Search (4972 results, page 3 of 249)

0.060337678 = product of:
  0.24135071 = sum of:
    0.24135071 = weight(_text_:headings in 350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24135071 = score(doc=350,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.7505675 = fieldWeight in 350, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=350)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Moving to a fully faceted syntax would resolve three problems facing Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): 1. Inconsistent syntax rules; 2. Inability to create headings that are coextensive with the topic of a work; and 3. Lack of effective displays for long lists of subdivisions under a single subject heading in OPACs and similar electronic displays. The authors advocate a fully faceted syntax using the facets of a modern faceted library classification (The Bliss Bibliographic Classification, 2d ed.). They demonstrate how this might be accomplished so as to integrate the new syntax with existing headings.

0.059718817 = product of:
  0.23887527 = sum of:
    0.23887527 = weight(_text_:headings in 5048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23887527 = score(doc=5048,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.7428692 = fieldWeight in 5048, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5048)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The new edition adds 7.200 new headings and their references; LCSH now has a total of 270.000 authority records. Instructions how to use the LCSH in: Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings (2002 cumulation: 5th. ed. 1996 with updates through 2002 interfiled; looseleaf in 4 vols.) with semiannual updates.

0.059718817 = product of:
  0.23887527 = sum of:
    0.23887527 = weight(_text_:headings in 443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23887527 = score(doc=443,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.7428692 = fieldWeight in 443, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=443)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Madison High School Library joined the South Dakota Library Network (SDLN), a multi-type library consortium with a shared online catalog in 1998. This study compares subject access in this small high school library both before and after the retrospective conversion. Vocabulary mapping between the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) and the Sears List of Subject Headings is discussed.

Object

Sears List of Subject Headings

0.057822496 = product of:
  0.23128998 = sum of:
    0.23128998 = weight(_text_:headings in 6611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23128998 = score(doc=6611,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.71928 = fieldWeight in 6611, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6611)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing's Working Group on Principles Underlying Subject Headings Languages has identified a set of eleven principles for subject heading languages and excerpted the texts that match each principle from the instructions for each of eleven national subject indexing systems, including excerpts from the LC's Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. This study compares the IFLA principles with other texts that express the principles underlying LCSH, especially Library of Congress Subject Headings: Principles of Structure and Policies for Application, prepared by Lois Mai Chan for the Library of Congress in 1990, Chan's later book on LCSH, and earlier documents by Haykin and Cutter. The principles are further elaborated for clarity and discussed

Source

The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone

0.057822496 = product of:
  0.23128998 = sum of:
    0.23128998 = weight(_text_:headings in 1784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23128998 = score(doc=1784,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.71928 = fieldWeight in 1784, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1784)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The Library of Congress Subject Headings has flaws in the logic and structure of its headings relating to the Southwest. Examples demonstrate aspects of the regional biases that make it frustrating to use LCSH for cataloging Southwest collections. The frustrations experienced by students, researchers, and library patrons trying to find detailed information on the Southwest have significant social consequences, especially for Hispanics and Native Americans. Antonio Gramsci's concepts provide a framework to present the implications of these consequences and the need to correct them. LCSH is a major cataloging and research resource both nationally and internationally. Successfully changing biased and inaccurate LCSH subject headings will exhibit social and political leadership while LCSH is providing technological leadership as a key source for developing cooperative online international authority files for subject headings.

0.057641804 = product of:
  0.11528361 = sum of:
    0.05494593 = weight(_text_:und in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05494593 = score(doc=183,freq=38.0), product of:
        0.14697514 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.37384504 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
          6.164414 = tf(freq=38.0), with freq of:
            38.0 = termFreq=38.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
    0.060337678 = weight(_text_:headings in 183) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060337678 = score(doc=183,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.18764187 = fieldWeight in 183, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=183)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Am 24. und 25. April 2006 hat die Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme auf Einladung der Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin Preußischer Kulturbesitz ihre 50. Sitzung in Berlin durchgeführt.

