Search (86 results, page 1 of 5)

0.19831927 = product of:
  0.39663854 = sum of:
    0.29442933 = weight(_text_:julien in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29442933 = score(doc=1835,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.53929025 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.235732 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.5459571 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.235732 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
    0.10220921 = weight(_text_:headings in 1835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10220921 = score(doc=1835,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.32167178 = fieldWeight in 1835, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1835)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Although subject hierarchies are widely used to index document collections, few tools leverage their structure to facilitate collection browsing. This is mostly due to the complexity of such structures that include thousands of nodes. This paper proposes a new approach to simplify subject hierarchies based on the distribution of documents among the nodes. A random walk algorithm simulates the route of a user within the hierarchy, under the assumption that the user is attracted by the most populated nodes. Poorly visited nodes can be identified and eliminated, leaving a structure containing only the nodes that best represent the content of the collection. Experiments on a collection indexed using the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) show that, as compared to the state-of-the-art simplification method, the random walk-based approach gives access to a larger part of the collection for the same structure size, and offers more flexibility to customize the complexity of thestructure.

0.16526605 = product of:
  0.3305321 = sum of:
    0.24535777 = weight(_text_:julien in 1834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24535777 = score(doc=1834,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.53929025 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.235732 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.45496422 = fieldWeight in 1834, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.235732 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1834)
    0.08517434 = weight(_text_:headings in 1834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08517434 = score(doc=1834,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.26805982 = fieldWeight in 1834, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1834)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) is a subject structure used to index large collections throughout the world. Browsing a collection through LCSH is difficult using current on-line tools in part because they are inadequately integrated with information collections. Users of these LCSH browsing tools are expected to find a promising LCSH string before using it to search for the information itself; many users do not have the patience for such a two-step process. This article proposes a method to fully integrate a specific collection in its subset of the LCSH hierarchy in order to facilitate LCSH browsing as well as information retrieval. Techniques are described to match LCSH strings assigned to the collection with an established string from the authority records, and build their specific LCSH hierarchy. The resulting subset of LCSH structure is described in terms of its size and broader/narrower term statistics, and implications for browsing and information retrieval are discussed. The results of this research have implications for institutions wishing to further capitalize on existing LCSH organization investments for the purpose of subject browsing and information retrieval.

0.16526605 = product of:
  0.3305321 = sum of:
    0.24535777 = weight(_text_:julien in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24535777 = score(doc=567,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.53929025 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.235732 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.45496422 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.235732 = idf(docFreq=31, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
    0.08517434 = weight(_text_:headings in 567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08517434 = score(doc=567,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.26805982 = fieldWeight in 567, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=567)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Subject searching is difficult with traditional text-based online public access library catalogues (OPACs), and the next-generation discovery layers are keyword searching and result filtering tools that offer little support for subject browsing. Next-generation OPACs ignore the rich network of relations offered by controlled subject vocabulary, which can facilitate subject browsing. A new generation of OPACs could leverage existing information-organization investments and offer online searchers a novel browsing and searching environment. This is a case study of the design and development of a virtual reality subject browsing and information retrieval tool. The functional prototype shows that the Library of Congress subject headings (LCSH) can be shaped into a useful and usable tree structure serving as a visual metaphor that contains a real world collection from the domain of science and engineering. Formative tests show that users can effectively browse the LCSH tree and carve it up based on their keyword search queries. This study uses a complex information-organization structure as a defining characteristic of an OPAC that goes beyond the standard keyword search model, toward the cutting edge of online search tools.

0.1512752 = product of:
  0.3025504 = sum of:
    0.06164098 = weight(_text_:und in 5593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06164098 = score(doc=5593,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14523193 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.42443132 = fieldWeight in 5593, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5593)
    0.24090943 = weight(_text_:headings in 5593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24090943 = score(doc=5593,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.7581877 = fieldWeight in 5593, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5593)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Classification

AN 94200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Grundlagen, Theorie / Thesauruskunde

LCSH

Subject headings

RVK

AN 94200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Grundlagen, Theorie / Thesauruskunde

Subject

Subject headings

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.09636377 = product of:
  0.38545507 = sum of:
    0.38545507 = weight(_text_:headings in 2842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.38545507 = score(doc=2842,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        1.2131003 = fieldWeight in 2842, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2842)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.087371714 = product of:
  0.17474343 = sum of:
    0.03019779 = weight(_text_:und in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03019779 = score(doc=2659,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14523193 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.20792803 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
    0.14454564 = weight(_text_:headings in 2659) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14454564 = score(doc=2659,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.4549126 = fieldWeight in 2659, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2659)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Classification

AN 75400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Schlagwortregeln, Schlagwortverzeichnis

LCSH

Subject headings

RVK

AN 75400 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Schlagwortregeln, Schlagwortverzeichnis

Subject

Subject headings

0.073021784 = product of:
  0.29208714 = sum of:
    0.29208714 = weight(_text_:headings in 2446) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29208714 = score(doc=2446,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.91925365 = fieldWeight in 2446, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2446)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

A recent survey at the Royal Library in the Netherlands showed that subject headings are more efficient than title keywords for retrieval purposes. 475 Dutch publications were selected at random and assigned subject headings. The study showed that subject headings provided additional useful information in 56% of titles. Subsequent searching of the library's online catalogue showed that 88% of titles were retrieved via subject headings against 57% through title keywords. Further precision may be achieved with the help of indexing staff, but at considerable cost

Footnote

Übers. d. Titels: A good title has no need of subject headings, or does it?: a comparative study of title keywords against subject headings

0.06760504 = product of:
  0.27042016 = sum of:
    0.27042016 = weight(_text_:headings in 6612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.27042016 = score(doc=6612,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.8510636 = fieldWeight in 6612, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6612)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Library of Congress Subjecl Headings retrieved as the results of a search in an online catalog are likely to be filed in straight alphabetical, word-by-word order, ignoring the semantic structures of these headings and scattering headings of a similar type. This practice makes LC headings unnecessarily difficult to use and negates much of their indexing power. Enthusiasm for filing simplicity and postcoordinate indexing are likely contributing factors to this phenomenon. Since the report Headings for Tomorrow (1992) first raised this issue, filing practices favoring postcoordination over precoordination appear to have become more widespread and more entrenched

Source

The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone

0.0625901 = product of:
  0.2503604 = sum of:
    0.2503604 = weight(_text_:headings in 682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2503604 = score(doc=682,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.7879317 = fieldWeight in 682, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=682)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The Library of Congress Subject Headings schema (LCSH) is the most commonly used and widely accepted subject vocabulary for general application. It is the de facto universal controlled vocabulary and has been a model for developing subject heading systems by many countries. However, LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control. Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid growth of the Web, are forcing changes in bibliographic control systems to make them easier to use, understand, and apply, and subject headings are no exception. The purpose of adapting the LCSH with a simplified syntax to create FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) headings is to retain the very rich vocabulary of LCSH while making the schema easier to understand, control, apply, and use. The schema maintains compatibility with LCSH--any valid Library of Congress subject heading can be converted to FAST headings.

0.05962204 = product of:
  0.23848815 = sum of:
    0.23848815 = weight(_text_:headings in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23848815 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.7505675 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.05962204 = product of:
  0.23848815 = sum of:
    0.23848815 = weight(_text_:headings in 2901) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23848815 = score(doc=2901,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.7505675 = fieldWeight in 2901, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2901)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.05962204 = product of:
  0.23848815 = sum of:
    0.23848815 = weight(_text_:headings in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23848815 = score(doc=167,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.7505675 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.05962204 = product of:
  0.23848815 = sum of:
    0.23848815 = weight(_text_:headings in 640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23848815 = score(doc=640,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.7505675 = fieldWeight in 640, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=640)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Libraries using the LCSH can increase the effectiveness of their subject access. This can be accomplished through one of four methods for applying an increased number of headings: the addition of subject headings in situations where none have been supplied by LC; the use of pattern secondary headings; the use of major + minor techniques; and the use of minor + major techniques. Each of these methods will provide additional subject access to supplement that produced by the Library of Congress

0.05962204 = product of:
  0.23848815 = sum of:
    0.23848815 = weight(_text_:headings in 2179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23848815 = score(doc=2179,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.7505675 = fieldWeight in 2179, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2179)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The Michigan State University Libraries (MSUL) digital repository contains numerous collections of openly available material. Since 2016, the digital repository has been using Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject headings as its primary subject vocabulary in order to streamline faceting, display, and search. The MSUL FAST use case presents some challenges that are not addressed by existing MARC-focused FAST tools. This paper will outline the MSUL digital repository team's justification for including FAST headings in the digital repository as well as workflows for adding FAST headings to Metadata Object Description Schema (MODS) metadata, their maintenance, and utilization for discovery.

0.05713669 = product of:
  0.22854675 = sum of:
    0.22854675 = weight(_text_:headings in 6611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22854675 = score(doc=6611,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.71928 = fieldWeight in 6611, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6611)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing's Working Group on Principles Underlying Subject Headings Languages has identified a set of eleven principles for subject heading languages and excerpted the texts that match each principle from the instructions for each of eleven national subject indexing systems, including excerpts from the LC's Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. This study compares the IFLA principles with other texts that express the principles underlying LCSH, especially Library of Congress Subject Headings: Principles of Structure and Policies for Application, prepared by Lois Mai Chan for the Library of Congress in 1990, Chan's later book on LCSH, and earlier documents by Haykin and Cutter. The principles are further elaborated for clarity and discussed

Source

The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone

0.0516342 = product of:
  0.2065368 = sum of:
    0.2065368 = weight(_text_:headings in 10) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2065368 = score(doc=10,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.6500105 = fieldWeight in 10, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=10)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Explores the question of whether academic libraries keep up with the changes in the LCSH system. Analysis of the handling of 15 subject headings in 50 academic library catalogues available via the Internet found that libraries are not consistently maintaining subject authority control, or making syndetic references and scope notes in their catalogues. Discusses the results from the perspective of the libraries' performance, performance on the headings overall, performance on references, performance on the type of change made to the headings,a nd performance within 3 widely used onlien catalogue systems (DRA, INNOPAC and NOTIS). Discusses the implications of the findings in relationship to expressions of dissatisfaction with the effectiveness of subject cataloguing expressed by discussion groups on the Internet

0.0516342 = product of:
  0.2065368 = sum of:
    0.2065368 = weight(_text_:headings in 2178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2065368 = score(doc=2178,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.6500105 = fieldWeight in 2178, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2178)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Digital repository migrations present a periodic opportunity to assess metadata quality and to perform strategic enhancements. Lafayette College Libraries implemented OCLC FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) for its digital image collections as part of a migration from multiple repositories to a single one built on the Samvera Hyrax open-source framework. Application of FAST has normalized subject headings across dissimilar collections in a way that tremendously improves descriptive consistency for staff and discoverability for end users. However, the process of applying FAST headings was complicated by several features of in-scope metadata as well as gaps in available controlled subject authorities.

0.05148428 = product of:
  0.10296856 = sum of:
    0.01779422 = weight(_text_:und in 3703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.01779422 = score(doc=3703,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14523193 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.12252277 = fieldWeight in 3703, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3703)
    0.08517434 = weight(_text_:headings in 3703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08517434 = score(doc=3703,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.26805982 = fieldWeight in 3703, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3703)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

When consumers search for health information, a major obstacle is their unfamiliarity with the medical terminology. Even though medical thesauri such as the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and related tools (e.g., the MeSH Browser) were created to help consumers find medical term definitions, the lack of direct and explicit integration of these help tools into a health retrieval system prevented them from effectively achieving their objectives. To explore this issue, we conducted an empirical study with two systems: One is a simple interface system supporting query-based searching; the other is an augmented system with two new components supporting MeSH term searching and MeSH tree browsing. A total of 45 subjects were recruited to participate in the study. The results indicated that the augmented system is more effective than the simple system in terms of improving user-perceived topic familiarity and question-answer performance, even though we did not find users spend more time on the augmented system. The two new MeSH help components played a critical role in participants' health information retrieval and were found to allow them to develop new search strategies. The findings of the study enhanced our understanding of consumers' search behaviors and shed light on the design of future health information retrieval systems.

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.051104605 = product of:
  0.20441842 = sum of:
    0.20441842 = weight(_text_:headings in 2904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20441842 = score(doc=2904,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 2904, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2904)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.051104605 = product of:
  0.20441842 = sum of:
    0.20441842 = weight(_text_:headings in 5276) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20441842 = score(doc=5276,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31774378 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06548176 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 5276, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5276)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)