinen und Qualitätsjournalismus PHILIP GRAF DÖNHOFF / CHRISTIAN BARTELS: Online-Recherche bei NETZEITUNG.DE SUSAN KEITH: Searching for News Headlines: Connections between Unresolved Hyperlinking Issues and a New Battle over Copyright Online AXEL BUNDENTHAL: Suchmaschinen als Herausforderung für Archive und Dokumentationsbereiche am Beispiel des ZDF BENJAMIN PETERS: The Search Engine Democracy: Metaphors and Muhammad
TEIL 3: QUALITÄT VON SUCHMASCHINEN UND NUTZERVERHALTEN] DIRK LEWANDOWSKI: Mit welchen Kennzahlen lässt sich die Qualität von Suchmaschinen messen? BENJAMIN EDELMAN: Assessing and Improving the Safety of Internet Search Engines HENDRIK SPECK / FREDERIC PHILIPP THIELE: Playing the Search Engines or Hacking the Box: Möglichkeiten und Gefahren von Suchmaschinen-Hacking am Beispiel von Google NATALIE KINK / THOMAS HESS: Suchmaschinen als Substitut traditioneller Medien? Erste Ergebnisse einer Studie zum Wandel der Informationsbeschaffung durch Suchmaschinen DIVINA FRAU-MEIGS: Minding the Gatekeepers: Search Engines for Young People, and the Regulatory Riddle of Harmful Content an Environmental Cognition Perspective MARCEL MACHILL / MARKUS BEILER / ULRIKE NEUMANN: Leistungsfähigkeit von wissenschaftlichen Suchmaschinen. Ein Experiment am Beispiel von Google Scholar

RVK

AP 18420 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Arten des Nachrichtenwesens, Medientechnik / Internet

0.14578176 = product of:
  0.2915635 = sum of:
    0.23102623 = weight(_text_:java in 2393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23102623 = score(doc=2393,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42386025 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        0.5450528 = fieldWeight in 2393, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2393)
    0.060537264 = weight(_text_:und in 2393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060537264 = score(doc=2393,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.13339174 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        0.4538307 = fieldWeight in 2393, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2393)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Komplexe Aufgaben und Probleme werden heute üblicherweise im Team bearbeitet und gelöst. Das gilt insbesondere für Softwareprojekte, denn die Entwicklung komplexer Softwaresysteme findet heutzutage meistens arbeitsteilig in - zunehmend räumlich verteilten - Teams statt. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird zum einen ein rollenbasiertes Konzept vorgestellt, das virtuellen Lernteams bei der Zusammenarbeit einen virtuellen Tutor zur Seite stellt, der dem Team im Rahmen von Rollendefiziten adaptierte Hilfestellung bietet und so die Lerneffektivität unterstützt. Zum anderen wird gezeigt, wie das Zusammenspiel zweier spezialisierter Systeme (VitaminL und K3) im Kontext des Blended Learning echte Mehrwerte in E-Learning-Szenarien bringen kann. Die in Benutzertests und einer Lehrveranstaltung ermittelten Evaluierungsergebnisse lassen auf die Tragfähigkeit des rollenbasierten, tutoriellen Konzepts schließen und decken gleichzeitig großes Weiterentwicklungpotenzial auf.

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.1, S.37-40

0.14111398 = product of:
  0.5644559 = sum of:
    0.5644559 = weight(_text_:hacking in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5644559 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5543143 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.216561 = idf(docFreq=11, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        1.0182958 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.216561 = idf(docFreq=11, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Defines Electronic Data Interchange (EDI) as the electronic transfer from computer to computer of data using an agreed standard to structure a message. Distinguishes between EDI and the Internet. Discusses copyright contracts; liability for statements, data protextion, and security/hacking

0.14002304 = product of:
  0.56009215 = sum of:
    0.56009215 = weight(_text_:java in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.56009215 = score(doc=2051,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.42386025 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        1.3214076 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Object

Java

0.13839406 = product of:
  0.27678812 = sum of:
    0.23102623 = weight(_text_:java in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23102623 = score(doc=3593,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42386025 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        0.5450528 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
    0.04576187 = weight(_text_:und in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04576187 = score(doc=3593,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13339174 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        0.34306374 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Internet verändert die Software-Szene / Java macht Dampf / PC bekommt Konkurrenz / Aufgeweckte Riesen gegen innovative Zwerge / Intranet heißt der neue Renner

Content

Das Internet boomt. Rund um den Globus basteln etablierte EDV-Konzerne und Branchenneulinge an Hard- und Software für das Netz der Netze. Glaubt man den Auguren, läutet seine Beliebtheit eine Revolution in der Informationstechnik ein. Der Ära der Großrechner und der Personalcomputer soll ein Zeitalter folgen, in dem 'das Netz der Computer' ist. Wer dann die Fäden ziehen wird, ist längst nicht ausgemacht. Ob herkömmliche PC mit ihren Programmen die Spinne im Netz bleiben oder neue Geräte und Software sich breitmachen, darüber wird derzeit lebhaft diskutiert

0.13201499 = product of:
  0.52805996 = sum of:
    0.52805996 = weight(_text_:java in 6015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.52805996 = score(doc=6015,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42386025 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        1.2458351 = fieldWeight in 6015, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6015)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Object

JAVA

0.13201499 = product of:
  0.52805996 = sum of:
    0.52805996 = weight(_text_:java in 45) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.52805996 = score(doc=45,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.42386025 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        1.2458351 = fieldWeight in 45, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=45)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Ovid Technologies is launching its Java search client to enable users to access Ovid's scientific databases on the Web with full search capabilities irrespective of the type of computer used. Explains the differences between Java and HTML. The Java client increases search speed by several orders of magnitude. The Ovid client does not need to wait for individual pages to load and incorporates multi-tasking. The interface includes tree displays; thesauri; mapping; explode/implode; search fields and context sensitive help. Display; save; and e-mail are available from the client

0.12695359 = product of:
  0.25390717 = sum of:
    0.23102623 = weight(_text_:java in 1604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23102623 = score(doc=1604,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42386025 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        0.5450528 = fieldWeight in 1604, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1604)
    0.022880934 = weight(_text_:und in 1604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022880934 = score(doc=1604,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13339174 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        0.17153187 = fieldWeight in 1604, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1604)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

iQvoc is a new open source SKOS-XL vocabulary management tool developed by the Federal Environment Agency, Germany, and innoQ Deutschland GmbH. Its immediate purpose is maintaining and publishing reference vocabularies in the upcoming Linked Data cloud of environmental information, but it may be easily adapted to host any SKOS- XL compliant vocabulary. iQvoc is implemented as a Ruby on Rails application running on top of JRuby - the Java implementation of the Ruby Programming Language. To increase the user experience when editing content, iQvoc uses heavily the JavaScript library jQuery.

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.115513116 = product of:
  0.46205246 = sum of:
    0.46205246 = weight(_text_:java in 5463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.46205246 = score(doc=5463,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.42386025 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        1.0901057 = fieldWeight in 5463, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5463)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

A spell book for mastering the WWW. Step by step, readers are taught how to use the Internet efficiently, and, in particular, how to publish information on the Web. After completing this book, the reader will be able, for example, to create stunning Web home pages and even take the first steps in Java programming. There are many books on the net bound to either one product, e.g. Mosaic, or to one topic, HTML. Mesaric, on the other hand, covers all WWW-related topics and all products which are in popular use. The magic revealed includes common data formats (HTML, PDF, JPEG, GIF), an introduction to Java and Java Srcipt, emerging technologies such as Hyper-G, hypermedia authoring with Haemony and Amadeus, information about ATM, TeleScript, and much more

Object

JAVA

0.115513116 = product of:
  0.46205246 = sum of:
    0.46205246 = weight(_text_:java in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.46205246 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42386025 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        1.0901057 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.110697925 = product of:
  0.4427917 = sum of:
    0.4427917 = weight(_text_:java in 6217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4427917 = score(doc=6217,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.42386025 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        1.0446644 = fieldWeight in 6217, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6217)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

A detailed description of how to use Java applets and Common Gateway Interface (CGI)/Dynamic Link Library (DLL) programs for Web publication of textual databases. The advantages of Java applets include low cost, flexible and visually appealing search interfaces, and the ability to be embedded in HTML pages, eliminating the need for Internet service provider permissions for their use. Highlights the FindIt family of Java applets from DoubleOLogic as one of the best product lines in the category. CGI programs may be written in Perl, Java, or some other language, and like DLL programs, must be installed on the server side. Notes that small-scale CGI and DLL applications cost from $150 to $8,000. Highlights Insight from Enigma Inc. as an excellent program at the high end of the cost range

0.1000373 = product of:
  0.4001492 = sum of:
    0.4001492 = weight(_text_:java in 6014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4001492 = score(doc=6014,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.42386025 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        0.94405925 = fieldWeight in 6014, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6014)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Most books on the Internet describe it from the user's end. This one, however, is unique in its focus on serving information on the WWW. It presents everything from the basics to advanced techniques and will thus prove invaluable to site administrators and developers. The author - an expert developer and researcher at UCSD - covers such topics as HTML 3.0, serving documents, interfaces, WWW utilities and browsers such as Netscape. Fisher also includes an introduction to programming with JAVA and JAVA sript, as well as the complete VRML 1.0 specification

Object

JAVA

0.1000373 = product of:
  0.4001492 = sum of:
    0.4001492 = weight(_text_:java in 4612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4001492 = score(doc=4612,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.42386025 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        0.94405925 = fieldWeight in 4612, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4612)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Discusses drawbacks of the Java programming language, and proposes some potential improvements for concurrent object-oriented software development. Java's passive object model does not provide an effective means for building distributed applications, critical for the future of Web-based next-generation information systems. Suggests improvements to Java's existing mechanisms for maintaining consistency across multiple threads, sending asynchronous messages and controlling resources. Drives the discussion with examples and suggestions from work on the Actor model of computation

Object

Java

0.1000373 = product of:
  0.4001492 = sum of:
    0.4001492 = weight(_text_:java in 6896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4001492 = score(doc=6896,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.42386025 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        0.94405925 = fieldWeight in 6896, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6896)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This paper proposes the use of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) as a language for modelling ontologies for Web resources and the knowledge contained within them. To provide a mechanism for serialising and processing object diagrams representing knowledge, a pair of XSI-T stylesheets have been developed to map from XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) encodings of class diagrams to corresponding RDF schemas and to Java classes representing the concepts in the ontologies. The Java code includes methods for marshalling and unmarshalling object-oriented information between in-memory data structures and RDF serialisations of that information. This provides a convenient mechanism for Java applications to share knowledge on the Web

0.09901124 = product of:
  0.39604497 = sum of:
    0.39604497 = weight(_text_:java in 2035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.39604497 = score(doc=2035,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42386025 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        0.9343763 = fieldWeight in 2035, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2035)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.09901124 = product of:
  0.39604497 = sum of:
    0.39604497 = weight(_text_:java in 2050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.39604497 = score(doc=2050,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42386025 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06014329 = queryNorm
        0.9343763 = fieldWeight in 2050, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2050)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)