Search (1088 results, page 55 of 55)

0.0063384157 = product of:
  0.025353663 = sum of:
    0.025353663 = weight(_text_:und in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025353663 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1478073 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06664293 = queryNorm
        0.17153187 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.0063384157 = product of:
  0.025353663 = sum of:
    0.025353663 = weight(_text_:und in 3633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025353663 = score(doc=3633,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1478073 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06664293 = queryNorm
        0.17153187 = fieldWeight in 3633, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3633)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.0063384157 = product of:
  0.025353663 = sum of:
    0.025353663 = weight(_text_:und in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025353663 = score(doc=4362,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1478073 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06664293 = queryNorm
        0.17153187 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

In Grenoble wurde um 1971 das Format MONOCLE als französische Adaption des USMARCII aufgestellt. Dieses wurde vom SiBiL-Verbund übernommen. MONOCLE wurde danach auch die Basis für das weiterentwickelte INTERMARC, das seinerseits ein Vorläufer von UNIMARC wurde. Die Ähnlichkeit mit USMARC ist recht stark, es gibt aber eine Reihe von abweichenden Feldern, vor allem sind die Indikatoren sehr unterschiedlich definiert. Immerhin hat die französische Orientierung auf USMARC dann um 1988 dazu geführt, daß die französischen Universitäten und die Bibliothèque Nationale sich zu einem Anschluß an OCLC entschließen konnten

0.0063384157 = product of:
  0.025353663 = sum of:
    0.025353663 = weight(_text_:und in 3021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025353663 = score(doc=3021,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1478073 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06664293 = queryNorm
        0.17153187 = fieldWeight in 3021, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3021)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Enthält Empfehlungen zur Vorgehensweise bei der Inhaltsanalyse und diskutiert Beispiele // Eine deutsche Übersetzung ist 1994 im Saur Verlag erschienen. - Rez. in: Knowledge organization 20(1993) no.2, S.98-99. (M.P. Satija)

0.0054329275 = product of:
  0.02173171 = sum of:
    0.02173171 = weight(_text_:und in 810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02173171 = score(doc=810,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1478073 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06664293 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 810, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=810)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

Enthält die Beiträge: OESER, E.: The two systems of knowledge organization; CAVALCANTI, C.: Systems applications and concepts in the field of classification; KAULA, P.N.: Rethinking on concepts in the study of classification; WAHLIN, E.: Analysis of different ordering principles (Appendices); GIERTZ, L.M.: Note on general principles and policies; VET, P.E. vander: Notes on the foundations of classificatio theories; MÖNKE, H.: Analytische Pragmatik und Dogmatik in der Klassifikation; FUGMANN, R.: The complementarity of natural and indexing languages; HENRIKSEN, T.: On the mechanization of the chain index (abstract); Rajan, T.N. et al: Associate relationships of concepts as seen through citations and citation index (abstract); RAHMSTORF, G.: Explication of class descriptions; DIENES, M.: Structural differences in classification systems and the testing of the compatibility matrix in the field of culture; KOERNER, H.G.: Classification and small computers; SCIBOR, E.: Polish subject-field classification - broad ordering system for use on a national scale; KLESZCZ, F.: Towards a classification, unification and selection of automatic indexing methods

0.0054329275 = product of:
  0.02173171 = sum of:
    0.02173171 = weight(_text_:und in 1237) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02173171 = score(doc=1237,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1478073 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06664293 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 1237, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1237)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Das System wird angewendet in den verschiedenen Ausgaben der 'International Classification and Indexing Bibliography' und in der laufenden Bibliographie in 'International Classification'

0.0054329275 = product of:
  0.02173171 = sum of:
    0.02173171 = weight(_text_:und in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02173171 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1478073 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06664293 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.0031692078 = product of:
  0.012676831 = sum of:
    0.012676831 = weight(_text_:und in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012676831 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1478073 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06664293 = queryNorm
        0.085765935 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus