Search (4976 results, page 1 of 249)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Tseng, Y.-H.: Automatic thesaurus generation for Chinese documents (2002) 0.13 
    0.12727633 = product of:
  0.25455266 = sum of:
    0.2366506 = weight(_text_:judges in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2366506 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5312371 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.063882 = idf(docFreq=37, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.44547075 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.063882 = idf(docFreq=37, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
    0.017902054 = weight(_text_:und in 226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017902054 = score(doc=226,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14611205 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.12252277 = fieldWeight in 226, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=226)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Tseng constructs a word co-occurrence based thesaurus by means of the automatic analysis of Chinese text. Words are identified by a longest dictionary match supplemented by a key word extraction algorithm that merges back nearby tokens and accepts shorter strings of characters if they occur more often than the longest string. Single character auxiliary words are a major source of error but this can be greatly reduced with the use of a 70-character 2680 word stop list. Extracted terms with their associate document weights are sorted by decreasing frequency and the top of this list is associated using a Dice coefficient modified to account for longer documents on the weights of term pairs. Co-occurrence is not in the document as a whole but in paragraph or sentence size sections in order to reduce computation time. A window of 29 characters or 11 words was found to be sufficient. A thesaurus was produced from 25,230 Chinese news articles and judges asked to review the top 50 terms associated with each of 30 single word query terms. They determined 69% to be relevant.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  2. Stone, A.T.: ¬The LCSH century : a brief history of the Library of Congress Subject Headings, and introduction to the centennial essays (2000) 0.11 
    0.11356984 = product of:
  0.22713968 = sum of:
    0.021482462 = weight(_text_:und in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021482462 = score(doc=6600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14611205 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
    0.20565721 = weight(_text_:headings in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20565721 = score(doc=6600,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.31966934 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The history of the Library of Congress Subject Headings is traced, from its beginnings with the implementation of a dictionary catalog at the Library of Congress in 1898 to the present day. The author describes the most significant changes which have occurred in LCSH policies and practices during the 100-year period. Events noted near the end of the century indicate an increased willingness on the part of' the Library of Congress to involve the larger library community in the creation or revision of subject headings and other decision-making regarding the LCSH system. Finally, the author provides a summary of the other contributions to this collection of essays, a collection which celebrates the "centennial" of the world's most popular library subject heading language
    Content
    Mit einer Publikationsgeschichte der LCSH (vgl. Tabellen) und dazu gehörenden Publikationen
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
  3. Heiner-Freiling, M.: Survey on subject heading languages used in national libraries and bibliographies (2000) 0.11 
    0.11356984 = product of:
  0.22713968 = sum of:
    0.021482462 = weight(_text_:und in 6921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021482462 = score(doc=6921,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14611205 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 6921, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6921)
    0.20565721 = weight(_text_:headings in 6921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20565721 = score(doc=6921,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.31966934 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 6921, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6921)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Surveys conducted during the last four years under the auspices of the International Federation of Library Associations and Organizations (IFLA) reveal that the Library of Congress Subject Headings is heavily used in national libraries outside of the United States, particularly in English-speaking countries. Many other countries report using a translation or adaptation of LCSH as their principal subject heading language. Magda Heiner-Freiling presents an analysis of the IFLA data, which also includes information on the classification schemes used by the libraries and whether or not the libraries have produced a manual on the creation and application of subject headings. The paper concludes with an Appendix showing the complete data from the 88 national libraries that respond to the surveys
    Content
    Mit einer tabellarischen Übersicht der eingesetzten Systeme und Regeln
    Object
    Sears List of Subject Headings
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
  4. Aitchison, J.; Gilchrist, A.; Bawden, D.: Thesaurus construction and use : a practical manual (2000) 0.11 
    0.111269385 = product of:
  0.22253877 = sum of:
    0.028643286 = weight(_text_:und in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028643286 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14611205 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.19603643 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
    0.19389549 = weight(_text_:headings in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19389549 = score(doc=1130,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31966934 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.60655016 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    LCSH
    Subject headings / Terminology
    Subject
    Subject headings / Terminology
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  5. Otterbacher, J.; Radev, D.: Exploring fact-focused relevance and novelty detection (2008) 0.10 
    0.10040235 = product of:
  0.4016094 = sum of:
    0.4016094 = weight(_text_:judges in 3210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.4016094 = score(doc=3210,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.5312371 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.063882 = idf(docFreq=37, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.75598896 = fieldWeight in 3210, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.063882 = idf(docFreq=37, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3210)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - Automated sentence-level relevance and novelty detection would be of direct benefit to many information retrieval systems. However, the low level of agreement between human judges performing the task is an issue of concern. In previous approaches, annotators were asked to identify sentences in a document set that are relevant to a given topic, and then to eliminate sentences that do not provide novel information. This paper aims to explore a new approach in which relevance and novelty judgments are made within the context of specific, factual information needs, rather than with respect to a broad topic. Design/methodology/approach - An experiment is conducted in which annotators perform the novelty detection task in both the topic-focused and fact-focused settings. Findings - Higher levels of agreement between judges are found on the task of identifying relevant sentences in the fact-focused approach. However, the new approach does not improve agreement on novelty judgments. Originality/value - The analysis confirms the intuition that making sentence-level relevance judgments is likely to be the more difficult of the two tasks in the novelty detection framework.
  6. Aikawa, H. (Bearb.): Guidelines on subject access to individual works of fiction, drama, etc. (2000) 0.09 
    0.09484202 = product of:
  0.37936807 = sum of:
    0.37936807 = weight(_text_:headings in 1176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37936807 = score(doc=1176,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.31966934 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        1.1867515 = fieldWeight in 1176, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1176)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    LCSH
    Form headings
    Subject headings / Literary form
    Subject headings / Literature
    Subject headings / Motion pictures
    Subject headings / Television programs
    Subject
    Form headings
    Subject headings / Literary form
    Subject headings / Literature
    Subject headings / Motion pictures
    Subject headings / Television programs
  7. Wiesenmüller, H.: LCSH goes RSWK? : Überlegungen zur Diskussion um die "Library of Congress subject headings" (2009) 0.09 
    0.08686882 = product of:
  0.17373765 = sum of:
    0.025317328 = weight(_text_:und in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025317328 = score(doc=26,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14611205 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.17327337 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
    0.14842032 = weight(_text_:headings in 26) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14842032 = score(doc=26,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.31966934 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.46429324 = fieldWeight in 26, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=26)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Im Jahr 1898 begann die Library of Congress mit der Arbeit an einem Schlagwortkatalog - die Geburtsstunde der 'Library of Congress subject headings' (LCSH). Heute stellen die LCSH das zentrale Werkzeug zur verbalen inhaltlichen Erschließung in der gesamten angloamerikanischen Welt dar. Auch die Kritik an diesem Erschließungssystem hat eine lange Geschichte: Sie lässt sich bis in die Mitte des vergangenen Jahrhunderts zurückverfolgen und betraf im Lauf der Zeit recht unterschiedliche Aspekte. Neu an der Debatte der letzten Jahre ist, dass die Struktur der LCSH ganz grundsätzlich in Frage gestellt wird. Eine Projektgruppe der Bibliothek der University of California etwa urteilte 2005: "LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control." In einer für die Library of Congress erstellten Expertise mit dem Titel 'On the record' von 2008 heißt es: "LCSH suffers (...) from a structure that is cumbersome from both administrative and automation points of view". Es wird empfohlen, die LCSH in ein flexibleres Werkzeug zu verwandeln: "Transform LCSH into a tool that provides a more flexible means to create and modify subject authority data." Dies beinhaltet zum einen ein "de-coupling of subject strings", also eine 'Entkoppelung' der fest zusammengefügten (präkombinierten) Eintragungen, und zum anderen die Möglichkeit, das LCSH-Vokabular für "faceted browsing and discovery" nutzbar zu machen . Besonders drastische Worte wurden 2006 im sogenannten 'Calhoun Report' gefunden - einem Papier, das mit seinen radikalen Thesen in der amerikanischen Bibliothekswelt viel Aufsehen erregte: Man müsse die Library of Congress dazu bringen, die LCSH zu 'zerschlagen' ("urge LC to dismantle LCSH") - ja, sie gar zu 'eliminieren' ("eliminate LCSH").
  8. Sun, Y.; Kantor, P.B.: Cross-evaluation : a new model for information system evaluation (2006) 0.08 
    0.08366862 = product of:
  0.33467448 = sum of:
    0.33467448 = weight(_text_:judges in 48) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.33467448 = score(doc=48,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.5312371 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.063882 = idf(docFreq=37, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.62999076 = fieldWeight in 48, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.063882 = idf(docFreq=37, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=48)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In this article, we introduce a new information system evaluation method and report on its application to a collaborative information seeking system, AntWorld. The key innovation of the new method is to use precisely the same group of users who work with the system as judges, a system we call Cross-Evaluation. In the new method, we also propose to assess the system at the level of task completion. The obvious potential limitation of this method is that individuals may be inclined to think more highly of the materials that they themselves have found and are almost certain to think more highly of their own work product than they do of the products built by others. The keys to neutralizing this problem are careful design and a corresponding analytical model based on analysis of variance. We model the several measures of task completion with a linear model of five effects, describing the users who interact with the system, the system used to finish the task, the task itself, the behavior of individuals as judges, and the selfjudgment bias. Our analytical method successfully isolates the effect of each variable. This approach provides a successful model to make concrete the "threerealities" paradigm, which calls for "real tasks," "real users," and "real systems."
  9. Kreyche, M.: Subject headings for the 21st century : the lcsh-es.org bilingual database (2008) 0.08 
    0.08345204 = product of:
  0.16690408 = sum of:
    0.021482462 = weight(_text_:und in 3625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.021482462 = score(doc=3625,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14611205 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 3625, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3625)
    0.14542161 = weight(_text_:headings in 3625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14542161 = score(doc=3625,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31966934 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.4549126 = fieldWeight in 3625, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3625)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Spanish is one of the most widely spoken languages in the world and a review of the lists of subject headings in this language reveals numerous efforts over a period of time, usually involving some form of collaboration, but largely isolated from each other. Technological developments suggest that a greater degree of cooperation is now possible and would be beneficial to the international library community if other barriers can be surmounted. The lcsh-es.org project demonstrates this concept in a practical way and suggest a new model for international cooperation in authority control. The site may be accessed at http://lcsh-es.org.
    Content
    Beitrag während: World library and information congress: 74th IFLA general conference and council, 10-14 August 2008, Québec, Canada. Vgl. auch: http://www.ibiblio.org/fred2.0/wordpress/?p=20 (mit Grafik der Beziehung zwischen 'mammal' und 'doorbell')
  10. Berg-Schorn, E.: MeSH 2006: Deutsche Version lieferbar (2006) 0.08 
    0.08251779 = product of:
  0.16503558 = sum of:
    0.043850895 = weight(_text_:und in 959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043850895 = score(doc=959,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.14611205 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.30011827 = fieldWeight in 959, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=959)
    0.121184684 = weight(_text_:headings in 959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.121184684 = score(doc=959,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31966934 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.37909386 = fieldWeight in 959, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=959)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Beim DIMDI erhalten Sie ab sofort die aktuelle deutsche Übersetzung des Thesaurus Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) 2006 der National Library of Medicine (NLM). Auf Anfrage liefern wir die neue Version 11.0 (Stand 2006) als kostenpflichtige XML-Datei auf CD-ROM. Gegenüber 2005 enthält derThesaurus 933 neue Deskriptoren. Andere wurden nach der aktuellen Terminologie umbenannt, obsolete Benennungen entfielen ganz. Da jede Deskriptorklasse in Konzepte und Unterkonzepte mit zugehörigen Begriffen unterteilt ist, beträgt die tatsächliche Zahl neuer Bezeichnungen etwa das Fünffache. Der laufend weiterentwickelte Thesaurus umfasst jetzt 23.880 Hauptschlagwörter (Main Headings). Zum Vergleich: vor zehn Jahren gab die NLM erst 18.436 Deskriptoren an. Zuwachs verzeichnet vor allem die Kategorie Chemische Substanzen, Drogen und Arzneimittel mit 684 neuen Schlagwörtern. Zahlreiche neue Begriffe enthalten auch die Kategorien Organismen, Krankheiten, Biowissenschaften, Anatomie sowie Analytische, diagnostische und therapeutische Verfahren und Geräte. Neue Deskriptoren sind beispielsweise Kalziumaktivierte Kaliumkanäle mit großer Leitfähigkeit, Tritonia-Meeresschnecke, Mesangiumzellen oder Bariatrische Chirurgie. Das DIMDI übersetzt den MeSH in enger Anlehnung an die amerikanische Vorlage und ist offizieller Herausgeber der deutschen Version (inkl. Urheberrechte). Der Thesaurus ist Bestandteil des UMLS (Unified Medical Language System) der NLM. Übersetzungen liegen auch in Finnisch, Französisch, Italienisch, Portugiesisch, Russisch und Spanisch vor.
  11. Gödert, W.: Multilingualität und Lokalisierung zur Wissenserkundung : oder vom Nutzen semantischer Netze für das Information Retrieval (2007) 0.08 
    0.079832934 = product of:
  0.15966587 = sum of:
    0.056837257 = weight(_text_:und in 1557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.056837257 = score(doc=1557,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.14611205 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.38899773 = fieldWeight in 1557, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1557)
    0.10282861 = weight(_text_:headings in 1557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10282861 = score(doc=1557,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31966934 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.32167178 = fieldWeight in 1557, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1557)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Das CrissCross-Projekt verfolgt die Zielsetzung, ein erweitertes multilinguales und thesaurusbasiertes Registervokabular zur Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation (DDC Deutsch) zu erstellen, das als Recherchevokabulars zu heterogen erschlossenen Dokumenten verwendet werden kann und soll damit die Ausgangsbedingungen für die Gestaltung von OPAC-Retrievalumgebungen verbessern helfen. Im einzelnen soll jedes Sachschlagwort der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) eine DDC-Notation erhalten und es sollen die im Projekt MACS begonnen Arbeiten fortgesetzt werden, Links zwischen den Schlagwörtern der SWD, den Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) und dem Répertoire d'autorité-matière encyclopédique et alphabétique unifé (Rameau) herzustellen. In diesem Beitrag wird der Vorschlag gemacht, die Zielsetzung des Projektes darin zu sehen, eine Kern-Ontologie mit universalen Relationen als Klassifikation zu benutzen und die beteiligten Normdateien als zugeordnete semantische Netze zu entwickeln, indem nicht-generische Relationen die Aufgabe der durch die Lokalisierung gestellten Anforderungen übernehmen. Generische Relationen im bekannten Thesaurussinn sind für derartige semantische Netze nicht mehr erforderlich, da sie sich aus den generischen Beziehungen der Kern-Ontologie vererben.
    Series
    Schriften der Vereinigung Österreichischer Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare (VÖB); Bd. 2
  12. Gaus, W.; Leiner, F.: Dokumentations- und Ordnungslehre : Theorie und Praxis des Information Retrieval (2003) 0.08 
    0.07975128 = product of:
  0.15950257 = sum of:
    0.07381206 = weight(_text_:und in 5524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07381206 = score(doc=5524,freq=34.0), product of:
        0.14611205 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.50517434 = fieldWeight in 5524, product of:
          5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
            34.0 = termFreq=34.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5524)
    0.085690506 = weight(_text_:headings in 5524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.085690506 = score(doc=5524,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31966934 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.26805982 = fieldWeight in 5524, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5524)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Diese Einführung in die Grundlagen der Dokumentation und des Information Retrieval, d.h. des Wiederauffindens von Information zu thematisch-inhaltlichen Fragen, entstand auf der Basis langjähriger Lehrerfahrung. Die sowohl theoretisch fundierte als auch praxisorientierte Darstellung der Daten-, Literatur- und Faktendokumentation enthält neben zahlreichen Übungen einen Beispiel-Thesaurus, die Besprechung realer Ordnungs- und Retrievalsysteme sowie ca. 200 Prüfungsfragen mit Antworten. Das Buch ist von zentraler Bedeutung für die Ausbildung von Dokumentaren, Bibliothekaren und Archivaren. Das Thema gewinnt aber auch an Bedeutung für Wissenschaftler aller Fachrichtungen. Das Buch ist in seiner systematischen Darstellung und didaktischen Aufbereitung einzigartig. Durch sein ausführliches Sachwortregister eignet es sich auch als Nachschlagewerk. In der vorliegenden vierten Auflage werden insbesondere Entwicklungen im Bereich des Internets und der Informationssysteme berücksichtigt.
    Content
    Zweck und Grundzüge der Dokumentation.- Begriff und Wesen der Information.- Dateien und Informationsspeicher.Referate.- Ordnungsprinzip Klassifikation.- Hierarchische Begriffsstrukturen.- Alphabetisches Sortieren und systematisches Anordnen.- Die Klassfikationen ICD-10 und ICPM.- Ordnungsprinzip Register.- Beispiel einer Dokumentation mit Registern.- Ordnungsprinzip Fassettenklassifikation.- Ordnungsprinzip Begriffskombination.- Struktur eines Ordnungssystems.Beispielthesaurus Gebäude.- Ordnungssystem Medical Subject Headings (MeSH).- Verbindungs-, Funktions-, Zeit- und Sprachdeskriptoren.- Dokumenten-Deskriptoren-Matrix.Relevanz- und Vollzähligkeitsrate.- Recherchieren und Suchstrategien.- Dokumentations- und Retrievalsysteme.Aktive Informationsdienste.- Revision eines Ordnungssystems.
  13. Jungk, S.: ¬Die Erschließung der Belletristik und Kinder- und Jugendliteratur im Sachkatalog der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Leipzig (2008) 0.08 
    0.07770549 = product of:
  0.15541098 = sum of:
    0.03544426 = weight(_text_:und in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03544426 = score(doc=3173,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14611205 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.24258271 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
    0.11996671 = weight(_text_:headings in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11996671 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31966934 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.37528375 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In its overall function as the archive of all German-language publications, the German National Library also collects and catalogues German-language literary works. Belles-lettres as well as children's and youth literature form a considerable part of the library's collection. From 1913 until 1990, the titles were assigned subject headings, were filed in the library's card subject catalogue according to genres and languages and (within these categories) were further divided into formal aspects, themes and motifs. The subject indexing of belles-lettres and children's and youth literature is unique in its scope and depth.
  14. Hearn, S.: Machine-assisted validation of LC Subject Headings : implications for authority file structure (2000) 0.07 
    0.073464304 = product of:
  0.29385722 = sum of:
    0.29385722 = weight(_text_:headings in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29385722 = score(doc=6607,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.31966934 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.91925365 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Many kinds of structure can be discerned in the headings and rules governing the Library of Congress Subject Headings. By addressing these structures at different levels, librarians can develop different approaches to the machine-assisted validation of subject headings, from the checking of individual words to the validation of complex forms of heading/subdivision compatibility. Using computer programs to assist with maintenance of subject headings is becoming increasingly necessary as technical services librarians strive to create consistent and useful patterns of subject collocation in library catalogs
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
  15. Koh, G.S.L.: Transferring intended messages of subject headings exemplified in the list of Korean subject headings (2006) 0.07 
    0.073464304 = product of:
  0.29385722 = sum of:
    0.29385722 = weight(_text_:headings in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29385722 = score(doc=100,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.31966934 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.91925365 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This paper focuses on meaning as the core concern and challenge of interoperability in a multilingual context. Korean subject headings, presently translated from English, crystallize issues attached to the semantics of translation in at least two languages (Korean, with written Chinese, and English). Presenting a model microcosm, which explains grammatical and semantic characteristics, and allows a search for equivalence of headings that have the closest approximation of semantic ranges, the study concludes the necessary conditions for linking multilingual subject headings and suggests an interoperable model for the transfer of meaning of headings across languages and cultures.
  16. Mitchell, V.; Hsieh-Yee, I.: Converting Ulrich's subject headings(TM) to FAST headings : a feasibility study (2007) 0.07 
    0.073464304 = product of:
  0.29385722 = sum of:
    0.29385722 = weight(_text_:headings in 1774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29385722 = score(doc=1774,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.31966934 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.91925365 = fieldWeight in 1774, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1774)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This paper presents a study that assessed the feasibility of applying the approach of the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST), an initiative of the Online Computer Library Center (OCLC), to records in the Ulrich's Periodicals Directory.? The goal is to determine whether a simplified application of Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), as illustrated by FAST, would benefit the Ulrich's system. This feasibility study found that although a few problems were encountered in the process, overall the FAST database was useful for converting Ulrich's subject headings into FAST headings.
    Object
    Ulrich's subject headings
  17. Wilk, D.; Rotenberg, S.; Schackam, S.; Hoffman, G.; Liebman, S.: Problems in the use of the Library of Congress Subject Headings as the basis for Hebrew Subject Headings in the Bar-Ilan University Library (2001) 0.07 
    0.072710805 = product of:
  0.29084322 = sum of:
    0.29084322 = weight(_text_:headings in 1498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.29084322 = score(doc=1498,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31966934 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.9098252 = fieldWeight in 1498, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1498)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  18. ASIS&T Thesaurus of Information Science, Technology and Librarianship (2005) 0.07 
    0.072271585 = product of:
  0.14454317 = sum of:
    0.018604362 = weight(_text_:und in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018604362 = score(doc=166,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14611205 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.12732941 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
    0.1259388 = weight(_text_:headings in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1259388 = score(doc=166,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.31966934 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.39396584 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    BK
    06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Classification
    06.00 / Information und Dokumentation: Allgemeines
    Footnote
    Weitere Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 58(2007) H.1, S.59-60 (J. Fassbender) mit Berücksichtigung der Software Thesaurus Master.
    LCSH
    Subject headings / Information science
    Subject headings / Information technology
    Subject headings / Library science
    Subject
    Subject headings / Information science
    Subject headings / Information technology
    Subject headings / Library science
  19. Hobson, S.P.; Dorr, B.J.; Monz, C.; Schwartz, R.: Task-based evaluation of text summarization using Relevance Prediction (2007) 0.07 
    0.070995174 = product of:
  0.2839807 = sum of:
    0.2839807 = weight(_text_:judges in 1938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2839807 = score(doc=1938,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.5312371 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.063882 = idf(docFreq=37, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.53456485 = fieldWeight in 1938, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.063882 = idf(docFreq=37, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1938)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This article introduces a new task-based evaluation measure called Relevance Prediction that is a more intuitive measure of an individual's performance on a real-world task than interannotator agreement. Relevance Prediction parallels what a user does in the real world task of browsing a set of documents using standard search tools, i.e., the user judges relevance based on a short summary and then that same user - not an independent user - decides whether to open (and judge) the corresponding document. This measure is shown to be a more reliable measure of task performance than LDC Agreement, a current gold-standard based measure used in the summarization evaluation community. Our goal is to provide a stable framework within which developers of new automatic measures may make stronger statistical statements about the effectiveness of their measures in predicting summary usefulness. We demonstrate - as a proof-of-concept methodology for automatic metric developers - that a current automatic evaluation measure has a better correlation with Relevance Prediction than with LDC Agreement and that the significance level for detected differences is higher for the former than for the latter.
  20. Gaus, W.: Dokumentations- und Ordnungslehre : Theorie und Praxis des Information Retrieval (2005) 0.07 
    0.0686183 = product of:
  0.1372366 = sum of:
    0.06868419 = weight(_text_:und in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06868419 = score(doc=1679,freq=46.0), product of:
        0.14611205 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.47007886 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
          6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
            46.0 = termFreq=46.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
    0.068552405 = weight(_text_:headings in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.068552405 = score(doc=1679,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31966934 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.065878585 = queryNorm
        0.21444786 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Dokumentation und Information Retrieval, also das gezielte Wiederauffinden von Informationen zu thematisch-inhaltlichen Fragestellungen sind wichtiger als je zuvor. Die hier vorliegende theoretisch fundierte und praxisorientierte Darstellung der Literatur-, Daten- und Faktendokumentation enthält viele instruktive Beispiele und praktische Übungen sowie einen umfassenden Beispielthesaurus und behandelt ausführlich Ordnungs- und Retrievalsysteme. Jedes Thema wird mit zahlreichen Prüfungsfragen abgeschlossen. Die detaillierten Antworten zu den insgesamt 195 Fragen umfassen alleine etwa 60 Seiten, Dieses Lehrbuch ist in seiner systematischen Darstellung und didaktischen Aufbereitung einzigartig. Durch sein ausführliches Sachwortregister eignet es sich auch als Nachschlagewerk. Die fünfte Auflage ist aktualisiert und erweitert worden.
    Classification
    AN 93200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Grundlagen, Theorie / Ordnungslehre, Systematik
    AN 95000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationspraxis / Bibliographische Erfassung, Suchpraxis
    Content
    Aus dem Inhalt: - Zweck und Grundzüge der Dokumentation - Begriff und Wesen der Information - Dateien und Informationsspeicher - Referate - Ordnungsprinzip Klassifikation - Hierarchische Begriffsstrukturen - Alphabetisches Sortieren und systematisches Anordnen - Die Klassifikationen ICD-10 und ICPM - Ordnungsprinzip Register - Beispiel einer Dokumentation mit Registern - Ordnungsprinzip Fassettenklassifikation - Ordnungsprinzip Begriffskombination - Struktur eines Ordnungssystems - Beispielthesaurus Gebäude - Ordnungssystem Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) - Verbindungs-, Funktions-, Zeit- und Sprachdeskriptoren - Dokumenten-Deskriptoren-Matrix - Relevanz- und Vollzähligkeitsrate - Recherchieren und Suchstrategien - Dokumentations- und Retrievalsysteme - Aktive Informationsdienste - Revision eines Ordnungssystems.
    RVK
    AN 93200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Grundlagen, Theorie / Ordnungslehre, Systematik
    AN 95000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationspraxis / Bibliographische Erfassung, Suchpraxis

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 3715
  • m 835
  • el 235
  • x 210
  • s 191
  • i 50
  • r 30
  • b 13
  • n 8
  • l 5
  • p 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications