Search (168 results, page 1 of 9)

0.14976881 = product of:
  0.29953763 = sum of:
    0.22979079 = weight(_text_:juli in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.22979079 = score(doc=174,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.45374227 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.548176 = idf(docFreq=172, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.5064346 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.548176 = idf(docFreq=172, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
    0.069746844 = weight(_text_:und in 174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069746844 = score(doc=174,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.15368472 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.4538307 = fieldWeight in 174, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=174)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Das Tutorium vermittelt theoretische Grundlagen der wissensorganisatorischen (semantischen) Integration und zeigt auch einige praktische Beispiele. Die Integration bezieht sich auf die Ebenen: Integration von ähnlichen Einträgen in verschiedenen Ontologien (Begriffe und Beziehungen) sowie von Aussagen über gleiche Aussagegegenstände und zugehörige Informationsressourcen. Hierzu werden ausgewählte semantische Wissenstechnologien (Topic Maps und RDF) und -werkzeuge vorgestellt und mit wissensorganisatorischen Grundlagen verbunden (z.B. SKOS - Simple Knowledge Organization Systems, http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/, oder Published Resource Identifiers).

Content

Tutorium auf der 10. Deutschen ISKO-Tagung (Wissensorganisation 2006): Kompatibilität und Heterogenität in der Wissensorganisation Universität Wien, Montag 03. Juli 2006.

0.114459455 = product of:
  0.22891891 = sum of:
    0.19696355 = weight(_text_:juli in 6448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19696355 = score(doc=6448,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.45374227 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.548176 = idf(docFreq=172, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.43408683 = fieldWeight in 6448, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.548176 = idf(docFreq=172, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6448)
    0.03195536 = weight(_text_:und in 6448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03195536 = score(doc=6448,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15368472 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.20792803 = fieldWeight in 6448, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6448)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.1097797 = product of:
  0.2195594 = sum of:
    0.19696355 = weight(_text_:juli in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19696355 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.45374227 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.548176 = idf(docFreq=172, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.43408683 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.548176 = idf(docFreq=172, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
    0.02259585 = weight(_text_:und in 2680) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02259585 = score(doc=2680,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15368472 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 2680, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2680)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch

0.1097797 = product of:
  0.2195594 = sum of:
    0.19696355 = weight(_text_:juli in 2685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19696355 = score(doc=2685,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.45374227 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.548176 = idf(docFreq=172, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.43408683 = fieldWeight in 2685, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.548176 = idf(docFreq=172, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2685)
    0.02259585 = weight(_text_:und in 2685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02259585 = score(doc=2685,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15368472 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 2685, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2685)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Source

Kompatibilität, Medien und Ethik in der Wissensorganisation - Compatibility, Media and Ethics in Knowledge Organization: Proceedings der 10. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation Wien, 3.-5. Juli 2006 - Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the German Section of the International Society of Knowledge Organization Vienna, 3-5 July 2006. Ed.: H.P. Ohly, S. Netscher u. K. Mitgutsch

0.06997699 = product of:
  0.13995399 = sum of:
    0.015063901 = weight(_text_:und in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015063901 = score(doc=674,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15368472 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.098018214 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
    0.12489008 = weight(_text_:headings in 674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12489008 = score(doc=674,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.33623707 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.3714346 = fieldWeight in 674, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=674)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

LCSH is known as such since 1975. It always has created headings to serve the LC collections instead of a theoretical basis. It started to replace cross reference codes by thesaural codes in 1986, in a mechanical fashion. It was in no way transformed into a thesaurus. Its encyclopedic coverage, its pre-coordinate concepts make it substantially distinct, considering that thesauri usually map a restricted field of knowledge and use uniterms. The questions raised are whether the new symbols comply with thesaurus standards and if they are true to one or to several models. Explanations and definitions from other lists of subject headings and thesauri, literature in the field of classification and subject indexing will provide some answers. For instance, see refers from a subject heading not used to another or others used. Exceptionally it will lead from a specific term to a more general one. Some equate a see reference with the equivalence relationship. Such relationships are pointed by USE in LCSH. See also references are made from the broader subject to narrower parts of it and also between associated subjects. They suggest lateral or vertical connexions as well as reciprocal relationships. They serve a coordination purpose for some, lay down a methodical search itinerary for others. Since their inception in the 1950's thesauri have been devised for indexing and retrieving information in the fields of science and technology. Eventually they attended to a number of social sciences and humanities. Research derived from thesauri was voluminous. Numerous guidelines are designed. They did not discriminate between the "hard" sciences and the social sciences. RT relationships are widely but diversely used in numerous controlled vocabularies. LCSH's aim is to achieve a list almost free of RT and SA references. It thus restricts relationships to BT/NT, USE and UF. This raises the question as to whether all fields of knowledge can "fit" in the Procrustean bed of RT/NT, i.e., genus/species relationships. Standard codes were devised. It was soon realized that BT/NT, well suited to the genus/species couple could not signal a whole-part relationship. In LCSH, BT and NT function as reciprocals, the whole-part relationship is taken into account by ISO. It is amply elaborated upon by authors. The part-whole connexion is sometimes studied apart. The decision to replace cross reference codes was an improvement. Relations can now be distinguished through the distinct needs of numerous fields of knowledge are not attended to. Topic inclusion, and topic-subtopic, could provide the missing link where genus/species or whole/part are inadequate. Distinct codes, BT/NT and whole/part, should be provided. Sorting relationships with mechanical means can only lead to confusion.

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.04173154 = product of:
  0.16692616 = sum of:
    0.16692616 = weight(_text_:headings in 49) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16692616 = score(doc=49,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.33623707 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.49645376 = fieldWeight in 49, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=49)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

18 August 2009 -- Today W3C announces a new standard that builds a bridge between the world of knowledge organization systems - including thesauri, classifications, subject headings, taxonomies, and folksonomies - and the linked data community, bringing benefits to both. Libraries, museums, newspapers, government portals, enterprises, social networking applications, and other communities that manage large collections of books, historical artifacts, news reports, business glossaries, blog entries, and other items can now use Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) to leverage the power of linked data. As different communities with expertise and established vocabularies use SKOS to integrate them into the Semantic Web, they increase the value of the information for everyone.

Content

SKOS Adapts to the Diversity of Knowledge Organization Systems A useful starting point for understanding the role of SKOS is the set of subject headings published by the US Library of Congress (LOC) for categorizing books, videos, and other library resources. These headings can be used to broaden or narrow queries for discovering resources. For instance, one can narrow a query about books on "Chinese literature" to "Chinese drama," or further still to "Chinese children's plays." Library of Congress subject headings have evolved within a community of practice over a period of decades. By now publishing these subject headings in SKOS, the Library of Congress has made them available to the linked data community, which benefits from a time-tested set of concepts to re-use in their own data. This re-use adds value ("the network effect") to the collection. When people all over the Web re-use the same LOC concept for "Chinese drama," or a concept from some other vocabulary linked to it, this creates many new routes to the discovery of information, and increases the chances that relevant items will be found. As an example of mapping one vocabulary to another, a combined effort from the STITCH, TELplus and MACS Projects provides links between LOC concepts and RAMEAU, a collection of French subject headings used by the Bibliothèque Nationale de France and other institutions. SKOS can be used for subject headings but also many other approaches to organizing knowledge. Because different communities are comfortable with different organization schemes, SKOS is designed to port diverse knowledge organization systems to the Web. "Active participation from the library and information science community in the development of SKOS over the past seven years has been key to ensuring that SKOS meets a variety of needs," said Thomas Baker, co-chair of the Semantic Web Deployment Working Group, which published SKOS. "One goal in creating SKOS was to provide new uses for well-established knowledge organization systems by providing a bridge to the linked data cloud." SKOS is part of the Semantic Web technology stack. Like the Web Ontology Language (OWL), SKOS can be used to define vocabularies. But the two technologies were designed to meet different needs. SKOS is a simple language with just a few features, tuned for sharing and linking knowledge organization systems such as thesauri and classification schemes. OWL offers a general and powerful framework for knowledge representation, where additional "rigor" can afford additional benefits (for instance, business rule processing). To get started with SKOS, see the SKOS Primer.

0.031866353 = product of:
  0.12746541 = sum of:
    0.12746541 = weight(_text_:headings in 787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12746541 = score(doc=787,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.33623707 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.37909386 = fieldWeight in 787, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=787)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This study considers the expressiveness (that is the expressive power or expressivity) of different types of Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS) and discusses its potential to be machine-processable in the context of the Semantic Web. For this purpose, the theoretical foundations of KOS are reviewed based on conceptualizations introduced by the Functional Requirements for Subject Authority Data (FRSAD) and the Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS); natural language processing techniques are also implemented. Applying a comparative analysis, the dataset comprises a thesaurus (Eurovoc), a subject headings system (LCSH) and a classification scheme (DDC). These are compared with an ontology (CIDOC-CRM) by focusing on how they define and handle concepts and relations. It was observed that LCSH and DDC focus on the formalism of character strings (nomens) rather than on the modelling of semantics; their definition of what constitutes a concept is quite fuzzy, and they comprise a large number of complex concepts. By contrast, thesauri have a coherent definition of what constitutes a concept, and apply a systematic approach to the modelling of relations. Ontologies explicitly define diverse types of relations, and are by their nature machine-processable. The paper concludes that the potential of both the expressiveness and machine processability of each KOS is extensively regulated by its structural rules. It is harder to represent subject headings and classification schemes as semantic networks with nodes and arcs, while thesauri are more suitable for such a representation. In addition, a paradigm shift is revealed which focuses on the modelling of relations between concepts, rather than the concepts themselves.

0.03154608 = product of:
  0.12618431 = sum of:
    0.12618431 = weight(_text_:headings in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12618431 = score(doc=517,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33623707 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.37528375 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Classes in the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system function as neighborhoods around focal topics in captions and notes. Topical neighborhoods are generated through specialization and instantiation, complex topic synthesis, index terms and mapped headings, hierarchical force, rules for choosing between numbers, development of the DDC over time, and use of the system in classifying resources. Implications of representation using a formal knowledge representation language are explored.

0.025493082 = product of:
  0.10197233 = sum of:
    0.10197233 = weight(_text_:headings in 3654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10197233 = score(doc=3654,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.33623707 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.30327508 = fieldWeight in 3654, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3654)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In order to transfer the Chinese Classified Thesaurus (CCT) into a machine-processable format and provide CCT-based Web services, a pilot study has been conducted in which a variety of selected CCT classes and mapped thesaurus entries are encoded with SKOS. OWL and RDFS are also used to encode the same contents for the purposes of feasibility and cost-benefit comparison. CCT is a collected effort led by the National Library of China. It is an integration of the national standards Chinese Library Classification (CLC) 4th edition and Chinese Thesaurus (CT). As a manually created mapping product, CCT provides for each of the classes the corresponding thesaurus terms, and vice versa. The coverage of CCT includes four major clusters: philosophy, social sciences and humanities, natural sciences and technologies, and general works. There are 22 main-classes, 52,992 sub-classes and divisions, 110,837 preferred thesaurus terms, 35,690 entry terms (non-preferred terms), and 59,738 pre-coordinated headings (Chinese Classified Thesaurus, 2005) Major challenges of encoding this large vocabulary comes from its integrated structure. CCT is a result of the combination of two structures (illustrated in Figure 1): a thesaurus that uses ISO-2788 standardized structure and a classification scheme that is basically enumerative, but provides some flexibility for several kinds of synthetic mechanisms Other challenges include the complex relationships caused by differences of granularities of two original schemes and their presentation with various levels of SKOS elements; as well as the diverse coordination of entries due to the use of auxiliary tables and pre-coordinated headings derived from combining classes, subdivisions, and thesaurus terms, which do not correspond to existing unique identifiers. The poster reports the progress, shares the sample SKOS entries, and summarizes problems identified during the SKOS encoding process. Although OWL Lite and OWL Full provide richer expressiveness, the cost-benefit issues and the final purposes of encoding CCT raise questions of using such approaches.

0.025262933 = product of:
  0.10105173 = sum of:
    0.10105173 = weight(_text_:und in 2139) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10105173 = score(doc=2139,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.15368472 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.6575262 = fieldWeight in 2139, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2139)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series

Philosophie und Geschichte der Wissenschaften; Bd.18

Source

Wirklichkeit und Wissen: Realismus, Antirealismus und Wirklichkeits-Konzeptionen in Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Hrsg.: H.J. Sandkühler

0.023061795 = product of:
  0.09224718 = sum of:
    0.09224718 = weight(_text_:und in 1731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09224718 = score(doc=1731,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.15368472 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.60023654 = fieldWeight in 1731, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1731)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series

Philosophie und Geschichte der Wissenschaften; Bd.18

Source

Wirklichkeit und Wissen: Realismus, Antirealismus und Wirklichkeits-Konzeptionen in Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Hrsg.: H.J. Sandkühler

0.023061795 = product of:
  0.09224718 = sum of:
    0.09224718 = weight(_text_:und in 607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09224718 = score(doc=607,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.15368472 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.60023654 = fieldWeight in 607, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=607)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series

Philosophie und Geschichte der Wissenschaften; Bd.18

Source

Wirklichkeit und Wissen: Realismus, Antirealismus und Wirklichkeits-Konzeptionen in Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Hrsg.: H.J. Sandkühler

0.02259585 = product of:
  0.0903834 = sum of:
    0.0903834 = weight(_text_:und in 608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0903834 = score(doc=608,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15368472 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.58810925 = fieldWeight in 608, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=608)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series

Philosophie und Geschichte der Wissenschaften; Bd.18

Source

Wirklichkeit und Wissen: Realismus, Antirealismus und Wirklichkeits-Konzeptionen in Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Hrsg.: H.J. Sandkühler

0.02259585 = product of:
  0.0903834 = sum of:
    0.0903834 = weight(_text_:und in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0903834 = score(doc=612,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.15368472 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.58810925 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Series

Philosophie und Geschichte der Wissenschaften; Bd.18

Source

Wirklichkeit und Wissen: Realismus, Antirealismus und Wirklichkeits-Konzeptionen in Philosophie und Wissenschaften. Hrsg.: H.J. Sandkühler

0.022532912 = product of:
  0.09013165 = sum of:
    0.09013165 = weight(_text_:headings in 1106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09013165 = score(doc=1106,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33623707 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.26805982 = fieldWeight in 1106, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1106)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to provide a critical analysis from an ethical perspective of how the concept of indigenous wayfinding and voyaging is mapped in knowledge representation, organization and discovery systems. Design/methodology/approach In this study, the Dewey Decimal Classification, the Library of Congress Subject Headings, the Library of Congress Classifications systems and the Web of Science citation database were methodically examined to determine how these systems represent and facilitate the discovery of indigenous knowledge of wayfinding and voyaging. Findings The analysis revealed that there was no dedicated representation of the indigenous practices of wayfinding and voyaging in the major knowledge representation, organization and discovery systems. By scattering indigenous practice across various, often very broad and unrelated classes, coherence in the record is disrupted, resulting in misrepresentation of these indigenous concepts. Originality/value This study contributes to a relatively limited research literature on representation and organization of indigenous knowledge of wayfinding and voyaging. This study calls to foster a better understanding and appreciation for the rich knowledge that indigenous cultures provide for an enlightened society.

0.01992767 = product of:
  0.07971068 = sum of:
    0.07971068 = weight(_text_:und in 20) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07971068 = score(doc=20,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.15368472 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.51866364 = fieldWeight in 20, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=20)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Der Artikel führt in semantische Technologien ein und gewährt Einblick in unterschiedliche Entwicklungsrichtungen. Insbesondere werden Business Semantics vorgestellt und vom Semantic Web abgegrenzt. Die Stärken von Business Semantics werden speziell an den Praxisbeispielen des Knowledge Portals und dem Projekt "Knowledge Base" der Wienerberger AG veranschaulicht. So werden die Anforderungen - was brauchen Anwendungen in Unternehmen heute - und die Leistungsfähigkeit von Systemen - was bieten Business Semantics - konkretisiert und gegenübergestellt.

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.6/7, S.359-366

0.01992767 = product of:
  0.07971068 = sum of:
    0.07971068 = weight(_text_:und in 23) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07971068 = score(doc=23,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.15368472 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.51866364 = fieldWeight in 23, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=23)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Dieser Beitrag beschreibt die Strukturierungsprinzipien und Anwendungskontexte lexikalisch-semantischer Wortnetze, insbesondere des deutschen Wortnetzes GermaNet. Wortnetze sind zurzeit besonders populäre elektronische Lexikonressourcen, die große Abdeckungen semantisch strukturierter Datenfür verschiedene Sprachen und Sprachverbünde enthalten. In Wortnetzen sind die häufigsten und wichtigsten Konzepte einer Sprache mit ihren elementaren Bedeutungsrelationen repräsentiert. Zentrale Anwendungen für Wortnetze sind u.a. die Lesartendisambiguierung und die Informationserschließung. Der Artikel skizziert die neusten Szenarien, in denen GermaNet eingesetzt wird: die Semantische Informationserschließung und die Integration allgemeinsprachlicher Wortnetze mit terminologischen Ressourcen vordem Hintergrund der Datenkonvertierung in OWL.

Source

Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 57(2006) H.6/7, S.309-314

0.019771371 = product of:
  0.079085484 = sum of:
    0.079085484 = weight(_text_:und in 4143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.079085484 = score(doc=4143,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.15368472 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.5145956 = fieldWeight in 4143, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4143)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Topic Maps auf der einen Seite und das Programm Concepto auf der anderen Seite werden beschrieben. Mt Topic Maps können Wortnetze und einfache Satzstrukturen dargestellt werden. Concepto dient zur Erfassung, Bearbeitung und Visualisierung von Wortschatz und Strukturen. Es unterstützt ein Wortmodell, bei dem die verschiedenen Lesarten eines Wortes erfasst und einfachen, formalsprachlichen Begriffen zugewiesen werden können. Die Funktionen beider Systeme werden verglichen. Es wird dargestellt, was an Topic Maps und an Concepto ergänzt werden müsste, wenn beide Systeme einen kompatiblen, wechselseitigen Datenaustausch zulassen sollen. Diese Erweiterungen würden die Anwendbarkeit der Systeme noch interessanter machen.

Source

Wissensorganisation und Edutainment: Wissen im Spannungsfeld von Gesellschaft, Gestaltung und Industrie. Proceedings der 7. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Berlin, 21.-23.3.2001. Hrsg.: C. Lehner, H.P. Ohly u. G. Rahmstorf

0.019568585 = product of:
  0.07827434 = sum of:
    0.07827434 = weight(_text_:und in 1105) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07827434 = score(doc=1105,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15368472 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.50931764 = fieldWeight in 1105, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1105)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Semantic Web - Taxonomie und Thesaurus - SKOS - Historie - Klassen und Eigenschaften - Beispiele - Generierung - automatisiert - per Folksonomie - Fazit und Ausblick

0.018640628 = product of:
  0.07456251 = sum of:
    0.07456251 = weight(_text_:und in 3885) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07456251 = score(doc=3885,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.15368472 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.069292925 = queryNorm
        0.48516542 = fieldWeight in 3885, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3885)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Der vorliegende Artikel beschreibt Social-Tagging-Systeme aus theoretisch-kognitionspsychologischer Perspektive und zeigt einige Parallelen und Analogien zwischen Social Tagging und der individuellen kognitiven bedeutungsbezogenen Wissensrepräsentation auf. Zuerst werden wesentliche Aspekte von Social Tagging vorgestellt, die für eine psychologische Betrachtungsweise von Bedeutung sind. Danach werden Modelle und empirische Befunde der Kognitionswissenschaften bezüglich der Speicherung und des Abrufs von Inhalten des Langzeitgedächtnisses beschrieben. Als Drittes werden Parallelen und Unterschiede zwischen Social Tagging und der internen Wissensrepräsentation erläutert und die Möglichkeit von individuellen Lernprozessen durch Social-Tagging-Systeme aufgezeigt.