Content

Inhalt: - Zusammenarbeit der Verbundsysteme, Verbesserung von Datentausch und Fremddatennutzung - - MARC21 als Austauschformat Die Arbeiten im Rahmen des Projektes Umstieg auf MARC 21 liegen im Zeitplan. Der gegenwärtige Schwerpunkt der Arbeit ist die Erstellung einer Konkordanz MAB2 - MARC 21, die laufend mit der Expertengruppe Datenformate zurückgekoppelt wird und den Verbünden nach ihrer Fertigstellung vorgelegt wird. Es wird erwartet, dass zum 1. Januar 2007 ein Stand erreicht ist, an dem die Verbünde die erforderlichen Schritte ihres Umstiegs konkret terminieren können. Ab Herbst soll eine Arbeitsgruppe aus Vertretern der Verbünde den Umstieg auf operativer Ebene konkret planen. Damit der Umstieg als gut vorbereiteter, konzertierter und flächendeckend durchgeführter Schritt vollzogen werden kann, sollen die Verbundzentralen entsprechende Kapazitäten einplanen. - - Matchkey Kooperative Neukatalogisierung - - Catalogue Enrichment Nach einem Beschluss in der 49. Sitzung wurde eine Arbeitsgruppe Catalogue enrichment unter Federführung des HBZ gegründet. Das HBZ hat einen Entwurf zu einer Referenzdatenbank für Kataloganreicherungen vorgelegt, der gegenwärtig diskutiert wird. Die Mitglieder der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Verbundsysteme haben sich darauf geeinigt, eine Bestandsaufnahme sowie eine Mengen- und Inhaltsabschätzung dessen zu machen, was sie in die Referenzdatenbank einspeisen können. Das HBZ wird ein Konzept für ein Daten- und Schnittstellenmodell vorlegen und einen Prototyp der Datenbank aufsetzen. Die Deutsche Bibliothek hat zugesagt, mit Verlegern über zusätzliche Daten wie Inhaltsverzeichnisse, Abstracts, Cover o.ä. zu verhandeln mit dem Ziel, diese Informationseinheiten zu übernehmen, ggf. selbst zu erstellen und über ihre Datendienste auszuliefern statt wie bisher nur als Link auf Drittsystemen zur Verfügung zu stellen. Der Deutsche Bibliotheksverband (DBV) steht mit dem Börsenverein des Deutschen Buchhandels in Kontakt und hat bereits eine prinzipielle Zusage erreicht; derzeit wird eine entsprechende Vereinbarung angestrebt. - - Normdaten-Onlineschnittstelle
- Neues von den Mitgliedern (in Auswahl, Stand: April 2006) - - Bibliotheksverbund Bayern (BVB) / Verbundzentrale - - - Erweiterung des ALEPH-Einsatzes - - - Catalogue Enrichment ADAM - - - CD-ROM-Server - - - InfoGuide - - - Application Service Providing (ASP) - - Bibliotheksservice-Zentrum Baden-Württemberg (BSZ) - - - SWB-Verbunddatenbank - - - Catalogue Enrichment - - - OPUS - - - Internetportal für Bibliotheken, Archive und Museen (BAM) - - - Metadatenverwaltung für den Verteilten Dokumentenserver (VDS) - - - Virtuelle Auskunft mit drei Partnerbibliotheken eröffnet - - Die Deutsche Bibliothek - - - DissOnline Portal - - - DissOnline Tutor - - - CrissCross Ziel des Projektes CrissCross ist es, ein multilinguales, thesaurusbasiertes und benutzergerechtes Recherchevokabular zu schaffen. Hierzu werden die Sachschlagwörter der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) mit den Notationen der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC) verbunden. Die Multilingualität wird durch die Verknüpfung mit ihren Äquivalenten in den beiden umfassenden Schlagwortnormdateien Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) und Rameau erreicht. Dabei wird auf den Ergebnissen des MACS-Projektes aufgebaut. Dem Nutzer wird so der Zugang zu heterogen erschlossenen Dokumenten ermöglicht, ohne dass er die Regeln des jeweiligen nationalen oder internationalen Erschließungsinstrumentes kennen muss. Projektpartner sind die Fakultät für Informations- und Kommunikationswissenschaften der Fachhochschule Köln und Die Deutsche Bibliothek. Das Projekt hat am 1. Februar 2006 begonnen und soll Ende Januar 2008 abgeschlossen sein. Technisch wird das Projekt im PICA/Iltis-System Der Deutschen Bibliothek und in der Arbeitsumgebung für die DDC "MelvilClass" realisiert. - - - DDC-vascoda
- - Gemeinsamer Bibliotheksverbund (GBV) / Verbundzentrale des GBV (VZG) - - - WWW-Datenbanken - - - Virtuelle Fachbibliotheken - - - Verbundkatalog Internetquellen VKI - - - Öffentliche Bibliotheken im GBV - - Hessisches BibliotheksinformationsSystem (NeBIS) / Verbundzentrale - - - HeBIS-Portal - - - PND-Projekt - - - Catalogue Enrichment - - Hochschulbibliothekszentrum des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (HBZ) - - - Bibliographischer Werkzeugkasten - - - DigiAuskunft - - - Suchmaschine - - - Suchmaschinentechnologie - - - Verfügbarkeitsrecherche - - - Publikationssysteme/Digital Peer Publishing (DiPP) - - Kooperativer Bibliotheksverbund Berlin-Brandenburg (KOBV) / KOBV-Zentrale - - - KOBV-Portal - - - Inbetriebnahme des neuen KOBV-Index - - - KOBV-Konsortialportal - - - OPUS- und Archivierungsdienste - - - Zeitschriftenartikel im Volltext
- - Österreichische Bibliothekenverbund und Service Ges.m.b.H. (OBVSG) Datenlieferung an die ZDB - - - ZDB als Fremddatenquelle/Normdatei - - - Österreichische Dissertationsdatenbank/eDoc - - - Anbindung weiterer Lokalsysteme - - - Retroerfassungsprojekt - - - Homepage /"Verbundportal" - - Zeitschriftendatenbank (ZDB) - - - ZDB-OPAC - - - Integration DDB in ZDB - - - Collection Management/ Kennzeichnung von Sondersommelgebietszeitschriften in der ZDB - - - Sigelverzeichnis online/Bibliotheksdatei der ZDB

0.0541726 = product of:
  0.1083452 = sum of:
    0.02389005 = weight(_text_:und in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02389005 = score(doc=3312,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.14697514 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.16254483 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
    0.084455155 = weight(_text_:headings in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.084455155 = score(doc=3312,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.2626439 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

BK

06.04 / Ausbildung, Beruf, Organisationen <Information und Dokumentation>

Classification

06.04 / Ausbildung, Beruf, Organisationen <Information und Dokumentation>

Footnote

The next section collects three papers, all presented at the meeting by the people best placed to address the topics authoritatively and comprehensively. The first is by John D. Byrum, of the Library of Congress, and Chair of the ISBD Review Group, who clearly and concisely explains the history and role of the ISBDs in "IFLA's ISBD Programme. Purpose, process, and prospects." The next paper, "Brave new FRBR world" is by Patrick Le Boeuf, of the Bibliothèque nationale de France and Chair of the FRBR Review Group (a French version is available an the website). Drawing from his extensive expertise with FRBR, Le Boeuf explains what FRBR is and equally importantly is not, points to its impact in the present context of Code revision, and discusses insights relevant to the working group topics that can be drawn from FRBR. Closing this section is Barbara Tillett's contribution "A Virtual International Authority File," which signals an important change in thinking about international cooperation for bibliographic control. Earlier efforts focussed an getting agreement about form and structure of headings, this view stresses linking authority files to share the intellectual effort yet present headings to the user in the form that is most appropriate culturally.
The section of background papers starts most appropriately by reprinting the Statement of Principles from the 1961 Paris Conference and continues with another twelve papers of varying lengths, most written specifically for the IME ICC. For the published report the papers have been organized to follow the order of topics assigned to the Tive working groups: Working Group 1 Personal names; WG2 Corporate bodies; WG3 Seriality; WG4 Multivolume/multipart structures; and WG5 Uniform titles, GMDs. Pino Buizza and Mauro Guerrini co-author a substantial paper "Author and title access point control: On the way national bibliographic agencies face the issue forty years after the Paris Principles," which was first presented in Italian at the November 2002 workshop an Cataloguing and Authority Control in Rome. Issues that remain unresolved are which name or title to adopt, which form of the name or title, and which entry word to select, while choice of headings has become more uniform. The impact of catalogue language (meaning both the language of the cataloguing agency and of the majority of users of the catalogue) an these choices is explored by examining the headings used in ten national authority files for a full range of names, personal and corporate. The reflections presented are both practical and grounded in theory. Mauro Guerrini, assisted by Pino Buizza and Lucia Sardo, contributes a further new paper "Corporate bodies from ICCP up to 2003," which is an excellent survey of the surprisingly controversial issue of corporate bodies as authors, starting with Panizzi, Jewett, Cutter, Dziatzko, Fumagalli, and Lubetzky, through the debate at the Paris Conference, to the views of Verona, Domanovszky and Carpenter, and work under the auspices of IFLA an the Form and structure of corporate headings (FSCH) project and its Rvew, as well as a look at the archival standard ISAAR(CPF). This paper is the only one to have a comprehensive bibliography.
Ton Heijligers reflects an the relation of the IME ICC effort to AACR and calls for an examination of the principles and function of the concept of main entry in his brief paper "Main entry into the future?" Ingrid Parent's article "From ISBD (S) to ISBD(CR): a voyage of discovery and alignment" is reprinted from Serials Librarian as it tells of the successful project not only to revise an ISBD, but also to harmonize three Codes for serials cataloguing: ISBD (CR), ISSN and AACR. Gunilla Jonsson's paper "The bibliographic unit in the digital context" is a perceptive discussion of level of granularity issues which must be addressed in deciding what to catalogue. Practical issues and user expectation are important considerations, whether the material to be catalogued is digital or analog. Ann Huthwaite's paper "Class of materials concept and GMDs" as well as Tom Delsey's ensuing comments, originated as Joint Steering Committee restricted papers in 2002. It is a great service to have them made widely available in this form as they raise fundamental issues and motivate work that has since taken place, leading to the current major round of revision to AACR. The GMD issue is about more than a list of terms and their placement in the cataloguing record, it is intertwined with consideration of whether the concept of classes of materials is helpful in organizing cataloguing rules, if so, which classes are needed, and how to allow for eventual integration of new types of materials. Useful in the Code comparison exercise is an extract of the section an access points from the draft of revised RAK (German cataloguing rules). Four short papers compare aspects of the Russian Cataloguing Rules with RAK and AACR: Tatiana Maskhoulia covers corporate body headings; Elena Zagorskaya outlines current development an serials and other continuing resources; Natalia N. Kasparova covers multilevel structures; Ljubov Ermakova and Tamara Bakhturina describe the uniform title and GMD provisions. The website includes one more item by Kasparova "Bibliographic record language in multilingual electronic communication." The volume is rounded out by the appendix which includes the conference agenda, the full list of participants, and the reports from the five working groups. Not for the casual reader, this volume is a must read for anyone working an cataloguing code development at the national or international levels, as well as those teaching cataloguing. Any practising cataloguer will benefit from reading the draft statement of principles and the three presentation papers, and dipping into the background papers."
Weitere Rez. in: ZfBB 52(2005) H.3/4, S.227-228 (K. Haller): " ... Im Mittelpunkt der Publikation steht das revidierte Statement of International Cataloguing Principles. Es wendet sich mit seinen Grundsätzen gleichermaßen an Bibliografien und Bibliothekskataloge sowie Datensammlungen in Archiven, Museen und dergleichen Einrichtungen. Terminologisch und inhaltlich geht das Statement von den Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) aus. Durch die Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR) werden die Normdateien und die Sacherschließung in das Statement eingebracht. Die FRBR sind ein theoretisches Modell, ein strategisches Dokument, in dem durch die Entitäten die logischen Zusammenhänge dargestellt und damit die notwendi ge Erschließungsqualität definiert wird. Es geht um klare Grundsätze für Wahl, Anzahl und Art der Suchbegriffe (access points) und deren Beziehungen. ... Insgesamt ist die Publikation sehr zu begrüßen und als Pflichtlektüre allen Verantwortlichen im Erschließungsbereich und dem in Ausbildung befindlichen Nachwuchs dringend zu empfehlen."

0.05414624 = product of:
  0.10829248 = sum of:
    0.018714258 = weight(_text_:und in 4243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018714258 = score(doc=4243,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14697514 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.12732941 = fieldWeight in 4243, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4243)
    0.089578226 = weight(_text_:headings in 4243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.089578226 = score(doc=4243,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.27857596 = fieldWeight in 4243, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4243)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Footnote

The didactic parts of the book are a collection of exercises, readings and resources constituting a "Teach yourself " chapter written by Alan Thomas, ending with the warning that "New challenges include how to devise multi-functional and usersensitive vocabularies, corporate taxonomies and ontologies, and how to apply the transformative technology to them." This is absolutely right, and there is a need for some good writing that would tackle these issues. Another chapter, by James Shearer, skilfully manages to compress a practical exercise in building a thesaurus into some twenty A5 size pages. The third chapter in this set, by Marianne Lykke Nielsen, contains extensive reviews of key issues and selected readings under eight headings from the concept of the thesaurus, through the various construction stages and ending with automatic construction techniques. . . . This is a useful and approachable book. It is a pity that the index is such a poor advertisement for vocabulary control and usefulness."

LCSH

Subject headings

RSWK

Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Information Retrieval / Inhaltserschließung / Thesaurus (BVB)

Subject

Informations- und Dokumentationswissenschaft / Information Retrieval / Inhaltserschließung / Thesaurus (BVB)
Subject headings

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.05225396 = product of:
  0.20901585 = sum of:
    0.20901585 = weight(_text_:headings in 3613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20901585 = score(doc=3613,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.6500105 = fieldWeight in 3613, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3613)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

This paper aims at illustrating the methodology of constructing the Arabic authority headings. Accordingly, the main focus is on the system of linking name headings in Arabic-Roman scripts and subject headings in the three languages Arabic, English and French. The Bibliotheca Alexandrina's biscript / trilingual authority file project »bibalex« can be considered the first step toward establishing cooperative projects with union catalogs and authority files.

0.05225396 = product of:
  0.20901585 = sum of:
    0.20901585 = weight(_text_:headings in 587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20901585 = score(doc=587,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.6500105 = fieldWeight in 587, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=587)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Evaluative and comparative studies of catalog data have tended to focus on methods that are labor intensive, demand expertise, and can examine only a limited number of records. This study explores an alternative approach to gathering and analyzing catalog data, focusing on the currency and consistency of controlled headings. The resulting data provide insight into libraries' use of changed headings and their success in maintaining currency and consistency, and the systems needed to support the current pace of heading changes.

0.05176772 = product of:
  0.10353544 = sum of:
    0.051817432 = weight(_text_:und in 3484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051817432 = score(doc=3484,freq=46.0), product of:
        0.14697514 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.35255915 = fieldWeight in 3484, product of:
          6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
            46.0 = termFreq=46.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3484)
    0.05171801 = weight(_text_:headings in 3484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05171801 = score(doc=3484,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.16083589 = fieldWeight in 3484, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3484)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Das Thema Erschließung war immer ein Kernthema bibliothekarischer Arbeit. Es wird zunehmend durch Aspekte der Internationalisierung und der Wirtschaftlichkeit beeinflusst. Wachsende Massendigitalisierung und verstärktes Aufkommen von E-Books stellen die Tradition der bisherigen bibliothekarischen Katalogisierungsgewohnheiten in Frage. Die Vielfalt der Datenproduzenten, deren Daten in die Bibliothekskataloge einfließen, nimmt zu. So liefern, zum Beispiel bei E-Books, in der Regel die Verlage auch die Nachweisdaten, die - wenn überhaupt - eher internationalen Standards als den RAK entsprechen. Innerhalb der Möglichkeiten des Web 2.0 entstehen sogenannte Next-Generation-Kataloge. Nutzer erstellen sich hier im Rahmen von LibraryThing auch ihre eigenen Kataloge. Der Anspruch von Bibliotheken, ihren Kunden für alle Fächer ein einheitliches Instrument zur Recherche nach lokal verfügbaren Ressourcen zu geben, macht grundsätzliche Diskussionen notwendig, zumal den Kunden mit der Suchmaschine Google ein Instrument zur Verfügung steht, das alle Nutzerbedürfnisse zu befriedigen scheint. Auch zur Rechtfertigung des Aufwands in den Bibliotheken ist es notwendig, die Nutzerperspektive einzunehmen und das eigene Arbeiten kritisch zu reflektieren. Ein Beispiel sei hier genannt: So dürfte es für Nutzer in der Regel irrelevant sein, ob es sich bei einem elektronischen Buch um eine Primär- oder eine Sekundärausgabe handelt. Die Anwendung des geltenden Regelwerks zur Formalerschließung kann hier aber zu unterschiedlichen Katalogisierungsergebnissen führen. Warum eigentlich? Seit kurzem ist zumindest dem Missstand abgeholfen, dass die elektronische Fassung z.B. einer Dissertation die Haupteintragung - anders als die zugehörige Druckausgabe - unter dem Sachtitel, und nicht unter dem Verfasser erhielt. Vor diesem Hintergrund hat sich die Facharbeitsgruppe Erschließung und Informationsvermittlung entschieden, ihren alljährlichen Workshop auf der Verbundkonferenz des Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbundes in diesem Jahr dem Thema "Zukunft der Erschließung" zu widmen, auch aus dem Eindruck heraus, dass hierzulande - im Gegensatz zu den USA - so gut wie keine grundsätzlichen Diskussionen stattfinden, obwohl es Anlass und Anregung gäbe. Zu denken ist z.B. an die Studie "On the Record", die eine Expertengruppe im Auftrag der Library of Congress erstellt hat und die Leitlinien für die bibliothekarische Erschließungsarbeit der Zukunft enthält.
Der Ausrichter des Workhops, die Facharbeitsgruppe Erschließung und Informationsvermittlung (FAG-El) des Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbundes (GBV) begleitet die Arbeit des GBV und der Verbundzentrale des GBV. Als eine von fünf Facharbeitsgruppen bereitet sie strategische Weiterentwicklungen vor und entwirft in Abstimmung mit der Verbundzentrale Konzepte und Konventionen für das von ihr behandelte Themenspektrum: - Strategien zur formalen und sachlichen Erschließung - Metadaten: Erzeugung, Transfer zwischen Systemen, nutzerorientierte Aufbereitung - Nutzerorientierte Weiterentwicklung der Nachweissysteme, Bibliothek 2.0 - Digitale Bibliothek und die Integration elektronischer Ressourcen in die bestehende Informationsinfrastruktur - Informationskompetenz, E-Learning, Auskunftsdienste.
Dass Bibliotheken sich der nutzergetriebenen Erschließung öffnen müssen, war Konsens. Um die in den Vorträgen gleichfalls geforderte Vernetzung von Datenbeständen und die dafür hilfreiche Normierung von Daten zu befördern, wäre es sinnvoll, wenn die bibliothekarischen Normdateien - allen voran die kooperativ gepflegte Schlagwortnormdatei - zur freien Nachnutzung ins Netz gestellt würden, ähnlich wie die Library of Congress es mit ihren Subject Headings vorgemacht hat, die SKOS-kodiert mittlerweile für Experimente zur Verfügung steheng. In Sachen Retrievalsysteme prallten gegensätzliche Meinungen aufeinander: Auslöser war das von Frau Jaeggi eingebrachte Beispiel "jakobinischer Freiheitsdrang": Sollte eine solche Suchanfrage automatisch so umgewandelt werden (z.B. in "Jakobiner" und "Freiheit"), dass der Nutzer ein sinnvolles Ergebnis erhält, oder soll dieser intellektuelle Schritt Aufgabe des Recherchierenden bleiben? Sollen die Bibliothekare sich nur um den Input kümmern, und den Output, die Gestaltung von Suchsystemen, besser anderen überlassen, die von bibliothekarischer Terminologie und Regelgeleitetheit unbelastet sind? Aber: Müssen Input und Output nicht immer zusammen betrachtet werden, weil man nicht herausholen kann, was man zuvor nicht hineingesteckt hat? Konsens unter allen Diskutanten war aber, dass themenbezogene Recherchen durch eine bessere Benutzerführung erleichtert werden müssen und dass der Schatz an Informationen und Wissen, der insbesondere in inhaltserschließenden Daten steckt, in den Bibliothekskatalogen endlich an die Oberfläche geholt werden muss. Zusammenfassend lässt sich sicher sagen: - Qualitätvolle bibliothekarische Erschließung ist nicht obsolet. - Sie ist Bestandteil der Wissensorganisation, die im Web erfolgt. - Öffnung und Vernetzbarkeit sind daher das Gebot der Stunde.

0.05171801 = product of:
  0.20687205 = sum of:
    0.20687205 = weight(_text_:headings in 816) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20687205 = score(doc=816,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 816, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=816)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.05171801 = product of:
  0.20687205 = sum of:
    0.20687205 = weight(_text_:headings in 1818) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20687205 = score(doc=1818,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 1818, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1818)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.05171801 = product of:
  0.20687205 = sum of:
    0.20687205 = weight(_text_:headings in 5753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20687205 = score(doc=5753,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 5753, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5753)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.05171801 = product of:
  0.20687205 = sum of:
    0.20687205 = weight(_text_:headings in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20687205 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.05171801 = product of:
  0.20687205 = sum of:
    0.20687205 = weight(_text_:headings in 6407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20687205 = score(doc=6407,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 6407, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6407)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.05171801 = product of:
  0.20687205 = sum of:
    0.20687205 = weight(_text_:headings in 576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20687205 = score(doc=576,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 576, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=576)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

The nature of a library's collections determines what kind of subject access to provide to those collections. The collections of the Cleveland Public Library serve both the recreational and research needs of a large urban population. The Cleveland Public Library uses Library of Congress Subject Headings to describe its collections. A study of subject searches entered by library patrons over the course of one week reveals several patterns among the types of subject headings used most frequently, reflecting the characteristics of the population served. Other topics discussed include subject access to fiction, juvenileliterature, and specialized collections

Source

The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone

0.05171801 = product of:
  0.20687205 = sum of:
    0.20687205 = weight(_text_:headings in 1015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20687205 = score(doc=1015,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 1015, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1015)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Ein Beitrag zum Nutzen von: People, places & things: a list of popular Library of Congress Subject Headings with Dewey Numbers. 2001.

0.05171801 = product of:
  0.20687205 = sum of:
    0.20687205 = weight(_text_:headings in 1421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20687205 = score(doc=1421,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 1421, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1421)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Footnote

Übers. d. Titels: Principles underlying subject headings: seeking unity in diversity

0.05171801 = product of:
  0.20687205 = sum of:
    0.20687205 = weight(_text_:headings in 2053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20687205 = score(doc=2053,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.32155764 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.066267736 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 2053, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2053)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)