Search (144 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Proceedings of the Workshop on 'Bibliometric Standards' (1996) 0.08 
    0.07668754 = product of:
  0.30675015 = sum of:
    0.30675015 = weight(_text_:june in 5140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30675015 = score(doc=5140,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3859721 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.79474694 = fieldWeight in 5140, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5140)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Issue devoted to the proceedings of the Workshop 'Bibliometric Standards' held in River Forest, Illinois, 11 June 1995
  2. Proceedings of the sixth conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (1997) 0.06 
    0.06390628 = product of:
  0.25562513 = sum of:
    0.25562513 = weight(_text_:june in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25562513 = score(doc=2037,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3859721 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.66228914 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Issue devoted to the proceedings of the 6th conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Jerusalem, 16-19 June 1997
  3. Proceedings of the sixth conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (1998) 0.06 
    0.06390628 = product of:
  0.25562513 = sum of:
    0.25562513 = weight(_text_:june in 2038) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25562513 = score(doc=2038,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3859721 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.66228914 = fieldWeight in 2038, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2038)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Issue devoted to the proceedings of the 6th conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Jerusalem, 16-19 June 1997
  4. Bar-Ilan, J.; Peritz, B.C.: Evolution, continuity, and disappearance of documents on a specific topic an the Web : a longitudinal study of "informetrics" (2004) 0.06 
    0.06326399 = product of:
  0.25305596 = sum of:
    0.25305596 = weight(_text_:june in 3886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25305596 = score(doc=3886,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3859721 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.6556328 = fieldWeight in 3886, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3886)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The present paper analyzes the changes that occurred to a set of Web pages related to "informetrics" over a period of 5 years between June 1998 and June 2003. Four times during this time span, in 1998,1999, 2002, and 2003, we monitored previously located pages and searched for new ones related to the topic. Thus, we were able to study the growth of the topic, white analyzing the rates of change and disappearance. The results indicate that modification, disappearance, and resurfacing cannot be ignored when studying the structure and development of the Web.
  5. Wouters, P.: ¬The signs of science (1998) 0.05 
    0.051125027 = product of:
  0.20450011 = sum of:
    0.20450011 = weight(_text_:june in 2023) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20450011 = score(doc=2023,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3859721 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.5298313 = fieldWeight in 2023, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2023)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 6th conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Jerusalem, 16-19 June 1997
  6. Bookstein, A.; Wright, B.: Ambiguity in measurement (1997) 0.05 
    0.051125027 = product of:
  0.20450011 = sum of:
    0.20450011 = weight(_text_:june in 2036) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20450011 = score(doc=2036,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3859721 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.5298313 = fieldWeight in 2036, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2036)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Extends the keynote address delivered at the 6th conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Jerusalem, 16-19 June 1997
  7. Small, H.: ¬A general framework for creating large scale maps of science in two or three dimensions : the SciViz system (1998) 0.05 
    0.051125027 = product of:
  0.20450011 = sum of:
    0.20450011 = weight(_text_:june in 2039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20450011 = score(doc=2039,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3859721 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.5298313 = fieldWeight in 2039, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2039)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 6th conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Jerusalem, 16-19 June 1997
  8. Gupta, B.M.; Sharma, P.; Karisiddappa, C.R.: Growth of research literature in scientific specialities : a modelling perspective (1997) 0.05 
    0.051125027 = product of:
  0.20450011 = sum of:
    0.20450011 = weight(_text_:june in 2040) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20450011 = score(doc=2040,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3859721 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.5298313 = fieldWeight in 2040, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2040)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 6th conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Jerusalem, 16-19 June 1997
  9. Huntington, P.; Nicholas, D.; Jamali, H.R.; Tenopir, C.: Article decay in the digital environment : an analysis of usage of OhioLINK by date of publication, employing deep log methods (2006) 0.05 
    0.04518857 = product of:
  0.18075427 = sum of:
    0.18075427 = weight(_text_:june in 339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18075427 = score(doc=339,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3859721 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.46830916 = fieldWeight in 339, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=339)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The article presents the early findings of an exploratory deep log analysis of journal usage on OhioLINK, conducted as part of the MaxData project, funded by the U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services. OhioLINK, the original Big Deal, provides a single digital platform of nearly 6,000 full-text journals for more than 600,000 people; for the purposes of the analysis, the raw logs were obtained from OhioLINK for the period June 2004 to December 2004. During this period approximately 1,215,000 items were viewed on campus in October 2004 and 1,894,000 items viewed off campus between June and December 2004. This article provides an analysis of the age of material that users consulted. From a methodological point of view OhioLINK offered an attractive platform to conduct age of publication usage studies because it is one of the oldest e-journal libraries and thus offered a relatively long archive and stable platform to conduct the studies. The project sought to determine whether the subject, the search approach adopted, and the type of journal item viewed (contents page, abstract, full-text article, etc.) was a factor in regard to the age of articles used.
  10. Bauer, J.; Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS) : authors, institutions, and network structures (2016) 0.05 
    0.04518857 = product of:
  0.18075427 = sum of:
    0.18075427 = weight(_text_:june in 4231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18075427 = score(doc=4231,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3859721 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.46830916 = fieldWeight in 4231, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4231)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    As a follow-up to the highly cited authors list published by Thomson Reuters in June 2014, we analyzed the top 1% most frequently cited papers published between 2002 and 2012 included in the Web of Science (WoS) subject category "Information Science & Library Science." In all, 798 authors contributed to 305 top 1% publications; these authors were employed at 275 institutions. The authors at Harvard University contributed the largest number of papers, when the addresses are whole-number counted. However, Leiden University leads the ranking if fractional counting is used. Twenty-three of the 798 authors were also listed as most highly cited authors by Thomson Reuters in June 2014 (http://highlycited.com/). Twelve of these 23 authors were involved in publishing 4 or more of the 305 papers under study. Analysis of coauthorship relations among the 798 highly cited scientists shows that coauthorships are based on common interests in a specific topic. Three topics were important between 2002 and 2012: (a) collection and exploitation of information in clinical practices; (b) use of the Internet in public communication and commerce; and (c) scientometrics.
  11. Gutierres Castanha, R.C.; Hilário, C.M.; Araújo, P.C. de; Cabrini Grácio, M.C.: Citation analysis of North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO) Proceedings (2007-2015) (2017) 0.05 
    0.04518857 = product of:
  0.18075427 = sum of:
    0.18075427 = weight(_text_:june in 4863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18075427 = score(doc=4863,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.3859721 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.46830916 = fieldWeight in 4863, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4863)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Beitrag bei: NASKO 2017: Visualizing Knowledge Organization: Bringing Focus to Abstract Realities. The sixth North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO 2017), June 15-16, 2017, in Champaign, IL, USA.
    Source
    http://www.iskocus.org/NASKO2017papers/NASKO2017_paper_14.pdf [NASKO 2017, June 15-16, 2017, Champaign, IL, USA]
  12. Katz, J.S.; Hicks, D.: How much is a collaboration worth? : a calibrated bibliometric model (1997) 0.04 
    0.044734396 = product of:
  0.17893758 = sum of:
    0.17893758 = weight(_text_:june in 2022) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17893758 = score(doc=2022,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3859721 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.46360236 = fieldWeight in 2022, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2022)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 6th conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Jerusalem, 16-19 June 1997
  13. Wilson, C.S.: Defining subject collections for informetric analyses : the effect of varying the subject aboutness level (1998) 0.04 
    0.044734396 = product of:
  0.17893758 = sum of:
    0.17893758 = weight(_text_:june in 2035) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17893758 = score(doc=2035,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3859721 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.46360236 = fieldWeight in 2035, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2035)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 6th conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Jerusalem, 16-19 June 1997
  14. Quoniam, L.: Bibliometric law used for information retrieval (1998) 0.04 
    0.044734396 = product of:
  0.17893758 = sum of:
    0.17893758 = weight(_text_:june in 2162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17893758 = score(doc=2162,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3859721 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.46360236 = fieldWeight in 2162, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2162)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Paper presented at the 6th conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Jerusalem, 16-19 June 1997
  15. Bar-Ilan, J.: ¬The Web as an information source on informetrics? : A content analysis (2000) 0.04 
    0.03834377 = product of:
  0.15337507 = sum of:
    0.15337507 = weight(_text_:june in 5587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15337507 = score(doc=5587,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3859721 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.39737347 = fieldWeight in 5587, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5587)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This article addresses the question of whether the Web can serve as an information source for research. Specifically, it analyzes by way of content analysis the Web pages retrieved by the major search engines on a particular date (June 7, 1998), as a result of the query 'informetrics OR informetric'. In 807 out of the 942 retrieved pages, the search terms were mentioned in the context of information science. Over 70% of the pages contained only indirect information on the topic, in the form of hypertext links and bibliographical references without annotation. The bibliographical references extracted from the Web pages were analyzed, and lists of most productive authors, most cited authors, works, and sources were compiled. The list of reference obtained from the Web was also compared to data retrieved from commercial databases. For most cases, the list of references extracted from the Web outperformed the commercial, bibliographic databases. The results of these comparisons indicate that valuable, freely available data is hidden in the Web waiting to be extracted from the millions of Web pages
  16. Hjoerland, B.; Nicolaisen, J.: Bradford's law of scattering : ambiguities in the concept of "subject" (2005) 0.03 
    0.03195314 = product of:
  0.12781256 = sum of:
    0.12781256 = weight(_text_:june in 1157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12781256 = score(doc=1157,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3859721 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.33114457 = fieldWeight in 1157, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1157)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Context: nature, impact and role. 5th International Conference an Conceptions of Library and Information Sciences, CoLIS 2005 Glasgow, UK, June 2005. Ed. by F. Crestani u. I. Ruthven
  17. Hellsten, I.; Leydesdorff, L.: Automated analysis of actor-topic networks on twitter : new approaches to the analysis of socio-semantic networks (2020) 0.03 
    0.03195314 = product of:
  0.12781256 = sum of:
    0.12781256 = weight(_text_:june in 610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12781256 = score(doc=610,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3859721 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.33114457 = fieldWeight in 610, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=610)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Social media data provide increasing opportunities for the automated analysis of large sets of textual documents. So far, automated tools have been developed either to account for the social networks among participants in the debates, or to analyze the content of these debates. Less attention has been paid to mapping co-occurrences of actors (participants) and topics (content) in online debates that can be considered as socio-semantic networks. We propose a new, automated approach that uses the whole matrix of co-addressed topics and actors for understanding and visualizing online debates. We show the advantages of the new approach with the analysis of two data sets: first, a large set of English-language Twitter messages at the Rio?+?20 meeting, in June 2012 (72,077 tweets), and second, a smaller data set of Dutch-language Twitter messages on bird flu related to poultry farming in 2015-2017 (2,139 tweets). We discuss the theoretical, methodological, and substantive implications of our approach, also for the analysis of other social media data.
  18. Stock, W.G.: Themenanalytische informetrische Methoden (1990) 0.02 
    0.021214392 = product of:
  0.08485757 = sum of:
    0.08485757 = weight(_text_:und in 5133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08485757 = score(doc=5133,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14280884 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.5942039 = fieldWeight in 5133, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5133)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Psychologie und Philosophie der Grazer Schule: eine Dokumentation zu Werk und Wirkungsgeschichte. Hrsg.: M. Stock und W.G. Stock
  19. Schwendtke, A.: Wissenschaftssystematik und Scientometrologie (1979) 0.02 
    0.0209968 = product of:
  0.0839872 = sum of:
    0.0839872 = weight(_text_:und in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0839872 = score(doc=76,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14280884 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.58810925 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Klassifikation und Erkenntnis I. Proc. der Plenarvorträge und der Sektion 1 "Klassifikation und Wissensgewinnung" der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Königstein/Ts., 5.-6.4.1979
  20. Schlögl, C.; Gorraiz, J.: Sind Downloads die besseren Zeitschriftennutzungsdaten? : Ein Vergleich von Download- und Zitationsidikatoren (2012) 0.02 
    0.0183722 = product of:
  0.0734888 = sum of:
    0.0734888 = weight(_text_:und in 1154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0734888 = score(doc=1154,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.14280884 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06438924 = queryNorm
        0.5145956 = fieldWeight in 1154, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1154)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In diesem Beitrag werden am Beispiel von Onkologie- und Pharmaziezeitschriften Unterschiede zwischen und Gemeinsamkeiten von Downloads und Zitaten herausgearbeitet. Die Download-Daten wurden von Elsevier (ScienceDirect) bereitgestellt, die Zitationsdaten wurden den Journal Citation Reports entnommen bzw. aus dem Web of Science recherchiert. Die Ergebnisse zeigen einen hohen Zusammenhang zwischen Download- und Zitationshäufigkeiten, der für die relativen Zeitschriftenindikatoren und auf Artikelebene etwas geringer ist. Deutliche Unterschiede bestehen hingegen zwischen den Altersstrukturen der herunter-geladenen und der zitierten Artikel. Elektronische Zeitschriften haben maßgeblich dazu beigetragen, dass aktuelle Literatur früher aufgegriffen und deutlich öfter zitiert wird, im Schnitt hat sich das Alter der zitierten Literatur in den letzten zehn Jahren aber kaum verändert.
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 59(2012) H.2, S.87-95

Authors

Years

Languages

  • d 106
  • e 36
  • m 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 124
  • el 12
  • m 7
  • s 5
  • r 2
  • x 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications