Search (4976 results, page 1 of 249)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Dovey, M.J.: Overview of the OMRAS project : online music retrieval and searching (2004) 0.20 
    0.19753447 = product of:
  0.39506894 = sum of:
    0.37048748 = weight(_text_:jisc in 4062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37048748 = score(doc=4062,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.55634713 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.6659286 = fieldWeight in 4062, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4062)
    0.02458147 = weight(_text_:und in 4062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02458147 = score(doc=4062,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14330555 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.17153187 = fieldWeight in 4062, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4062)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Until recently, most research an music information retrieval concentrated an monophonic music. Online Music Retrieval and Searching (OMRAS) is a threeyear project funded under the auspices of the JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee)/NSF (National Science Foundation) International Digital Library Initiative which began in 1999 and whose remit was to investigate the issues surrounding polyphonic music information retrieval. Here we outline the work OMRAS has achieved in pattern matching, document retrieval, and audio transcription, as weIl as some prototype work in how to implement these techniques into library systems.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft zur Musikerschließung und zum Musikretrieval
  2. Nicholson, D.: Help us make HILT's terminology services useful in your information service (2008) 0.13 
    0.13231695 = product of:
  0.5292678 = sum of:
    0.5292678 = weight(_text_:jisc in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5292678 = score(doc=4654,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.55634713 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.95132655 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The JISC-funded HILT project is looking to make contact with staff in information services or projects interested in helping it test and refine its developing terminology services. The project is currently working to create pilot web services that will deliver machine-readable terminology and cross-terminology mappings data likely to be useful to information services wishing to extend or enhance the efficacy of their subject search or browse services. Based on SRW/U, SOAP, and SKOS, the HILT facilities, when fully operational, will permit such services to improve their own subject search and browse mechanisms by using HILT data in a fashion transparent to their users. On request, HILT will serve up machine-processable data on individual subject schemes (broader terms, narrower terms, hierarchy information, preferred and non-preferred terms, and so on) and interoperability data (usually intellectual or automated mappings between schemes, but the architecture allows for the use of other methods) - data that can be used to enhance user services. The project is also developing an associated toolkit that will help service technical staff to embed HILT-related functionality into their services. The primary aim is to serve JISC funded information services or services at JISC institutions, but information services outside the JISC domain may also find the proposed services useful and wish to participate in the test and refine process.
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft / Gruppe "Wissenschaftliche Literaturversorgungs- und Informationssysteme" (LIS): Aus der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (2005) 0.13 
    0.13213226 = product of:
  0.26426452 = sum of:
    0.21170712 = weight(_text_:jisc in 4656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21170712 = score(doc=4656,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.55634713 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.38053063 = fieldWeight in 4656, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4656)
    0.052557394 = weight(_text_:und in 4656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052557394 = score(doc=4656,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.14330555 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.36675057 = fieldWeight in 4656, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4656)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    "Der Ausschuss für wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken und Informationssysteme der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft hat sich in seiner letzten Herbstsitzung am 07.-08. Oktober 2004 mit folgenden Themen beschäftigt: Ergebnisse der Machbarkeitsstudie Der Deutschen Bibliothek zur Umstellung von RAK auf AACR2 Ziel der an Der Deutschen Bibliothek durchgeführten Studie war die Ermittlung der Rahmenbedingungen und Konsequenzen sowie des Zeitablaufs für einen Umstieg unter nutzerorientierten, bibliothekarischen, organisatorischen und vor allem auch betriebswirtschaftlichen Gesichtspunkten. Frau Dr. Niggemann (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) stellte im Ausschuss den Schlussbericht des Projekts vor. Die Ergebnisse ließen keine Umstände erkennen, die gegen eine Anwendung internationaler Formate und Regelwerke in Deutschland sprächen. Vielmehr ergäben sich daraus auch Vorteile für die Katalogisierung. Da trotz dieser klaren Sachlage weite Teile der bibliothekarischen Öffentlichkeit gegen einen Umstieg seien, empfehle Die Deutsche Bibliothek die schrittweise Internationalisierung deutscher Standards durch Umsetzung einzelner konsensfähiger Maßnahmen. Die Ergebnisse und Schlussfolgerungen des Berichts wurden anschließend im Ausschuss einer differenzierten Bewertung unterzogen - über das eventuelle Verbleiben bei den deutschen Regelwerken wurde Bedauern geäußert. Es sei allerdings fraglich, ob alleine durch den Wechsel des Regelwerkes bzw. der Formate die Grundproble me der deutschen Katalogisierungs- und Verbundstrukturen zu lösen seien. Einhellig kritisch bewertet wurde der hohe Kostenaufwand, mit dem ausweislich der Studie die Formalkatalogisierung in Deutschland noch immer betrieben werde. Hier müssten dringend neue Strategien entwickelt und aktiv verfolgt werden. Als Sofortmaßnahme mahnte derAusschuss die baldige Vereinheitlichung der Datenstrukturen in den Verbundsystemen an. Mittelfristig sieht der Ausschuss in der Internationalisierung der deutschen Informationsinfrastrukturen ein notwendiges und mit Priorität zu verfolgendes Ziel. Europäisches Netzwerk "Knowledge Exchange" Der Informationsaustausch zwischen den europäischen Fördereinrichtungen zu Fragen der Informa tions-Infrastrukturförderung beruht derzeit überwiegend auf jeweils bilateralen Kontakten, eine übergreifende Diskussion findet kaum statt. ZurVerbesserung dieser Kommunikation wird nun die Einrichtung von >Knowledge Exchange< vorbereitet, einem europäischen Netzwerk nationaler Förderinstitutionen bzw. Informationseinrichtungen, die auf jeweils nationaler Ebene für die Weiterentwicklung der Informationsund Kommunikationsstrukturen im Bereich Bildung und Wissenschaft (mit)verantwortlich sind. Neben der Gruppe »Wissenschaftliche Literaturversorgungsund Informationssysteme« (LIS) der DFG gehören dem Netzwerk das Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) aus Großbritannien, SURF, die niederländische Organisation für die Zusammenarbeit der Universitäten im Bereich der Informations-und Kommunikationstechnologie sowie das Rechenzentrum der dänischen Nationalbibliothek (DEF) an. Als Ziel dieses Netzwerks werden engere Abstimmungen der nationalen Strategien bzw. die Entwicklung gemeinsamer Strategien auf dem Gebiet der Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie angestrebt. Zudem würde der Informationsaustausch über aktuelle Entwicklungen der Informations-Infrastruktur in den europäischen Partnerländern wesentlich vereinfacht. Redundante Entwicklungen können auf diese Weise vermieden, Synergien genutzt werden. Darüber hinaus wird das Netzwerk als Ansprechpartner für außereuropäische Partner dienen. Die Initiative wurde vom Ausschuss für wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken und Informationssysteme einhellig begrüßt."
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 52(2005) H.2, S.91-93
  4. Banwell, L.; Ray, K.; Coulson, G.; Urquhart, C.; Lonsdale, R.; Armstrong, C.; Thomas, R.; Spink, S.; Yeoman, A.; Fenton, R.; Rowley, J.: ¬The JISC User Behaviour Monitoring and Evaluation Framework (2004) 0.11 
    0.11458984 = product of:
  0.45835936 = sum of:
    0.45835936 = weight(_text_:jisc in 5434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.45835936 = score(doc=5434,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.55634713 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.823873 = fieldWeight in 5434, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5434)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Describes key aspects of the methodology and outcomes of the JISC User Behaviour Monitoring and Evaluation Framework in its first three annual cycles (1999-2002). The Framework was initiated to assure the JISC that their investment in digital content and network infrastructure facilitates use and learning, and to identify barriers and facilitators to the use of electronic information services (EIS). Key Framework outcomes are: a multi-dimensional across sector methodology for the continued monitoring of user behaviour in respect of EIS and the factors that impact on that behaviour; a profile of user behaviour in respect of EIS over the three annual cycles of the Framework; the EIS Diagnostic Toolkit that can be used to benchmark development in the provision and use of EIS in specific disciplines or at specific institutions; a methodology for monitoring, and a profile of the EIS resources available to higher and further education users; and a summary of some of the key issues in their provision. The challenge for the future is the embedding of EIS in curricula and learning experiences.
  5. Stone, A.T.: ¬The LCSH century : a brief history of the Library of Congress Subject Headings, and introduction to the centennial essays (2000) 0.11 
    0.1113884 = product of:
  0.2227768 = sum of:
    0.02106983 = weight(_text_:und in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02106983 = score(doc=6600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14330555 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
    0.20170698 = weight(_text_:headings in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20170698 = score(doc=6600,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.31352916 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The history of the Library of Congress Subject Headings is traced, from its beginnings with the implementation of a dictionary catalog at the Library of Congress in 1898 to the present day. The author describes the most significant changes which have occurred in LCSH policies and practices during the 100-year period. Events noted near the end of the century indicate an increased willingness on the part of' the Library of Congress to involve the larger library community in the creation or revision of subject headings and other decision-making regarding the LCSH system. Finally, the author provides a summary of the other contributions to this collection of essays, a collection which celebrates the "centennial" of the world's most popular library subject heading language
    Content
    Mit einer Publikationsgeschichte der LCSH (vgl. Tabellen) und dazu gehörenden Publikationen
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
  6. Heiner-Freiling, M.: Survey on subject heading languages used in national libraries and bibliographies (2000) 0.11 
    0.1113884 = product of:
  0.2227768 = sum of:
    0.02106983 = weight(_text_:und in 6921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02106983 = score(doc=6921,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14330555 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 6921, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6921)
    0.20170698 = weight(_text_:headings in 6921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20170698 = score(doc=6921,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.31352916 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 6921, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6921)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Surveys conducted during the last four years under the auspices of the International Federation of Library Associations and Organizations (IFLA) reveal that the Library of Congress Subject Headings is heavily used in national libraries outside of the United States, particularly in English-speaking countries. Many other countries report using a translation or adaptation of LCSH as their principal subject heading language. Magda Heiner-Freiling presents an analysis of the IFLA data, which also includes information on the classification schemes used by the libraries and whether or not the libraries have produced a manual on the creation and application of subject headings. The paper concludes with an Appendix showing the complete data from the 88 national libraries that respond to the surveys
    Content
    Mit einer tabellarischen Übersicht der eingesetzten Systeme und Regeln
    Object
    Sears List of Subject Headings
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
  7. Aitchison, J.; Gilchrist, A.; Bawden, D.: Thesaurus construction and use : a practical manual (2000) 0.11 
    0.10913214 = product of:
  0.21826428 = sum of:
    0.028093109 = weight(_text_:und in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028093109 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14330555 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.19603643 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
    0.19017117 = weight(_text_:headings in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19017117 = score(doc=1130,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31352916 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.60655016 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    LCSH
    Subject headings / Terminology
    Subject
    Subject headings / Terminology
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  8. Rowley, J.; Urquhart, C.: Understanding student information behavior in relation to electronic information services : lessons from longitudinal monitoring and evaluation, part 1 (2007) 0.09 
    0.09356221 = product of:
  0.37424883 = sum of:
    0.37424883 = weight(_text_:jisc in 1449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37424883 = score(doc=1449,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.55634713 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.67268944 = fieldWeight in 1449, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1449)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This two-part article establishes a model of the mediating factors that influence student information behavior concerning electronic or digital information sources that support their learning. The first part reviews the literature that underpinned the development of the research methodology for the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) User Behavior Monitoring and Evaluation Framework, as well as the literature that has subsequently helped to develop the model over the 5 years the Framework operated in the United Kingdom, in five cycles of research that were adjusted to meet the emerging needs of the JISC at the time. The literature review attempts to synthesize the two main perspectives in the research studies: (a) smallscale studies of student information behavior; and (b) the studies that focus on the quantitative usage of particular electronic information services in universities, often including implications for training and support. As the review indicates, there are gaps in the evidence concerning the browsing and selection strategies of undergraduate students and the interaction of some of the mediating influences on information behavior. The Framework developed a multimethod, qualitative and quantitative methodology for the continued monitoring of user behavior. This article discusses the methods used and the projectmanagement challenges involved, and concludes that at the outset, intended impacts need to be specified carefully, and that funding needs to be committed at that point for a longitudinal study. A research project on information behavior, intended to inform current policymaking on infrastructure provision, is inherently difficult as behavior changes lag behind provision.
  9. Rowlands, I.; Nicholas, D.; Williams, P.; Huntington, P.; Fieldhouse, M.; Gunter, B.; Withey, R.; Jamali, H.R.; Dobrowolski, T.; Tenopir, C.: ¬The Google generation : the information behaviour of the researcher of the future (2008) 0.09 
    0.09356221 = product of:
  0.37424883 = sum of:
    0.37424883 = weight(_text_:jisc in 3017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37424883 = score(doc=3017,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.55634713 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.67268944 = fieldWeight in 3017, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3017)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This article is an edited version of a report commissioned by the British Library and JISC to identify how the specialist researchers of the future (those born after 1993) are likely to access and interact with digital resources in five to ten years' time. The purpose is to investigate the impact of digital transition on the information behaviour of the Google Generation and to guide library and information services to anticipate and react to any new or emerging behaviours in the most effective way. Design/methodology/approach - The study was virtually longitudinal and is based on a number of extensive reviews of related literature, survey data mining and a deep log analysis of a British Library and a JISC web site intended for younger people. Findings - The study shows that much of the impact of ICTs on the young has been overestimated. The study claims that although young people demonstrate an apparent ease and familiarity with computers, they rely heavily on search engines, view rather than read and do not possess the critical and analytical skills to assess the information that they find on the web. Originality/value - The paper reports on a study that overturns the common assumption that the "Google generation" is the most web-literate.
  10. Aikawa, H. (Bearb.): Guidelines on subject access to individual works of fiction, drama, etc. (2000) 0.09 
    0.0930203 = product of:
  0.3720812 = sum of:
    0.3720812 = weight(_text_:headings in 1176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3720812 = score(doc=1176,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.31352916 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        1.1867515 = fieldWeight in 1176, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1176)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    LCSH
    Form headings
    Subject headings / Literary form
    Subject headings / Literature
    Subject headings / Motion pictures
    Subject headings / Television programs
    Subject
    Form headings
    Subject headings / Literary form
    Subject headings / Literature
    Subject headings / Motion pictures
    Subject headings / Television programs
  11. Wiesenmüller, H.: LCSH goes RSWK? : Überlegungen zur Diskussion um die "Library of Congress subject headings" (2009) 0.09 
    0.08520026 = product of:
  0.17040052 = sum of:
    0.024831036 = weight(_text_:und in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.024831036 = score(doc=26,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14330555 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.17327337 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
    0.14556947 = weight(_text_:headings in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14556947 = score(doc=26,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.31352916 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.46429324 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Im Jahr 1898 begann die Library of Congress mit der Arbeit an einem Schlagwortkatalog - die Geburtsstunde der 'Library of Congress subject headings' (LCSH). Heute stellen die LCSH das zentrale Werkzeug zur verbalen inhaltlichen Erschließung in der gesamten angloamerikanischen Welt dar. Auch die Kritik an diesem Erschließungssystem hat eine lange Geschichte: Sie lässt sich bis in die Mitte des vergangenen Jahrhunderts zurückverfolgen und betraf im Lauf der Zeit recht unterschiedliche Aspekte. Neu an der Debatte der letzten Jahre ist, dass die Struktur der LCSH ganz grundsätzlich in Frage gestellt wird. Eine Projektgruppe der Bibliothek der University of California etwa urteilte 2005: "LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control." In einer für die Library of Congress erstellten Expertise mit dem Titel 'On the record' von 2008 heißt es: "LCSH suffers (...) from a structure that is cumbersome from both administrative and automation points of view". Es wird empfohlen, die LCSH in ein flexibleres Werkzeug zu verwandeln: "Transform LCSH into a tool that provides a more flexible means to create and modify subject authority data." Dies beinhaltet zum einen ein "de-coupling of subject strings", also eine 'Entkoppelung' der fest zusammengefügten (präkombinierten) Eintragungen, und zum anderen die Möglichkeit, das LCSH-Vokabular für "faceted browsing and discovery" nutzbar zu machen . Besonders drastische Worte wurden 2006 im sogenannten 'Calhoun Report' gefunden - einem Papier, das mit seinen radikalen Thesen in der amerikanischen Bibliothekswelt viel Aufsehen erregte: Man müsse die Library of Congress dazu bringen, die LCSH zu 'zerschlagen' ("urge LC to dismantle LCSH") - ja, sie gar zu 'eliminieren' ("eliminate LCSH").
  12. Kreyche, M.: Subject headings for the 21st century : the lcsh-es.org bilingual database (2008) 0.08 
    0.0818491 = product of:
  0.1636982 = sum of:
    0.02106983 = weight(_text_:und in 3625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02106983 = score(doc=3625,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14330555 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 3625, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3625)
    0.14262837 = weight(_text_:headings in 3625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14262837 = score(doc=3625,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31352916 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.4549126 = fieldWeight in 3625, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3625)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Spanish is one of the most widely spoken languages in the world and a review of the lists of subject headings in this language reveals numerous efforts over a period of time, usually involving some form of collaboration, but largely isolated from each other. Technological developments suggest that a greater degree of cooperation is now possible and would be beneficial to the international library community if other barriers can be surmounted. The lcsh-es.org project demonstrates this concept in a practical way and suggest a new model for international cooperation in authority control. The site may be accessed at http://lcsh-es.org.
    Content
    Beitrag während: World library and information congress: 74th IFLA general conference and council, 10-14 August 2008, Québec, Canada. Vgl. auch: http://www.ibiblio.org/fred2.0/wordpress/?p=20 (mit Grafik der Beziehung zwischen 'mammal' und 'doorbell')
  13. Berg-Schorn, E.: MeSH 2006: Deutsche Version lieferbar (2006) 0.08 
    0.080932796 = product of:
  0.16186559 = sum of:
    0.043008614 = weight(_text_:und in 959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043008614 = score(doc=959,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.14330555 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.30011827 = fieldWeight in 959, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=959)
    0.11885698 = weight(_text_:headings in 959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11885698 = score(doc=959,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31352916 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.37909386 = fieldWeight in 959, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=959)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Beim DIMDI erhalten Sie ab sofort die aktuelle deutsche Übersetzung des Thesaurus Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) 2006 der National Library of Medicine (NLM). Auf Anfrage liefern wir die neue Version 11.0 (Stand 2006) als kostenpflichtige XML-Datei auf CD-ROM. Gegenüber 2005 enthält derThesaurus 933 neue Deskriptoren. Andere wurden nach der aktuellen Terminologie umbenannt, obsolete Benennungen entfielen ganz. Da jede Deskriptorklasse in Konzepte und Unterkonzepte mit zugehörigen Begriffen unterteilt ist, beträgt die tatsächliche Zahl neuer Bezeichnungen etwa das Fünffache. Der laufend weiterentwickelte Thesaurus umfasst jetzt 23.880 Hauptschlagwörter (Main Headings). Zum Vergleich: vor zehn Jahren gab die NLM erst 18.436 Deskriptoren an. Zuwachs verzeichnet vor allem die Kategorie Chemische Substanzen, Drogen und Arzneimittel mit 684 neuen Schlagwörtern. Zahlreiche neue Begriffe enthalten auch die Kategorien Organismen, Krankheiten, Biowissenschaften, Anatomie sowie Analytische, diagnostische und therapeutische Verfahren und Geräte. Neue Deskriptoren sind beispielsweise Kalziumaktivierte Kaliumkanäle mit großer Leitfähigkeit, Tritonia-Meeresschnecke, Mesangiumzellen oder Bariatrische Chirurgie. Das DIMDI übersetzt den MeSH in enger Anlehnung an die amerikanische Vorlage und ist offizieller Herausgeber der deutschen Version (inkl. Urheberrechte). Der Thesaurus ist Bestandteil des UMLS (Unified Medical Language System) der NLM. Übersetzungen liegen auch in Finnisch, Französisch, Italienisch, Portugiesisch, Russisch und Spanisch vor.
  14. Nicholson, D.M.; Dawson, A.; Shiri, A.: HILT: a pilot terminology mapping service with a DDC spine (2006) 0.08 
    0.079390176 = product of:
  0.3175607 = sum of:
    0.3175607 = weight(_text_:jisc in 3152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.3175607 = score(doc=3152,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.55634713 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.57079595 = fieldWeight in 3152, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3152)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The role of DDC in the ongoing HILT (High-level Thesaurus) project is discussed. A phased initiative, funded by JISC in the UK, HILT addresses an issue of likely interest to anyone serving users wishing to cross-search or cross-browse groups of networked information services, whether at regional, national or international level - the problem of subject-based retrieval from multiple sources using different subject schemes for resource description. Although all three phases of HILT to date are covered, the primary concern is with the subject interoperability solution piloted in phase II, and with the use of DDC as a spine in that approach.
  15. Gödert, W.: Multilingualität und Lokalisierung zur Wissenserkundung : oder vom Nutzen semantischer Netze für das Information Retrieval (2007) 0.08 
    0.07829951 = product of:
  0.15659901 = sum of:
    0.055745535 = weight(_text_:und in 1557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055745535 = score(doc=1557,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.14330555 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.38899773 = fieldWeight in 1557, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1557)
    0.10085349 = weight(_text_:headings in 1557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10085349 = score(doc=1557,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31352916 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.32167178 = fieldWeight in 1557, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1557)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Das CrissCross-Projekt verfolgt die Zielsetzung, ein erweitertes multilinguales und thesaurusbasiertes Registervokabular zur Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC Deutsch) zu erstellen, das als Recherchevokabulars zu heterogen erschlossenen Dokumenten verwendet werden kann und soll damit die Ausgangsbedingungen für die Gestaltung von OPAC-Retrievalumgebungen verbessern helfen. Im einzelnen soll jedes Sachschlagwort der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) eine DDC-Notation erhalten und es sollen die im Projekt MACS begonnen Arbeiten fortgesetzt werden, Links zwischen den Schlagwörtern der SWD, den Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) und dem Répertoire d'autorité-matière encyclopédique et alphabétique unifé (Rameau) herzustellen. In diesem Beitrag wird der Vorschlag gemacht, die Zielsetzung des Projektes darin zu sehen, eine Kern-Ontologie mit universalen Relationen als Klassifikation zu benutzen und die beteiligten Normdateien als zugeordnete semantische Netze zu entwickeln, indem nicht-generische Relationen die Aufgabe der durch die Lokalisierung gestellten Anforderungen übernehmen. Generische Relationen im bekannten Thesaurussinn sind für derartige semantische Netze nicht mehr erforderlich, da sie sich aus den generischen Beziehungen der Kern-Ontologie vererben.
    Series
    Schriften der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare (VÖB); Bd. 2
  16. Gaus, W.; Leiner, F.: Dokumentations- und Ordnungslehre : Theorie und Praxis des Information Retrieval (2003) 0.08 
    0.07821943 = product of:
  0.15643886 = sum of:
    0.07239429 = weight(_text_:und in 5524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07239429 = score(doc=5524,freq=34.0), product of:
        0.14330555 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.50517434 = fieldWeight in 5524, product of:
          5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
            34.0 = termFreq=34.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5524)
    0.08404457 = weight(_text_:headings in 5524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08404457 = score(doc=5524,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31352916 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.26805982 = fieldWeight in 5524, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5524)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Diese Einführung in die Grundlagen der Dokumentation und des Information Retrieval, d.h. des Wiederauffindens von Information zu thematisch-inhaltlichen Fragen, entstand auf der Basis langjähriger Lehrerfahrung. Die sowohl theoretisch fundierte als auch praxisorientierte Darstellung der Daten-, Literatur- und Faktendokumentation enthält neben zahlreichen Übungen einen Beispiel-Thesaurus, die Besprechung realer Ordnungs- und Retrievalsysteme sowie ca. 200 Prüfungsfragen mit Antworten. Das Buch ist von zentraler Bedeutung für die Ausbildung von Dokumentaren, Bibliothekaren und Archivaren. Das Thema gewinnt aber auch an Bedeutung für Wissenschaftler aller Fachrichtungen. Das Buch ist in seiner systematischen Darstellung und didaktischen Aufbereitung einzigartig. Durch sein ausführliches Sachwortregister eignet es sich auch als Nachschlagewerk. In der vorliegenden vierten Auflage werden insbesondere Entwicklungen im Bereich des Internets und der Informationssysteme berücksichtigt.
    Content
    Zweck und Grundzüge der Dokumentation.- Begriff und Wesen der Information.- Dateien und Informationsspeicher.Referate.- Ordnungsprinzip Klassifikation.- Hierarchische Begriffsstrukturen.- Alphabetisches Sortieren und systematisches Anordnen.- Die Klassfikationen ICD-10 und ICPM.- Ordnungsprinzip Register.- Beispiel einer Dokumentation mit Registern.- Ordnungsprinzip Fassettenklassifikation.- Ordnungsprinzip Begriffskombination.- Struktur eines Ordnungssystems.Beispielthesaurus Gebäude.- Ordnungssystem Medical Subject Headings (MeSH).- Verbindungs-, Funktions-, Zeit- und Sprachdeskriptoren.- Dokumenten-Deskriptoren-Matrix.Relevanz- und Vollzähligkeitsrate.- Recherchieren und Suchstrategien.- Dokumentations- und Retrievalsysteme.Aktive Informationsdienste.- Revision eines Ordnungssystems.
  17. Jungk, S.: ¬Die Erschließung der Belletristik und Kinder- und Jugendliteratur im Sachkatalog der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Leipzig (2008) 0.08 
    0.07621293 = product of:
  0.15242586 = sum of:
    0.034763448 = weight(_text_:und in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034763448 = score(doc=3173,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14330555 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.24258271 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
    0.1176624 = weight(_text_:headings in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1176624 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31352916 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.37528375 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In its overall function as the archive of all German-language publications, the German National Library also collects and catalogues German-language literary works. Belles-lettres as well as children's and youth literature form a considerable part of the library's collection. From 1913 until 1990, the titles were assigned subject headings, were filed in the library's card subject catalogue according to genres and languages and (within these categories) were further divided into formal aspects, themes and motifs. The subject indexing of belles-lettres and children's and youth literature is unique in its scope and depth.
  18. Rice, R.: Applying DC to institutional data repositories (2008) 0.07 
    0.07484977 = product of:
  0.29939908 = sum of:
    0.29939908 = weight(_text_:jisc in 3664) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29939908 = score(doc=3664,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.55634713 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.53815156 = fieldWeight in 3664, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.610425 = idf(docFreq=21, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3664)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    DISC-UK DataShare (2007-2009), a project led by the University of Edinburgh and funded by JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee, UK), arises from an existing consortium of academic data support professionals working in the domain of social science datasets (Data Information Specialists Committee-UK). We are working together across four universities with colleagues engaged in managing open access repositories for e-prints. Our project supports 'early adopter' academics who wish to openly share datasets and presents a model for depositing 'orphaned datasets' that are not being deposited in subject-domain data archives/centres. Outputs from the project are intended to help to demystify data as complex objects in repositories, and assist other institutional repository managers in overcoming barriers to incorporating research data. By building on lessons learned from recent JISC-funded data repository projects such as SToRe and GRADE the project will help realize the vision of the Digital Repositories Roadmap, e.g. the milestone under Data, "Institutions need to invest in research data repositories" (Heery and Powell, 2006). Application of appropriate metadata is an important area of development for the project. Datasets are not different from other digital materials in that they need to be described, not just for discovery but also for preservation and re-use. The GRADE project found that for geo-spatial datasets, Dublin Core metadata (with geo-spatial enhancements such as a bounding box for the 'coverage' property) was sufficient for discovery within a DSpace repository, though more indepth metadata or documentation was required for re-use after downloading. The project partners are examining other metadata schemas such as the Data Documentation Initiative (DDI) versions 2 and 3, used primarily by social science data archives (Martinez, 2008). Crosswalks from the DDI to qualified Dublin Core are important for describing research datasets at the study level (as opposed to the variable level which is largely out of scope for this project). DataShare is benefiting from work of of the DRIADE project (application profile development for evolutionary biology) (Carrier, et al, 2007), eBank UK (developed an application profile for crystallography data) and GAP (Geospatial Application Profile, in progress) in defining interoperable Dublin Core qualified metadata elements and their application to datasets for each partner repository. The solution devised at Edinburgh for DSpace will be covered in the poster.
  19. Hearn, S.: Machine-assisted validation of LC Subject Headings : implications for authority file structure (2000) 0.07 
    0.07205321 = product of:
  0.28821284 = sum of:
    0.28821284 = weight(_text_:headings in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28821284 = score(doc=6607,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.31352916 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.91925365 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Many kinds of structure can be discerned in the headings and rules governing the Library of Congress Subject Headings. By addressing these structures at different levels, librarians can develop different approaches to the machine-assisted validation of subject headings, from the checking of individual words to the validation of complex forms of heading/subdivision compatibility. Using computer programs to assist with maintenance of subject headings is becoming increasingly necessary as technical services librarians strive to create consistent and useful patterns of subject collocation in library catalogs
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
  20. Koh, G.S.L.: Transferring intended messages of subject headings exemplified in the list of Korean subject headings (2006) 0.07 
    0.07205321 = product of:
  0.28821284 = sum of:
    0.28821284 = weight(_text_:headings in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.28821284 = score(doc=100,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.31352916 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0646132 = queryNorm
        0.91925365 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This paper focuses on meaning as the core concern and challenge of interoperability in a multilingual context. Korean subject headings, presently translated from English, crystallize issues attached to the semantics of translation in at least two languages (Korean, with written Chinese, and English). Presenting a model microcosm, which explains grammatical and semantic characteristics, and allows a search for equivalence of headings that have the closest approximation of semantic ranges, the study concludes the necessary conditions for linking multilingual subject headings and suggests an interoperable model for the transfer of meaning of headings across languages and cultures.

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 3714
  • m 836
  • el 236
  • x 210
  • s 191
  • i 50
  • r 30
  • b 13
  • n 8
  • l 5
  • p 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications