Search (1451 results, page 2 of 73)

0.03497479 = product of:
  0.13989916 = sum of:
    0.13989916 = weight(_text_:june in 4998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13989916 = score(doc=4998,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42247158 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.33114457 = fieldWeight in 4998, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4998)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports results of a questionnaire survey, conducted by the School of Information and Media, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland, between June and November 1997, to compare and contrast the range and value of use of the Internet with traditional reference sources in Scottish public libraries. Data was collected on the extent of Internet connectivity in Scottish public libraries in 1995, the uses of the Internet in public libraries and the percentages of library staff using it and the type of work for which they are using it. The current study built upon the work of the UKOLN survey by looking at the use of the Internet in reference work by library reference staff in comparison to their usage of traditional printed sources. Recommends that consideration ahould be given to obtaining additional external funding for Internet and WWW access, authorities should consider allocating more resources to training reference staff in Internet use, consideration should be given to providing reference staff with training on the technical difficulties associated with using the Internet and information on authoritative, quality Web sites should be made available to reference staff in all public libraries

0.03339683 = product of:
  0.06679366 = sum of:
    0.055959664 = weight(_text_:june in 2795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055959664 = score(doc=2795,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42247158 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.13245782 = fieldWeight in 2795, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2795)
    0.010833992 = weight(_text_:und in 2795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010833992 = score(doc=2795,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15631357 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.06930935 = fieldWeight in 2795, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2795)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

BK

05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft

Classification

05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft

Footnote

The economic opportunity divide is predicated an the hypothesis that there has, indeed, been a major shift in opportunities driven by changes in the information environment. The authors document this paradigm shift well with arguments from the political and economic right and left. This chapter might be described as an "attitudinal" chapter. The authors are concerned here with the perceptions of their respondents of their information skills and skill levels with their economic outlook and opportunities. Technological skills and economic opportunities are correlated, one finds, in the minds of all across all ages, genders, races, ethnicities, and income levels. African Americans in particular are ". . attuned to the use of technology for economic opportunity" (p. 80). The fourth divide is the democratic divide. The Internet may increase political participation, the authors posit, but only among groups predisposed to participate and perhaps among those with the skills necessary to take advantage of the electronic environment (p. 86). Certainly the Web has played an important role in disseminating and distributing political messages and in some cases in political fund raising. But by the analysis here, we must conclude that the message does not reach everyone equally. Thus, the Internet may widen the political participation gap rather than narrow it. The book has one major, perhaps fatal, flaw: its methodology and statistical application. The book draws upon a survey performed for the authors in June and July 2001 by the Kent State University's Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) lab (pp. 7-9). CATI employed a survey protocol provided to the reader as Appendix 2. An examination of the questionnaire reveals that all questions yield either nominal or ordinal responses, including the income variable (pp. 9-10). Nevertheless, Mossberger, Tolbert, and Stansbury performed a series of multiple regression analyses (reported in a series of tables in Appendix 1) utilizing these data. Regression analysis requires interval/ratio data in order to be valid although nominal and ordinal data can be incorporated by building dichotomous dummy variables. Perhaps Mossberger, Tolbert, and Stansbury utilized dummy variables; but 1 do not find that discussed. Moreover, 1 would question a multiple regression made up completely of dichotomous dummy variables. I come away from Virtual Inequality with mixed feelings. It is useful to think of the digital divide as more than one phenomenon. The four divides that Mossberger, Tolbert, and Stansbury offeraccess, skills, economic opportunity, and democratic-are useful as a point of departure and debate. No doubt, other divides will be identified and documented. This book will lead the way. Second, without question, Mossberger, Tolbert, and Stansbury provide us with an extremely well-documented, -written, and -argued work. Third, the authors are to be commended for the multidisciplinarity of their work. Would that we could see more like it. My reservations about their methodological approach, however, hang over this review like a shroud."

0.03208569 = product of:
  0.12834276 = sum of:
    0.12834276 = weight(_text_:headings in 6187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12834276 = score(doc=6187,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3419886 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.37528375 = fieldWeight in 6187, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6187)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The past 100 years have seen the development of numerous systems for the structured representation of knowledge and information, including hierarchical classification systems and with sophisticated features for the representation of term relationships. Discusses reasons for the lack of widespread adoption of these systems, particularly in the USA. The suggested structure for indexing the Internet or other large electronic collections of documents is based on that of book indexes: specific headings with coined modifications

0.03208569 = product of:
  0.12834276 = sum of:
    0.12834276 = weight(_text_:headings in 6818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12834276 = score(doc=6818,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3419886 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.37528375 = fieldWeight in 6818, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6818)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

As the amount of accessible information on the WWW increases, so will the cost of accessing it, even if search servcies remain free, due to the increasing amount of time users will have to spend to find needed items. Considers what the seemingly unorganized Web and the organized world of libraries can offer each other. The OCLC Scorpion Project is attempting to combine indexing and cataloguing, specifically focusing on building tools for automatic subject recognition using the technqiues of library science and information retrieval. If subject headings or concept domains can be automatically assigned to electronic items, improved filtering tools for searching can be produced

0.03208569 = product of:
  0.12834276 = sum of:
    0.12834276 = weight(_text_:headings in 4408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12834276 = score(doc=4408,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3419886 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.37528375 = fieldWeight in 4408, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4408)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

WWW sites, consisting mainly of links to other Internet resources, have begun to proliferate and these sites are valuable to library users and researchers because they bring together in a single Web site links to a comprehensive array of information resources. Because libraries may elect to include bibliographic records for these sites in their online catalogues, cataloguers should be aware of some of the main aspects of cataloguing this new type of resource. Concludes that cataloguers should be aware of the main types and different characteristics of these Web sites, how to describe them in bibliographic records and how to assign appropriate subject headings for them

0.03208569 = product of:
  0.12834276 = sum of:
    0.12834276 = weight(_text_:headings in 292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12834276 = score(doc=292,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3419886 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.37528375 = fieldWeight in 292, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=292)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

While many catalogers are using the Web to find the information they need to perform authority work quickly and accurately, the full potential of the Web to assist catalogers in name authority work has yet to be realized. The ever-growing nature of the Web means that available information for creating personal name, corporate name, and other types of headings will increase. In this article, we examine ways in which simple and effective Web searching can save catalogers time and money in the process of authority work. In addition, questions involving evaluating authority information found on the Web are explored.

0.027979832 = product of:
  0.11191933 = sum of:
    0.11191933 = weight(_text_:june in 1002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11191933 = score(doc=1002,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.42247158 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.26491565 = fieldWeight in 1002, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1002)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In the present work we discuss opportunities, problems, tools and techniques encountered when interconnecting discipline-specific subject classifications, primarily organized as search devices in bibliographic databases, with general classifications originally devised for book shelving in public libraries. We first state the fundamental distinction between topical (or subject) classifications and object classifications. Then we trace the structural limitations that have constrained subject classifications since their library origins, and the devices that were used to overcome the gap with genuine knowledge representation. After recalling some general notions on structure, dynamics and interferences of subject classifications and of the objects they refer to, we sketch a synthetic overview on discipline-specific classifications in Mathematics, Computing and Physics, on one hand, and on general classifications on the other. In this setting we present The Scientific Classifications Page, which collects groups of Web pages produced by a pool of software tools for developing hypertextual presentations of single or paired subject classifications from sequential source files, as well as facilities for gathering information from KWIC lists of classification descriptions. Further we propose a concept-oriented methodology for interconnecting subject classifications, with the concrete support of a relational analysis of the whole Mathematics Subject Classification through its evolution since 1959. Finally, we recall a very basic method for interconnection provided by coreference in bibliographic records among index elements from different systems, and point out the advantages of establishing the conditions of a more widespread application of such a method. A part of these contents was presented under the title Mathematics Subject Classification and related Classifications in the Digital World at the Eighth International Conference Crimea 2001, "Libraries and Associations in the Transient World: New Technologies and New Forms of Cooperation", Sudak, Ukraine, June 9-17, 2001, in a special session on electronic libraries, electronic publishing and electronic information in science chaired by Bernd Wegner, Editor-in-Chief of Zentralblatt MATH.

0.02750202 = product of:
  0.11000808 = sum of:
    0.11000808 = weight(_text_:headings in 494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11000808 = score(doc=494,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3419886 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.32167178 = fieldWeight in 494, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=494)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports results of a questionnaire survey of cataloguers, conducted over the AUTOCAT Internet discussion group, to determine those areas of cataloguing for which the Internet is a valuable tool and those areas for which it is not as useful. Respondents indicated 4 areas in which cataloguers use the Internet: searching the OPACs of other libraries, communicating with colleagues, accessing online cataloguing documentation and publications, and authority work. Cataloguers who found access to other libraries' OPACs did so for the following reasons: assigning call numbers and subject headings; finding full cataloguing copy from other libraries; enriching their local catalogue with notes present in records in other libraries; finding copy for foreign language items that cannot be read by library staff; and resolving difficult problems when important parts of the item are missing ar are in disarray. Some cataloguers also related processes for which they have found the Internet to not be efficient

0.02750202 = product of:
  0.11000808 = sum of:
    0.11000808 = weight(_text_:headings in 56) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11000808 = score(doc=56,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3419886 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.32167178 = fieldWeight in 56, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=56)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The Internet challenges designers of reference resources to structure user interfaces so that they facilitate quick access to bibliographies. Designers can organize bibliographies in chronological order of publication, alphabetical listing by author or title and/or subject-headings; or can follow a subject classification scheme from the relevant field. Chronological order of publication and alphabetical listings of authors and titles are the simplest ways to organize bibliographic materials, but these methods usually fall to present the thematic relations among the various items. The subject classification is the most systematic presentation, but the most complicated to develop. This study explores the subject classification model, elaborates its rationale, demonstrates an exemplary faceted subject classification scheme grounded in solid scientific foundations, and clarifies the scientific foundations of the three-phase structuring methodology that was utilized. The exemplary classificatory model is a seven-facet subject classification scheme designed for classifying scholarly papers in the field of Logotherapy. The study, in particular the scientific structuring methodology, provides an example for structuring bibliographic resources in the social sciences, as well as in other academic fields

0.02750202 = product of:
  0.11000808 = sum of:
    0.11000808 = weight(_text_:headings in 739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11000808 = score(doc=739,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3419886 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.32167178 = fieldWeight in 739, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=739)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Possibilities are being explored to use traditional bibliographic tools, like Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), Library of Congress Classification (LCC), Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), and Universal Decimal Classification (UDC), to improve the organization of information resources on the Internet. The most recent edition of DDC, with its enhanced features, has greater potential than other traditional approaches. A review of selected Web sites that use DDC to organize Web resources indicates, however, that the full potential of the DDC scheme for this purpose has not been realized. While the review found that the DDC classification structure was more effective when compared with other knowledge organization systems, we conclude that DDC needs to be further enhanced to make it more suitable for this application. As widely reported in the professional literature, OCLC has conducted research on the potential of DDC for organizing Web resources. Such research, however, is experimental and should be supplemented by empirical studies with user participation.

0.026812758 = product of:
  0.10725103 = sum of:
    0.10725103 = weight(_text_:und in 279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10725103 = score(doc=279,freq=32.0), product of:
        0.15631357 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.6861275 = fieldWeight in 279, product of:
          5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
            32.0 = termFreq=32.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=279)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Vernetzung und Netzwerke finden sich allerorten, haben vielerlei Qualität und Materialität, erfüllen diverse Zwecke und Funktionen und konstituieren unterschiedliche Infrastrukturen, nicht nur kommunikativer und sozialer Art. Mit der Entwicklung und Verbreitung der Informationstechnik, der globalen Transport- und Vermittlungssysteme und endlich der anhaltenden Digitalisierung werden der Begriff und die damit bezeichnete Konnektivität omnipräsent und auf digitale Netze fokussiert, die im Internet als dem Netz der Netze seinen wichtigsten und folgenreichsten Prototypen findet. Dessen Entwicklung wird kompakt dargestellt. Die bereits vorhandenen und verfügbaren Anwendungsfelder sowie die künftigen (Industrie 4.0, Internet der Dinge) lassen revolutionäre Umbrüche in allen Segmenten der Gesellschaft erahnen, die von der nationalstaatlichen Gesetzgebung und Politik kaum mehr gesteuert und kontrolliert werden, neben unbestreitbar vielen Vorzügen und Verbesserungen aber auch Risiken und Benachteiligungen zeitigen können.

0.024168694 = product of:
  0.09667478 = sum of:
    0.09667478 = weight(_text_:und in 6437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09667478 = score(doc=6437,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.15631357 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.618467 = fieldWeight in 6437, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6437)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Das Fachinformationszentrum (FIZ) Karlsruhe ist als internationale Drehscheibe für Fachinformation seit Jahrzehnten verlässlicher und professioneller Servicepartner der Informationssuchenden in Wissenschaft und Technik. Neue web-basierte Dienstleistungen und Produkte erlauben dem professionellen Informationsbroker ebenso wie dem gelegentlichen Onliner oder Internet Pedestrian den effizienten und kostengünstigen Zugang zu Metadaten, naturwissenschaftlich-technisehen Daten und Fakten. Elektronische Volltexte per Hyperlink oder die komplette Dokument-Vermittlung werden gleichfalls angeboten. Die Weiterentwicklung und flexible Anpassung der Informationssysteme ermöglichen auch die Verknüpfung mit lokalen und regionalen Netzen der Forschungseinrichtungen und Hochschulen. Neue Serviceleistungen und Abrechnungsverfahren bieten besonders preisgünstige Konditionen für Hochschulen durch akademische Programme und Festpreise auf Subskriptionsbasis für ausgewählte Datenbanken. Darüber hinaus ist das FIZ Karlsruhe kompetenter Kooperationspartner bei Entwicklung und Betrieb von Informationssystemen

Source

nfd Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 51(2000) H.7, S.397-406

0.023220532 = product of:
  0.09288213 = sum of:
    0.09288213 = weight(_text_:und in 878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09288213 = score(doc=878,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15631357 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.5942039 = fieldWeight in 878, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=878)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series

Kölner Arbeiten zum Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen; H.21

Source

Internet und Bibliotheken: Entwicklung - Praxis - Herausforderungen. Hrsg.: H. Jüngling

0.023220532 = product of:
  0.09288213 = sum of:
    0.09288213 = weight(_text_:und in 883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09288213 = score(doc=883,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15631357 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.5942039 = fieldWeight in 883, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=883)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series

Kölner Arbeiten zum Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen; H.21

Source

Internet und Bibliotheken: Entwicklung - Praxis - Herausforderungen. Hrsg.: H. Jüngling

0.023220532 = product of:
  0.09288213 = sum of:
    0.09288213 = weight(_text_:und in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09288213 = score(doc=884,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15631357 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.5942039 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series

Kölner Arbeiten zum Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen; H.21

Source

Internet und Bibliotheken: Entwicklung - Praxis - Herausforderungen. Hrsg.: H. Jüngling

0.023220532 = product of:
  0.09288213 = sum of:
    0.09288213 = weight(_text_:und in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09288213 = score(doc=886,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15631357 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.5942039 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series

Kölner Arbeiten zum Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen; H.21

Source

Internet und Bibliotheken: Entwicklung - Praxis - Herausforderungen. Hrsg.: H. Jüngling

0.023220532 = product of:
  0.09288213 = sum of:
    0.09288213 = weight(_text_:und in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09288213 = score(doc=2840,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15631357 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.5942039 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Imprint

Darmstadt : Fachhochschule, Fachbereich Information und Dokumentation

0.023220532 = product of:
  0.09288213 = sum of:
    0.09288213 = weight(_text_:und in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09288213 = score(doc=1483,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15631357 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.5942039 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Wissenschaftliche und öffentliche Bibliotheken: CD-ROM und Online, Kinder und Jugendliche. Red.: H. Grube u. A. Holderried

0.023220532 = product of:
  0.09288213 = sum of:
    0.09288213 = weight(_text_:und in 3310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09288213 = score(doc=3310,freq=24.0), product of:
        0.15631357 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.5942039 = fieldWeight in 3310, product of:
          4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
            24.0 = termFreq=24.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3310)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Die Berücksichtigung der Informationsbedarfe und Informationsgewohnheiten ihrer jeweiligen Zielgruppe ist ein wesentliches Charakteristikum desAngebots der Virtuellen Fachbibliotheken Technik und Physik: Von Ingenieuren und Physikern gestellte Anforderungen an ein Informationsangebot werden in den Virtuellen Fachbibliotheken Technik und Physik umgesetzt, um demAnspruch gerecht zu werden, einen integrierten Zugang zu fachrelevanten Informationen und Dienstleistungen zu bieten. Dabei ist nicht nur bei derAuswahl der bereitgestellten Informationsquellen, sondern insbesondere auch bei derAufbereitung (wie z.B. der sachlichen Erschließung) und Präsentation der Inhalte und Angebote der Virtuellen Fachbibliotheken auf fachspezifische Gewohnheiten und Konventionen zu achten. Kooperationen z.B. mit Fachwissenschaftlern und mit Informationslieferanten sind für die Bereitstellung eines umfassenden und qualitativ hochwertigen Angebots wesentlich.

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 55(2004) H.2, S.81-88

0.022982365 = product of:
  0.09192946 = sum of:
    0.09192946 = weight(_text_:und in 2511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09192946 = score(doc=2511,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.15631357 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070478216 = queryNorm
        0.58810925 = fieldWeight in 2511, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2511)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Die elektronische Erfassung aller bedeutenden gedruckten Informationen und ihre Verbreitung über die weltweiten Datennetze in digitalisierter Form oder als Volltext stellt eine der zur Zeit größten Herausforderungen und Chancen für unsere Informationsgesellschaft dar. Der nachstehende Artikel widmet sich der oft gestellten Frage nach den technischen Methoden für die elektronische Erfassung, Erschließung und Bereitstellung gedruckter Vorlagen und beschreibt die wichtigsten Schritte der Digitalisierung und Datenaufbereitung und ihrer technischen und organisatorischen Parameter

Content

Beschreibt den Prozeß der digitalisierten Aufbereitung von Text und Bild etc. über Scannen