Search (14229 results, page 2 of 712)

  1. Robertson, S.; Tait, J.: In Memoriam Karen Sparck Jones (2007) 0.13 
    0.12532601 = product of:
  0.50130403 = sum of:
    0.50130403 = weight(_text_:jones in 2995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.50130403 = score(doc=2995,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.43290398 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        1.1580029 = fieldWeight in 2995, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2995)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Biographed
    Sparck Jones, Karen
  2. Sparck Jones, K.: Search term relevance weighting given little relevance information (1979) 0.13 
    0.12532601 = product of:
  0.50130403 = sum of:
    0.50130403 = weight(_text_:jones in 2939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.50130403 = score(doc=2939,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.43290398 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        1.1580029 = fieldWeight in 2939, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2939)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.329-338.
  3. Robertson, S.; Tait, J.: Karen Sparck Jones (2008) 0.13 
    0.12532601 = product of:
  0.50130403 = sum of:
    0.50130403 = weight(_text_:jones in 2596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.50130403 = score(doc=2596,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.43290398 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        1.1580029 = fieldWeight in 2596, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2596)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Biographed
    Sparck Jones, Karen
  4. Theory of subject analysis : A sourcebook (1985) 0.12 
    0.12470768 = product of:
  0.1662769 = sum of:
    0.07384906 = weight(_text_:jones in 4622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07384906 = score(doc=4622,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43290398 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.17058992 = fieldWeight in 4622, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4622)
    0.013468735 = weight(_text_:und in 4622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013468735 = score(doc=4622,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15546227 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.086636685 = fieldWeight in 4622, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4622)
    0.078959115 = weight(_text_:headings in 4622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.078959115 = score(doc=4622,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.34012607 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.23214662 = fieldWeight in 4622, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4622)
  0.75 = coord(3/4)
    Abstract
    Definition and Scope For the purpose of this reader, subject analysis is understood to encompass vocabulary structuring and subject indexing. Vocabulary structuring refers to the constructing of tools, such as classifications, subject heading lists, and thesauri, designed to facilitate the organization and retrieval of information. These tools, though called by different names, are similar in that they structure or control the basic vocabulary of a subject index language by 1) stipulating terms that may be used in the classing or indexing of documents and 2) displaying semantic relationships, such as hierarchy and synonymy, that obtain between these terms. They differ in the kinds of terms and relationships they recognize and in the manner in which these are displayed. Subject indexing refers to the application of a vocabulary, which may be more or less well structured, to indicate the content or aboutness of documents. Traditionally subject indexing limits its domain to only certain types of documents, such as passages within books (back-of-book indexing) or periodical articles, and the expression it uses to only certain types of strings, for example, descriptors or index terms as opposed to subject headings or class numbers. However, in a generalized and more modern sense, subject indexing refers to the indication of the theme or topic of any document, indeed any retrieval artifact, by any meaningful string of alphanumeric characters. The value of construing the meaning of subject analysis broadly is threefold: it permits comparing a variety of approaches to subject analysis; it permits generalizing about these approaches at a relatively high descriptive level, so that principles and objectives are shown in relief; and, most importantly perhaps, it permits a unified view of the traditional and information scientific approaches to subject analysis.
    Content
    Eine exzellente (und durch die Herausgeber kommentierte) Zusammenstellung und Wiedergabe folgender Originalbeiträge: CUTTER, C.A.: Subjects; DEWEY, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index: introduction; HOPWOOD, H.V.: Dewey expanded; HULME, E.W.: Principles of book classification; KAISER, J.O.: Systematic indexing; MARTEL, C.: Classification: a brief conspectus of present day library practice; BLISS, H.E.: A bibliographic classification: principles and definitions; RANGANATHAN, S.R.: Facet analysis: fundamental categories; PETTEE, J.: The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog; PETTEE, J.: Fundamental principles of the dictionary catalog; PETTEE, J.: Public libraries and libraries as purveyors of information; HAYKIN, D.J.: Subject headings: fundamental concepts; TAUBE, M.: Functional approach to bibliographic organization: a critique and a proposal; VICKERY, B.C.: Systematic subject indexing; FEIBLEMAN, J.K.: Theory of integrative levels; GARFIELD, E.: Citation indexes for science; CRG: The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval; LUHN, H.P.: Keyword-in-context index for technical literature; COATES, E.J.: Significance and term relationship in compound headings; FARRADANE, J.E.L.: Fundamental fallacies and new needs in classification; FOSKETT, D.J.: Classification and integrative levels; CLEVERDON, C.W. u. J. MILLS: The testing of index language devices; MOOERS, C.N.: The indexing language of an information retrieval system; NEEDHAM, R.M. u. K. SPARCK JONES: Keywords and clumps; ROLLING, L.: The role of graphic display of concept relationships in indexing and retrieval vocabularies; BORKO, H.: Research in computer based classification systems; WILSON, P.: Subjects and the sense of position; LANCASTER, F.W.: Evaluating the performance of a large computerized information system; SALTON, G.: Automatic processing of foreign language documents; FAIRTHORNE, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification; AUSTIN, D. u. J.A. DIGGER: PRECIS: The Preserved Context Index System; FUGMANN, R.: The complementarity of natural and indexing languages
  5. Vasiljev, A.: Thesaurus project of the Delft University of Technology Library : Allgemeiner Thesaurus für Bibliotheken (1982) 0.12 
    0.12470174 = product of:
  0.24940348 = sum of:
    0.04309995 = weight(_text_:und in 1528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04309995 = score(doc=1528,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.15546227 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.2772374 = fieldWeight in 1528, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1528)
    0.20630352 = weight(_text_:headings in 1528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20630352 = score(doc=1528,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.34012607 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.60655016 = fieldWeight in 1528, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1528)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Discussion of the results and consequences of the automation project named thesaurus/concordance project, carried out at the DUT Library. The aim of the project was, by making the subject headings and their corresponding classification codes machine readable, to produce periodically cumulative lists, classifies lists, lists per subject fields, alphabetical lists of inverted subheadings and geographical names with their corresponding main headings and notations
    Source
    Numerische und nicht-numerische Klassifikation zwischen Theorie und Praxis. Proc. der 5. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Klassifikation, Hofgeismar, 7.-10.4.1981. Hrsg.: Peter Ihm u.a
  6. Jones, S.: Kommunikation, das Internet und Elektromagnetismus (1997) 0.12 
    0.12094384 = product of:
  0.24188767 = sum of:
    0.17723775 = weight(_text_:jones in 173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17723775 = score(doc=173,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43290398 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.40941584 = fieldWeight in 173, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=173)
    0.064649925 = weight(_text_:und in 173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064649925 = score(doc=173,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.15546227 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.41585606 = fieldWeight in 173, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=173)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In meinem Buch CyberSociety: Computer-Mediated Communication and Community habe ich Begriffe, die gewöhnlich dazu gebraucht werden, um das Internet zu beschreiben, als unglücklich gewählte Metaphern kritisiert - so wie in den USA »Information Highway« und »National Information Infrastructure«. Sie sind unglücklich, weil sie viel intellektuellen und sozialen Ballast mit sich tragen, den sie sich durch verblüffende Parallelen zwischen dem gegenwärtigen Projekt des »Information Superhighway« und dem Highway-Projekt aufladen, das in Amerika zur Zeit der Weltkriege durchgeführt wurde - wie etwa das Vertrauen in das Wort »Highway« und seine romantische Konnotation der freien Fahrt. Eine andere wichtige Parallele ist die zwischen dem ursprünglich militärisch motivierten Bau von Autobahnen (die bereits auf Thomas Jefferson zurückgeht) und den militärischen Ursprüngen des prominentesten Informationsnetzes, des Internet, in dem das Computernetzwerk des Verteidigungsministeriums mit den Forschungszentren der Universitäten verbunden worden ist. Schließlich besteht eine weitere Parallele zwischen dem »Weltraumwettrennen« der sechziger Jahre und unserem anhaltenden Streben, bei neuen Technologien und Wissenschaften führend zu sein.
  7. Stone, A.T.: ¬The LCSH century : a brief history of the Library of Congress Subject Headings, and introduction to the centennial essays (2000) 0.12 
    0.12083756 = product of:
  0.24167512 = sum of:
    0.022857198 = weight(_text_:und in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022857198 = score(doc=6600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15546227 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
    0.21881792 = weight(_text_:headings in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21881792 = score(doc=6600,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.34012607 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The history of the Library of Congress Subject Headings is traced, from its beginnings with the implementation of a dictionary catalog at the Library of Congress in 1898 to the present day. The author describes the most significant changes which have occurred in LCSH policies and practices during the 100-year period. Events noted near the end of the century indicate an increased willingness on the part of' the Library of Congress to involve the larger library community in the creation or revision of subject headings and other decision-making regarding the LCSH system. Finally, the author provides a summary of the other contributions to this collection of essays, a collection which celebrates the "centennial" of the world's most popular library subject heading language
    Content
    Mit einer Publikationsgeschichte der LCSH (vgl. Tabellen) und dazu gehörenden Publikationen
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
  8. Heiner-Freiling, M.: Survey on subject heading languages used in national libraries and bibliographies (2000) 0.12 
    0.12083756 = product of:
  0.24167512 = sum of:
    0.022857198 = weight(_text_:und in 6921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022857198 = score(doc=6921,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15546227 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 6921, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6921)
    0.21881792 = weight(_text_:headings in 6921) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.21881792 = score(doc=6921,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.34012607 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.64334357 = fieldWeight in 6921, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6921)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Surveys conducted during the last four years under the auspices of the International Federation of Library Associations and Organizations (IFLA) reveal that the Library of Congress Subject Headings is heavily used in national libraries outside of the United States, particularly in English-speaking countries. Many other countries report using a translation or adaptation of LCSH as their principal subject heading language. Magda Heiner-Freiling presents an analysis of the IFLA data, which also includes information on the classification schemes used by the libraries and whether or not the libraries have produced a manual on the creation and application of subject headings. The paper concludes with an Appendix showing the complete data from the 88 national libraries that respond to the surveys
    Content
    Mit einer tabellarischen Übersicht der eingesetzten Systeme und Regeln
    Object
    Sears List of Subject Headings
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T.Stone
  9. Jones, E.A.: In search of UBC : s study in the convergence of practice between the Library of Congress and the other ABACUS libraries (1997) 0.12 
    0.11943613 = product of:
  0.23887226 = sum of:
    0.14769812 = weight(_text_:jones in 2093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14769812 = score(doc=2093,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43290398 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.34117985 = fieldWeight in 2093, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2093)
    0.09117413 = weight(_text_:headings in 2093) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09117413 = score(doc=2093,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.34012607 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.26805982 = fieldWeight in 2093, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2093)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a comparative analysis of choice and form of main entry in the monograph cataloguing of the LoC and that of the British Library and the national libraries of Canada and Australia in 1982 and 1989, to examine the level and kind of consistency achieved in Anglo-American descriptive cataloguing. The overall aim of the project was to investigate the achievement of UBC and the implicit idea that bibliographic records created by the national bibliographic agency (NBA) of one country should be acceptable, without modification, to the NBAs of other countries. Part 2 provides an analysis of patternsaffecting the form of main entry headings (personal and corporate names), choice and form of uniform titles and titles proper, and miscellaneous descriptive cataloguing elements. These steps are intended to lead to a common MARC format, a common file of authority records, and, ultimately, a common file of bibliographic records for the cataloguing agencies of the major English speaking countries. concludes that Barbara Tillett's vision of 1 seamless bibliographic system, either real or virtual, looks realizable over a 5 to 10 year horizon
  10. Hermann, M.: Bibliotheksdarstellungen im Film : ein Analysemodell und vier Fallbeispiele (2012) 0.12 
    0.11885611 = product of:
  0.23771222 = sum of:
    0.17723775 = weight(_text_:jones in 3448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.17723775 = score(doc=3448,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43290398 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.40941584 = fieldWeight in 3448, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3448)
    0.06047447 = weight(_text_:und in 3448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06047447 = score(doc=3448,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.15546227 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.38899773 = fieldWeight in 3448, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3448)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Die Darstellung von Bibliotheken und Bibliothekaren ist von den Anfängen des Kinos bis zur Gegenwart ein fester Bestandteil der Filmgeschichte. Dennoch ist der Darstellung der Institution Bibliothek in der akademischen Diskussion bisher wenig Beachtung geschenkt worden. Die wenigen Beiträge sind sich in ihrer Betrachtung von Bibliotheken im Film erstaunlicherweise darin einig, dass Bibliotheken vorrangig die Funktion einer atmosphärischen Kulisse einnehmen und darüber hinaus nur selten eine weitergehende, für die Handlung erhebliche Bedeutung erfahren. Diese undifferenzierte Sicht auf Bibliotheken im Film wird der Fülle und Vielfalt der Darstellungen jedoch nicht gerecht. Um die Vielschichtigkeit der Thematik besser zu erfassen, wird in diesem Artikel ein Analysemodell vorgeschlagen, das eine strukturierte Einordnung von Bibliotheksdarstellungen im Film erlaubt. Anhand vier filmischer Beispiele - Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade (1989), Misery (1990), City of Angels (1998) und The Shawshank Redemption (1994) - werden unterschiedliche Ausprägungsformen von Bibliothekdarstellungen im Film aufgezeigt. Diese Fallbeispiele verdeutlichen, dass die Funktionen und Bedeutungen von Bibliotheken im Film wesentlich vielfältiger sind als bisher allgemein angenommen. Es lässt sich in zudem in Ansätzen herausarbeiten, mit welchen Attributen und Werten Bibliotheken konventionell in Verbindung gebracht werden.
  11. Aitchison, J.; Gilchrist, A.; Bawden, D.: Thesaurus construction and use : a practical manual (1997) 0.12 
    0.1183899 = product of:
  0.2367798 = sum of:
    0.030476267 = weight(_text_:und in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030476267 = score(doc=254,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15546227 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.19603643 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
    0.20630352 = weight(_text_:headings in 254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20630352 = score(doc=254,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.34012607 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.60655016 = fieldWeight in 254, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=254)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    LCSH
    Subject headings / Terminology
    Subject
    Subject headings / Terminology
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  12. Schneider, K.: Über den Musik-Thesaurus und die inhaltliche Erschliessung von Musik (1996) 0.12 
    0.1183899 = product of:
  0.2367798 = sum of:
    0.030476267 = weight(_text_:und in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030476267 = score(doc=3558,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15546227 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.19603643 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
    0.20630352 = weight(_text_:headings in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20630352 = score(doc=3558,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.34012607 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.60655016 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Lecture given at the AIBM conference, Karlsruhe, Sep 95. The thesaurus appeared 1st in 1982, produced according to DIN standard 1463. This standard is largely adhered to, with 2 deviations: the controlled vocabulary is rather universal, covering more than 1 musical field, and descriptors are used as systematic collection points, with non-decriptors as subordinate headings. The 1994 edition has widened its contents range. There are still problems with ambiguity of headings and titles
  13. Olderr, S.: Olderr's fiction subject headings : a supplement and guide to the LC thesaurus (1991) 0.12 
    0.1183899 = product of:
  0.2367798 = sum of:
    0.030476267 = weight(_text_:und in 3850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030476267 = score(doc=3850,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15546227 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.19603643 = fieldWeight in 3850, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3850)
    0.20630352 = weight(_text_:headings in 3850) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20630352 = score(doc=3850,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.34012607 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.60655016 = fieldWeight in 3850, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3850)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Enthält in einem Appendix A: 'Guidelines on subject access to individual works of fiction, drama, etc.' des American Library Association Subject Analysis Committee; und in einem Appendix B die Verfahrensweise der Library of Congress bei der Zuteilung von Library of Congress Subject Headings zur Schönen Literatur
  14. Aitchison, J.; Gilchrist, A.; Bawden, D.: Thesaurus construction and use : a practical manual (2000) 0.12 
    0.1183899 = product of:
  0.2367798 = sum of:
    0.030476267 = weight(_text_:und in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030476267 = score(doc=1130,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15546227 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.19603643 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
    0.20630352 = weight(_text_:headings in 1130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20630352 = score(doc=1130,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.34012607 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        0.60655016 = fieldWeight in 1130, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1130)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    LCSH
    Subject headings / Terminology
    Subject
    Subject headings / Terminology
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  15. Jones, M.H.: Year's work in cataloging and classification : 1978 (1979) 0.12 
    0.11815849 = product of:
  0.47263396 = sum of:
    0.47263396 = weight(_text_:jones in 307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.47263396 = score(doc=307,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43290398 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        1.0917755 = fieldWeight in 307, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=307)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  16. Jones, K.P.: Natural-language processing and automatic indexing : a reply (1990) 0.12 
    0.11815849 = product of:
  0.47263396 = sum of:
    0.47263396 = weight(_text_:jones in 393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.47263396 = score(doc=393,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43290398 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        1.0917755 = fieldWeight in 393, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=393)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  17. Jones, K.P.: How do we index? : a report of some Aslib Information Group activity (1983) 0.12 
    0.11815849 = product of:
  0.47263396 = sum of:
    0.47263396 = weight(_text_:jones in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.47263396 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43290398 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        1.0917755 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  18. Hutchins, J.: Summarization: some problems and methods (1987) 0.12 
    0.11815849 = product of:
  0.47263396 = sum of:
    0.47263396 = weight(_text_:jones in 2737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.47263396 = score(doc=2737,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43290398 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        1.0917755 = fieldWeight in 2737, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2737)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Informatics 9: Meaning: the frontier of informatics: proceedings of a conference. Ed.: K.P. Jones
  19. Sparck Jones, K.: Automatic classification (1976) 0.12 
    0.11815849 = product of:
  0.47263396 = sum of:
    0.47263396 = weight(_text_:jones in 2907) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.47263396 = score(doc=2907,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43290398 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        1.0917755 = fieldWeight in 2907, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2907)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  20. Sparck Jones, K.; Tait, J.I.: Automatic search term variant generation (1984) 0.12 
    0.11815849 = product of:
  0.47263396 = sum of:
    0.47263396 = weight(_text_:jones in 2917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.47263396 = score(doc=2917,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.43290398 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.070094384 = queryNorm
        1.0917755 = fieldWeight in 2917, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.176015 = idf(docFreq=250, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2917)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 10205
  • m 2323
  • el 1042
  • s 599
  • x 591
  • i 174
  • r 127
  • ? 68
  • b 58
  • n 57
  • p 26
  • l 25
  • h 20
  • d 18
  • u 14
  • fi 10
  • v 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • ms 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications