Search (1213 results, page 1 of 61)

0.20879975 = product of:
  0.835199 = sum of:
    0.835199 = weight(_text_:java in 6858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.835199 = score(doc=6858,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.42499092 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        1.965216 = fieldWeight in 6858, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6858)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Why use Java? Object oriented primer. Java applets. The Java language. Branching and looping. Graphics. Animation and multithreading. Handling exceptions. The Java.awt package. Handling events. Windows, dialogs and menus. Input and output streams. Modifiers and packages. Java and C++

LCSH

Java (Computer program language)

Object

Java

RSWK

Java <Programmiersprache>
World wide web / Seite / Gestaltung / Java <Programmiersprache> (2134) (4231)

Subject

Java (Computer program language)
Java <Programmiersprache>
World wide web / Seite / Gestaltung / Java <Programmiersprache> (2134) (4231)

0.16211598 = product of:
  0.6484639 = sum of:
    0.6484639 = weight(_text_:java in 5740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.6484639 = score(doc=5740,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.42499092 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        1.52583 = fieldWeight in 5740, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5740)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The Ovid Java interface is compared with the Ovid Web Gateway and Ovid Windows Client, focusing on functionality from the user's perspective. The Java version draws upon both earlier Web and Windows versions, thus combining the worlds of the Web and application programs. It is concluded that Ovid Java offers enhanced functionality and requires high-end hardware and browser software to run well. Additional enhancements are forthcoming, some dependent upon the further development of Sun Microsystems' Java programming language

Object

Java

0.14723705 = product of:
  0.2944741 = sum of:
    0.016387122 = weight(_text_:und in 3105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016387122 = score(doc=3105,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13374756 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        0.12252277 = fieldWeight in 3105, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3105)
    0.27808696 = weight(_text_:helen in 3105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27808696 = score(doc=3105,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5509661 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.1365185 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        0.5047261 = fieldWeight in 3105, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.1365185 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3105)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Once upon a time, the thesaurus was venerated. It marked a breakthrough in the retrieval of very specific needles of information hidden in large haystacks. Some of the veneration rubbed off on to the trained information professionals, who alone mastered the occult art of using it to concoct effective search strategies. All this was in the time before we had a computer on every desk, when a collection of 10,000 articles was considered large, and long before the Google era. But now, who has the patience to consult a complicated thesaurus? Only a dedicated few. Has the thesaurus passed its sell-by date? And even its use-by date? These questions, and more, were tossed around at the Great Debate by a community of enthusiasts. While some limitations of the old-fashioned (?) thesaurus were noted, it still received a happy vote of confidence at the end. - Judi Vernau (2015) First speaker for the proposition - Vanda Broughton (2015) First speaker for the opposition - Helen Lippell (2015) Second speaker for the proposition - Leonard Will (2015) Second speaker for the opposition - Cross-examination of expert witnesses - Martin White (2015) Questions and discussion from the floor

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.14617062 = product of:
  0.29234123 = sum of:
    0.2316425 = weight(_text_:java in 2393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2316425 = score(doc=2393,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42499092 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        0.5450528 = fieldWeight in 2393, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2393)
    0.060698748 = weight(_text_:und in 2393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060698748 = score(doc=2393,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.13374756 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        0.4538307 = fieldWeight in 2393, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2393)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Komplexe Aufgaben und Probleme werden heute üblicherweise im Team bearbeitet und gelöst. Das gilt insbesondere für Softwareprojekte, denn die Entwicklung komplexer Softwaresysteme findet heutzutage meistens arbeitsteilig in - zunehmend räumlich verteilten - Teams statt. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird zum einen ein rollenbasiertes Konzept vorgestellt, das virtuellen Lernteams bei der Zusammenarbeit einen virtuellen Tutor zur Seite stellt, der dem Team im Rahmen von Rollendefiziten adaptierte Hilfestellung bietet und so die Lerneffektivität unterstützt. Zum anderen wird gezeigt, wie das Zusammenspiel zweier spezialisierter Systeme (VitaminL und K3) im Kontext des Blended Learning echte Mehrwerte in E-Learning-Szenarien bringen kann. Die in Benutzertests und einer Lehrveranstaltung ermittelten Evaluierungsergebnisse lassen auf die Tragfähigkeit des rollenbasierten, tutoriellen Konzepts schließen und decken gleichzeitig großes Weiterentwicklungpotenzial auf.

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.1, S.37-40

0.14039655 = product of:
  0.5615862 = sum of:
    0.5615862 = weight(_text_:java in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5615862 = score(doc=2051,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.42499092 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        1.3214076 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Object

Java

0.13876322 = product of:
  0.27752644 = sum of:
    0.2316425 = weight(_text_:java in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2316425 = score(doc=3593,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42499092 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        0.5450528 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
    0.04588394 = weight(_text_:und in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04588394 = score(doc=3593,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13374756 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        0.34306374 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Internet verändert die Software-Szene / Java macht Dampf / PC bekommt Konkurrenz / Aufgeweckte Riesen gegen innovative Zwerge / Intranet heißt der neue Renner

Content

Das Internet boomt. Rund um den Globus basteln etablierte EDV-Konzerne und Branchenneulinge an Hard- und Software für das Netz der Netze. Glaubt man den Auguren, läutet seine Beliebtheit eine Revolution in der Informationstechnik ein. Der Ära der Großrechner und der Personalcomputer soll ein Zeitalter folgen, in dem 'das Netz der Computer' ist. Wer dann die Fäden ziehen wird, ist längst nicht ausgemacht. Ob herkömmliche PC mit ihren Programmen die Spinne im Netz bleiben oder neue Geräte und Software sich breitmachen, darüber wird derzeit lebhaft diskutiert

0.13306376 = product of:
  0.26612753 = sum of:
    0.09927536 = weight(_text_:java in 378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09927536 = score(doc=378,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42499092 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        0.23359407 = fieldWeight in 378, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=378)
    0.16685216 = weight(_text_:helen in 378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16685216 = score(doc=378,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5509661 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.1365185 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        0.30283564 = fieldWeight in 378, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.1365185 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=378)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Long Papers * Suggestions for OWL 3, Pascal Hitzler. * BestMap: Context-Aware SKOS Vocabulary Mappings in OWL 2, Rinke Hoekstra. * Mechanisms for Importing Modules, Bijan Parsia, Ulrike Sattler and Thomas Schneider. * A Syntax for Rules in OWL 2, Birte Glimm, Matthew Horridge, Bijan Parsia and Peter Patel-Schneider. * PelletSpatial: A Hybrid RCC-8 and RDF/OWL Reasoning and Query Engine, Markus Stocker and Evren Sirin. * The OWL API: A Java API for Working with OWL 2 Ontologies, Matthew Horridge and Sean Bechhofer. * From Justifications to Proofs for Entailments in OWL, Matthew Horridge, Bijan Parsia and Ulrike Sattler. * A Solution for the Man-Man Problem in the Family History Knowledge Base, Dmitry Tsarkov, Ulrike Sattler and Robert Stevens. * Towards Integrity Constraints in OWL, Evren Sirin and Jiao Tao. * Processing OWL2 ontologies using Thea: An application of logic programming, Vangelis Vassiliadis, Jan Wielemaker and Chris Mungall. * Reasoning in Metamodeling Enabled Ontologies, Nophadol Jekjantuk, Gerd Gröner and Jeff Z. Pan.
Demo/Position Papers * Conjunctive Query Answering in Distributed Ontology Systems for Ontologies with Large OWL ABoxes, Xueying Chen and Michel Dumontier. * Node-Link and Containment Methods in Ontology Visualization, Julia Dmitrieva and Fons J. Verbeek. * A JC3IEDM OWL-DL Ontology, Steven Wartik. * Semantically Enabled Temporal Reasoning in a Virtual Observatory, Patrick West, Eric Rozell, Stephan Zednik, Peter Fox and Deborah L. McGuinness. * Developing an Ontology from the Application Up, James Malone, Tomasz Adamusiak, Ele Holloway, Misha Kapushesky and Helen Parkinson.

0.13236715 = product of:
  0.5294686 = sum of:
    0.5294686 = weight(_text_:java in 6015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5294686 = score(doc=6015,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42499092 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        1.2458351 = fieldWeight in 6015, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6015)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Object

JAVA

0.13236715 = product of:
  0.5294686 = sum of:
    0.5294686 = weight(_text_:java in 45) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5294686 = score(doc=45,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.42499092 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        1.2458351 = fieldWeight in 45, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=45)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Ovid Technologies is launching its Java search client to enable users to access Ovid's scientific databases on the Web with full search capabilities irrespective of the type of computer used. Explains the differences between Java and HTML. The Java client increases search speed by several orders of magnitude. The Ovid client does not need to wait for individual pages to load and incorporates multi-tasking. The interface includes tree displays; thesauri; mapping; explode/implode; search fields and context sensitive help. Display; save; and e-mail are available from the client

0.12729223 = product of:
  0.25458446 = sum of:
    0.2316425 = weight(_text_:java in 1604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2316425 = score(doc=1604,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42499092 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        0.5450528 = fieldWeight in 1604, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1604)
    0.02294197 = weight(_text_:und in 1604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02294197 = score(doc=1604,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13374756 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        0.17153187 = fieldWeight in 1604, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1604)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

iQvoc is a new open source SKOS-XL vocabulary management tool developed by the Federal Environment Agency, Germany, and innoQ Deutschland GmbH. Its immediate purpose is maintaining and publishing reference vocabularies in the upcoming Linked Data cloud of environmental information, but it may be easily adapted to host any SKOS- XL compliant vocabulary. iQvoc is implemented as a Ruby on Rails application running on top of JRuby - the Java implementation of the Ruby Programming Language. To increase the user experience when editing content, iQvoc uses heavily the JavaScript library jQuery.

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.117982306 = product of:
  0.47192922 = sum of:
    0.47192922 = weight(_text_:helen in 1458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.47192922 = score(doc=1458,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.5509661 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.1365185 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        0.8565486 = fieldWeight in 1458, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          9.1365185 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1458)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Helen Brownson was a federal government employee from 1942 to 1970. At a time when scientific data were becoming exceedingly hard to manage, Brownson was instrumental in coordinating national and international efforts for more efficient, cost-effective, and universal information exchange. Her most significant contributions to documentation/information science were during her years at the National Science Foundation's Office of Scientific Information. From 1951 to 1966, Brownson played a key role in identifying and subsequently distributing government funds toward projects that sought to resolve information-handling problems of the time: information access, preservation, storage, classification, and retrieval. She is credited for communicating the need for information systems and indexing mechanisms to have stricter criteria, standards, and evaluation methods; laying the foundation for present-day NSF-funded computational linguistics projects; and founding several pertinent documentation/information science publications including the Annual Review of Information Science and Technology.

0.11582125 = product of:
  0.463285 = sum of:
    0.463285 = weight(_text_:java in 5463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.463285 = score(doc=5463,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.42499092 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        1.0901057 = fieldWeight in 5463, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5463)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

A spell book for mastering the WWW. Step by step, readers are taught how to use the Internet efficiently, and, in particular, how to publish information on the Web. After completing this book, the reader will be able, for example, to create stunning Web home pages and even take the first steps in Java programming. There are many books on the net bound to either one product, e.g. Mosaic, or to one topic, HTML. Mesaric, on the other hand, covers all WWW-related topics and all products which are in popular use. The magic revealed includes common data formats (HTML, PDF, JPEG, GIF), an introduction to Java and Java Srcipt, emerging technologies such as Hyper-G, hypermedia authoring with Haemony and Amadeus, information about ATM, TeleScript, and much more

Object

JAVA

0.11582125 = product of:
  0.463285 = sum of:
    0.463285 = weight(_text_:java in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.463285 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42499092 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        1.0901057 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.11099322 = product of:
  0.4439729 = sum of:
    0.4439729 = weight(_text_:java in 6217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4439729 = score(doc=6217,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.42499092 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        1.0446644 = fieldWeight in 6217, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6217)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

A detailed description of how to use Java applets and Common Gateway Interface (CGI)/Dynamic Link Library (DLL) programs for Web publication of textual databases. The advantages of Java applets include low cost, flexible and visually appealing search interfaces, and the ability to be embedded in HTML pages, eliminating the need for Internet service provider permissions for their use. Highlights the FindIt family of Java applets from DoubleOLogic as one of the best product lines in the category. CGI programs may be written in Perl, Java, or some other language, and like DLL programs, must be installed on the server side. Notes that small-scale CGI and DLL applications cost from $150 to $8,000. Highlights Insight from Enigma Inc. as an excellent program at the high end of the cost range

0.10030416 = product of:
  0.40121663 = sum of:
    0.40121663 = weight(_text_:java in 6014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.40121663 = score(doc=6014,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.42499092 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        0.94405925 = fieldWeight in 6014, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6014)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Most books on the Internet describe it from the user's end. This one, however, is unique in its focus on serving information on the WWW. It presents everything from the basics to advanced techniques and will thus prove invaluable to site administrators and developers. The author - an expert developer and researcher at UCSD - covers such topics as HTML 3.0, serving documents, interfaces, WWW utilities and browsers such as Netscape. Fisher also includes an introduction to programming with JAVA and JAVA sript, as well as the complete VRML 1.0 specification

Object

JAVA

0.10030416 = product of:
  0.40121663 = sum of:
    0.40121663 = weight(_text_:java in 4612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.40121663 = score(doc=4612,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.42499092 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        0.94405925 = fieldWeight in 4612, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4612)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Discusses drawbacks of the Java programming language, and proposes some potential improvements for concurrent object-oriented software development. Java's passive object model does not provide an effective means for building distributed applications, critical for the future of Web-based next-generation information systems. Suggests improvements to Java's existing mechanisms for maintaining consistency across multiple threads, sending asynchronous messages and controlling resources. Drives the discussion with examples and suggestions from work on the Actor model of computation

Object

Java

0.10030416 = product of:
  0.40121663 = sum of:
    0.40121663 = weight(_text_:java in 6896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.40121663 = score(doc=6896,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.42499092 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        0.94405925 = fieldWeight in 6896, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6896)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This paper proposes the use of the Unified Modeling Language (UML) as a language for modelling ontologies for Web resources and the knowledge contained within them. To provide a mechanism for serialising and processing object diagrams representing knowledge, a pair of XSI-T stylesheets have been developed to map from XML Metadata Interchange (XMI) encodings of class diagrams to corresponding RDF schemas and to Java classes representing the concepts in the ontologies. The Java code includes methods for marshalling and unmarshalling object-oriented information between in-memory data structures and RDF serialisations of that information. This provides a convenient mechanism for Java applications to share knowledge on the Web

0.09927536 = product of:
  0.39710143 = sum of:
    0.39710143 = weight(_text_:java in 2035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.39710143 = score(doc=2035,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42499092 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        0.9343763 = fieldWeight in 2035, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2035)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.09927536 = product of:
  0.39710143 = sum of:
    0.39710143 = weight(_text_:java in 2050) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.39710143 = score(doc=2050,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42499092 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        0.9343763 = fieldWeight in 2050, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2050)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.097330436 = product of:
  0.38932174 = sum of:
    0.38932174 = weight(_text_:helen in 1523) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.38932174 = score(doc=1523,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5509661 = queryWeight, product of:
          9.1365185 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06030372 = queryNorm
        0.7066165 = fieldWeight in 1523, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          9.1365185 = idf(docFreq=12, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1523)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The WWW represents the final step in the evolution of the Internet and is a tool with many practical applications for library training. 2 such WWW applications are discussed in light of projects undertaken in the Helen Topping Architecture and Fine Arts Library at Southern California University. The WWW may be used as a resource in the library as a source of content which must be taught and should be presented to users along with the same information literacy skills which must accompany any resource. The WWW may be used as a publishing tool where the content is created according to the particular instructional need or situation. This usage involves the technology of the WWW rather than its content