Search (1443 results, page 1 of 73)

0.16524355 = product of:
  0.6609742 = sum of:
    0.6609742 = weight(_text_:herrmann in 5364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.6609742 = score(doc=5364,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5227066 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.175107 = idf(docFreq=33, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        1.2645223 = fieldWeight in 5364, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.175107 = idf(docFreq=33, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5364)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.14163733 = product of:
  0.5665493 = sum of:
    0.5665493 = weight(_text_:herrmann in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5665493 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5227066 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.175107 = idf(docFreq=33, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        1.0838763 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.175107 = idf(docFreq=33, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: IfB 6(1998) H.1/2, S.15-16 (R. Herrmann)

0.14163733 = product of:
  0.5665493 = sum of:
    0.5665493 = weight(_text_:herrmann in 984) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5665493 = score(doc=984,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5227066 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.175107 = idf(docFreq=33, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        1.0838763 = fieldWeight in 984, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.175107 = idf(docFreq=33, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=984)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: IfB 6(1998) H.1/2, S.13-15 (R. Herrmann)

0.14163733 = product of:
  0.5665493 = sum of:
    0.5665493 = weight(_text_:herrmann in 2193) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5665493 = score(doc=2193,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5227066 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.175107 = idf(docFreq=33, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        1.0838763 = fieldWeight in 2193, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.175107 = idf(docFreq=33, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2193)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: IfB 6(1998) H.1/2, S.12-13 (R. Herrmann)

0.14163733 = product of:
  0.5665493 = sum of:
    0.5665493 = weight(_text_:herrmann in 3545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5665493 = score(doc=3545,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5227066 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.175107 = idf(docFreq=33, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        1.0838763 = fieldWeight in 3545, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.175107 = idf(docFreq=33, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3545)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Rez. in: IfB 5(1997) H.1/2, S.30-31 (R. Herrmann)

0.10153477 = product of:
  0.40613908 = sum of:
    0.40613908 = weight(_text_:june in 6039) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.40613908 = score(doc=6039,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38327208 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        1.0596626 = fieldWeight in 6039, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6039)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.10153477 = product of:
  0.40613908 = sum of:
    0.40613908 = weight(_text_:june in 1588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.40613908 = score(doc=1588,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38327208 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        1.0596626 = fieldWeight in 1588, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1588)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Online. 20(1996), May/June, S.15-28

0.07615108 = product of:
  0.30460432 = sum of:
    0.30460432 = weight(_text_:june in 1880) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.30460432 = score(doc=1880,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38327208 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        0.79474694 = fieldWeight in 1880, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1880)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

Online and CD notes. 1997, June, S.3-6

0.06345923 = product of:
  0.25383693 = sum of:
    0.25383693 = weight(_text_:june in 1829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25383693 = score(doc=1829,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38327208 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        0.66228914 = fieldWeight in 1829, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1829)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Issue devoted to selected papers of the Annual Conference of the Internet Society / 5th Joint European Networking Conference, Held in June 13-17, 1994, Prague

0.06282143 = product of:
  0.25128573 = sum of:
    0.25128573 = weight(_text_:june in 3886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.25128573 = score(doc=3886,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.38327208 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        0.6556328 = fieldWeight in 3886, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3886)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The present paper analyzes the changes that occurred to a set of Web pages related to "informetrics" over a period of 5 years between June 1998 and June 2003. Four times during this time span, in 1998,1999, 2002, and 2003, we monitored previously located pages and searched for new ones related to the topic. Thus, we were able to study the growth of the topic, white analyzing the rates of change and disappearance. The results indicate that modification, disappearance, and resurfacing cannot be ignored when studying the structure and development of the Web.

0.050767384 = product of:
  0.20306954 = sum of:
    0.20306954 = weight(_text_:june in 1587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20306954 = score(doc=1587,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38327208 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        0.5298313 = fieldWeight in 1587, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1587)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Wiederabdruck aus: Online 1996, May/June, S.15-28

0.050767384 = product of:
  0.20306954 = sum of:
    0.20306954 = weight(_text_:june in 2561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20306954 = score(doc=2561,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38327208 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        0.5298313 = fieldWeight in 2561, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2561)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Source

OCLC newsletter. 1997, May/June, S.28-29

0.050767384 = product of:
  0.20306954 = sum of:
    0.20306954 = weight(_text_:june in 3693) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20306954 = score(doc=3693,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38327208 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        0.5298313 = fieldWeight in 3693, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3693)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Questions whether the public's medical knowledge will be increased by improving end user access to Medline through the Internet. Evaluates the new service PubMed and the Internet Grateful Med (IGM) service which was made free in June 1997. Describes sample searches carried out on PubMed. Outlines 2 non-National Library of Medicine Web Medicine sites: IntelliHealth (http://www.intellihealth.com/ih/ihtHome) and BioMedNet (http://biomednet.com.db/medline)

0.03807554 = product of:
  0.15230216 = sum of:
    0.15230216 = weight(_text_:june in 3448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15230216 = score(doc=3448,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38327208 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        0.39737347 = fieldWeight in 3448, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3448)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Based on a talk delivered at an International Group of the Library Association Open Meeting in Dec 1996 and at UmbrelLA 4 in Manchester, UK, June 1997

0.03807554 = product of:
  0.15230216 = sum of:
    0.15230216 = weight(_text_:june in 5587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15230216 = score(doc=5587,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38327208 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        0.39737347 = fieldWeight in 5587, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5587)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This article addresses the question of whether the Web can serve as an information source for research. Specifically, it analyzes by way of content analysis the Web pages retrieved by the major search engines on a particular date (June 7, 1998), as a result of the query 'informetrics OR informetric'. In 807 out of the 942 retrieved pages, the search terms were mentioned in the context of information science. Over 70% of the pages contained only indirect information on the topic, in the form of hypertext links and bibliographical references without annotation. The bibliographical references extracted from the Web pages were analyzed, and lists of most productive authors, most cited authors, works, and sources were compiled. The list of reference obtained from the Web was also compared to data retrieved from commercial databases. For most cases, the list of references extracted from the Web outperformed the commercial, bibliographic databases. The results of these comparisons indicate that valuable, freely available data is hidden in the Web waiting to be extracted from the millions of Web pages

0.03807554 = product of:
  0.15230216 = sum of:
    0.15230216 = weight(_text_:june in 6104) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15230216 = score(doc=6104,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38327208 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        0.39737347 = fieldWeight in 6104, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6104)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) has worked well in the rapid establishment of HTML standards but it has been criticized for not assuring compliance and in June 1998 a new organization, the Web Standards Project (WSP) was formed. Membership is free to individuals and at present consists of Web designers and W3C members. Describes the stages in the implementation of standards and focuses on Cascading Style Sheets (CSS). A style sheet is essentially a template that can be used to create a consistent appearance across documents. 'Cascading' means that a single page can use multiple style sheets. Explains how style sheets can replace HTML tags, using the example of fonts, and why CSS is a greater attraction to designers than to Web users. Outlines the current state of the CSS standard and predicts that Web users will be adopting it sooner or later

0.03807554 = product of:
  0.15230216 = sum of:
    0.15230216 = weight(_text_:june in 997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15230216 = score(doc=997,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38327208 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        0.39737347 = fieldWeight in 997, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=997)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Firstgov is the U.S. federal portal to government information and services. It was conceived by the Clinton administration in June of 2000 and launched in September 2000. A case study of the development of Firstgov indicated that top-level leadership, a small and committed project team, and the very condensed timeframe of the project were factors that contributed to the success of the portal. Another reason cited for the success of the Firstgov development was the U.S. federal information policy environment, a robust and evolving framework creating the climate for electronic government. An unusual feature of the project development was the donation of the Inktomi search engine for three years, an event that further enabled Firstgov to open its door on time and on budget. The portal continues today with funding and resources designed to ensure its future.

0.03807554 = product of:
  0.15230216 = sum of:
    0.15230216 = weight(_text_:june in 3706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15230216 = score(doc=3706,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38327208 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        0.39737347 = fieldWeight in 3706, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3706)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Social network sites like MySpace are increasingly important environments for expressing and maintaining interpersonal connections, but does online communication exacerbate or ameliorate the known tendency for offline friendships to form between similar people (homophily)? This article reports an exploratory study of the similarity between the reported attributes of pairs of active MySpace Friends based upon a systematic sample of 2,567 members joining on June 18, 2007 and Friends who commented on their profile. The results showed no evidence of gender homophily but significant evidence of homophily for ethnicity, religion, age, country, marital status, attitude towards children, sexual orientation, and reason for joining MySpace. There were also some imbalances: women and the young were disproportionately commenters, and commenters tended to have more Friends than commentees. Overall, it seems that although traditional sources of homophily are thriving in MySpace networks of active public connections, gender homophily has completely disappeared. Finally, the method used has wide potential for investigating and partially tracking homophily in society, providing early warning of socially divisive trends.

0.03807554 = product of:
  0.15230216 = sum of:
    0.15230216 = weight(_text_:june in 3636) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15230216 = score(doc=3636,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38327208 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        0.39737347 = fieldWeight in 3636, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3636)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Recent work by Evans, Cordova, and Sipole (2014) reveals that in the two months leading up to the 2012 election, female House candidates used the social media site Twitter more often than male candidates. Not only did female candidates tweet more often, but they also spent more time attacking their opponents and discussing important issues in American politics. In this article, we examine whether the female winners of those races acted differently than the male winners in the 2012 election, and whether they differed in their tweeting-style during two months in the summer of 2013. Using a hand-coded content analysis of every tweet from each member in the U.S. House of Representatives in June and July of 2013, we show that women differ from their male colleagues in their frequency and type of tweeting, and note some key differences between the period during the election and the period after. This article suggests that context greatly affects representatives' Twitter-style.

0.031729616 = product of:
  0.12691846 = sum of:
    0.12691846 = weight(_text_:june in 4998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12691846 = score(doc=4998,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.38327208 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06393881 = queryNorm
        0.33114457 = fieldWeight in 4998, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4998)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Reports results of a questionnaire survey, conducted by the School of Information and Media, Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen, Scotland, between June and November 1997, to compare and contrast the range and value of use of the Internet with traditional reference sources in Scottish public libraries. Data was collected on the extent of Internet connectivity in Scottish public libraries in 1995, the uses of the Internet in public libraries and the percentages of library staff using it and the type of work for which they are using it. The current study built upon the work of the UKOLN survey by looking at the use of the Internet in reference work by library reference staff in comparison to their usage of traditional printed sources. Recommends that consideration ahould be given to obtaining additional external funding for Internet and WWW access, authorities should consider allocating more resources to training reference staff in Internet use, consideration should be given to providing reference staff with training on the technical difficulties associated with using the Internet and information on authoritative, quality Web sites should be made available to reference staff in all public libraries