-
Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998)
0.05
0.047598403 = product of:
0.19039361 = sum of:
0.19039361 = weight(_text_:having in 4053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19039361 = score(doc=4053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36014074 = queryWeight, product of:
5.981156 = idf(docFreq=304, maxDocs=44421)
0.060212567 = queryNorm
0.52866447 = fieldWeight in 4053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.981156 = idf(docFreq=304, maxDocs=44421)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4053)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Examines in detail the author cataloguing practices adopted by the Italian National Library Service, as set out in its 1995 Cataloguing Guide (Guida SBN), and discusses how far these practices accord with the standard 1979 RICA author cataloguing rules. Since the author headings prescribed by RICA include personal names, corporate names and titles, this survey looks at all such SBN catalogue entries having an access point function. Presents many examples of standard and variant forms of heading, and reviews control procedures
-
Bolzoni, D.; Santoro, M.: Percorsi bibliografici (1996)
0.04
0.0416486 = product of:
0.1665944 = sum of:
0.1665944 = weight(_text_:having in 5805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1665944 = score(doc=5805,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36014074 = queryWeight, product of:
5.981156 = idf(docFreq=304, maxDocs=44421)
0.060212567 = queryNorm
0.4625814 = fieldWeight in 5805, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.981156 = idf(docFreq=304, maxDocs=44421)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5805)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Describes a proposed system for helping public library users, in praticular students, in their document searches. The system would directly involve users in compiling cards that indictae the various library sources (encyclopedias, books, newspapers, magazines, etc.) from which they retrieved bibliographic data. These cards would then be used to create a search path catalogue having 2 sections: general research topics; and keywords. Subsequently the librarian would form a database from this information. Such a system would not only benefit other researchers but also help the library to plan acquisition and rationalise its document arrangements. The scheme won 3rd prize in an open competition designated 'La biblioteca desiderata' (The kind of library we want), promoted jointly by the Milan Province Cultural Office and Biblioteche Oggi
-
Galeffi, A.; Sardo, A.L.: Cataloguing, a necessary evil : critical aspects of RDA (2016)
0.03
0.029749004 = product of:
0.11899602 = sum of:
0.11899602 = weight(_text_:having in 3952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11899602 = score(doc=3952,freq=2.0), product of:
0.36014074 = queryWeight, product of:
5.981156 = idf(docFreq=304, maxDocs=44421)
0.060212567 = queryNorm
0.3304153 = fieldWeight in 3952, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.981156 = idf(docFreq=304, maxDocs=44421)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3952)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The Toolkit designed by the RDA Steering Committee makes Resource Description and Access available on the web, together with other useful documents (workflows, mappings, etc.). Reading, learning and memorizing are interconnected, and a working tool should make these activities faster and easier to perform. Some issues arise while verifying the real easiness of use and learning of the tool. The practical and formal requirements for a cataloguing code include plain language, ease of memorisation, clarity of instructions, familiarity for users, predictability and reproducibility of solutions, and general usability. From a formal point of view, the RDA text does not appear to be conceived for an uninterrupted reading, but just for reading of few paragraphs for temporary catalographic needs. From a content point of view, having a syndetic view of the description of a resource is rather difficult: catalographic details are scattered and their re-organization is not easy. The visualisation and logical organisation in the Toolkit could be improved: the table of contents occupies a sizable portion of the screen and resizing or hiding it is not easy; the indentation leaves little space to the words; inhomogeneous font styles (italic and bold) and poor contrast between background and text colours make reading not easy; simultaneous visualization of two or more parts of the text is not allowed; and Toolkit's icons are less intuitive than expected. In the conclusion, some suggestions on how to improve the Toolkit's aspects and usability are provided.