Search (1353 results, page 1 of 68)

0.287218 = product of:
  0.574436 = sum of:
    0.35423842 = weight(_text_:java in 3079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.35423842 = score(doc=3079,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.45955986 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        0.7708211 = fieldWeight in 3079, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3079)
    0.22019759 = weight(_text_:holdings in 3079) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22019759 = score(doc=3079,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43088168 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6077175 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        0.51103956 = fieldWeight in 3079, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.6077175 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3079)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Feature on OCLC's SiteSearch suite of software, first introduced in 1992, and how it is helping over 250 libraries integrate and manage their electronic library collections. Describes the new features of version 4.0, released in Apr 1997, which include a new interface, Java based architecture, and an online documentation and training site. Gives an account of how Java is helping the Georgia Library Learning Online (GALILEO) project to keep pace on the WWW; the use of SiteSearch by libraries to customize their interface to electronic resources; and gives details of Project Athena (Assessing Technological Horizons to Educate the Nashville Area), which is using OCLC SiteSearch to allow area library users to search the holdings of public and university libraries simultaneously

0.2257836 = product of:
  0.9031344 = sum of:
    0.9031344 = weight(_text_:java in 6858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.9031344 = score(doc=6858,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.45955986 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        1.965216 = fieldWeight in 6858, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6858)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Why use Java? Object oriented primer. Java applets. The Java language. Branching and looping. Graphics. Animation and multithreading. Handling exceptions. The Java.awt package. Handling events. Windows, dialogs and menus. Input and output streams. Modifiers and packages. Java and C++

LCSH

Java (Computer program language)

Object

Java

RSWK

Java <Programmiersprache>
World wide web / Seite / Gestaltung / Java <Programmiersprache> (2134) (4231)

Subject

Java (Computer program language)
Java <Programmiersprache>
World wide web / Seite / Gestaltung / Java <Programmiersprache> (2134) (4231)

0.20172086 = product of:
  0.40344173 = sum of:
    0.21470092 = weight(_text_:java in 2656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21470092 = score(doc=2656,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.45955986 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        0.46718815 = fieldWeight in 2656, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2656)
    0.1887408 = weight(_text_:holdings in 2656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1887408 = score(doc=2656,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43088168 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6077175 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        0.43803394 = fieldWeight in 2656, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.6077175 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2656)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Many information professionals feel that the time is still far off when the WWW can offer the combined funtionality and content of traditional online and CD-ROM databases, but there have been a number of recent Web developments to reflect on. Describes the testing and launch by Ovid of its Java client which, in effect, allows access to its databases on the Web with full search functionality, and the initiative of Euromonitor in providing Web access to its whole collection of consumer research reports and its entire database of business sources. Also reviews the service of a newcomer to the information scene, Information Quest (IQ) founded by Dawson Holdings which has made an agreement with Infonautics to offer access to its Electric Library database thus adding over 1.000 reference, consumer and business publications to its Web based journal service

0.17530257 = product of:
  0.70121026 = sum of:
    0.70121026 = weight(_text_:java in 5740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.70121026 = score(doc=5740,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.45955986 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        1.52583 = fieldWeight in 5740, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5740)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The Ovid Java interface is compared with the Ovid Web Gateway and Ovid Windows Client, focusing on functionality from the user's perspective. The Java version draws upon both earlier Web and Windows versions, thus combining the worlds of the Web and application programs. It is concluded that Ovid Java offers enhanced functionality and requires high-end hardware and browser software to run well. Additional enhancements are forthcoming, some dependent upon the further development of Sun Microsystems' Java programming language

Object

Java

0.15806021 = product of:
  0.31612042 = sum of:
    0.2504844 = weight(_text_:java in 2393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2504844 = score(doc=2393,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.45955986 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        0.5450528 = fieldWeight in 2393, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2393)
    0.06563601 = weight(_text_:und in 2393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06563601 = score(doc=2393,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.14462665 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        0.4538307 = fieldWeight in 2393, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2393)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Komplexe Aufgaben und Probleme werden heute üblicherweise im Team bearbeitet und gelöst. Das gilt insbesondere für Softwareprojekte, denn die Entwicklung komplexer Softwaresysteme findet heutzutage meistens arbeitsteilig in - zunehmend räumlich verteilten - Teams statt. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird zum einen ein rollenbasiertes Konzept vorgestellt, das virtuellen Lernteams bei der Zusammenarbeit einen virtuellen Tutor zur Seite stellt, der dem Team im Rahmen von Rollendefiziten adaptierte Hilfestellung bietet und so die Lerneffektivität unterstützt. Zum anderen wird gezeigt, wie das Zusammenspiel zweier spezialisierter Systeme (VitaminL und K3) im Kontext des Blended Learning echte Mehrwerte in E-Learning-Szenarien bringen kann. Die in Benutzertests und einer Lehrveranstaltung ermittelten Evaluierungsergebnisse lassen auf die Tragfähigkeit des rollenbasierten, tutoriellen Konzepts schließen und decken gleichzeitig großes Weiterentwicklungpotenzial auf.

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 59(2008) H.1, S.37-40

0.15181647 = product of:
  0.6072659 = sum of:
    0.6072659 = weight(_text_:java in 2051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.6072659 = score(doc=2051,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.45955986 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        1.3214076 = fieldWeight in 2051, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2051)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Object

Java

0.15005028 = product of:
  0.30010056 = sum of:
    0.2504844 = weight(_text_:java in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2504844 = score(doc=3593,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.45955986 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        0.5450528 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
    0.049616158 = weight(_text_:und in 3593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049616158 = score(doc=3593,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14462665 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        0.34306374 = fieldWeight in 3593, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3593)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Internet verändert die Software-Szene / Java macht Dampf / PC bekommt Konkurrenz / Aufgeweckte Riesen gegen innovative Zwerge / Intranet heißt der neue Renner

Content

Das Internet boomt. Rund um den Globus basteln etablierte EDV-Konzerne und Branchenneulinge an Hard- und Software für das Netz der Netze. Glaubt man den Auguren, läutet seine Beliebtheit eine Revolution in der Informationstechnik ein. Der Ära der Großrechner und der Personalcomputer soll ein Zeitalter folgen, in dem 'das Netz der Computer' ist. Wer dann die Fäden ziehen wird, ist längst nicht ausgemacht. Ob herkömmliche PC mit ihren Programmen die Spinne im Netz bleiben oder neue Geräte und Software sich breitmachen, darüber wird derzeit lebhaft diskutiert

0.14313395 = product of:
  0.5725358 = sum of:
    0.5725358 = weight(_text_:java in 6015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5725358 = score(doc=6015,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.45955986 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        1.2458351 = fieldWeight in 6015, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6015)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Object

JAVA

0.14313395 = product of:
  0.5725358 = sum of:
    0.5725358 = weight(_text_:java in 45) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5725358 = score(doc=45,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.45955986 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        1.2458351 = fieldWeight in 45, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=45)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Ovid Technologies is launching its Java search client to enable users to access Ovid's scientific databases on the Web with full search capabilities irrespective of the type of computer used. Explains the differences between Java and HTML. The Java client increases search speed by several orders of magnitude. The Ovid client does not need to wait for individual pages to load and incorporates multi-tasking. The interface includes tree displays; thesauri; mapping; explode/implode; search fields and context sensitive help. Display; save; and e-mail are available from the client

0.14067908 = product of:
  0.5627163 = sum of:
    0.5627163 = weight(_text_:holdings in 927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5627163 = score(doc=927,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.43088168 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6077175 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        1.3059648 = fieldWeight in 927, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          6.6077175 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=927)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Discusses standards related to the USMARC holdings format. Considers issues of concern surrounding the following standards: Z39.71, the proposed standard for holdings statements for bibliographic items; Z39.50, the standard for intersystem search and retrieval; and X12, the national standard for the transmission of business data. Aslo discusses the relationship between EDI and the USMARC holdings format. Work is currently in progress to update the holdings format

0.14000323 = product of:
  0.28000647 = sum of:
    0.028352091 = weight(_text_:und in 1557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028352091 = score(doc=1557,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14462665 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        0.19603643 = fieldWeight in 1557, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1557)
    0.2516544 = weight(_text_:holdings in 1557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2516544 = score(doc=1557,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43088168 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6077175 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        0.58404523 = fieldWeight in 1557, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.6077175 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1557)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

Die Klassifikation und ihr Umfeld: Proc. 10. Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Münster, 18.-21.6.1986. Hrsg.: P.O. Degens

0.13764624 = product of:
  0.2752925 = sum of:
    0.2504844 = weight(_text_:java in 1604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2504844 = score(doc=1604,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.45955986 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        0.5450528 = fieldWeight in 1604, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1604)
    0.024808079 = weight(_text_:und in 1604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024808079 = score(doc=1604,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14462665 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        0.17153187 = fieldWeight in 1604, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1604)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

iQvoc is a new open source SKOS-XL vocabulary management tool developed by the Federal Environment Agency, Germany, and innoQ Deutschland GmbH. Its immediate purpose is maintaining and publishing reference vocabularies in the upcoming Linked Data cloud of environmental information, but it may be easily adapted to host any SKOS- XL compliant vocabulary. iQvoc is implemented as a Ruby on Rails application running on top of JRuby - the Java implementation of the Ruby Programming Language. To increase the user experience when editing content, iQvoc uses heavily the JavaScript library jQuery.

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.1354024 = product of:
  0.2708048 = sum of:
    0.10735046 = weight(_text_:java in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10735046 = score(doc=2558,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.45955986 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        0.23359407 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
    0.16345432 = weight(_text_:holdings in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16345432 = score(doc=2558,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.43088168 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6077175 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        0.37934852 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.6077175 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

"MOST INTEGRATED library systems, as they are currently configured and used, should be removed from public view. Before I say why, let me be clean that I think the integrated library system serves a very important, albeit limited, role. An integrated library system should serve as a key piece of the infrastructure of a library, handling such tasks as ma terials acquisition, cataloging (including holdings, of course), and circulation. The integrated library system should be a complete and accurate recording of a local library's holdings. It should not be presented to users as the primary system for locating information. It fails badly at that important job. - Lack of content- The central problem of almost any library catalog system is that it typically includes only information about the books and journals held by a parficular library. Most do not provide access to joumal article indexes, web search engines, or even selective web directories like the Librarians' Index to the Internet. If they do offen such access, it is only via links to these services. The library catalog is far from onestop shopping for information. Although we acknowledge that fact to each other, we still treat it as if it were the best place in the universe to begin a search. Most of us give the catalog a place of great prominente an our web pages. But Information for each book is limited to the author, title, and a few subject headings. Seldom can book reviews, jacket summaries, recommendations, or tables of contents be found-or anything at all to help users determine if they want the material. - Lack of coverage - Most catalogs do not allow patrons to discover even all the books that are available to them. If you're lucky, your catalog may cover the collections of those libraries with which you have close ties-such as a regional network. But that leaves out all those items that could be requested via interlibrary loan. As Steve Coffman pointed out in his "Building Earth's Largest Library" article, we must show our users the universe that is open to them, highlight the items most accessible, and provide an estimate of how long it would take to obtain other items. - Inability to increase coverage - Despite some well-meaning attempts to smash everything of interest into the library catalog, the fact remains that most integrated library systems expect MARC records and MARC records only. This means that whatever we want to put into the catalog must be described using MARC and AACR2 (see "Marc Must Die," LJ 10/15/02, p. 26ff.). This is a barrier to dramatically increasing the scope of a catalog system, even if we decided to do it. How would you, for example, use the Open Archives Initiative Harvesting Protocol to crawl the bibliographic records of remote repositories and make them searchable within your library catalog? It can't be dope, and it shouldn't. The library catalog should be a record of a given library's holdings. Period.
- User Interface hostility - Recently I used the Library catalogs of two public libraries, new products from two major library vendors. A link an one catalog said "Knowledge Portal," whatever that was supposed to mean. Clicking an it brought you to two choices: Z39.50 Bibliographic Sites and the World Wide Web. No public library user will have the faintest clue what Z39.50 is. The other catalog launched a Java applet that before long froze my web browser so badly I was forced to shut the program down. Pick a popular book and pretend you are a library patron. Choose three to five libraries at random from the lib web-cats site (pick catalogs that are not using your system) and attempt to find your book. Try as much as possible to see the system through the eyes of your patrons-a teenager, a retiree, or an older faculty member. You may not always like what you see. Now go back to your own system and try the same thing. - What should the public see? - Our users deserve an information system that helps them find all different kinds of resources-books, articles, web pages, working papers in institutional repositories-and gives them the tools to focus in an what they want. This is not, and should not be, the library catalog. It must communicate with the catalog, but it will also need to interface with other information systems, such as vendor databases and web search engines. What will such a tool look like? We are seeing the beginnings of such a tool in the current offerings of cross-database search tools from a few vendors (see "Cross-Database Search," LJ 10/15/01, p. 29ff). We are in the early stages of developing the kind of robust, userfriendly tool that will be required before we can pull our catalogs from public view. Meanwhile, we can begin by making what we have easier to understand and use."

0.1334599 = product of:
  0.5338396 = sum of:
    0.5338396 = weight(_text_:holdings in 2970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5338396 = score(doc=2970,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.43088168 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6077175 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        1.238947 = fieldWeight in 2970, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.6077175 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2970)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Imprint

London : Common Law Institute for Intellectual Property Holdings

0.1252422 = product of:
  0.5009688 = sum of:
    0.5009688 = weight(_text_:java in 5463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5009688 = score(doc=5463,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.45955986 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        1.0901057 = fieldWeight in 5463, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5463)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

A spell book for mastering the WWW. Step by step, readers are taught how to use the Internet efficiently, and, in particular, how to publish information on the Web. After completing this book, the reader will be able, for example, to create stunning Web home pages and even take the first steps in Java programming. There are many books on the net bound to either one product, e.g. Mosaic, or to one topic, HTML. Mesaric, on the other hand, covers all WWW-related topics and all products which are in popular use. The magic revealed includes common data formats (HTML, PDF, JPEG, GIF), an introduction to Java and Java Srcipt, emerging technologies such as Hyper-G, hypermedia authoring with Haemony and Amadeus, information about ATM, TeleScript, and much more

Object

JAVA

0.1252422 = product of:
  0.5009688 = sum of:
    0.5009688 = weight(_text_:java in 86) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5009688 = score(doc=86,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.45955986 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        1.0901057 = fieldWeight in 86, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=86)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.12250283 = product of:
  0.24500567 = sum of:
    0.024808079 = weight(_text_:und in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024808079 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14462665 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        0.17153187 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
    0.22019759 = weight(_text_:holdings in 1625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22019759 = score(doc=1625,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43088168 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.6077175 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        0.51103956 = fieldWeight in 1625, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.6077175 = idf(docFreq=162, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1625)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

EC project PRESTO has completed a survey of the holdings and preservation status of ten major broadcast archives. These archives represent a significant portion of total European broadcast archives, including some ofthe largest individual collections.The main findings are that approximately 75% of this material is at risk or inaccessible and that the collections are growing at roughly four times the rate of current progress in preservation work. This article gives detailed results of the survey, and describes the technical developments being produced by project PRESTO to reduce the costs and improve the effectiveness of multimedia archive preservation projects.

Source

Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 49(2002) H.2, S.69-73

0.120021455 = product of:
  0.48008582 = sum of:
    0.48008582 = weight(_text_:java in 6217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.48008582 = score(doc=6217,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.45955986 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        1.0446644 = fieldWeight in 6217, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6217)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

A detailed description of how to use Java applets and Common Gateway Interface (CGI)/Dynamic Link Library (DLL) programs for Web publication of textual databases. The advantages of Java applets include low cost, flexible and visually appealing search interfaces, and the ability to be embedded in HTML pages, eliminating the need for Internet service provider permissions for their use. Highlights the FindIt family of Java applets from DoubleOLogic as one of the best product lines in the category. CGI programs may be written in Perl, Java, or some other language, and like DLL programs, must be installed on the server side. Notes that small-scale CGI and DLL applications cost from $150 to $8,000. Highlights Insight from Enigma Inc. as an excellent program at the high end of the cost range

0.10846294 = product of:
  0.43385175 = sum of:
    0.43385175 = weight(_text_:java in 6014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.43385175 = score(doc=6014,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.45955986 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        0.94405925 = fieldWeight in 6014, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6014)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Most books on the Internet describe it from the user's end. This one, however, is unique in its focus on serving information on the WWW. It presents everything from the basics to advanced techniques and will thus prove invaluable to site administrators and developers. The author - an expert developer and researcher at UCSD - covers such topics as HTML 3.0, serving documents, interfaces, WWW utilities and browsers such as Netscape. Fisher also includes an introduction to programming with JAVA and JAVA sript, as well as the complete VRML 1.0 specification

Object

JAVA

0.10846294 = product of:
  0.43385175 = sum of:
    0.43385175 = weight(_text_:java in 4612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.43385175 = score(doc=4612,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.45955986 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06520885 = queryNorm
        0.94405925 = fieldWeight in 4612, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          7.0475073 = idf(docFreq=104, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4612)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Discusses drawbacks of the Java programming language, and proposes some potential improvements for concurrent object-oriented software development. Java's passive object model does not provide an effective means for building distributed applications, critical for the future of Web-based next-generation information systems. Suggests improvements to Java's existing mechanisms for maintaining consistency across multiple threads, sending asynchronous messages and controlling resources. Drives the discussion with examples and suggestions from work on the Actor model of computation

Object

Java