Search (13692 results, page 3 of 685)

  1. Ho, J.: ¬An analysis of the structure of a subject heading list (1993) 0.10 
    0.096640535 = product of:
  0.38656214 = sum of:
    0.38656214 = weight(_text_:heading in 6855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.38656214 = score(doc=6855,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41314662 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 6855, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6855)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  2. Studwell, W.E.: Library of Congress Subject Heading period subdivisions for Australia, New Zealand and selected world islands : some proposed additions (1985) 0.10 
    0.096640535 = product of:
  0.38656214 = sum of:
    0.38656214 = weight(_text_:heading in 896) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.38656214 = score(doc=896,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41314662 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 896, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=896)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  3. Studwell, W.E.; Rast, E.; Felmlee, C.: Library of Congress Subject Heading period subdivisions for Africa : some proposed additions (1984) 0.10 
    0.096640535 = product of:
  0.38656214 = sum of:
    0.38656214 = weight(_text_:heading in 453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.38656214 = score(doc=453,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41314662 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.9356536 = fieldWeight in 453, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=453)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  4. Lucarelli, A.: Work in progress on the new Soggettario (2005) 0.10 
    0.09577182 = product of:
  0.19154364 = sum of:
    0.09490311 = weight(_text_:june in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09490311 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.409416 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.23180118 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
    0.096640535 = weight(_text_:heading in 42) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.096640535 = score(doc=42,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41314662 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.2339134 = fieldWeight in 42, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=42)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Work on a prototype of the new Soggettario (the main Italian subject heading list) has begun in October 2004 at the Central National Library of Florence (BNCF). BNCF is involving in the renewal of the most used subject indexing tool of Italian libraries. The project had already produced a Feasibility Study, representing a reference for the works which have started recently. An Italian abstract of the Feasibility Study, and more documentation, can be found in the BCNF website at the Web address <http://www bncf.firenze.sbn.it/progetti/>. Together with the project team and the BNCF staff, some young external consultants are working, who are focusing on the terminological component of the system, namely the prototype of the Thesaurus. At the same time, documents are produced which define procedures, establish criteria, and give guidelines. The list of items by which the prototype started consists of: - the terms included in the updates provided by the Italian National Bibliography (BNI) during the period 1986-1998 (already published in the form of lists); - the items introduced from 1999 to 2005 - other items introduced in the past years but never recorded; - some terms from the Soggettario (1956) or from BNI updates (1956-19S5), being especially outdated and needing revision. In building the semantic networks and the hierarchies, and in making the terminological control, of course, more terms have to be included, which come from the Soggettario, the BNI and other authoritative sources both catalographic (various indexing tools) and lexicographic (general and special directories). DDC numbers are also related to the terms in the Thesaurus. The prototype, to be completed in April 2006, will include a sample of terms for each disciplinary area. About 5000 terms will have a complete structure, but 6000 more will be included in the Thesaurus in order to fill the semantic networks, and marked with a different working status. For the prototype the AgroVoc software is used, which has been provided by FAO and adapted by the BNCF computing staff in order to match the specific requirements of the project. Thanks to the potential of this software, we intend to test in future on the multilingual side of terminology. Such work is likely to begin by testing links to the corresponding forms used by the Library of Congress. We are currently beginning to focus on this, and we wish that external parties be involved which are concerned with multilingual terminology in more or less specialistic contexts. We will follow the road of conventions with Italian universities, which could cooperate to this development through their students and graded students. We are also looking at the developments in the work of the British BSI working group on standards for thesauri convened by Stella Dextre Clarke.
    Testing on the syntactic component of the language is in progress, carried out by a team working on the basis of some terms of the Thesaurus which have been identified for possessing some special features. This will maybe lead to some changes and simplifications in the original structures coming from the GRIS model <http://wwwaib.it/aib/commiss/gris/ guida.htm> and the Feasibility Study. Within June 2006, two basic documents will be published: - a paper volume containing the Rules, concerning both terminology and syntax, explanations of the Thesaurus, criteria, choices made about the categories and the width of the semantic network, etc.; - a CD containing the Thesaurus. One side of great interest will be the c-learning process of the indexing language of the new Soggettario. This has to be undertaken only after the prototype stage is done. At that time, once the text of the Rules will have been published, it will be possible for the system to spread, to be learned, and to be tested by various indexers and partners.
  5. Ranganathan, S.R.: Subject headings and facet analysis (1964) 0.10 
    0.09564932 = product of:
  0.38259727 = sum of:
    0.38259727 = weight(_text_:heading in 1833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.38259727 = score(doc=1833,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.41314662 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.9260569 = fieldWeight in 1833, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1833)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    After establishing the terminology, shows how the choice of the name of the subject of a document and the rendering of the name in the heading of the specific subject entry can be got by facet analysis based on postulates and principles. After showing that subject headings constitute an artificial language, points out that using facet analysis for subject heading does not amount to using class number. Marks out the area for an objective statistical survey of sought heading for subject entry. Calls on Council for Library Resources Incorporated to provide for this project
  6. USMARC format for authority data : including guidelines for content designation (1993) 0.10 
    0.09564932 = product of:
  0.38259727 = sum of:
    0.38259727 = weight(_text_:heading in 3713) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.38259727 = score(doc=3713,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.41314662 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.9260569 = fieldWeight in 3713, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3713)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Includes changes to all examples throughout the publication, as approved by MARBI in January 1993. Makes obsolete the second indicator position (non-filing characters) in all of the heading fields except the 130, which is uniform titles. Also new to this edition: definition of 18X heading fields for general, geographic and chronological subdivision headings, plus related 48X and 58X fields... 7XX fields for heading-linking entries... and the control field 003, named the 'control number identifier.' Also eliminates the national-level requirement codes at the field level
  7. Chan, L.M.: ¬The principle of uniform heading in descriptive cataloging : ideal and reality (1983) 0.10 
    0.09564932 = product of:
  0.38259727 = sum of:
    0.38259727 = weight(_text_:heading in 434) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.38259727 = score(doc=434,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.41314662 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.9260569 = fieldWeight in 434, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=434)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The principle of uniform heading underlies the rules for headings in descriptive cataloging in the American tradition. The rationale and the evolution of the principle are examined and its implications discussed in terms of the history of cataloging codes. The ideal embodied in the principle of uniform heading has been undergoing gradual modification in recent codes and considerably compromised in cataloging practice today.
  8. UNIMARC / CCF : Proceedings of the Workshop held in Florence, 5-7- June 1991 (1993) 0.09 
    0.09490311 = product of:
  0.37961245 = sum of:
    0.37961245 = weight(_text_:june in 328) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37961245 = score(doc=328,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.409416 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.9272047 = fieldWeight in 328, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=328)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  9. Senechal, M.: ¬The continuing silence of Bourbaki : an interview with Pierre Cartier, June 18, 1997 (1998) 0.09 
    0.09490311 = product of:
  0.37961245 = sum of:
    0.37961245 = weight(_text_:june in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37961245 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.409416 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.9272047 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  10. Dublin Core Metadata Element Set endorsed by European standard organization (2000) 0.09 
    0.09490311 = product of:
  0.37961245 = sum of:
    0.37961245 = weight(_text_:june in 5487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37961245 = score(doc=5487,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.409416 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.9272047 = fieldWeight in 5487, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5487)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    OCLC newsletter. 2000, no.245, May/June., S.26-27
  11. Wallace, D.A.: Archiving Metadata Forum : report from the Recordkeeping Metadata Working Meeting, June 2000 (2001) 0.09 
    0.09490311 = product of:
  0.37961245 = sum of:
    0.37961245 = weight(_text_:june in 4834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.37961245 = score(doc=4834,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.409416 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.9272047 = fieldWeight in 4834, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4834)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  12. Stone, A.T.: ¬The LCSH century : a brief history of the Library of Congress Subject Headings, and introduction to the centennial essays (2000) 0.09 
    0.09397081 = product of:
  0.18794163 = sum of:
    0.022272144 = weight(_text_:und in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022272144 = score(doc=6600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15148303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
    0.16566949 = weight(_text_:heading in 6600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16566949 = score(doc=6600,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41314662 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.40099442 = fieldWeight in 6600, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6600)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The history of the Library of Congress Subject Headings is traced, from its beginnings with the implementation of a dictionary catalog at the Library of Congress in 1898 to the present day. The author describes the most significant changes which have occurred in LCSH policies and practices during the 100-year period. Events noted near the end of the century indicate an increased willingness on the part of' the Library of Congress to involve the larger library community in the creation or revision of subject headings and other decision-making regarding the LCSH system. Finally, the author provides a summary of the other contributions to this collection of essays, a collection which celebrates the "centennial" of the world's most popular library subject heading language
    Content
    Mit einer Publikationsgeschichte der LCSH (vgl. Tabellen) und dazu gehörenden Publikationen
  13. Landry, P.: Multilingual subject access : the linking approach of MACS (2004) 0.09 
    0.09397081 = product of:
  0.18794163 = sum of:
    0.022272144 = weight(_text_:und in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022272144 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15148303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
    0.16566949 = weight(_text_:heading in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16566949 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41314662 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.40099442 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The MACS (Multilingual access to subjects) project is one of the many projects that are currently exploring solutions to multilingual subject access to online catalogs. Its strategy is to develop a Web based link and search interface through which equivalents between three Subject Heading Languages: SWD/RSWK (Schlagwortnormdatei/Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog) for German, RAMEAU (Repertoire d'Autorite-Matière Encyclopedique et Alphabetique Unifie) for French and LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings) for English can be created and maintained, and by which users can access online databases in the language of their choice. Factors that have lead to this approach will be examined and the MACS linking strategy will be explained. The trend to using mapping or linking strategies between different controlled vocabularies to create multilingual access challenges the traditional view of the multilingual thesaurus.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  14. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: In pursuit of interoperability : can we standardize mapping types? (2011) 0.09 
    0.09397081 = product of:
  0.18794163 = sum of:
    0.022272144 = weight(_text_:und in 788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022272144 = score(doc=788,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15148303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 788, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=788)
    0.16566949 = weight(_text_:heading in 788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16566949 = score(doc=788,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.41314662 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.40099442 = fieldWeight in 788, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=788)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    In the last few years projects such as DESIRE, MACS, CrissCross and KoMoHe have demonstrated the benefits as well as the challenges of mapping between controlled vocabularies. Each project has taken a slightly different approach to the definition and implementation of appropriate types of mapping. The mapping types supported by SKOS are slightly different again. In an ideal world, all major databases would be interconnected; all widely used thesauri, classification schemes and subject heading schemes would map to each other; and all of us would use the same basic types of mapping to enable universal interoperability. Or would we? This paper will discuss the feasibility and desirability of agreeing and implementing standardized mapping types.
    Series
    Bibliotheca Academica - Reihe Informations- und Bibliothekswissenschaften; Bd. 1
  15. Baca, M.; Gill, M.: Encoding multilingual knowledge systems in the digital age : the Getty vocabularies (2015) 0.09 
    0.0924816 = product of:
  0.1849632 = sum of:
    0.16269106 = weight(_text_:june in 3203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16269106 = score(doc=3203,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.409416 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.39737347 = fieldWeight in 3203, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.994357 = idf(docFreq=300, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3203)
    0.022272144 = weight(_text_:und in 3203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022272144 = score(doc=3203,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15148303 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 3203, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3203)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    Papers from the Fifth North American Symposium on Knowledge Organization (NASKO 2015), sponsored by ISKO-Canada/US, June 18-19, 2015, Los Angeles, California. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_42_2015_4.pdf.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  16. Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993) 0.08 
    0.083693154 = product of:
  0.33477262 = sum of:
    0.33477262 = weight(_text_:heading in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.33477262 = score(doc=5611,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.41314662 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.8102998 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis
  17. Chan, L.M.; Vizine-Goetz, D.: Errors and obsolete elements in assigned Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for subject cataloging and subject authority control (1997) 0.08 
    0.083693154 = product of:
  0.33477262 = sum of:
    0.33477262 = weight(_text_:heading in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.33477262 = score(doc=1492,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.41314662 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.8102998 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    An analysis of a sample of 9.442 headings assigned by the LoC to bibliographic records disclosed 2 types of invalid headings: those that were erroneous and those that were obsolete. Each type revealed recurring patterns. Errors and obsolete elements occuring in assigned heading involve MARC coding, terminology in main headings and subdivisions, application of subdivisions, and in mechanical elements such as punctuation and capitalization. Different headings (e.g. personal name, corporate name, topical, etc.) display different patterns as well as predominance of errors and obsoleteness. Although the overall error rate is low, an awareness and understanding of patterns of errors and obsolescnce in subject heading strings should contribute to improvement in subject heading assignment and subject authority control
  18. Lu, S.-j.: ¬A study on Chinese subject headings (1997) 0.08 
    0.083693154 = product of:
  0.33477262 = sum of:
    0.33477262 = weight(_text_:heading in 2803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.33477262 = score(doc=2803,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.41314662 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.8102998 = fieldWeight in 2803, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2803)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Discusses the theory and practice of subject headings, the principle and application of subject heading lists in various countries, and the present situation of the Chinese subject heading list in Taiwan. Suggests improvements to the chinese Subject Headings as follows: to increase the number of subject headings; to control the vocabulary to be used; to use fixed fields of Chinese MARC, performing the partial function of subdivision in the chinese Subject Headings; to announce the addition, correction and deletion of subject headings regularly and to compile a users' manual; to establish a national subject heading authority file in the MARC format; and to use the Chinese Subject Headings to organize Internet resources
  19. Drabenstott, K.M.: Facilitating geographic subdivision assignment in subject headings (1992) 0.08 
    0.083693154 = product of:
  0.33477262 = sum of:
    0.33477262 = weight(_text_:heading in 3708) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.33477262 = score(doc=3708,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.41314662 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.8102998 = fieldWeight in 3708, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3708)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Recognises the limitations of the existing files of Library of Congress name and subject authority records for indirect geographic subdivision. Makes recommendations for enhancements to existing authority records, which would enable online systems to assist in subject heading formulation and verify, with limited assistance by human intermediaries, whether geographic subdivision is authorized for use with a particular main heading and whether the correct form of indirect geographic subdivision is authorized for use with a particular main heading and whether the correct form of indirect geographic subdivision is given. A study of subdivided subject headings in a large bibliographic data base forms the basis of the recommendations
  20. Lazinger, S.S.: LC Classification of a library and information science library for maximum shelf retrieval (1984) 0.08 
    0.083693154 = product of:
  0.33477262 = sum of:
    0.33477262 = weight(_text_:heading in 464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.33477262 = score(doc=464,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.41314662 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06830023 = queryNorm
        0.8102998 = fieldWeight in 464, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.0489783 = idf(docFreq=284, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=464)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In reclassifying a Library and Information Science library from DDC to LC, an attempt was made to concentrate books with related subject headings on the shelf for maximum shelf retrieval even in cases where the Subject Authorities or C.I.P. assign them varying numbers. Most of the shelf concentration was achieved either by selecting a single number for a given heading and then classifying all books with the heading in that number or by replacing the standard LC number for a heading with one which placed it together with related books on the shelf.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 9769
  • m 2248
  • el 1073
  • x 593
  • s 584
  • i 169
  • r 121
  • ? 66
  • n 58
  • b 49
  • l 24
  • p 22
  • h 18
  • d 15
  • u 14
  • fi 10
  • v 2
  • z 2
  • au 1
  • ms 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications