Search (14206 results, page 2 of 711)

0.13094798 = product of:
  0.1745973 = sum of:
    0.06022524 = weight(_text_:joint in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06022524 = score(doc=3312,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43664446 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.2418823 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.13792741 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.2418823 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44421)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
    0.025218967 = weight(_text_:und in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025218967 = score(doc=3312,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.15515085 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.16254483 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
    0.08915309 = weight(_text_:headings in 3312) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08915309 = score(doc=3312,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.33944473 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.2626439 = fieldWeight in 3312, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=3312)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)

BK

06.04 / Ausbildung, Beruf, Organisationen <Information und Dokumentation>

Classification

06.04 / Ausbildung, Beruf, Organisationen <Information und Dokumentation>

Footnote

The next section collects three papers, all presented at the meeting by the people best placed to address the topics authoritatively and comprehensively. The first is by John D. Byrum, of the Library of Congress, and Chair of the ISBD Review Group, who clearly and concisely explains the history and role of the ISBDs in "IFLA's ISBD Programme. Purpose, process, and prospects." The next paper, "Brave new FRBR world" is by Patrick Le Boeuf, of the Bibliothèque nationale de France and Chair of the FRBR Review Group (a French version is available an the website). Drawing from his extensive expertise with FRBR, Le Boeuf explains what FRBR is and equally importantly is not, points to its impact in the present context of Code revision, and discusses insights relevant to the working group topics that can be drawn from FRBR. Closing this section is Barbara Tillett's contribution "A Virtual International Authority File," which signals an important change in thinking about international cooperation for bibliographic control. Earlier efforts focussed an getting agreement about form and structure of headings, this view stresses linking authority files to share the intellectual effort yet present headings to the user in the form that is most appropriate culturally.
The section of background papers starts most appropriately by reprinting the Statement of Principles from the 1961 Paris Conference and continues with another twelve papers of varying lengths, most written specifically for the IME ICC. For the published report the papers have been organized to follow the order of topics assigned to the Tive working groups: Working Group 1 Personal names; WG2 Corporate bodies; WG3 Seriality; WG4 Multivolume/multipart structures; and WG5 Uniform titles, GMDs. Pino Buizza and Mauro Guerrini co-author a substantial paper "Author and title access point control: On the way national bibliographic agencies face the issue forty years after the Paris Principles," which was first presented in Italian at the November 2002 workshop an Cataloguing and Authority Control in Rome. Issues that remain unresolved are which name or title to adopt, which form of the name or title, and which entry word to select, while choice of headings has become more uniform. The impact of catalogue language (meaning both the language of the cataloguing agency and of the majority of users of the catalogue) an these choices is explored by examining the headings used in ten national authority files for a full range of names, personal and corporate. The reflections presented are both practical and grounded in theory. Mauro Guerrini, assisted by Pino Buizza and Lucia Sardo, contributes a further new paper "Corporate bodies from ICCP up to 2003," which is an excellent survey of the surprisingly controversial issue of corporate bodies as authors, starting with Panizzi, Jewett, Cutter, Dziatzko, Fumagalli, and Lubetzky, through the debate at the Paris Conference, to the views of Verona, Domanovszky and Carpenter, and work under the auspices of IFLA an the Form and structure of corporate headings (FSCH) project and its Rvew, as well as a look at the archival standard ISAAR(CPF). This paper is the only one to have a comprehensive bibliography.
Ton Heijligers reflects an the relation of the IME ICC effort to AACR and calls for an examination of the principles and function of the concept of main entry in his brief paper "Main entry into the future?" Ingrid Parent's article "From ISBD (S) to ISBD(CR): a voyage of discovery and alignment" is reprinted from Serials Librarian as it tells of the successful project not only to revise an ISBD, but also to harmonize three Codes for serials cataloguing: ISBD (CR), ISSN and AACR. Gunilla Jonsson's paper "The bibliographic unit in the digital context" is a perceptive discussion of level of granularity issues which must be addressed in deciding what to catalogue. Practical issues and user expectation are important considerations, whether the material to be catalogued is digital or analog. Ann Huthwaite's paper "Class of materials concept and GMDs" as well as Tom Delsey's ensuing comments, originated as Joint Steering Committee restricted papers in 2002. It is a great service to have them made widely available in this form as they raise fundamental issues and motivate work that has since taken place, leading to the current major round of revision to AACR. The GMD issue is about more than a list of terms and their placement in the cataloguing record, it is intertwined with consideration of whether the concept of classes of materials is helpful in organizing cataloguing rules, if so, which classes are needed, and how to allow for eventual integration of new types of materials. Useful in the Code comparison exercise is an extract of the section an access points from the draft of revised RAK (German cataloguing rules). Four short papers compare aspects of the Russian Cataloguing Rules with RAK and AACR: Tatiana Maskhoulia covers corporate body headings; Elena Zagorskaya outlines current development an serials and other continuing resources; Natalia N. Kasparova covers multilevel structures; Ljubov Ermakova and Tamara Bakhturina describe the uniform title and GMD provisions. The website includes one more item by Kasparova "Bibliographic record language in multilingual electronic communication." The volume is rounded out by the appendix which includes the conference agenda, the full list of participants, and the reports from the five working groups. Not for the casual reader, this volume is a must read for anyone working an cataloguing code development at the national or international levels, as well as those teaching cataloguing. Any practising cataloguer will benefit from reading the draft statement of principles and the three presentation papers, and dipping into the background papers."
Weitere Rez. in: ZfBB 52(2005) H.3/4, S.227-228 (K. Haller): " ... Im Mittelpunkt der Publikation steht das revidierte Statement of International Cataloguing Principles. Es wendet sich mit seinen Grundsätzen gleichermaßen an Bibliografien und Bibliothekskataloge sowie Datensammlungen in Archiven, Museen und dergleichen Einrichtungen. Terminologisch und inhaltlich geht das Statement von den Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) aus. Durch die Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR) werden die Normdateien und die Sacherschließung in das Statement eingebracht. Die FRBR sind ein theoretisches Modell, ein strategisches Dokument, in dem durch die Entitäten die logischen Zusammenhänge dargestellt und damit die notwendi ge Erschließungsqualität definiert wird. Es geht um klare Grundsätze für Wahl, Anzahl und Art der Suchbegriffe (access points) und deren Beziehungen. ... Insgesamt ist die Publikation sehr zu begrüßen und als Pflichtlektüre allen Verantwortlichen im Erschließungsbereich und dem in Ausbildung befindlichen Nachwuchs dringend zu empfehlen."

0.12775703 = product of:
  0.5110281 = sum of:
    0.5110281 = weight(_text_:joint in 4342) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.5110281 = score(doc=4342,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.43664446 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.2418823 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        1.1703529 = fieldWeight in 4342, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.2418823 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4342)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Special issue devoted to the Joint Funding Councils' Libraries Review Group Report (The Follett Report)

0.1253199 = product of:
  0.2506398 = sum of:
    0.03226021 = weight(_text_:und in 1216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03226021 = score(doc=1216,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15515085 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.20792803 = fieldWeight in 1216, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1216)
    0.21837959 = weight(_text_:headings in 1216) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21837959 = score(doc=1216,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.33944473 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 1216, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1216)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Teilw. zugl.: Köln, Fachhochschule für Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen, Hausarbeit zur Laufbahnprüfung für den Höheren Bibliotheksdienst

LCSH

Subject headings / Literature
Subject headings / Shakespeare, William, 1564 / 1616

Subject

Subject headings / Literature
Subject headings / Shakespeare, William, 1564 / 1616

0.124451935 = product of:
  0.24890387 = sum of:
    0.043013614 = weight(_text_:und in 1528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043013614 = score(doc=1528,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15515085 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.2772374 = fieldWeight in 1528, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1528)
    0.20589025 = weight(_text_:headings in 1528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20589025 = score(doc=1528,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.33944473 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.60655016 = fieldWeight in 1528, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1528)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Discussion of the results and consequences of the automation project named thesaurus/concordance project, carried out at the DUT Library. The aim of the project was, by making the subject headings and their corresponding classification codes machine readable, to produce periodically cumulative lists, classifies lists, lists per subject fields, alphabetical lists of inverted subheadings and geographical names with their corresponding main headings and notations

Source

Numerische und nicht-numerische Klassifikation zwischen Theorie und Praxis. Proc. der 5. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Hofgeismar, 7.-10.4.1981. Hrsg.: Peter Ihm u.a

0.120777294 = product of:
  0.24155459 = sum of:
    0.1505631 = weight(_text_:joint in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1505631 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43664446 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.2418823 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.34481853 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.2418823 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
    0.09099149 = weight(_text_:headings in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09099149 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33944473 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.26805982 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

For almost 20 years, the National Bibliographic Network (Red Nacional de Información Bibliográfica (RENIB)) has been the driving force of library networking and resource sharing in Chile. Administratively dependent on the National Library (Biblioteca Nacional) and also physically located on its premises, RENIB has been very successful in bringing together librarians from most of the major Chilean libraries and in obtaining their cooperation for a number of important joint projects. The most important among these was the development of the national union catalog, which provides access to the holdings of all member libraries. An earlier project resulted in the online union list of periodicals, developed jointly with the National Commission of Scientific and Technological Research (Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica (CONICYT)), which contains periodical records and detailed holdings data of twenty-four universities. As the bibliographic database was being planned, RENIB personnel anticipated the need for a centralized authorities database in order to maintain consistency and uniform standards. Participating libraries provided expert staff members who work jointly with RENIB in teams that build and maintain headings for names, subjects, series, uniform titles, and subdivisions and resolve conflicts. RENIB provided documentation and training and, especially, the organizational structure that now allows for continuing cooperation among institutions that, traditionally, had not worked together.

0.120777294 = product of:
  0.24155459 = sum of:
    0.1505631 = weight(_text_:joint in 316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1505631 = score(doc=316,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43664446 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.2418823 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.34481853 = fieldWeight in 316, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.2418823 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=316)
    0.09099149 = weight(_text_:headings in 316) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09099149 = score(doc=316,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33944473 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.26805982 = fieldWeight in 316, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=316)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

International efforts to provide authority control include the work of IFLA, the AUTHOR Project funded by the European Commission, and related work conducted under the auspices of the ICA/CDS. IFLA developed the guidelines Form and Structure of Corporate Headings, documented the formulation of names along the lines of national origin in its publication Names of Persons, and published Guidelines for Authority and Reference Entries. Attention has shifted from a single authority record for each entity that would be shared internationally through the exchange of records to linking parallel authority records for the same entity. The access control of the future will account for difference in cataloging rules, transliteration standards, and cultural differences within the same language as well as for the need for different languages and scripts and will enable users to display the script and form of a heading that they expect. Project AUTHOR is a shared set of resource national authority files that used selections from the authority files of France, the United Kingdom, Spain, Portugal, and Belgium. The prototype tested an adaptation of Z39.50 server software for authority records and displays for user interface. An international standard for authority control records has been developed for corporate bodies, persons, and families. Through joint meetings efforts have been synchronized to develop authority control at the international level.

0.1205955 = product of:
  0.241191 = sum of:
    0.022811413 = weight(_text_:und in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022811413 = score(doc=6600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15515085 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
    0.21837959 = weight(_text_:headings in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21837959 = score(doc=6600,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.33944473 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

The history of the Library of Congress Subject Headings is traced, from its beginnings with the implementation of a dictionary catalog at the Library of Congress in 1898 to the present day. The author describes the most significant changes which have occurred in LCSH policies and practices during the 100-year period. Events noted near the end of the century indicate an increased willingness on the part of' the Library of Congress to involve the larger library community in the creation or revision of subject headings and other decision-making regarding the LCSH system. Finally, the author provides a summary of the other contributions to this collection of essays, a collection which celebrates the "centennial" of the world's most popular library subject heading language

Content

Mit einer Publikationsgeschichte der LCSH (vgl. Tabellen) und dazu gehörenden Publikationen

Source

The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone

0.1205955 = product of:
  0.241191 = sum of:
    0.022811413 = weight(_text_:und in 6921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022811413 = score(doc=6921,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15515085 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 6921, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6921)
    0.21837959 = weight(_text_:headings in 6921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21837959 = score(doc=6921,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.33944473 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 6921, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6921)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Surveys conducted during the last four years under the auspices of the International Federation of Library Associations and Organizations (IFLA) reveal that the Library of Congress Subject Headings is heavily used in national libraries outside of the United States, particularly in English-speaking countries. Many other countries report using a translation or adaptation of LCSH as their principal subject heading language. Magda Heiner-Freiling presents an analysis of the IFLA data, which also includes information on the classification schemes used by the libraries and whether or not the libraries have produced a manual on the creation and application of subject headings. The paper concludes with an Appendix showing the complete data from the 88 national libraries that respond to the surveys

Content

Mit einer tabellarischen Übersicht der eingesetzten Systeme und Regeln

Object

Sears List of Subject Headings

Source

The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone

0.12045048 = product of:
  0.48180193 = sum of:
    0.48180193 = weight(_text_:joint in 921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.48180193 = score(doc=921,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43664446 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.2418823 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        1.1034193 = fieldWeight in 921, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.2418823 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=921)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

0.118700825 = product of:
  0.23740165 = sum of:
    0.21078834 = weight(_text_:joint in 4062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21078834 = score(doc=4062,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43664446 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.2418823 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.48274595 = fieldWeight in 4062, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.2418823 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4062)
    0.026613316 = weight(_text_:und in 4062) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026613316 = score(doc=4062,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15515085 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.17153187 = fieldWeight in 4062, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4062)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Until recently, most research an music information retrieval concentrated an monophonic music. Online Music Retrieval and Searching (OMRAS) is a threeyear project funded under the auspices of the JISC (Joint Information Systems Committee)/NSF (National Science Foundation) International Digital Library Initiative which began in 1999 and whose remit was to investigate the issues surrounding polyphonic music information retrieval. Here we outline the work OMRAS has achieved in pattern matching, document retrieval, and audio transcription, as weIl as some prototype work in how to implement these techniques into library systems.

Footnote

Beitrag in einem Themenheft zur Musikerschließung und zum Musikretrieval

0.11815274 = product of:
  0.23630548 = sum of:
    0.030415218 = weight(_text_:und in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030415218 = score(doc=254,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15515085 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.19603643 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
    0.20589025 = weight(_text_:headings in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20589025 = score(doc=254,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.33944473 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.60655016 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

LCSH

Subject headings / Terminology

Subject

Subject headings / Terminology

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.11815274 = product of:
  0.23630548 = sum of:
    0.030415218 = weight(_text_:und in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030415218 = score(doc=3558,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15515085 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.19603643 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
    0.20589025 = weight(_text_:headings in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20589025 = score(doc=3558,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.33944473 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.60655016 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Lecture given at the AIBM conference, Karlsruhe, Sep 95. The thesaurus appeared 1st in 1982, produced according to DIN standard 1463. This standard is largely adhered to, with 2 deviations: the controlled vocabulary is rather universal, covering more than 1 musical field, and descriptors are used as systematic collection points, with non-decriptors as subordinate headings. The 1994 edition has widened its contents range. There are still problems with ambiguity of headings and titles

0.11815274 = product of:
  0.23630548 = sum of:
    0.030415218 = weight(_text_:und in 3850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030415218 = score(doc=3850,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15515085 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.19603643 = fieldWeight in 3850, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3850)
    0.20589025 = weight(_text_:headings in 3850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20589025 = score(doc=3850,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.33944473 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.60655016 = fieldWeight in 3850, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3850)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

Enthält in einem Appendix A: 'Guidelines on subject access to individual works of fiction, drama, etc.' des American Library Association Subject Analysis Committee; und in einem Appendix B die Verfahrensweise der Library of Congress bei der Zuteilung von Library of Congress Subject Headings zur Schönen Literatur

0.11815274 = product of:
  0.23630548 = sum of:
    0.030415218 = weight(_text_:und in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030415218 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15515085 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.19603643 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
    0.20589025 = weight(_text_:headings in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20589025 = score(doc=1130,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.33944473 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.60655016 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

LCSH

Subject headings / Terminology

Subject

Subject headings / Terminology

Theme

Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus

0.117874995 = product of:
  0.23574999 = sum of:
    0.053767018 = weight(_text_:und in 199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053767018 = score(doc=199,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15515085 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.34654674 = fieldWeight in 199, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=199)
    0.18198298 = weight(_text_:headings in 199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18198298 = score(doc=199,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33944473 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.53611964 = fieldWeight in 199, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=199)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Classification

AN 75000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Allgemeines

RVK

AN 75000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Bibliothekswesen / Sacherschließung in Bibliotheken / Allgemeines

0.11169781 = product of:
  0.22339562 = sum of:
    0.12045048 = weight(_text_:joint in 952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12045048 = score(doc=952,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43664446 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.2418823 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.27585483 = fieldWeight in 952, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.2418823 = idf(docFreq=234, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=952)
    0.10294513 = weight(_text_:headings in 952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10294513 = score(doc=952,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.33944473 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.30327508 = fieldWeight in 952, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=952)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

This paper describes recent initiatives to make standard library metadata models and structures available to the Semantic Web, including IFLA standards such as Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD), and International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD) along with the infrastructure that supports them. The FRBR Review Group is currently developing representations of FRAD and the entityrelationship model of FRBR in resource description framework (RDF) applications, using a combination of RDF, RDF Schema (RDFS), Simple Knowledge Organisation System (SKOS) and Web Ontology Language (OWL), cross-relating both models where appropriate. The ISBD/XML Task Group is investigating the representation of ISBD in RDF. The IFLA Namespaces project is developing an administrative and technical infrastructure to support such initiatives and encourage uptake of standards by other agencies. The paper describes similar initiatives with related external standards such as RDA - resource description and access, REICAT (the new Italian cataloguing rules) and CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM). The DCMI RDA Task Group is working with the Joint Steering Committee for RDA to develop Semantic Web representations of RDA structural elements, which are aligned with FRBR and FRAD, and controlled metadata content vocabularies. REICAT is also based on FRBR, and an object-oriented version of FRBR has been integrated with CRM, which itself has an RDF representation. CRM was initially based on the metadata needs of the museum community, and is now seeking extension to the archives community with the eventual aim of developing a model common to the main cultural information domains of archives, libraries and museums. The Vocabulary Mapping Framework (VMF) project has developed a Semantic Web tool to automatically generate mappings between metadata models from the information communities, including publishers. The tool is based on several standards, including CRM, FRAD, FRBR, MARC21 and RDA.
The paper discusses the importance of these initiatives in releasing as linked data the very large quantities of rich, professionally-generated metadata stored in formats based on these standards, such as UNIMARC and MARC21, addressing such issues as critical mass for semantic and statistical inferencing, integration with user- and machine-generated metadata, and authenticity, veracity and trust. The paper also discusses related initiatives to release controlled vocabularies, including the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), ISBD, Library of Congress Name Authority File (LCNAF), Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), Rameau (French subject headings), Universal Decimal Classification (UDC), and the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) as linked data. Finally, the paper discusses the potential collective impact of these initiatives on metadata workflows and management systems.

0.11144136 = product of:
  0.44576544 = sum of:
    0.44576544 = weight(_text_:headings in 4788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.44576544 = score(doc=4788,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.33944473 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        1.3132195 = fieldWeight in 4788, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4788)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Abstract

Compares language-related subject headings used in 'Sears list of subject headings' and 'Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH)'. Comments on the inconsistent application of subdivisions for the Spanish and French laguages and literature. Describes the results of a survey of student knowledge of subject headings

Object

Sears List of Subject Headings

0.11123635 = product of:
  0.2224727 = sum of:
    0.019009512 = weight(_text_:und in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019009512 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15515085 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.12252277 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
    0.20346318 = weight(_text_:headings in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20346318 = score(doc=1648,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.33944473 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.59940004 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Within the multilingual framework of the CrissCross project, MACS (Multilingual Access to Subjects) has continued its work. MACS has developed a prototype of mappings between three vocabularies: the LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings), RAMEAU (Répertoire d'autorité-matière encyclopédique et alphabétique unifié) and the SWD (Schlagwortnormdatei). A database with a Link Management System (LMI), which allows for an easy linking between English, French and German subject headings, was created. The database started working with headings from the disciplines sports and theatre, but by now headings from all other fields of knowledge have been included as well. In 2008-2010, equivalencies between English and French headings which had been produced by the Bibliothèque nationale de France have been completed with the most important German SWD topical terms. Thus, more than 50.000 trilingual links are now available and can be used in different retrieval scenarios. It is planned to use them in The European Library (TEL) in order to support multilingual searches over all European National Library collections. The article informs about the project workflow, methodology of mapping and future applications of MACS links.

Series

Bibliotheca Academica - Reihe Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaften; Bd. 1

0.110001 = product of:
  0.220002 = sum of:
    0.038019024 = weight(_text_:und in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038019024 = score(doc=5233,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15515085 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.24504554 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
    0.18198298 = weight(_text_:headings in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18198298 = score(doc=5233,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33944473 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.53611964 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Footnote

Bezugnahme auf: 'Subject cataloging manual: subject headings. 4th ed. Washington 1991' und Vorläufer

0.110001 = product of:
  0.220002 = sum of:
    0.038019024 = weight(_text_:und in 4058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.038019024 = score(doc=4058,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15515085 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.24504554 = fieldWeight in 4058, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4058)
    0.18198298 = weight(_text_:headings in 4058) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18198298 = score(doc=4058,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.33944473 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06995397 = queryNorm
        0.53611964 = fieldWeight in 4058, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4058)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Eine Einführung in der Probleme der Formal- und Inhaltserschließung

Content

Revised to take account of the 1988 revision of AACR2, the publication of new ISBD texts, the changed format of LC subject headings and progress in computer applications