Search (5078 results, page 1 of 254)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Stone, A.T.: ¬The LCSH century : a brief history of the Library of Congress Subject Headings, and introduction to the centennial essays (2000) 0.12
    0.12124987 = product of:
      0.24249974 = sum of:
        0.02293519 = weight(_text_:und in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02293519 = score(doc=6600,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15599272 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
        0.21956454 = weight(_text_:headings in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21956454 = score(doc=6600,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.3412866 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The history of the Library of Congress Subject Headings is traced, from its beginnings with the implementation of a dictionary catalog at the Library of Congress in 1898 to the present day. The author describes the most significant changes which have occurred in LCSH policies and practices during the 100-year period. Events noted near the end of the century indicate an increased willingness on the part of' the Library of Congress to involve the larger library community in the creation or revision of subject headings and other decision-making regarding the LCSH system. Finally, the author provides a summary of the other contributions to this collection of essays, a collection which celebrates the "centennial" of the world's most popular library subject heading language
    Content
    Mit einer Publikationsgeschichte der LCSH (vgl. Tabellen) und dazu gehörenden Publikationen
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
  2. Heiner-Freiling, M.: Survey on subject heading languages used in national libraries and bibliographies (2000) 0.12
    0.12124987 = product of:
      0.24249974 = sum of:
        0.02293519 = weight(_text_:und in 6921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02293519 = score(doc=6921,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15599272 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 6921, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6921)
        0.21956454 = weight(_text_:headings in 6921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21956454 = score(doc=6921,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.3412866 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 6921, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6921)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Surveys conducted during the last four years under the auspices of the International Federation of Library Associations and Organizations (IFLA) reveal that the Library of Congress Subject Headings is heavily used in national libraries outside of the United States, particularly in English-speaking countries. Many other countries report using a translation or adaptation of LCSH as their principal subject heading language. Magda Heiner-Freiling presents an analysis of the IFLA data, which also includes information on the classification schemes used by the libraries and whether or not the libraries have produced a manual on the creation and application of subject headings. The paper concludes with an Appendix showing the complete data from the 88 national libraries that respond to the surveys
    Content
    Mit einer tabellarischen Übersicht der eingesetzten Systeme und Regeln
    Object
    Sears List of Subject Headings
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
  3. Aitchison, J.; Gilchrist, A.; Bawden, D.: Thesaurus construction and use : a practical manual (2000) 0.12
    0.118793845 = product of:
      0.23758769 = sum of:
        0.030580254 = weight(_text_:und in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030580254 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15599272 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.19603643 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
        0.20700744 = weight(_text_:headings in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20700744 = score(doc=1130,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3412866 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.60655016 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    LCSH
    Subject headings / Terminology
    Subject
    Subject headings / Terminology
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  4. Ohly, H.P.: ¬Die Bibliometrie ist tot - es lebe die Bibliometrie (2003) 0.10
    0.10311131 = product of:
      0.20622262 = sum of:
        0.1428331 = weight(_text_:jasist in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1428331 = score(doc=3030,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42644024 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.33494282 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
        0.063389525 = weight(_text_:und in 3030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063389525 = score(doc=3030,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.15599272 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.4063621 = fieldWeight in 3030, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3030)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Vom 5. bis 7. November 2003 findet auf Initiative und in der Verantwortung der Zentralbibliothek des Forschungszentrums Jülich die Konferenz "Bibliometric Analysis in Science and Research" statt: Bibliometrische Indikatoren, Bibliomefrisches Mapping, Webmetrie und Forschungspolitik stehen auf dem Programm. Nach einer Phase der Beruhigung auf dem Bibliometriesektor scheint dieses Forschungsfeld nun von der Bibliothekswissenschaft wieder eine Belebung zu erfahren. Vor allem in den 80erJahren wurden Gesetze von Bradford, Lotka und Zipf heiß diskutiert. Halbwertszeiten, Forschungsfronten und Kernzeitschriften sind Dank der Datenbanken des ISI problemlos aufzuspüren und werden gerne zur Selbstbespiegelung der Wissenschaft benutzt (Diodalo 1994). Die Zeitschrifen Scientometrics und die JASIST belegen, dass die mathematischen Modellierungen auf diesem Gebiet noch immer nicht an ihre Grenzen gestoßen sind. Und Vereinigungen wie die Gesellschaft für Wissenschaftsforschung oder die ISSI und deren Diskussionsliste oder Sigmetrics zeigen, dass nach wie vor eine starke Community auf diesem Gebiet aktiv ist. Andererseits hat der Begriff Bibliometrie ein wenig von seinem schillernden Glanz verloren und wird gerne durch Mapping, Cybermetrics (gleichnamig das "International Journal of Scientometrics, Informetrics and Bibliometrics"), Information Mining und anders in modernere Kontexte gesetzt (Park/Thelwall 2003). War es das relativierende Wissenschaftsverständnis, der Wegfall der konkurrierenden politischen Systeme oder die stürmische Medienentwicklung in der Wissenschaft, welche die Bibliometrie aus der Bibliotheks- und Informationsdiskussion vorübergehend verschwinden ließ?
  5. Aikawa, H. (Bearb.): Guidelines on subject access to individual works of fiction, drama, etc. (2000) 0.10
    0.101255596 = product of:
      0.40502238 = sum of:
        0.40502238 = weight(_text_:headings in 1176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.40502238 = score(doc=1176,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.3412866 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            1.1867515 = fieldWeight in 1176, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1176)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    LCSH
    Form headings
    Subject headings / Literary form
    Subject headings / Literature
    Subject headings / Motion pictures
    Subject headings / Television programs
    Subject
    Form headings
    Subject headings / Literary form
    Subject headings / Literature
    Subject headings / Motion pictures
    Subject headings / Television programs
  6. Klosek, J.: Data privacy in the information age (2000) 0.10
    0.09998317 = product of:
      0.39993268 = sum of:
        0.39993268 = weight(_text_:jasist in 3970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.39993268 = score(doc=3970,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42644024 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.9378399 = fieldWeight in 3970, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3970)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 53(2002) no.3, S.251-253 (A.T. Schroeder)
  7. Warner, J.: Information, knowledge, text (2001) 0.10
    0.09998317 = product of:
      0.39993268 = sum of:
        0.39993268 = weight(_text_:jasist in 6813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.39993268 = score(doc=6813,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42644024 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.9378399 = fieldWeight in 6813, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6813)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 53(2002) no.8, S.690-691 (J. Andersen)
  8. Mani, T.: Automatic summarization (2001) 0.10
    0.09998317 = product of:
      0.39993268 = sum of:
        0.39993268 = weight(_text_:jasist in 5076) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.39993268 = score(doc=5076,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42644024 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.9378399 = fieldWeight in 5076, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5076)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 53(2002) no.5, S.410-411 (S.J. Lincicium)
  9. He, S.; Spink, A.: ¬A comparison of foreign authorship distribution in JASIST and the Journal of Documentation (2002) 0.10
    0.09998317 = product of:
      0.39993268 = sum of:
        0.39993268 = weight(_text_:jasist in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.39993268 = score(doc=230,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.42644024 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.9378399 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    He and Spink count the first authors in JASIST and JDoc from 1950 to 1999 whose affiliation is outside the country of origin of each publication and record the time period and the author's geographic location. Foreign authorship in JASIST increased nearly four fold from 1995 to 1999 and the number of represented locations 3.6 times while in the same time period JDoc's foreign authorship doubled and foreign locations increased four fold. The largest foreign location for JDoc is the USA and the largest foreign location for JASIST is the UK. Canada is second on both lists.
  10. Buckland, M.K.: Emanuel Goldberg and his knowledge machine : information, invention, and political forces (2006) 0.09
    0.09482468 = product of:
      0.18964936 = sum of:
        0.1428331 = weight(_text_:jasist in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1428331 = score(doc=2991,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42644024 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.33494282 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
        0.046816263 = weight(_text_:und in 2991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046816263 = score(doc=2991,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.15599272 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.30011827 = fieldWeight in 2991, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2991)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    BK
    06.01 / Geschichte des Informations- und Dokumentationswesens
    02.01 / Geschichte der Wissenschaft und Kultur
    Classification
    06.01 / Geschichte des Informations- und Dokumentationswesens
    02.01 / Geschichte der Wissenschaft und Kultur
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 63(2012) no.2, S.427-428 (Thomas Haigh)
    RSWK
    Information und Dokumentation / Informationstechnik / Geschichte
    Subject
    Information und Dokumentation / Informationstechnik / Geschichte
  11. Wiesenmüller, H.: LCSH goes RSWK? : Überlegungen zur Diskussion um die "Library of Congress subject headings" (2009) 0.09
    0.09274322 = product of:
      0.18548644 = sum of:
        0.027029384 = weight(_text_:und in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027029384 = score(doc=26,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15599272 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.17327337 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
        0.15845706 = weight(_text_:headings in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15845706 = score(doc=26,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.3412866 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.46429324 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Im Jahr 1898 begann die Library of Congress mit der Arbeit an einem Schlagwortkatalog - die Geburtsstunde der 'Library of Congress subject headings' (LCSH). Heute stellen die LCSH das zentrale Werkzeug zur verbalen inhaltlichen Erschließung in der gesamten angloamerikanischen Welt dar. Auch die Kritik an diesem Erschließungssystem hat eine lange Geschichte: Sie lässt sich bis in die Mitte des vergangenen Jahrhunderts zurückverfolgen und betraf im Lauf der Zeit recht unterschiedliche Aspekte. Neu an der Debatte der letzten Jahre ist, dass die Struktur der LCSH ganz grundsätzlich in Frage gestellt wird. Eine Projektgruppe der Bibliothek der University of California etwa urteilte 2005: "LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control." In einer für die Library of Congress erstellten Expertise mit dem Titel 'On the record' von 2008 heißt es: "LCSH suffers (...) from a structure that is cumbersome from both administrative and automation points of view". Es wird empfohlen, die LCSH in ein flexibleres Werkzeug zu verwandeln: "Transform LCSH into a tool that provides a more flexible means to create and modify subject authority data." Dies beinhaltet zum einen ein "de-coupling of subject strings", also eine 'Entkoppelung' der fest zusammengefügten (präkombinierten) Eintragungen, und zum anderen die Möglichkeit, das LCSH-Vokabular für "faceted browsing and discovery" nutzbar zu machen . Besonders drastische Worte wurden 2006 im sogenannten 'Calhoun Report' gefunden - einem Papier, das mit seinen radikalen Thesen in der amerikanischen Bibliothekswelt viel Aufsehen erregte: Man müsse die Library of Congress dazu bringen, die LCSH zu 'zerschlagen' ("urge LC to dismantle LCSH") - ja, sie gar zu 'eliminieren' ("eliminate LCSH").
  12. Kreyche, M.: Subject headings for the 21st century : the lcsh-es.org bilingual database (2008) 0.09
    0.089095384 = product of:
      0.17819077 = sum of:
        0.02293519 = weight(_text_:und in 3625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02293519 = score(doc=3625,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15599272 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 3625, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3625)
        0.15525557 = weight(_text_:headings in 3625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15525557 = score(doc=3625,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3412866 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.4549126 = fieldWeight in 3625, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3625)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Spanish is one of the most widely spoken languages in the world and a review of the lists of subject headings in this language reveals numerous efforts over a period of time, usually involving some form of collaboration, but largely isolated from each other. Technological developments suggest that a greater degree of cooperation is now possible and would be beneficial to the international library community if other barriers can be surmounted. The lcsh-es.org project demonstrates this concept in a practical way and suggest a new model for international cooperation in authority control. The site may be accessed at http://lcsh-es.org.
    Content
    Beitrag während: World library and information congress: 74th IFLA general conference and council, 10-14 August 2008, Québec, Canada. Vgl. auch: http://www.ibiblio.org/fred2.0/wordpress/?p=20 (mit Grafik der Beziehung zwischen 'mammal' und 'doorbell')
  13. Berg-Schorn, E.: MeSH 2006: Deutsche Version lieferbar (2006) 0.09
    0.08809796 = product of:
      0.17619592 = sum of:
        0.046816263 = weight(_text_:und in 959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046816263 = score(doc=959,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.15599272 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.30011827 = fieldWeight in 959, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=959)
        0.12937966 = weight(_text_:headings in 959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12937966 = score(doc=959,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3412866 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.37909386 = fieldWeight in 959, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=959)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Beim DIMDI erhalten Sie ab sofort die aktuelle deutsche Übersetzung des Thesaurus Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) 2006 der National Library of Medicine (NLM). Auf Anfrage liefern wir die neue Version 11.0 (Stand 2006) als kostenpflichtige XML-Datei auf CD-ROM. Gegenüber 2005 enthält derThesaurus 933 neue Deskriptoren. Andere wurden nach der aktuellen Terminologie umbenannt, obsolete Benennungen entfielen ganz. Da jede Deskriptorklasse in Konzepte und Unterkonzepte mit zugehörigen Begriffen unterteilt ist, beträgt die tatsächliche Zahl neuer Bezeichnungen etwa das Fünffache. Der laufend weiterentwickelte Thesaurus umfasst jetzt 23.880 Hauptschlagwörter (Main Headings). Zum Vergleich: vor zehn Jahren gab die NLM erst 18.436 Deskriptoren an. Zuwachs verzeichnet vor allem die Kategorie Chemische Substanzen, Drogen und Arzneimittel mit 684 neuen Schlagwörtern. Zahlreiche neue Begriffe enthalten auch die Kategorien Organismen, Krankheiten, Biowissenschaften, Anatomie sowie Analytische, diagnostische und therapeutische Verfahren und Geräte. Neue Deskriptoren sind beispielsweise Kalziumaktivierte Kaliumkanäle mit großer Leitfähigkeit, Tritonia-Meeresschnecke, Mesangiumzellen oder Bariatrische Chirurgie. Das DIMDI übersetzt den MeSH in enger Anlehnung an die amerikanische Vorlage und ist offizieller Herausgeber der deutschen Version (inkl. Urheberrechte). Der Thesaurus ist Bestandteil des UMLS (Unified Medical Language System) der NLM. Übersetzungen liegen auch in Finnisch, Französisch, Italienisch, Portugiesisch, Russisch und Spanisch vor.
  14. ¬The digital enterprise : how to reshape your business for a connected world (2001) 0.09
    0.085699864 = product of:
      0.34279945 = sum of:
        0.34279945 = weight(_text_:jasist in 6995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34279945 = score(doc=6995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42644024 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.8038628 = fieldWeight in 6995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6995)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 52(2001) no.12, S.1084-1085 (C.J. Barr)
  15. ¬The map library in the new millennium (2001) 0.09
    0.085699864 = product of:
      0.34279945 = sum of:
        0.34279945 = weight(_text_:jasist in 365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34279945 = score(doc=365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42644024 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.8038628 = fieldWeight in 365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=365)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 53(2002) no.3, S.250-251 (K.L. Walter)
  16. Bazillion, R.J.; Braun, C.L.: Academic libraries as high-tech gateways : a guide to design & space decisions (2001) 0.09
    0.085699864 = product of:
      0.34279945 = sum of:
        0.34279945 = weight(_text_:jasist in 1294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34279945 = score(doc=1294,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42644024 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.8038628 = fieldWeight in 1294, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1294)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez.: JASIST 52(2001) no.11, S.983 (I. Fourie)
  17. Weller, A.C.: Editorial peer review : its strengths and weaknesses (2001) 0.09
    0.085699864 = product of:
      0.34279945 = sum of:
        0.34279945 = weight(_text_:jasist in 4173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34279945 = score(doc=4173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42644024 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.8038628 = fieldWeight in 4173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4173)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 52(2001) no.11, S.984-985 (D.A. Stirling)
  18. Jaffe, A.B.; Trajtenberg, M.: Patents, citations and innovations : a window on the knowledge economy (2002) 0.09
    0.085699864 = product of:
      0.34279945 = sum of:
        0.34279945 = weight(_text_:jasist in 231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34279945 = score(doc=231,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42644024 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.8038628 = fieldWeight in 231, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=231)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 54(2003) no.8, S.802-803 (C. Chen)
  19. Gurstein, M.: Community informatics : enabling communities with information and communication technologies (2000) 0.09
    0.085699864 = product of:
      0.34279945 = sum of:
        0.34279945 = weight(_text_:jasist in 517) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34279945 = score(doc=517,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42644024 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.8038628 = fieldWeight in 517, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=517)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 52(2001) no.11, S.981-983 (T. Dumova)
  20. Peer-to-peer : harnessing the benefits of a disruptive technology (2001) 0.09
    0.085699864 = product of:
      0.34279945 = sum of:
        0.34279945 = weight(_text_:jasist in 837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.34279945 = score(doc=837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.42644024 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.07033355 = queryNorm
            0.8038628 = fieldWeight in 837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0631127 = idf(docFreq=280, maxDocs=44421)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=837)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 52(2001) no.13, S.1191-1192 (L.A. Ennis)

Languages

Types

  • a 3726
  • m 924
  • el 235
  • s 219
  • x 210
  • i 50
  • r 30
  • b 13
  • n 8
  • l 5
  • p 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications