Search (1171 results, page 1 of 59)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Hammond, N.: Tailoring hypertext for the learner (1991) 0.16 
    0.16452973 = product of:
  0.6581189 = sum of:
    0.6581189 = weight(_text_:hammond in 2929) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.6581189 = score(doc=2929,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47977006 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        1.3717382 = fieldWeight in 2929, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2929)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  2. Budzik, J.; Hammond, K.J.; Birnbaum, L.: Information access in context (2001) 0.16 
    0.16452973 = product of:
  0.6581189 = sum of:
    0.6581189 = weight(_text_:hammond in 4835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.6581189 = score(doc=4835,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47977006 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        1.3717382 = fieldWeight in 4835, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4835)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  3. Bradshaw, S.; Hammond, K.: Using citations in facilitate precise indexing and automatic index creation in collections of research papers (2001) 0.14 
    0.14102547 = product of:
  0.5641019 = sum of:
    0.5641019 = weight(_text_:hammond in 4803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5641019 = score(doc=4803,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47977006 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        1.1757755 = fieldWeight in 4803, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4803)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  4. Microsoft Bookshelf '94 : multimedia reference library (1994) 0.12 
    0.117521234 = product of:
  0.47008494 = sum of:
    0.47008494 = weight(_text_:hammond in 5550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.47008494 = score(doc=5550,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47977006 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        0.979813 = fieldWeight in 5550, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5550)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Enthält: The Hammond World Atlas; The People's Chronology; Columbia Dictionary of Quotations; The American Heritage Dictionary, 3rd ed.; The Concise Columbia Encyclopedia, end ed.; Roget's Thesaurus of English Words and Phrases; Wolrd Almanac and Book of Facts, 1994
  5. Weiner, J.M.; Horowitz, R.S.; Malogolowkin, H.; Weiner, R.E.; Hammond, G.D.: Microcomputer preparation of scientific literature reviews (1990) 0.09 
    0.094016984 = product of:
  0.37606794 = sum of:
    0.37606794 = weight(_text_:hammond in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37606794 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47977006 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        0.7838504 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  6. Burke, R.D.; Hammond, K.J.; Young, B.C.: ¬The FindMe approach to assisted browsing (1997) 0.09 
    0.094016984 = product of:
  0.37606794 = sum of:
    0.37606794 = weight(_text_:hammond in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37606794 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47977006 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        0.7838504 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  7. Smiraglia, R.P.: Derivative bibliographic relationships among theological works (1999) 0.09 
    0.090542436 = product of:
  0.36216974 = sum of:
    0.36216974 = weight(_text_:judaic in 676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.36216974 = score(doc=676,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.595547 = queryWeight, product of:
          11.008321 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        0.60812956 = fieldWeight in 676, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          11.008321 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=676)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Derivative bibliographic relationships are the primary relationships that exist among the members of a bibliographic family--the set of interrelated works where the relationships among entities express shared semantic or linguistic activity. Derivative bibliographic relationships exist between any new conception of a work and its original source (the progenitor), or its successor, or both. Discipline was a poor predictor of derivative relationships in prior studies of derivative bibliographic relationships. For the present study random samples of works were drawn from the catalogs of the Bobst Library, New York University, and the Burke Library, Union Theological Seminary, New York. Two sites were chosen to allow a test of the differences in collection development patterns between a university research library and a theological library. Bibliographic families were compiled for each work. Results indicate: 1) derivative bibliographic relationships exist for somewhere between one-half and two-thirds of theological works in this study; 2) there is little difference in proportions of derivative bibliographic relationships or in the size of bibliographic families between the two collections; 3) there is a positive correlation between the age of the progenitor work and the size of the bibliographic family); 4) there are significant gaps in coverage of theological bibliographic families online; 5) there is some evidence of differing patterns of derivation between Judaic and Islamic literature and Christian literature; 5) forms and genres are useful in a limited way for predicting the incidence of derivative relationships in theological literature
  8. Hammond, C.; Mitchell, E.: Library instruction for the professions : informations needs and libraries (1997) 0.08 
    0.08226486 = product of:
  0.32905945 = sum of:
    0.32905945 = weight(_text_:hammond in 3995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32905945 = score(doc=3995,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47977006 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        0.6858691 = fieldWeight in 3995, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3995)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  9. Bradshaw, S.; Hammond, K.: Constructing indices from citations in collections of research papers (1999) 0.08 
    0.08226486 = product of:
  0.32905945 = sum of:
    0.32905945 = weight(_text_:hammond in 682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.32905945 = score(doc=682,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47977006 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        0.6858691 = fieldWeight in 682, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=682)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  10. Shum, S.B.; Hammond, N.: Argumentation-based design rationale : what use at what cost? (1994) 0.07 
    0.070512734 = product of:
  0.28205094 = sum of:
    0.28205094 = weight(_text_:hammond in 241) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28205094 = score(doc=241,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47977006 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        0.58788776 = fieldWeight in 241, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=241)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  11. Heckner, M.; Mühlbacher, S.; Wolff, C.: Tagging tagging : a classification model for user keywords in scientific bibliography management systems (2007) 0.07 
    0.06648005 = product of:
  0.2659202 = sum of:
    0.2659202 = weight(_text_:hammond in 1533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2659202 = score(doc=1533,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.47977006 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        0.5542659 = fieldWeight in 1533, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1533)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Recently, a growing amount of systems that allow personal content annotation (tagging) are being created, ranging from personal sites for organising bookmarks (del.icio.us), photos (flickr.com) or videos (video.google.com, youtube.com) to systems for managing bibliographies for scientific research projects (citeulike.org, connotea.org). Simultaneously, a debate on the pro and cons of allowing users to add personal keywords to digital content has arisen. One recurrent point-of-discussion is whether tagging can solve the well-known vocabulary problem: In order to support successful retrieval in complex environments, it is necessary to index an object with a variety of aliases (cf. Furnas 1987). In this spirit, social tagging enhances the pool of rigid, traditional keywording by adding user-created retrieval vocabularies. Furthermore, tagging goes beyond simple personal content-based keywords by providing meta-keywords like funny or interesting that "identify qualities or characteristics" (Golder and Huberman 2006, Kipp and Campbell 2006, Kipp 2007, Feinberg 2006, Kroski 2005). Contrarily, tagging systems are claimed to lead to semantic difficulties that may hinder the precision and recall of tagging systems (e.g. the polysemy problem, cf. Marlow 2006, Lakoff 2005, Golder and Huberman 2006). Empirical research on social tagging is still rare and mostly from a computer linguistics or librarian point-of-view (Voß 2007) which focus either on the automatic statistical analyses of large data sets, or intellectually inspect single cases of tag usage: Some scientists studied the evolution of tag vocabularies and tag distribution in specific systems (Golder and Huberman 2006, Hammond 2005). Others concentrate on tagging behaviour and tagger characteristics in collaborative systems. (Hammond 2005, Kipp and Campbell 2007, Feinberg 2006, Sen 2006). However, little research has been conducted on the functional and linguistic characteristics of tags.1 An analysis of these patterns could show differences between user wording and conventional keywording. In order to provide a reasonable basis for comparison, a classification system for existing tags is needed.
  12. Budzik, J.; Hammond, K.: Q&A: a system for the capture, organization and reuse of expertise (1999) 0.06 
    0.058760617 = product of:
  0.23504247 = sum of:
    0.23504247 = weight(_text_:hammond in 668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23504247 = score(doc=668,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47977006 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        0.4899065 = fieldWeight in 668, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=668)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  13. Budzik, J.; Hammond, K.: Watson : anticipating and contextualizing information needs (1999) 0.06 
    0.058760617 = product of:
  0.23504247 = sum of:
    0.23504247 = weight(_text_:hammond in 669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23504247 = score(doc=669,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47977006 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        0.4899065 = fieldWeight in 669, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=669)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  14. Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Flack, M.: Social bookmarking tools (II) : a case study - Connotea (2005) 0.06 
    0.058760617 = product of:
  0.23504247 = sum of:
    0.23504247 = weight(_text_:hammond in 2189) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23504247 = score(doc=2189,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47977006 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        0.4899065 = fieldWeight in 2189, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2189)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  15. Hammond, C.C.; Brown, S.W.: Citation searching : search smarter & find more (2008) 0.06 
    0.058760617 = product of:
  0.23504247 = sum of:
    0.23504247 = weight(_text_:hammond in 3206) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23504247 = score(doc=3206,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.47977006 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        0.4899065 = fieldWeight in 3206, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3206)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  16. Hammond, T.; Hannay, T.; Lund, B.; Scott, J.: Social bookmarking tools (I) : a general review (2005) 0.06 
    0.058170043 = product of:
  0.23268017 = sum of:
    0.23268017 = weight(_text_:hammond in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23268017 = score(doc=2188,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.47977006 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        0.48498267 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://dlib.ukoln.ac.uk/dlib/april05/hammond/04hammond.html.
  17. Knowledge: creation, organization and use : Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Washington, DC, 31.10.-4.11.1999. Ed.: Larry Woods (1999) 0.05 
    0.050888192 = product of:
  0.20355277 = sum of:
    0.20355277 = weight(_text_:hammond in 721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20355277 = score(doc=721,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.47977006 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        0.4242715 = fieldWeight in 721, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          8.868255 = idf(docFreq=16, maxDocs=44421)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=721)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Enthält u.a. die Beiträge: AUSTIN, D.: A proposal for an International Standard Object Number works. BATEMAN, J.: Modelling the importance of end-user relevance criteria. BILAL, D.: Web search engines for children: a comparative study and performance evaluation of Yahooligans!, AskJeeves for Kids, and Super Snooper. BOROS, E., P.B. KANTOR u. D.J. NEU: Pheromonic representation of user quests by digital structures. BRADSHAW, S., K. HAMMOND: Constructing indices from citations in collections of research papers. BUDZIK, J., K. HAMMOND: Q&A: a system for the capture, organization and reuse of expertise. BUDZIK, J., K. HAMMOND: Watson: anticipating and contextualizing information needs. CHOO, C.W., B. DETLOR u. D. TURNBULL: Information seeking on the Web: an integrated model of browsing and searching. CORTEZ, E.M.: Planning and implementing a high performance knowledge base. DING, W., D. SOERGEL u. G. MARCHIONINI: Performance of visual, verbal, and combined video surrogates. DU TOIT, A.: Developing a framework for managing knowledge in enterprises. FALCONER, J.: The business pattern: a new tool for organizational knowledge capture and reuse. GOODRUM, A., A. SPINK: Visual information seeking: a study of image queries on the world wide web. HEIDORN, P.B.: The identification of index terms in natural language object descriptions. HILL, L.L., Q. ZHENG: Indirect geospatial referencing through place names in the digital library: Alexandra digital library experience with developing and implementing gazetteers. JURISICA, I., J. MYLOPOULOS u. E. YU: Using ontologies for knowledge management: an information systems perspective. KANTOR, B., E. BOROS u. B. MELAMED u.a.: The information quest: a dynamic model of user's information needs. KANTOR, P., M.H. KIM u. U. Ibraev u.a.: Estimating the number of relevant documents in enormous collections. KIM, Y., B. NORGARD U. A. CHEN u.a.: Using ordinary language in access metadata of divers types of information resources: trade classifications and numeric data. KOLLURI, V., D.P. METZLER: Knowledge guided rule learning. LARSON, R.R., C. CARSON: Information access for a digital library: Cheshire II and the Berkeley environment digital library. LEAZER, G.H., J. FURNER: Topological indices of textual identity networks. LIN, X.: Designing a visual interface for online searching. MA, Y., V.B. DIODATO: Icons as visual form of knowledge representation on the World Wide Web: a semiotic analysis.
  18. Chafe, W.L.: Meaning and the structure of language (1980) 0.02 
    0.020581717 = product of:
  0.08232687 = sum of:
    0.08232687 = weight(_text_:und in 1220) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08232687 = score(doc=1220,freq=32.0), product of:
        0.11998771 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        0.6861275 = fieldWeight in 1220, product of:
          5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
            32.0 = termFreq=32.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1220)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Classification
    ET 400 Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft. Indogermanistik. Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen / Einzelgebiete der Sprachwissenschaft, Sprachbeschreibung / Semantik und Lexikologie / Allgemeines
    ET 430 Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft. Indogermanistik. Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen / Einzelgebiete der Sprachwissenschaft, Sprachbeschreibung / Semantik und Lexikologie / Synchrone Semantik / Allgemeines (Gesamtdarstellungen)
    RVK
    ET 400 Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft. Indogermanistik. Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen / Einzelgebiete der Sprachwissenschaft, Sprachbeschreibung / Semantik und Lexikologie / Allgemeines
    ET 430 Allgemeine und vergleichende Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft. Indogermanistik. Außereuropäische Sprachen und Literaturen / Einzelgebiete der Sprachwissenschaft, Sprachbeschreibung / Semantik und Lexikologie / Synchrone Semantik / Allgemeines (Gesamtdarstellungen)
  19. Boßmeyer, C.: UNIMARC und MAB : Strukturunterschiede und Kompatibilitätsfragen (1995) 0.02 
    0.020370618 = product of:
  0.08148247 = sum of:
    0.08148247 = weight(_text_:und in 2436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08148247 = score(doc=2436,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.11998771 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        0.67909014 = fieldWeight in 2436, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2436)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 42(1995) H.5, S.465-480
  20. SimTown : baue deine eigene Stadt (1995) 0.02 
    0.018005252 = product of:
  0.07202101 = sum of:
    0.07202101 = weight(_text_:und in 5546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07202101 = score(doc=5546,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.11998771 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.054099716 = queryNorm
        0.60023654 = fieldWeight in 5546, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5546)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    SimTown wurde entwickelt, um Kindern die wichtigsten Konzepte der Wirtschaft (Angebot und Nachfrage), Ökologie (Rohstoffe, Umweltverschmutzung und Recycling) und Städteplanung (Gleichgewicht zwischen Wohnraum, Arbeitsplätzen und Erholungsstätten) auf einfache und unterhaltsame Art nahezubringen
    Issue
    PC CD-ROM Windows. 8 Jahre und älter.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 32
  • m 3
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 746
  • m 300
  • el 100
  • s 92
  • i 22
  • n 17
  • x 12
  • r 10
  • b 7
  • ? 1
  • v 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications