Search (4970 results, page 2 of 249)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Gaus, W.: Dokumentations- und Ordnungslehre : Theorie und Praxis des Information Retrieval (2005) 0.07 
    0.06760938 = product of:
  0.13521875 = sum of:
    0.0676743 = weight(_text_:und in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0676743 = score(doc=1679,freq=46.0), product of:
        0.14396372 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.47007886 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
          6.78233 = tf(freq=46.0), with freq of:
            46.0 = termFreq=46.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
    0.06754445 = weight(_text_:headings in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06754445 = score(doc=1679,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.21444786 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Dokumentation und Information Retrieval, also das gezielte Wiederauffinden von Informationen zu thematisch-inhaltlichen Fragestellungen sind wichtiger als je zuvor. Die hier vorliegende theoretisch fundierte und praxisorientierte Darstellung der Literatur-, Daten- und Faktendokumentation enthält viele instruktive Beispiele und praktische Übungen sowie einen umfassenden Beispielthesaurus und behandelt ausführlich Ordnungs- und Retrievalsysteme. Jedes Thema wird mit zahlreichen Prüfungsfragen abgeschlossen. Die detaillierten Antworten zu den insgesamt 195 Fragen umfassen alleine etwa 60 Seiten, Dieses Lehrbuch ist in seiner systematischen Darstellung und didaktischen Aufbereitung einzigartig. Durch sein ausführliches Sachwortregister eignet es sich auch als Nachschlagewerk. Die fünfte Auflage ist aktualisiert und erweitert worden.
    Classification
    AN 93200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Grundlagen, Theorie / Ordnungslehre, Systematik
    AN 95000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationspraxis / Bibliographische Erfassung, Suchpraxis
    Content
    Aus dem Inhalt: - Zweck und Grundzüge der Dokumentation - Begriff und Wesen der Information - Dateien und Informationsspeicher - Referate - Ordnungsprinzip Klassifikation - Hierarchische Begriffsstrukturen - Alphabetisches Sortieren und systematisches Anordnen - Die Klassifikationen ICD-10 und ICPM - Ordnungsprinzip Register - Beispiel einer Dokumentation mit Registern - Ordnungsprinzip Fassettenklassifikation - Ordnungsprinzip Begriffskombination - Struktur eines Ordnungssystems - Beispielthesaurus Gebäude - Ordnungssystem Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) - Verbindungs-, Funktions-, Zeit- und Sprachdeskriptoren - Dokumenten-Deskriptoren-Matrix - Relevanz- und Vollzähligkeitsrate - Recherchieren und Suchstrategien - Dokumentations- und Retrievalsysteme - Aktive Informationsdienste - Revision eines Ordnungssystems.
    RVK
    AN 93200 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Grundlagen, Theorie / Ordnungslehre, Systematik
    AN 95000 Allgemeines / Buch- und Bibliothekswesen, Informationswissenschaft / Informationswissenschaft / Informationspraxis / Bibliographische Erfassung, Suchpraxis
  2. Nauri, M.; Svanberg, M.: Svenska ämnesord : en introduktion (2004) 0.07 
    0.06754445 = product of:
  0.2701778 = sum of:
    0.2701778 = weight(_text_:headings in 1378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2701778 = score(doc=1378,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.8577914 = fieldWeight in 1378, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1378)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Swedish subject headings
  3. Wool, G.: Filing and precoordination : how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters (2000) 0.07 
    0.06701469 = product of:
  0.26805875 = sum of:
    0.26805875 = weight(_text_:headings in 6612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.26805875 = score(doc=6612,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.8510636 = fieldWeight in 6612, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6612)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subjecl Headings retrieved as the results of a search in an online catalog are likely to be filed in straight alphabetical, word-by-word order, ignoring the semantic structures of these headings and scattering headings of a similar type. This practice makes LC headings unnecessarily difficult to use and negates much of their indexing power. Enthusiasm for filing simplicity and postcoordinate indexing are likely contributing factors to this phenomenon. Since the report Headings for Tomorrow (1992) first raised this issue, filing practices favoring postcoordination over precoordination appear to have become more widespread and more entrenched
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone
  4. (Sears') List of Subject Headings (2000) 0.07 
    0.066077374 = product of:
  0.2643095 = sum of:
    0.2643095 = weight(_text_:headings in 112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2643095 = score(doc=112,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.83916 = fieldWeight in 112, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=112)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Content
    Vorgänger: 'List of Subject Headings for small libraries, compiled from lists used in nine representative small libraries', Ed.: M.E. Sears. - 1st ed. 1923. - 2nd ed. 1926. - 3rd ed. 1933. - 4th ed. 1939, Ed.: I.S. Monro. - 5th ed. 1944: 'Sears List of Subject Headings', Ed. I. S. Monro. - 6th ed. 1950, Ed.: B.M. Frick. - 7th ed. 1954 - 8th ed. 1959. - 'List of Subject Headings'. - 9th. ed. 1965, Ed.: B.M. Westby. - 10th ed. 1972. - 11th ed. 1977. - 12th ed. 1982. - 13th ed. 1986, Ed.: C. Rovira u. C. Reyes. - 14th ed. 1991. Ed. M.T. Mooney. - 15th ed. 1994, Ed.: J. Miller - 16th ed. 1997, Ed.: J. Miller
    Object
    Sears List of Subject Headings
  5. Knowlton, S.A.: Three decades since prejudices and antipathies : a study of changes in the Library of Congress Subject Headings (2005) 0.07 
    0.066077374 = product of:
  0.2643095 = sum of:
    0.2643095 = weight(_text_:headings in 5841) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2643095 = score(doc=5841,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.83916 = fieldWeight in 5841, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5841)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings have been criticized for containing biased subject headings. One leading critic has been Sanford Berman, whose 1971 monograph Prejudices and Antipathies: A Tract on the LC Subject Heads Concerning People (P&A) listed a number of objectionable headings and proposed remedies. In the decades since P&A was first published, many of Berman's suggestions have been implemented, while other headings remain unchanged. This paper compiles all of Berman's suggestions and tracks the changes that have occurred; a brief analysis of the remaining areas of bias is included.
  6. Ho, J.: Applying form/genre headings to foreign films : a summary of AUTOCAT and OLAC-LIST discussions (2005) 0.07 
    0.066077374 = product of:
  0.2643095 = sum of:
    0.2643095 = weight(_text_:headings in 717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.2643095 = score(doc=717,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.83916 = fieldWeight in 717, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=717)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In several discussions on two electronic lists (AUTOCAT and OLAC-LIST) from 1993 to 2003, librarians expressed interest in using form/genre headings to provide access to foreign films as a separate category of material, as well as by language and country of production, but observed that existing standards do not accommodate these practices. Various options were discussed, including the adaptation of subject headings intended for topical use, geographical subdivision of existing form/genre headings, and the creation of local headings. This paper summarizes the discussions and describes the local policy at Texas A&M University Libraries.
  7. Niggemann, E.: Magda Heiner-Freiling (1950-2007) (2007) 0.06 
    0.062218275 = product of:
  0.12443655 = sum of:
    0.065335155 = weight(_text_:und in 1676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.065335155 = score(doc=1676,freq=56.0), product of:
        0.14396372 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.4538307 = fieldWeight in 1676, product of:
          7.483315 = tf(freq=56.0), with freq of:
            56.0 = termFreq=56.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1676)
    0.059101395 = weight(_text_:headings in 1676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059101395 = score(doc=1676,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.18764187 = fieldWeight in 1676, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1676)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Content
    "Magda Heiner-Freiling, die Leiterin der Abteilung Sacherschließung am Frankfurter Standort der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek, ist am 22. Juli 2007 im Alter von 57 Jahren während ihres Urlaubs tödlich verunglückt. Sie wird in unserer Erinnerung weiterleben als Kollegin, deren enormes Fachwissen wir ebenso schätzten wie ihre warmherzige Sorge um das Wohlergehen ihrer Kollegen und Mitarbeiter. Sie war eine exzellente Expertin und engagierte Bibliothekarin und sie war dabei vor allem auch eine herzliche, immer hilfsbereite, sich für andere notfalls auch kämpferisch einsetzende, mitfühlende Kollegin und Vorgesetzte. Magda Heiner-Freiling verband, integrierte, schaffte Nähe und Vertrautheit nicht nur in ihrer unmittelbaren Umgebung, sondern mühelos auch über geografische Entfernungen hinweg. Ihren Kampfgeist, ihre Loyalität, ihre soziale Kompetenz, ihre Begeisterungsfähigkeit und ihre erfrischende Direktheit habe ich vor allem in den vergangenen zwei Jahren geschätzt, in denen sie mir als Abteilungsleiterin gegenübersaß. Nach ihrem 1. Staatsexamen in den Fächern Deutsch, Englisch und Erziehungswissenschaften sowie weiteren Studien in den Fächern Neuere deutsche Literaturwissenschaft, wissenschaftliche Politik und europäische Ethnologie an der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität in Mainz und an der Philipps-Universität in Marburg begann 1974 ihr bibliothekarischer Werdegang als Bibliotheksreferendarin bei der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek in Frankfurt am Main. 1976 legte sie die bibliothekarische Staatsprüfung für den höheren Dienst an wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken an der Bibliotheksschule Frankfurt am Main ab. Neben ihrer Tätigkeit als Fachreferentin hat Magda Heiner-Freiling von der ersten Stunde an bei der RSWK-Entwicklung mitgearbeitet. Sie betreute die Belange der öffentlichen Bibliotheken mit großem Engagement und führte Anfang der neunziger Jahre die »Expertengruppe Erschließung für Kinder- und Jugendliteratur, Belletristik, Schul- und Berufsschulbücher«; auch hat sie sich viele Jahre in die Arbeit der Expertengruppe RSWK/SWD eingebracht. Ihrem ausgeprägten Interesse für das Andere, für andere Sprachen, andere Kulturen, entsprach ihr besonderes Interesse für die internationale Klassifikationspraxis und -theorie und den multilingualen Ansatz von Normvokabularien. Sie war von 1994 bis 2000 Mitglied des IFLA-Gremiums »Section on Classification and Indexing / Standing Committee« und hat diese Arbeit immer mit großer Begeisterung gemacht. Darüber hinaus hat sie in den IFLA Working Groups »Working Group of Anonymous Classics«, »Working Group on Guidelines for Multilingual Thesauri« und »Working Group >Survey on Subject Heading Languages in National Bibliographies<« aktiv mitgearbeitet.
    Magda Heiner-Freiling war die treibende Kraft, sie war die Initiatorin, die Seele bei der Einführung der Dewey-Dezimalklassifikation in Deutschland; sie war Projektleiterin der DDC-Übertragung ins Deutsche (»DDC Deutsch«, 2002-2005), Vorsitzende der Expertengruppe DDC (seit 2001) und hat das Konsortium DDC mitbegründet. Ihre Freude an Sprachen erwies sich in der Gestaltung und tatkräftigen Mitarbeit im Projekt MACS (»Multilingual Access to Subject Headings«); aus den Erfahrungen mit der DDC erwuchs ein neues Projekt »CrissCross«. Magda Heiner-Freiling hat die bibliothekarische Arbeit als ein zweites Zuhause angesehen, als einen Lebensraum, den es aus Sicht einer engagierten Gewerkschaftlerin zu gestalten galt. Sie ist darin aufgegangen und hat mit ihrem Wissen und ihrem Fachverstand ihr bibliothekarisches Umfeld geprägt. Gleichzeitig hat sie zwei Kindergroßgezogen und war mit dem kulturellen Leben in Frankfurt sehr verwachsen. Als leidenschaftlich Reisende war sie viel zwischen Marokko und der Seidenstraße unterwegs, erlernte die arabische Sprache, war aber genauso für ihre großzügige, herzliche Gastfreundschaft bekannt und beherbergte zu Hause immer wieder Gäste aus der Bibliothekswelt. Wir trauern um einen wunderbaren Menschen. Magda Heiner-Freiling wird in der Erinnerung ihrer Kolleginnen und Kollegen der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek, der Zunft der Sacherschließer in Deutschland und weltweit, weiterleben: als eine Kollegin, deren enormes Fachwissen wir ebenso schätzten wie ihr lebendiges Interesse an ihrem Gegenüber, ihre Herzlichkeit, Hilfsbereitschaft, Offenheit, ihr Engagement für soziale Gerechtigkeit und die Sorge um das Wohlergehen der Menschen in ihrer beruflichen Umgebung. Eine solche Kombination von Expertise und Mitmenschlichkeit ist rar. Magda Heiner-Freiling fehlt uns sehr - in jeder Beziehung."
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 54(2007) H.4/5, S.293
  8. Dean, R.J.: FAST: development of simplified headings for metadata (2004) 0.06 
    0.062043536 = product of:
  0.24817415 = sum of:
    0.24817415 = weight(_text_:headings in 682) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.24817415 = score(doc=682,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.7879317 = fieldWeight in 682, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=682)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings schema (LCSH) is the most commonly used and widely accepted subject vocabulary for general application. It is the de facto universal controlled vocabulary and has been a model for developing subject heading systems by many countries. However, LCSH's complex syntax and rules for constructing headings restrict its application by requiring highly skilled personnel and limit the effectiveness of automated authority control. Recent trends, driven to a large extent by the rapid growth of the Web, are forcing changes in bibliographic control systems to make them easier to use, understand, and apply, and subject headings are no exception. The purpose of adapting the LCSH with a simplified syntax to create FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) headings is to retain the very rich vocabulary of LCSH while making the schema easier to understand, control, apply, and use. The schema maintains compatibility with LCSH--any valid Library of Congress subject heading can be converted to FAST headings.
  9. Kuhr, P.S.: Putting the world back together : mapping multiple vocabularies into a single thesaurus (2003) 0.06 
    0.06124164 = product of:
  0.12248328 = sum of:
    0.0211666 = weight(_text_:und in 4813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0211666 = score(doc=4813,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14396372 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 4813, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4813)
    0.10131668 = weight(_text_:headings in 4813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10131668 = score(doc=4813,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.32167178 = fieldWeight in 4813, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4813)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This paper describes an ongoing project in which the subject headings contained in twelve controlled vocabularies covering multiple disciplines from the humanities to the sciences and including law and education among others are being collapsed into a single vocabulary and reference structure. The design of the database, algorithms created to programmatically link like-concepts, and daily maintenance are detailed. The problems and pitfalls of dealing with multiple vocabularies are noted, as well as the difficulties in relying purely an computer generated algorithms. The application of this megathesaurus to bibliographic records and methodology of retrieval is explained.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  10. Landry, P.: Multilingual subject access : the linking approach of MACS (2004) 0.06 
    0.06124164 = product of:
  0.12248328 = sum of:
    0.0211666 = weight(_text_:und in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0211666 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14396372 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.14702731 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
    0.10131668 = weight(_text_:headings in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10131668 = score(doc=9,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.32167178 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The MACS (Multilingual access to subjects) project is one of the many projects that are currently exploring solutions to multilingual subject access to online catalogs. Its strategy is to develop a Web based link and search interface through which equivalents between three Subject Heading Languages: SWD/RSWK (Schlagwortnormdatei/Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog) for German, RAMEAU (Repertoire d'Autorite-Matière Encyclopedique et Alphabetique Unifie) for French and LCSH (Library of Congress Subject Headings) for English can be created and maintained, and by which users can access online databases in the language of their choice. Factors that have lead to this approach will be examined and the MACS linking strategy will be explained. The trend to using mapping or linking strategies between different controlled vocabularies to create multilingual access challenges the traditional view of the multilingual thesaurus.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  11. Sears' list of subject headings (2007) 0.06 
    0.06088375 = product of:
  0.243535 = sum of:
    0.243535 = weight(_text_:headings in 617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.243535 = score(doc=617,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.7732028 = fieldWeight in 617, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=617)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: KO 35(2008) no.1, S.55-58 (M.P. Satija): "The Sears List, first published in 1923, has survived times of destabilizing changes while keeping reasonable continuity with the past. Dr. Joseph Miller, at the helm since 1992 and the longest-serving editor in the eighty-four years of the List's existence, first edited the 15th edition of the Sears (1994). Over the years, the Sears has achieved more than it had hoped for: ever-increasing use the world over. In fact, the turbulent progress of media and information theories has forced the Sears to keep up with the changing times. Knowledge organization is a shifting sand in the electronic era. Vast and varied changes generate not only new information, but also new terms and phrases. It is trite to say that the electronic media have transformed the way in which we access information and knowledge. The new edition of the Sears has absorbed these changes to reflect the times. The 19th edition, released in May 2007, has about 440 new headings, to bring the new total to over 8000 headings, which keeps the growth rate at five percent. Newly-added headings generally fall into one of two categories: a) headings for the new and current subjects and b) headings previously missed. A few more have been modified. New editions are produced regularly to: - incorporate terms for new subjects, - restructure the form of old headings to suit the changing information needs and informationseeking behaviour of the users, - add new terms to old subject headings to reflect current usage, - delete the obsolete subjects, - forge new relations between subjects and their terms. Two major areas of new additions are in the fields of Islam, as might be expected, and the graphic novel- the latter has thirty headings perhaps drawn from the WilsonWeb Database on Graphic Novels Core Collection. ... The lapses are minor and could be forgiven; they in no way detract from this continuously-expanding and well-established tool for subject-cataloguing in small and medium libraries. The handy List and its lucid introduction make Sears an excellent and convenient tool for teaching subject headings' use and principles, as well as methods of vocabulary control. With its glossy and flowery cover, clear typeface and high production standards, the new edition is particularly welcome."
    LCSH
    Subject headings
    Object
    Sears List of Subject Headings
    Subject
    Subject headings
  12. Cazan, C.: Medizinische Ontologien : das Ende des MeSH (2006) 0.06 
    0.060171615 = product of:
  0.12034323 = sum of:
    0.052798778 = weight(_text_:und in 1132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052798778 = score(doc=1132,freq=28.0), product of:
        0.14396372 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.36675057 = fieldWeight in 1132, product of:
          5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
            28.0 = termFreq=28.0
          2.217899 = idf(docFreq=13141, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1132)
    0.06754445 = weight(_text_:headings in 1132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06754445 = score(doc=1132,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.21444786 = fieldWeight in 1132, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1132)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Die Komplexizität medizinischer Fragestellungen und des medizinischen Informationsmanagements war seit den Anfängen der Informatik immer ein besonders wichtiges Thema. Trotz des Scheiterns der Künstlichen Intelligenz in den 80er Jahren des vorigen Jahrhunderts haben deren Kernideen Früchte getragen. Durch kongruente Entwicklung einer Reihe anderer Wissenschaftsdisziplinen und der exponentiellen Entwicklung im Bereich Computerhardware konnten die gestellten, hohen Anforderungen bei der medizinischen Informationssuche doch noch erfüllt werden. Die programmatische Forderung von Tim Berners-Lee betreffend "Semantic Web" im Jahr 2000 hat dem Thema Ontologien für maschinenlesbare Repositorien in Allgemein- und Fachsprache breitere Aufmerksamkeit gewonnen. Da in der Medizin (PubMed) mit dem von NLM schon vor 20 Jahren entwickelten Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) eine funktionierende Ontologie in Form eines semantischen Netzes in Betrieb ist, ist es auch für Medizinbibliothekare und Medizindokumentare hoch an der Zeit, sich damit zu beschäftigen. Ontologien können im Wesen, trotz der informatisch vernebelnden Terminologie, als Werkzeuge der Klassifikation verstanden werden. Hier sind von seiten der Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswissenschaft wesentliche Beiträge möglich. Der vorliegende Bericht bietet einen Einstieg in das Thema, erklärt wesentliche Elemente des UMLS und schließt mit einer kommentierten Anmerkungs- und Literaturliste für die weitere Beschäftigung mit Ontologien.
    Content
    Dieser Aufsatz ist kein Abgesang auf MeSH (= Medical Subject Headings in Medline/PubMed), wie man/frau vielleicht vermuten könnte. Vielmehr wird - ohne informatiklastiges Fachchinesisch - an Hand des von der National Library of Medicine entwickelten Unified Medical Language System erklärt, worin die Anforderungen an Ontologien bestehen, die im Zusammenhang mit dem Semantic Web allerorten eingefordert und herbeigewünscht werden. Eine Lektüre für Einsteigerinnen, die zum Vertiefen der gewonnenen Begriffssicherheit an Hand der weiterführenden Literaturhinweise anregt. Da das UMLS hier vor allem als Beispiel verwendet wird, werden auch Bibliothekarlnnen, Dokumentarlnnen und Informationsspezialistinnen anderer Fachbereiche den Aufsatz mit Gewinn lesen - und erfahren, dass unser Fachwissen aus der Sacherschließung und der Verwendung und Mitgestaltung von Normdateien und Thesauri bei der Entwicklung von Ontologien gefragt ist! (Eveline Pipp, Universitätsbibliothek Innsbruck). - Die elektronische Version dieses Artikels ist verfügbar unter: http://www.egms.de/en/journals/mbi/2006-6/mbi000049.shtml.
    Theme
    Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
  13. Wilk, D.: Problems in the use of Library of Congress Subject Headings as the basis for Hebrew subject headings in the Bar-Ilan University Library (2000) 0.06 
    0.059701428 = product of:
  0.23880571 = sum of:
    0.23880571 = weight(_text_:headings in 6416) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23880571 = score(doc=6416,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.7581877 = fieldWeight in 6416, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6416)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  14. Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Subject Headings : principles and application (2005) 0.06 
    0.059701428 = product of:
  0.23880571 = sum of:
    0.23880571 = weight(_text_:headings in 5598) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23880571 = score(doc=5598,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.7581877 = fieldWeight in 5598, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5598)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The only comprehensive treatise an the Library of Congress Subject Headings system, now fully updated to address LCSH in the electronic environment.
  15. Denda, K.: Beyond subject headings : a structured information retrieval tool for interdisciplinary fields (2005) 0.06 
    0.059101395 = product of:
  0.23640558 = sum of:
    0.23640558 = weight(_text_:headings in 1106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23640558 = score(doc=1106,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.7505675 = fieldWeight in 1106, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1106)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  16. Lipscomb, C.E.: Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) (2000) 0.06 
    0.059101395 = product of:
  0.23640558 = sum of:
    0.23640558 = weight(_text_:headings in 4759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23640558 = score(doc=4759,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.7505675 = fieldWeight in 4759, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4759)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  17. Poll, J.: ¬A question of perspective : assigning Library of Congress Subject Headings to classical literature and ancient history (2001) 0.06 
    0.059101395 = product of:
  0.23640558 = sum of:
    0.23640558 = weight(_text_:headings in 438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23640558 = score(doc=438,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.7505675 = fieldWeight in 438, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=438)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This article explains the concept of world view and shows how the world view of cataloguers influences the development and assignment of subject headings to works about other cultures and civilizations, using works from Classical literature and Ancient history as examples. Cataloguers are encouraged to evaluate the headings they assign to works in Classical literature and Ancient history in terms of the world views of Ancient Greece and Rome so that headings reflect the contents of the works they describe and give fuller expression to the diversity of thoughts and themes that characterize these ancient civilizations.
  18. Marshall, L.: Specific and generic subject headings : increasing subject access to library materials (2003) 0.06 
    0.059101395 = product of:
  0.23640558 = sum of:
    0.23640558 = weight(_text_:headings in 497) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23640558 = score(doc=497,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.7505675 = fieldWeight in 497, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=497)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The principle of specificity for subject headings provides a clear advantage to many researchers for the precision it brings to subject searching. However, for some researchers very specific subject headings hinder an efficient and comprehensive search. An appropriate broader heading, especially when made narrower in scope by the addition of subheadings, can benefit researchers by providing generic access to their topic. Assigning both specific and generic subject headings to a work would enhance the subject accessibility for the diverse approaches and research needs of different catalog users. However, it can be difficult for catalogers to assign broader terms consistently to different works and without consistency the gathering function of those terms may not be realized.
  19. Kulczak, D.E.; Reineka, C.: Marcive GPO records and authority control : an evaluation of name and subject headings at the University of Arkansas libraries (2004) 0.06 
    0.059101395 = product of:
  0.23640558 = sum of:
    0.23640558 = weight(_text_:headings in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23640558 = score(doc=533,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.7505675 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In mid-1999, the University of Arkansas Libraries began loading MarciveGPO records into its Innovative Interfaces catalog. Pursuant to that activity, the Database Maintenance Unit examined five system-generated authority reports in order to evaluate the quality of Marcive headings and to determine whether future GPO records could be loaded into the catalog without further authority processing. Final results indicated that while the overall quality of Marcive headings was good, a significant percentage of headings that appeared on the authority reports required additional attention.
  20. Anderson, J.D.; Hofmann, M.A.: ¬A fully faceted syntax for Library of Congress Subject Headings (2006) 0.06 
    0.059101395 = product of:
  0.23640558 = sum of:
    0.23640558 = weight(_text_:headings in 350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23640558 = score(doc=350,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.31496912 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.06490995 = queryNorm
        0.7505675 = fieldWeight in 350, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.8524013 = idf(docFreq=942, maxDocs=44421)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=350)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Moving to a fully faceted syntax would resolve three problems facing Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): 1. Inconsistent syntax rules; 2. Inability to create headings that are coextensive with the topic of a work; and 3. Lack of effective displays for long lists of subdivisions under a single subject heading in OPACs and similar electronic displays. The authors advocate a fully faceted syntax using the facets of a modern faceted library classification (The Bliss Bibliographic Classification, 2d ed.). They demonstrate how this might be accomplished so as to integrate the new syntax with existing headings.

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 3708
  • m 835
  • el 236
  • x 210
  • s 192
  • i 50
  • r 30
  • b 13
  • n 8
  • l 5
  • p 3
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications