Search (1355 results, page 1 of 68)

0.12372303 = product of:
  0.49489212 = sum of:
    0.49489212 = weight(_text_:handling in 6273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.49489212 = score(doc=6273,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        1.3720267 = fieldWeight in 6273, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6273)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Beschreibung der Leistungen der 'Information handling Service Corporation (IHS)'

0.11248539 = product of:
  0.22497077 = sum of:
    0.025004147 = weight(_text_:und in 3822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025004147 = score(doc=3822,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12754847 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.19603643 = fieldWeight in 3822, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3822)
    0.19996662 = weight(_text_:handling in 3822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19996662 = score(doc=3822,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.5543825 = fieldWeight in 3822, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3822)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Der Forschungsbericht "Rough Set Theory Based Automatic Text Categorization and the Handling of Semantic Heterogeneity" von Xueying Zhang ist in Buchform auf Englisch erschienen. Zhang hat in ihrer Arbeit ein Verfahren basierend auf der Rough Set Theory entwickelt, das Beziehungen zwischen Schlagwörtern verschiedener Vokabulare herstellt. Sie war von 2003 bis 2005 Mitarbeiterin des IZ und ist seit Oktober 2005 Associate Professor an der Nanjing University of Science and Technology.

0.107147284 = product of:
  0.42858914 = sum of:
    0.42858914 = weight(_text_:handling in 2936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.42858914 = score(doc=2936,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        1.1882099 = fieldWeight in 2936, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2936)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Describes the conceptual framework and a vocabulary which can be used to discuss strategies and choices involved in question handling. A model of question handling is presented which provides for: developing strategies for handling questions; evaluating the appropriateness of the strategy; and relating levels of service to resource requirements. The model involves 5 phases: conducting a reference interview; formulating a question handling strategy; handling the question; reporting the result to the client; and evaluating the service delivered. It describes the reference librarian's interaction with a client and the types of decisions which a librarian makes when selecting and matching the level of resources to the desired level of service.

0.10463875 = product of:
  0.2092775 = sum of:
    0.05930254 = weight(_text_:und in 6939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05930254 = score(doc=6939,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.12754847 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.4649412 = fieldWeight in 6939, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6939)
    0.14997496 = weight(_text_:handling in 6939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14997496 = score(doc=6939,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.41578686 = fieldWeight in 6939, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6939)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This book takes the broadest view of information, considering it as a phenomenon in its own roght, rather than exploring the technology for handling it. It is very much concerned with the meaning of information - and what we as individuals do with it

BK

02.10 / Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft

Classification

AP 16100 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Aussagefunktion und Aussagegestaltung / Unterrichtung (Information)
MS 7850 Soziologie / Spezielle Soziologien / Soziologie der Massenkommunikation und öffentlichen Meinung / Allgemeine Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation und ihrer Medien; Begriff der Öffentlichkeit; Meinungsbildung, public relations
02.10 / Wissenschaft und Gesellschaft

RVK

AP 16100 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Aussagefunktion und Aussagegestaltung / Unterrichtung (Information)
MS 7850 Soziologie / Spezielle Soziologien / Soziologie der Massenkommunikation und öffentlichen Meinung / Allgemeine Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation und ihrer Medien; Begriff der Öffentlichkeit; Meinungsbildung, public relations

0.10295592 = product of:
  0.20591184 = sum of:
    0.030941054 = weight(_text_:und in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030941054 = score(doc=329,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12754847 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.24258271 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
    0.17497079 = weight(_text_:handling in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17497079 = score(doc=329,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.48508468 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This authoritative user's guide and reference manual for the LATEX computer typesetting system has been revised to document features now available in the new standard software release - LATEX2e. The new edition features additional styles and functions, improved font handling, and enhanced graphics capabilities.

Classification

ST 281 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Einzelne Benutzerschnittstellen (alphabet.)

RVK

ST 281 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Einzelne Benutzerschnittstellen (alphabet.)

0.09998331 = product of:
  0.39993325 = sum of:
    0.39993325 = weight(_text_:handling in 1088) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.39993325 = score(doc=1088,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        1.108765 = fieldWeight in 1088, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1088)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.09998331 = product of:
  0.39993325 = sum of:
    0.39993325 = weight(_text_:handling in 7706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.39993325 = score(doc=7706,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        1.108765 = fieldWeight in 7706, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7706)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.09998331 = product of:
  0.39993325 = sum of:
    0.39993325 = weight(_text_:handling in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.39993325 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        1.108765 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.09842471 = product of:
  0.19684942 = sum of:
    0.021878628 = weight(_text_:und in 3623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021878628 = score(doc=3623,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12754847 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.17153187 = fieldWeight in 3623, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3623)
    0.17497079 = weight(_text_:handling in 3623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17497079 = score(doc=3623,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.48508468 = fieldWeight in 3623, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3623)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The patterns of overlap between terms which are closely related in a thesaurus are considered. The relationships considered are parent/child, in which one term is a broader term of the other, and sibling in which to 2 terms share the same broader term. The patterns of overlap observed in the MeSH thesaurus with respect to selected MEDLINE postings are examined. The implications of the overlap patterns are discussed, in particular, the impact of the overlap patterns on the potential effectiveness of a proposed algorithm for handling negation is considered.

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.09624777 = product of:
  0.38499108 = sum of:
    0.38499108 = weight(_text_:judaic in 676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.38499108 = score(doc=676,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.6330741 = queryWeight, product of:
          11.008321 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.60812956 = fieldWeight in 676, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          11.008321 = idf(docFreq=1, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=676)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Derivative bibliographic relationships are the primary relationships that exist among the members of a bibliographic family--the set of interrelated works where the relationships among entities express shared semantic or linguistic activity. Derivative bibliographic relationships exist between any new conception of a work and its original source (the progenitor), or its successor, or both. Discipline was a poor predictor of derivative relationships in prior studies of derivative bibliographic relationships. For the present study random samples of works were drawn from the catalogs of the Bobst Library, New York University, and the Burke Library, Union Theological Seminary, New York. Two sites were chosen to allow a test of the differences in collection development patterns between a university research library and a theological library. Bibliographic families were compiled for each work. Results indicate: 1) derivative bibliographic relationships exist for somewhere between one-half and two-thirds of theological works in this study; 2) there is little difference in proportions of derivative bibliographic relationships or in the size of bibliographic families between the two collections; 3) there is a positive correlation between the age of the progenitor work and the size of the bibliographic family); 4) there are significant gaps in coverage of theological bibliographic families online; 5) there is some evidence of differing patterns of derivation between Judaic and Islamic literature and Christian literature; 5) forms and genres are useful in a limited way for predicting the incidence of derivative relationships in theological literature

0.088373594 = product of:
  0.35349438 = sum of:
    0.35349438 = weight(_text_:handling in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.35349438 = score(doc=601,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.98001903 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Information handling technology is an explosive growth area. Librarians need not run faster just to keep up with the information explosion any more, but must now run faster to keep up with the information controllability explosion. If they don't, their place in the information-handling world will be usurped by others who do realise what a growth area it is

0.086588085 = product of:
  0.34635234 = sum of:
    0.34635234 = weight(_text_:handling in 5247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.34635234 = score(doc=5247,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.96021867 = fieldWeight in 5247, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5247)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Whereas up to now document analysis was mainly concerned with the handling of formal properties of documents (scanning, editing), AI (artificial intelligence) techniques in the field of Natural Language Processing have shown the possibility of "Content based text handling", i.e., a content analysis for textual documents. Research and development in this field at The Siemens Corporate Research Laboratories are described in this article.

0.086588085 = product of:
  0.34635234 = sum of:
    0.34635234 = weight(_text_:handling in 5875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.34635234 = score(doc=5875,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.96021867 = fieldWeight in 5875, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5875)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Describes the EDUCATE (End User Courses in Information Access through Communication Technology) project for end user education in information access, retrieval and handling, a 3 year CEC Libraries Programme Project started in Feb 94. Examines the need for education and training in information retrieval and handling, presents the course design, and gives the goals for the project. Discusses the use of networks in connection with EDUCATE, and the tools and interfaces used. Describes the ways in which the program can be used for a variety of users

0.07576458 = product of:
  0.30305833 = sum of:
    0.30305833 = weight(_text_:handling in 5416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30305833 = score(doc=5416,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.84019136 = fieldWeight in 5416, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5416)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In the information age marked by the global highways and instant information handling sharing worldwide, all citizens must become knowledgeable about, and efficient in, handling information. People need training in how to organize, evaluate, and analyze the enormous array of information now available in both print and electronic formats. Information skills need to be taught and developed on all levels from elementary schools thorugh universities. Librarians worldwide are uniquely qualified through education, training, and experience to provide people with necessary information-handling skills on all levels. Using available data regarding information literacy programs on the international level, Rader proposes a course of action for the next decade

0.07576458 = product of:
  0.30305833 = sum of:
    0.30305833 = weight(_text_:handling in 4939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30305833 = score(doc=4939,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.84019136 = fieldWeight in 4939, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4939)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The Semantic Web has attracted much attention, both from academia and industry. An important role in research towards the Semantic Web is played by formalisms and technologies for handling uncertainty and/or vagueness. In this paper, I first provide some motivating examples for handling uncertainty and/or vagueness in the Semantic Web. I then give an overview of some own formalisms for handling uncertainty and/or vagueness in the Semantic Web.

0.07498748 = product of:
  0.2999499 = sum of:
    0.2999499 = weight(_text_:handling in 1039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2999499 = score(doc=1039,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.8315737 = fieldWeight in 1039, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1039)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.07498748 = product of:
  0.2999499 = sum of:
    0.2999499 = weight(_text_:handling in 1040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2999499 = score(doc=1040,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.8315737 = fieldWeight in 1040, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1040)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.07498748 = product of:
  0.2999499 = sum of:
    0.2999499 = weight(_text_:handling in 105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2999499 = score(doc=105,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.8315737 = fieldWeight in 105, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=105)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.07498748 = product of:
  0.2999499 = sum of:
    0.2999499 = weight(_text_:handling in 1846) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2999499 = score(doc=1846,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.8315737 = fieldWeight in 1846, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1846)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Novel ideas often experience resistance from incumbent forces. While evidence of the bias against novelty has been widely identified in science, there is still a lack of large-scale quantitative work to study this problem occurring in the prepublication process of manuscripts. This paper examines the association between manuscript novelty and handling time of publication based on 778,345 articles in 1,159 journals indexed by PubMed. Measuring the novelty as the extent to which manuscripts disrupt existing knowledge, we found systematic evidence that higher novelty is associated with longer handling time. Matching and fixed-effect models were adopted to confirm the statistical significance of this pattern. Moreover, submissions from prestigious authors and institutions have the advantage of shorter handling time, but this advantage is diminishing as manuscript novelty increases. In addition, we found longer handling time is negatively related to the impact of manuscripts, while the relationships between novelty and 3- and 5-year citations are U-shape. This study expands the existing knowledge of the novelty bias by examining its existence in the prepublication process of manuscripts.

0.07069887 = product of:
  0.2827955 = sum of:
    0.2827955 = weight(_text_:handling in 3743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2827955 = score(doc=3743,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.36070153 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.057508692 = queryNorm
        0.78401524 = fieldWeight in 3743, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.272122 = idf(docFreq=227, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3743)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports on the 2 year trail period of the document delivery system ADONIS, made for the pharmaceutical industry. A market survey reports the needs of the pharmaceutical industry for such a product. Its success as a CD-ROM product depends on rapid conversion from paper in less than 3 weeks and special compression techniques to limit the number of CD-ROMs produced. Discusses handling of source material, the production software, errata handling and the hardware. Considers current developments, the benefits of using ADONIS generally and those for the publishers